If we did not allow Muslim foreigners into the United States...........

[Beachboy]

And the hits just keep on comin'.

Your name-calling is adolescent.

... followed immediately by:

Just brainwashed Islam cattle.

So regular you can set your watch by it.

I agree that it doesn't help to ruin a message with name calling and such (stay above it), but then when a person see's barbaric actions out of people that are waring with his nation in which he see's himself as an American in, and that he feels under attack by such actions, then I guess the name calling or speak is to him justified, even though I don't engage in that sort of thing myself when trying to speak about an issue or a people of concern, but that's just me.

I think your post is reasonable, but I think this guy said it more succinctly. Remember war involves demonizing the enemy. And demonizing Muslims is, "a piece of cake."

They do it to themselves, just watch them kill and blow up cities.

The only ones speaking up for Muslims here, are their fellow rag-heads. Muzzies have offended everyone. If they were not murderers and traitors they would be funny to watch with their backward ways.

 

[ABikerSailor]

And the hits just keep on comin'.



... followed immediately by:



So regular you can set your watch by it.

I agree that it doesn't help to ruin a message with name calling and such (stay above it), but then when a person see's barbaric actions out of people that are waring with his nation in which he see's himself as an American in, and that he feels under attack by such actions, then I guess the name calling or speak is to him justified, even though I don't engage in that sort of thing myself when trying to speak about an issue or a people of concern, but that's just me.

I think your post is reasonable, but I think this guy said it more succinctly. Remember war involves demonizing the enemy. And demonizing Muslims is, "a piece of cake."

They do it to themselves, just watch them kill and blow up cities.

The only ones speaking up for Muslims here, are their fellow rag-heads. Muzzies have offended everyone. If they were not murderers and traitors they would be funny to watch with their backward ways.

Yeah.................sure.....................demonizing the enemy....................just like Hitler did with the Jews.

Or....................how about like what the white man did with the Native Americans?

Wanna talk about the black folk who sat on a bus, or refused to drink at the black fountains?

Wanna know something? The people who demonize others are usually the ones who should be demonized because of their very short sighted views.

 

[beagle9]

I agree that it doesn't help to ruin a message with name calling and such (stay above it), but then when a person see's barbaric actions out of people that are waring with his nation in which he see's himself as an American in, and that he feels under attack by such actions, then I guess the name calling or speak is to him justified, even though I don't engage in that sort of thing myself when trying to speak about an issue or a people of concern, but that's just me.

I think your post is reasonable, but I think this guy said it more succinctly. Remember war involves demonizing the enemy. And demonizing Muslims is, "a piece of cake."

They do it to themselves, just watch them kill and blow up cities.

The only ones speaking up for Muslims here, are their fellow rag-heads. Muzzies have offended everyone. If they were not murderers and traitors they would be funny to watch with their backward ways.

Yeah.................sure.....................demonizing the enemy....................just like Hitler did with the Jews.

Or....................how about like what the white man did with the Native Americans?

Wanna talk about the black folk who sat on a bus, or refused to drink at the black fountains?

Wanna know something? The people who demonize others are usually the ones who should be demonized because of their very short sighted views.

Sounds like you are a man with vengeance and hatred in your heart, and maybe a chip on your shoulder to boot, even though all that you speak of has been taken care of by the white man who recognized his wrong through out history, and then corrected himself even at the cost of his own peoples lives in the process in which shows just how good white people really are in the end. Now here we have people like you trying to bring the past up against white people, as if it will be the final nail in the coffin for them as found in the quest for dominance over them by those who think in this sort of way, but what they or you don't understand is this, the white man can think to himself next if not careful, "what kind of fool was I to have done what I have done, just to bring about my peoples demise and downfall in the end because of" ? This is where the white people in America are being pushed towards if these people whom desire to see white people suffer now in some sort of vengeful thinking because of the past, in which has been settled already, and is still being settled in small pockets as we speak by white on white corrections. The wrong thing to do is make white people feel that they were complete fools for doing all that they have done to make this nation diverse and as great as it had become to date, just because of some sort of vengeance or hatred being kept or fueled now by those whom think in these sorts of ways. Here is how good white people (Americans) are, and how they had done the right thing even onto their enemies who were trying so hard to kill them in war back then.

 

[irosie91]

there is a difference between VENGEANCE, BIGOTRY-----and
well thought out----appropriate response.---VERY WELL THOUGHT
OUT.

My little pet peeve is the utter lack of response by the
civilized world to the wonton, barbaric, vandalizing in
the name of islam ----of WORLD HERITAGE. My sense
regarding the bombing of the Giant Buddha carvings
in Afghanistan is that it was an act comitted in the NAME
OF ISLAM ----by muslims ----whose numbers are so vast
and whose INTERRELATIONSHIPS are so strong---that it
could have been accomplished only by overhwelming --
even if tacit---- approval by the muslims of the world. I am not
all that vindictive that I would seek blood shed-----just a
symbolic response-----like a destruction of an important
muslim shrine<<< that's all. The world had no right to
NON-RESPONSE. Hundreds of "holy sites" have been
vandalized since-----mayby relatively minor but I do honestly
believe that if the world had responded in 2001----(?--or was it
2002?) lots of temples and churches would have been spared
since

 

[Beachboy]

I think your post is reasonable, but I think this guy said it more succinctly. Remember war involves demonizing the enemy. And demonizing Muslims is, "a piece of cake."

They do it to themselves, just watch them kill and blow up cities.

The only ones speaking up for Muslims here, are their fellow rag-heads. Muzzies have offended everyone. If they were not murderers and traitors they would be funny to watch with their backward ways.

Yeah.................sure.....................demonizing the enemy....................just like Hitler did with the Jews.

Or....................how about like what the white man did with the Native Americans?

Wanna talk about the black folk who sat on a bus, or refused to drink at the black fountains?

Wanna know something? The people who demonize others are usually the ones who should be demonized because of their very short sighted views.

Sounds like you are a man with vengeance and hatred in your heart, and maybe a chip on your shoulder to boot, even though all that you speak of has been taken care of by the white man who recognized his wrong through out history, and then corrected himself even at the cost of his own peoples lives in the process in which shows just how good white people really are in the end. Now here we have people like you trying to bring the past up against white people, as if it will be the final nail in the coffin for them as found in the quest for dominance over them by those who think in this sort of way, but what they or you don't understand is this, the white man can think to himself next if not careful, "what kind of fool was I to have done what I have done, just to bring about my peoples demise and downfall in the end because of" ? This is where the white people in America are being pushed towards if these people whom desire to see white people suffer now in some sort of vengeful thinking because of the past, in which has been settled already, and is still being settled in small pockets as we speak by white on white corrections. The wrong thing to do is make white people feel that they were complete fools for doing all that they have done to make this nation diverse and as great as it had become to date, just because of some sort of vengeance or hatred being kept or fueled now by those whom think in these sorts of ways. Here is how good white people (Americans) are, and how they had done the right thing even onto their enemies who were trying so hard to kill them in war back then. [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kjSBZLSpD8Q"]Germany Today: Post-World War II Reconstruction, 1947 - YouTube[/ame]

Gosh! You really think so? Wonder if it has to do with 2,977 innocent people killed in the World Trade Center in 2001, plus three more this year at the Boston Marathon bombing, plus many more in the years in between. So, you are saying it is "vengeful" to want justice against the Muslims who caused the death of my fellow citizens? Actually, I don't care what you think!

Stop trying to cover your ass. You Muslim animals, only understand violence. Anglo-Saxons were drawing and quartering before the rag-headed trash had even crawled out of the caves. You want violence. America can deliver!

Merely a more technological approach!

Faster, less painful, and safe for our pilot.
Absolutely beautiful!
​

 

[KevinWestern]

Yeah.................sure.....................demonizing the enemy....................just like Hitler did with the Jews.

Or....................how about like what the white man did with the Native Americans?

Wanna talk about the black folk who sat on a bus, or refused to drink at the black fountains?

Wanna know something? The people who demonize others are usually the ones who should be demonized because of their very short sighted views.

Sounds like you are a man with vengeance and hatred in your heart, and maybe a chip on your shoulder to boot, even though all that you speak of has been taken care of by the white man who recognized his wrong through out history, and then corrected himself even at the cost of his own peoples lives in the process in which shows just how good white people really are in the end. Now here we have people like you trying to bring the past up against white people, as if it will be the final nail in the coffin for them as found in the quest for dominance over them by those who think in this sort of way, but what they or you don't understand is this, the white man can think to himself next if not careful, "what kind of fool was I to have done what I have done, just to bring about my peoples demise and downfall in the end because of" ? This is where the white people in America are being pushed towards if these people whom desire to see white people suffer now in some sort of vengeful thinking because of the past, in which has been settled already, and is still being settled in small pockets as we speak by white on white corrections. The wrong thing to do is make white people feel that they were complete fools for doing all that they have done to make this nation diverse and as great as it had become to date, just because of some sort of vengeance or hatred being kept or fueled now by those whom think in these sorts of ways. Here is how good white people (Americans) are, and how they had done the right thing even onto their enemies who were trying so hard to kill them in war back then. [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kjSBZLSpD8Q"]Germany Today: Post-World War II Reconstruction, 1947 - YouTube[/ame]

Gosh! You really think so? Wonder if it has to do with 2,977 innocent people killed in the World Trade Center in 2001, plus three more this year at the Boston Marathon bombing, plus many more in the years in between. So, you are saying it is "vengeful" to want justice against the Muslims who caused the death of my fellow citizens? Actually, I don't care what you think!

Stop trying to cover your ass. You Muslim animals, only understand violence. Anglo-Saxons were drawing and quartering before the rag-headed trash had even crawled out of the caves. You want violence. America can deliver!

Merely a more technological approach!

Faster, less painful, and safe for our pilot.
Absolutely beautiful!
​

(a) How many Muslims has the US killed on their turf in the past decade?
(b) How many Americans have been killed by Muslims on US soil in the past decade?

I assure you, "(a)" is a gigantically larger number.

I've yet to really see an answer from you...


.

 

[irosie91]

I would not hazard a guess-----in the US ---we do not describe our
criminal population by religion. As to numbers of muslims killed by muslims---
the number is very high----as to number of muslims killed by americans---
in the past year----probably in something like ---in the hundreds . As to numbers of
murders comitted by muslims in the USA whether muslim or non muslim as victims---
probably over into the thousands. As to numbers of muslims killed by muslims in the world--into the hundreds of thousands

 

[beagle9]

Yeah.................sure.....................demonizing the enemy....................just like Hitler did with the Jews.

Or....................how about like what the white man did with the Native Americans?

Wanna talk about the black folk who sat on a bus, or refused to drink at the black fountains?

Wanna know something? The people who demonize others are usually the ones who should be demonized because of their very short sighted views.

Sounds like you are a man with vengeance and hatred in your heart, and maybe a chip on your shoulder to boot, even though all that you speak of has been taken care of by the white man who recognized his wrong through out history, and then corrected himself even at the cost of his own peoples lives in the process in which shows just how good white people really are in the end. Now here we have people like you trying to bring the past up against white people, as if it will be the final nail in the coffin for them as found in the quest for dominance over them by those who think in this sort of way, but what they or you don't understand is this, the white man can think to himself next if not careful, "what kind of fool was I to have done what I have done, just to bring about my peoples demise and downfall in the end because of" ? This is where the white people in America are being pushed towards if these people whom desire to see white people suffer now in some sort of vengeful thinking because of the past, in which has been settled already, and is still being settled in small pockets as we speak by white on white corrections. The wrong thing to do is make white people feel that they were complete fools for doing all that they have done to make this nation diverse and as great as it had become to date, just because of some sort of vengeance or hatred being kept or fueled now by those whom think in these sorts of ways. Here is how good white people (Americans) are, and how they had done the right thing even onto their enemies who were trying so hard to kill them in war back then. [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kjSBZLSpD8Q"]Germany Today: Post-World War II Reconstruction, 1947 - YouTube[/ame]

Gosh! You really think so? Wonder if it has to do with 2,977 innocent people killed in the World Trade Center in 2001, plus three more this year at the Boston Marathon bombing, plus many more in the years in between. So, you are saying it is "vengeful" to want justice against the Muslims who caused the death of my fellow citizens? Actually, I don't care what you think!

Stop trying to cover your ass. You Muslim animals, only understand violence. Anglo-Saxons were drawing and quartering before the rag-headed trash had even crawled out of the caves. You want violence. America can deliver!

Merely a more technological approach!

Faster, less painful, and safe for our pilot.
Absolutely beautiful!
​

Are you stupid or something ? I was responding to Abikersailor.... Now go back and read carefully before you act stupid again..

 

[Beachboy]

Sounds like you are a man with vengeance and hatred in your heart, and maybe a chip on your shoulder to boot, even though all that you speak of has been taken care of by the white man who recognized his wrong through out history, and then corrected himself even at the cost of his own peoples lives in the process in which shows just how good white people really are in the end. Now here we have people like you trying to bring the past up against white people, as if it will be the final nail in the coffin for them as found in the quest for dominance over them by those who think in this sort of way, but what they or you don't understand is this, the white man can think to himself next if not careful, "what kind of fool was I to have done what I have done, just to bring about my peoples demise and downfall in the end because of" ? This is where the white people in America are being pushed towards if these people whom desire to see white people suffer now in some sort of vengeful thinking because of the past, in which has been settled already, and is still being settled in small pockets as we speak by white on white corrections. The wrong thing to do is make white people feel that they were complete fools for doing all that they have done to make this nation diverse and as great as it had become to date, just because of some sort of vengeance or hatred being kept or fueled now by those whom think in these sorts of ways. Here is how good white people (Americans) are, and how they had done the right thing even onto their enemies who were trying so hard to kill them in war back then. Germany Today: Post-World War II Reconstruction, 1947 - YouTube

Gosh! You really think so? Wonder if it has to do with 2,977 innocent people killed in the World Trade Center in 2001, plus three more this year at the Boston Marathon bombing, plus many more in the years in between. So, you are saying it is "vengeful" to want justice against the Muslims who caused the death of my fellow citizens? Actually, I don't care what you think!

Stop trying to cover your ass. You Muslim animals, only understand violence. Anglo-Saxons were drawing and quartering before the rag-headed trash had even crawled out of the caves. You want violence. America can deliver!

Merely a more technological approach!

Faster, less painful, and safe for our pilot.
Absolutely beautiful!
​

Are you stupid or something ? I was responding to Abikersailor.... Now go back and read carefully before you act stupid again..

If you are so competent, why not try making your own thread? I am the OP on this, and I will address what I choose to. Got it, hot shot?

Besides if you had read post 608, you would realize the action moved out of this thread four days ago!!! And, it has moved on again since. Try to keep up.

This thread has been beaten to death. Here is a similar thread with a more urgent message!

http://www.usmessageboard.com/curre...tanbul-as-dictator-implements-muslim-law.html
​

.
​

 

[ABikerSailor]

I think we've got it..........................BitchBoi is one a bit insecure.

No wonder he hates those that go against him...........................

 

[Pogo]

Delusions of grandeur too.

If you are so competent, why not try making your own thread? I am the OP on this, and I will address what I choose to. Got it, hot shot?

Besides if you had read post 608, you would realize the action moved out of this thread four days ago!!! And, it has moved on again since. Try to keep up.

... When did this thread ever have "action"?

Such are the trappings of a narcissist.

 

[Pogo]

You Muslim animals, only understand violence. Anglo-Saxons were drawing and quartering before the rag-headed trash had even crawled out of the caves. You want violence. America can deliver!

Great. Takes his own point and self-immolates it. "We" invented drawing and quartering, and that makes "them" the animals.

​

 

[antiquity]

I oppose any immigration bill that doesn't secure the border first and fails to punishes any employer who hires illegals for any reason.
Another point, actually two points, one put a hold on anyone from a Muslim society for at least five years and two....stop educational visas for Chinese students. Seem there is strong evidence that students from China after they return to China after getting high tech education in computer science are using it to attack both commercial and government military sites in the US.

 

[ABikerSailor]

Apparently, BitchBoi is going to use history.

Good luck asshole..................much of it is against you, and your bigoted claims...................

 

[Beachboy]

I think we've got it..........................BitchBoi is one a bit insecure.

No wonder he hates those that go against him...........................

Insecure? Muslims were not on my radar a few weeks ago. Then, the facts on the Boston Marathon bombers came out. Then, I looked back and researched 9/11. Then, I found the following list of violent actions by Muslims on Wiki. After reading this list one would have to be blind deaf, and dumb not to know Muslims are enemies of western culture. Muslims are prepared to kill anyone who disagrees with them. American Muslims who do nothing to stop the violence are as guilty as those who perform it. We must fight fire with fire.

Read this fucking list, moron! Here are many solid reasons to feel insecure about Muslims.


Islam's doctrines and texts have in some cases been associated with violence. This article deals with the juxtaposition in Islamic law and theology of violence and non-violence by groups and individuals. Attitudes and laws towards both violence and peace exist within the Islamic tradition.
Contents

• 1 Perception of Islam
  • 1.1 Western perceptions
  • 1.2 Islamic views on violence
• 2 Islamic sources
  • 2.1 Qur'an
  • 2.2 Jihad
    • 2.2.1 Qur'anic verses in favor of violence
    • 2.2.2 Scholars' comment in favor of Jihad
    • 2.2.3 Hadiths about Jihad
  • 2.3 Domestic violence
• 3 Modern violence
  • 3.1 Ayatollah
  • 3.2 Mujahedin
  • 3.3 Taliban
  • 3.4 Saddam Hussein
  • 3.5 Laskar Jihad
  • 3.6 Hezbollah
  • 3.7 Omar al-Bashir
  • 3.8 Wahabbists
• 4 Terrorism
  • 4.1 World domination
• 5 See also
• 6 References

Perception of Islam

Western perceptions

Sutton and Vertigans describe Western views of Islam as based on a stereotype of it as an inherently violent religion, characterizing it as a 'religion of the sword'. They characterize the image of Islam in the Western world as "dominated by conflict, aggression, 'fundamentalism', and global-scale violent terrorism."[1]
Juan Eduardo Campo writes that, "Europeans (have) viewed Islam in various ways: sometimes as a backward, violent religion; sometimes as an Arabian Nights fantasy; and sometimes as a complex and changing product of history and social life."[2] Robert Gleave writes that, "at the centre of popular conceptions of Islam as a violent religion are the punishments carried out by regimes hoping to bolster both their domestic and international Islamic credentials.[3]
The 9/11 attack on the US and other[when?] attacks since then associated with people who follow the Islamic faith, have led many non-Muslims to indict Islam as a violent religion.[4] According to Corrigan and Hudson, "some conservative Christian leaders (have) complained that Islam (is) incompatible with what they believed to be a Christian America."[5] Examples of Christian leaders who have expressed such sentiments include Franklin Graham and Pat Robertson.[6] According to a survey conducted by a research group affiliated with the Southern Baptist Convention, two out of three Protestant pastors believe Islam is a "dangerous" religion.[7]
Islamic views on violence

In response to these charges, Ram Puniyani assert that, "Islam does not condone violence but, like other religions, does believe in self-defence".[8]
Mark Juergensmeyer describes the teachings of Islam as ambiguous about violence. He asserts that, like all religions, Islam occasionally allows for force while stressing that the main spiritual goal is one of nonviolence and peace.[9] Hood, Hill and Spika write that "(a)lthough it would be a mistake to think that Islam is inherently a violent religion, it would be equally inappropriate to fail to understand the conditions under which believers might feel justified in acting violently against those whom their tradition feels should be opposed."[10]
Similarly, Chandra Muzaffar asserts that, "(t)he Quranic exposition on resisting aggression, oppression and injustice lays down the parameters within which fighting or the use of violence is legitimate. What this means is that one can use the Quran as the criterion for when violence is legitimate and when it is not."[11]
Islamic sources

Qur'an

Main article: Qur'an and violence
The Qur'an's teachings on matters of war and peace have become topics of heated discussion in recent years. On the one hand, some critics claim that certain verses of the Qur'an sanction military action against unbelievers as a whole both during the lifetime of Muhammad and after. The Qur'an says, "Fight in the name of your religion with those who fight against you."[12] On the other hand, other scholars argue that such verses of the Qur'an are interpreted out of context,[13][14] and argue that when the verses are read in context it clearly appears that the Qur'an prohibits aggression,[15][16][17] and allows fighting only in self-defense.[18][19]
Jihad

Main article: Jihad
Jihad, an Islamic term, is a religious duty of Muslims. In Arabic, the word jih&#257;d translates as "struggle". Jihad appears 41 times in the Quran and frequently in the idiomatic expression "striving in the way of Allah (al-jihad fi sabil Allah)".[20][21][22]
Jihad is an important religious duty for Muslims. A minority among the Sunni scholars sometimes refer to this duty as the sixth pillar of Islam, though it occupies no such official status.[23] In Twelver Shi'a Islam, however, Jihad is one of the 10 Practices of the Religion.
There is controversy regarding the extent of correlation between jihad and violence, and whether some have used confusion over the definition of the term to their advantage.[24]
Middle East historian Bernard Lewis argues that "the overwhelming majority of classical theologians, jurists, and traditionalists (specialists in the hadith) understood the obligation of jihad in a military sense."[25] Furthermore, Lewis maintains that for most of the recorded history of Islam, from the lifetime of the Prophet Muhammad onward, the word jihad was used in a primarily military sense.[26] Although some Islamic scholars have different perspectives on the implementation of Jihad, there is strong consensus amongst them that the concept of jihad will always include armed struggle against what they see as persecution and oppression.[27][28]


Qur'anic verses in favor of violence

Qur'an that claims it is the "clear truth and the best explanation"[Quran 25:33], a revelation that was sent down "to make everything clear"[Quran 16:89] and the eternal word of Allah[Quran 56:80], commands its adherents in chapter no. 47,

Quran in chapter 9 says,

&#8220;Freedom from (all) obligations (is declared) from Allah and His Messenger to those of the Mushrikun (polytheists, pagans, idolaters, disbelievers in the Oneness of Allah), with whom you made a treaty.[1]
So travel freely (O Mushrikun) for four months (as you will) throughout the land, but know that you cannot escape (from the Punishment of) Allah, and Allah will disgrace the disbelievers.[2]

And a declaration from Allah and His Messenger to mankind on the greatest day (the 10th of Dhul-Hijjah &#8212; the 12th month of Islamic calendar) that Allah is free from (all) obligations to the Mushrikun and so is His Messenger. So if you (Mushrikun) repent, it is better for you, but if you turn away, then know that you cannot escape (from the Punishment of) Allah. And give tidings (to Muhammad) of a painful torment to those who disbelieve.[3]

Except those of the Mushrikun with whom you have a treaty, and who have not subsequently failed you in aught, nor have supported anyone against you. So fulfill their treaty to them to the end of their term. Surely Allah loves Al- Mattaqun (the pious &#8212; see V.2:2).[4]

Then when the Sacred Months (the Ist, 7th, 11th, and 12th months of the Islamic calendar) have passed, then kill the Mushrikun wherever you find them, and capture them and besiege them, and prepare for them each and every ambush. But if they repent and perform As-Salat (Iqamat-as-Salat), and give Zakat, then leave their way free. Verily, Allah is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful.[5]

And if anyone of the Mushrikun (polytheists, idolaters, pagans, disbelievers in the Oneness of Allah) seeks your protection then grant him protection, so that he may hear the Word of Allah (the Quran), and then escort him to where he can be secure, that is because they are men who know not.[6]&#8221;
&#8212;Muhsin khan translated Quran, verse 9:1-6
​

&#8220;O you who believe (in Allah's Oneness and in His Messenger (Muhammad)! Verily, the Mushrikun (polytheists, pagans, idolaters, disbelievers in the Oneness of Allah, and in the Message of Muhammad) are Najasun (impure). So let them not come near Al-Masjid-al-Haram (at Makkah) after this year, and if you fear poverty, Allah will enrich you if He will, out of His Bounty. Surely, Allah is All-Knowing, All-Wise. [28] Fight against those who
(1) believe not in Allah,(2) nor in the Last Day,(3) nor forbid that which has been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger(4) and those who acknowledge not the religion of truth (i.e. Islam) among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians), until they pay the Jizyah with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued. [29] And the Jews say: 'Uzair (Ezra) is the son of Allah, and the Christians say: Messiah is the son of Allah. That is a saying from their mouths. They imitate the saying of the disbelievers of old. Allah's Curse be on them, how they are deluded away from the truth! [30]&#8221;
&#8212;Muhsin khan translated Quran, verse 9:28-30
​

Quran chapter 8 says,

&#8220;(Remember) when your Lord inspired the angels, "Verily, I am with you, so keep firm those who have believed. I will cast terror into the hearts of those who have disbelieved, so strike them over the necks, and smite over all their fingers and toes."[12]
This is because they defied and disobeyed Allah and His Messenger. And whoever defies and disobeys Allah and His Messenger, then verily, Allah is Severe in punishment.[13]&#8221;
&#8212;Muhsin khan translated Quran, verse 8:12-13
​

&#8220;Say to those who have disbelieved, if they cease (from disbelief) their past will be forgiven. But if they return (thereto), then the examples of those (punished) before them have already preceded (as a warning).[38]
And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping others besides Allah) and the religion (worship) will all be for Allah Alone [in the whole of the world]. But if they cease (worshipping others besides Allah), then certainly, Allah is All-Seer of what they do.[39]&#8221;
&#8212;Muhsin khan translated Quran, verse 8:38-39
​

In his tafsir, Ibn Kathir, one of the most well-renown Islamic scholars, explains the verses further:

&#8220;Allah then commanded fighting the disbelievers when He said:
(...until there is no more Fitnah) meaning, Shirk. This is the opinion of Ibn `Abbas, Abu Al-`Aliyah, Mujahid, Al-Hasan, Qatadah, Ar-Rabi`, Muqatil bin Hayyan, As-Suddi and Zayd bin Aslam.

Allah's statement:
(...and the religion (all and every kind of worship) is for Allah (Alone).) means, `So that the religion of Allah becomes dominant above all other religions.' It is reported in the Two Sahihs that Abu Musa Al-Ash`ari said: "The Prophet was asked, `O Allah's Messenger! A man fights out of bravery, and another fights to show off, which of them fights in the cause of Allah' The Prophet said:
(He who fights so that Allah's Word is superior, then he fights in Allah's cause.) In addition, it is reported in the Two Sahihs:
(I have been ordered (by Allah) to fight the people until they proclaim, `None has the right to be worshipped but Allah'. Whoever said it, then he will save his life and property from me, except for cases of the law, and their account will be with Allah.)&#8221;
&#8212;Tafsir of Ibn Kathir, The Order to fight until there is no more Fitnah
​

Scholars' comment in favor of Jihad

Imam Al-Suyuti (c. 1445-1505 AD) was a famous Egyptian writer, religious scholar, juristic expert and teacher wrote:

&#8220;Fight those who don't believe in God nor in the Last Day [Unless they believe in the Prophet God bless him and grant him peace] nor hold what is forbidden that which God and His emissary have forbidden [e.g., wine] nor embrace the true faith [which is firm, and abrogates other faiths, i.e., the Islamic religion] from among [for distinguishing] those who were given the Book [i.e., the Jews and Christians] unless they give the head-tax [i.e., the annual taxes imposed on them] (/'an yadin/) humbly submissive, and obedient to Islam's rule.&#8221;
&#8212;Suyuti, Durr al-Manthur (Beirut Edition), vol. 3, p. 228
​

About Jihad, leader of the Afghan Jihad, Abdullah Yusuf Azzam wrote:

&#8220;Jihad Against the Kuffar is of two Types: Offensive Jihad (where the enemy is attacked in his own territory) ... [and] Defensive Jihad. This is expelling the Kuffar from our land, and it is Fard Ayn [personal religious obligation on Muslim individuals], a compulsory duty upon all ... ...Where the Kuffar [infidels] are not gathering to fight the Muslims, the fighting becomes Fard Kifaya [religious obligation on Muslim society] with the minimum requirement of appointing believers to guard borders, and the sending of an army at least once a year to terrorise the enemies of Allah. It is a duty of the Imam (Caliph) to assemble and send out an army unit into the land of war once or twice every year. Moreover, it is the responsibility of the Muslim population to assist him, and if he does not send an army he is in sin.- And the Ulama have mentioned that this type of jihad is for maintaining the payment of Jizya. The scholars of the principles of religion have also said: " Jihad is Daw'ah [Islamic preaching] with a force, and is obligatory to perform with all available capabilities, until there remains only Muslims or people who submit to Islam.&#8221;
&#8212;A. Y. Azzam, Offensive Jihad Vs. Defensive Jihad
​

Shaykh A&#7717;mad Sirhind&#299; (d. 1624) was an Islamic scholar and a prominent Sufi. He is regarded as having rejuvenated Islam, due to which he is commonly called "Mujadid Alf Thani", meaning "revival of the second millennium". He wrote,

&#8220;Shariat can be fostered through the sword. Kufr and Islam are opposed to each other. The progress of one is possible only at the expense of the other and co-existences between these two contradictory faiths in unthinkable.
The honor of Islam lies in insulting kufr and kafirs. One who respects kafirs, dishonors the Muslims. To respect them does not merely mean honouring them and assigning them a seat of honor in any assembly, but it also implies keeping company with them or showing considerations to them. They should be kept at an arm's length like dogs. ... If some worldly business cannot be performed without them, in that case only a minimum of contact should be established with them but without taking them into confidence. The highest Islamic sentiment asserts that it is better to forego that worldly business and that no relationship should be established with the kafirs.
The real purpose in levying jizya on them is to humiliate them to such an extent that, on account of fear of jizya, they may not be able to dress well and to live in grandeur. They should constantly remain terrified and trembling. It is intended to hold them under contempt and to uphold the honor and might of Islam. . . .
Whenever a Jew is killed, it is for the benefit of Islam&#8221;
&#8212;A. Sirhindi, Excerpted from Saiyid Athar Abbas Rizvi, Muslim Revivalist Movements in Northern India in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries (Agra, Lucknow: Agra University, Balkrishna Book Co., 1965), pp.247-50; and Yohanan Friedmann, Shaykh Ahmad Sirhindi: An Outline of His Thought and a Study of His Image in the Eyes of Posterity (Montreal, Quebec: McGill University, Institute of Islamic Studies, 1971), pp. 73-74.
​

Hadiths about Jihad

Narrated Anas bin Malik: Allah's Apostle said, "I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.' And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally and their reckoning will be with Allah." Narrated Maimun ibn Siyah that he asked Anas bin Malik, "O Abu Hamza! What makes the life and property of a person sacred?" He replied, "Whoever says, 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah', faces our Qibla during the prayers, prays like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims have."

&#8212; Sahih al-Bukhari, 1:8:387 and Sahih al-Bukhari, 1:2:24 see also Sahih Muslim, 1:30,Sahih Muslim, 1:31,Sahih Muslim, 1:32,Sahih Muslim, 1:33,Sahih Muslim, 1:34​

On the day of Al-Ahzab (i.e. clans) the Prophet said, (After this battle) we will go to attack them (i.e. the infidels) and they will not come to attack us."

&#8212; Sahih al-Bukhari, 5:59:435 see also Sahih Muslim, 19:4294​

Narrated Abu Huraira: I heard Allah's Apostle saying, "The example of a Mujahid in Allah's Cause-- and Allah knows better who really strives in His Cause----is like a person who fasts and prays continuously. Allah guarantees that He will admit the Mujahid in His Cause into Paradise if he is killed, otherwise He will return him to his home safely with rewards and war booty."

&#8212; Sahih al-Bukhari, 4:52:46 see also Sahih Muslim, 20:4646​

Narrated Anas bin Malik: The Prophet said, "Nobody who dies and finds good from Allah (in the Hereafter) would wish to come back to this world even if he were given the whole world and whatever is in it, except the martyr who, on seeing the superiority of martyrdom, would like to come back to the world and get killed again (in Allah's Cause)." Narrated Anas: The Prophet said, "A single endeavor (of fighting) in Allah's Cause in the afternoon or in the forenoon is better than all the world and whatever is in it. A place in Paradise as small as the bow or lash of one of you is better than all the world and whatever is in it. And if a houri from Paradise appeared to the people of the earth, she would fill the space between Heaven and the Earth with light and pleasant scent and her head cover is better than the world and whatever is in it."

&#8212; Sahih al-Bukhari, 4:52:53 see also Sahih al-Bukhari, 4:52:50, Sahih al-Bukhari, 4:52:54​

It has been narrated on the authority of Abu Huraira that the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) said: One who died but did not fight in the way of Allah nor did he express any desire (or determination) for Jihid died the death of a hypocrite. 'Abdullah b. Mubarak said: We think the hadith pertained to the time of the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him)

&#8212; Sahih Muslim, 20:4696 see also Sahih Muslim, 20:4631, Sahih Muslim, 20:4634, Sahih Muslim, 20:4635​

A man whose face was covered with an iron mask (i.e. clad in armor) came to the Prophet and said, "O Allah's Apostle! Shall I fight or embrace Islam first? "The Prophet said, "Embrace Islam first and then fight." So he embraced Islam, and was martyred. Allah's Apostle said, A Little work, but a great reward. "(He did very little (after embracing Islam), but he will be rewarded in abundance)."

&#8212; Sahih al-Bukhari, 4:52:63 see also Sahih Muslim, 20:4639​

Narrated 'Abdullah bin Abi Aufa: Allah's Apostle said, "Know that Paradise is under the shades of swords."

&#8212; Sahih al-Bukhari, 4:52:73 see also Sahih al-Bukhari, 4:52:72​

Narrated Abu Said Al-Khudri: Somebody asked, "O Allah's Apostle! Who is the best among the people?" Allah's Apostle replied "A believer who strives his utmost in Allah's Cause with his life and property." They asked, "Who is next?" He replied, "A believer who stays in one of the mountain paths worshipping Allah and leaving the people secure from his mischief."

&#8212; Sahih al-Bukhari, 4:52:45 see also Sahih Muslim, 20:4652,Sahih Muslim, 20:4653​

Narrated Abu Musa: A man came to the Prophet and asked, "A man fights for war booty; another fights for fame and a third fights for showing off; which of them fights in Allah's Cause?" The Prophet said, "He who fights that Allah's Word (i.e. Islam) should be superior, fights in Allah's Cause."

&#8212; Sahih al-Bukhari, 4:52:65 see also Sahih al-Bukhari, 4:52:48​

Narrated Abu Huraira: A man came to Allah's Apostle and said, "Instruct me as to such a deed as equals Jihad (in reward)." He replied, "I do not find such a deed." Then he added, "Can you, while the Muslim fighter is in the battle-field, enter your mosque to perform prayers without cease and fast and never break your fast?" The man said, "But who can do that?" Abu- Huraira added, "The Mujahid (i.e. Muslim fighter) is rewarded even for the footsteps of his horse while it wanders bout (for grazing) tied in a long rope."

&#8212; Sahih al-Bukhari, 4:52:44 see also Sahih Muslim, 19:4315, Sahih Muslim, 19:4314​

Domestic violence

Main article: Islam and domestic violence
The relationship between Islam and domestic violence is disputed. These ideas are vaguely justified with reference to the Qur'an, in one Surah, An-Nisa, 34, which discusses forms of beating in certain circumstances. Some of the scholars allowing "beating" stress that it is a last resort, discountenanced, and must be done lightly so much so not to cause pain or injury.[29]
Modern violence

This section may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. No cleanup reason has been specified. Please help improve this section if you can. (June 2011) See also: Criticism of Islam
According to Islamic scholar Khaleel Mohammed, throughout the world, Muslim intellectuals are punished for criticizing various aspects of traditional and contemporary Islam, citing the case of Muhammad Said al-Ashmawy, who is being held in Egypt under house arrest for his own protection; Abdel Karim Soroush who was beaten in Iran for raising the voice of inquiry, and Mahmoud Tahawho was killed in Sudan. Rifat Hassan, Fatima Mernissi, Abdallah an-Na'im, Mohammed Arkoun, and Amina Wadud were all vilified by the imams for asking Muslims to use their intellect.[30]
Other examples:

• Hashem Aghajari, an Iranian university professor, was initially sentenced to death because of a speech that criticized some of the present Islamic practices in Iran being in contradiction with the original practices and ideology of Islam, and particularly for stating that Muslims were not "monkeys" and "should not blindly follow" the clerics. The sentence was later commuted to three years in jail, and he was released in 2004 after serving two years of that sentence.[31][32][33]

• Christoph Luxenberg feels compelled to work under a pseudonym to protect himself because of fears that a new book on the origins of the Qur'an,[34][35] may make him a target for violence.[36][37] he goes/went by this assumed name in order to protect himself.[38]

• In recent times fatwas calling for execution have been issued against novelist Salman Rushdie and activist Taslima Nasreen for pejorative comments on Islam.[39]
• On 2 November 2004, Dutch filmmaker Theo van Gogh was assassinated by Dutch-born Mohammed Bouyeri for producing the 10-minute film Submission critical of the abusive treatment of women by Muslims. A letter threatening the author of the screenplay, Ayaan Hirsi Ali, was pinned to his body by a knife. Hirsi Ali entered into hiding immediately following the assassination, and now is protected by bodyguards.[40]

• On 30 September 2005, the Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten published editorial cartoons, many of which caricatured the Islamic prophet Mohammed. The publication was intended to contribute to the debate regarding criticism of Islam and self-censorship;[41] objectives which manifested themselves in the public outcry from Muslim communities within Denmark and the subsequent apology by the paper. However, the controversy deepened when further examples of the cartoons were reprinted in newspapers in more than fifty other countries. This led to protests across the Muslim world, some of which escalated into violence, including setting fire to the Norwegian and Danish Embassies in Syria, and the storming of European buildings and desecration of the Danish and German flags in Gaza City.[42] Globally, at least 139 people were killed and 823 injured.[43]

• On 19 September 2006 French writer and philosophy teacher Robert Redeker wrote an editorial for Le Figaro, a French conservative newspaper, in which he attacked Islam and Muhammad, writing: "Pitiless war leader, pillager, butcher of Jews and polygamous, this is how Mohammed is revealed by the Qur'an." He received death threats and went into hiding.[44] The teacher was forced into hiding after describing the Qu'ran as a "book of extraordinary violence" and Islam as "a religion which ... exalts violence and hate."[45]

• On 4 August 2007, Ehsan Jami was attacked in his hometown of Voorburg in The Netherlands by three men. The attack is widely believed to be linked to his activities for the Central Committee for Ex-Muslims. The national anti-terrorism coordinator's office, the public prosecution department and the police decided during a meeting on 6 August that "additional measures" were necessary for the protection of Jami, who subsequently received extra security.[46]

"Hatred towards people who follow other religions such as Jews and Christians, as well as Hindus and other polytheists, are a part of the teachings of the Islamic holy book, the Qur'an."[47]

 

[Beachboy]

Ayatollah

"Perhaps the most resounding call to jihad in modern times occurred on 21 January 1979," suggest authors, as the Ayatollah Khomeini announced a Jihad against the US. "The people have absolute confidence in their victory in this holy war (jihad-e moqaddas)," said the Islamic icon.[48]
Ayatollah Khomeini's "Radical Islamic Revolution executed and killed hundreds of thousands of people in the name of Radical Islam."[49]
Iran, under the Ayatollah Khomeini, categorized the 1980-1988 Iran-Iraq war as a 'Holy war'.[50] "Khomeini's call to jihad incited thousands of Iranian teenagers to volunteer for martyrdom missions."[48] The Basiji movement 'created' child and adult sacrifice as "holy soldiers,"[51] Blessed by Iranian mullahs' regime.[52]
The Basiji ideology enjoys a revival under Iran's president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad,[51] who is a member.[53] The movement has a nominal strength of 12.6 million, and has been present in schools since it was first created in 1979 by the Ayatollah.[54] Basijis were used in crackdowns in 1999, in 2003[55] and in the brutality of 2009 on protesters in Iran.[56]
The group demands in training intense Quran studies, it calls for “Basij Ethics and Etiquette” and “Major Islamic Commandments.” The Basijis have been known to act in defending a strict Islamic conduct."[57] and enforcing Sharia law.[58] often "merging" with Ansar-e Hezbollah men in enforcing Sharia law.[55] In one example, Human rights activists charged that Basiji Islamic militiamen have raped and murdered 26 year old Elnaz Babazadeh for wearing an improper dress.[59]
On 19 August 1979 the Ayatollah declared a jihad against the Kurds in Iran. "Once jihad is declared, all males over 15 must join the fight, the enemy's property is open to confiscation."[60]
"Ayatollah Khomeini played on the messianic overtones of this belief during the Iranian revolution." The ideology of "Twelver" in Shiite Islam (return of the 12th Imam — belief) was invoked by many who believed that the Ayatollah will "return" as their Mahdi (Islamic Messiah). Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad refocuses this belief of the Mahdi's return by public statements and various symbolic actions, Iraq's Shiite al-Sadr's army is called the Mahdi army.[61]
Mujahedin

In 1979 Afghanistan, local Muslim rebels began fighting the Soviets army, calling themselves Mujahideen, they used guerrilla war.[62]
Author of the book Holy war Wilhelm Dietl accounted how one Mujahed fighter told him en route to an armed attack in Herat: "We love to kill Russians and to be killed."[63]
Taliban

Some of the Taliban have fought against the Soviets in the 1980s. They battle to conquer the country.[64] Many Madrassas endorse Jihad in Pakistan and in Afghanistan.[65]
In the 1980s, the Afghan jihad had been financed by Saudi Arabia[66] as well as other countries including the United States of America.[citation needed]
Saddam Hussein

Saddam Hussein warned of a jihad against the United States in 1991.[67] In 2003, after the March 20 US, British led invasion of Iraq, Saddam Hussein called for a holy war against "an aggression on the land of Islam." (invoking the Quranic theme: "Fight them everywhere...")[68] The statement accused the coalition forces of waging a war against Islam. His information Minister conlcuding: "Therefore, jihad is a duty in confronting them... Those who are martyred will be rewarded in heaven. Seize the opportunity, my brothers."[69]
Laskar Jihad

The paramilitary organisation Laskar Jihad called "to wage a jihad or holy war" into Indonesia's Moluccan islands, and carried out anti-Christian attacks in Sulawesi,[70] the same group was involved in the 1999 violence against Christians and Chinese[71] in East Timor.[72] It has been categorized as "Indonesia's Dirty Little Holy War Holy Terror.[70]
Hezbollah

Hezbollah's spiritual guidance, Sheik Muhammed Hussein Fadlallah, who witnessing journalist says was behind the hostage crisis in Lebanon in the 1980s,[73] said: "We see ourselves as mujihadeen who fight a Holy War." Justifying bombings, kidnapping, murder.[74]
However British journalist Robert Fisk disputes these claims about Fadlallh:

The Americans put it about that he had blessed the suicide bomber who struck the US marine base in Beirut in 1983, killing 241 service personnel. Fadlallah always denied this to me and I believe him. Suicide bombers, however insane we regard them, don't need to be blessed; they think they are doing God's duty without any help from a marja like Fadlallah.
​

[75]
Omar al-Bashir

"In the present conflict in Darfur, jihad is usually interpreted as holy war by the government in Khartoum."[76] The Sudanese National Islamic Front declared in 1992 a jihad, or holy war, against all in the Nuba Mountains who supported the SPLA."[77][78]
Sudan's leader Omar Al-Bashir, in 1997 "declared a jihad (holy war) against" Ethiopia.[79] Accused of genocide he threatened in 2007 "to mount a jihad against United Nations peacekeepers."[80]
Wahabbists

The Whabbists have a long history of fundamentalism and jihad, declaring holy wars on others, to force them into accepting their purified version of Islam[81]
In 2010, a 'Glut of fatwas spurred Saudi king to impose curbs,' Saudi political analyst explaining: "If you endorse jihad, it means you are searching for a war with the rest of the world."[82]
Some militant Islamic movements cite Saudi Wahhabi clerics to justify violence.[83]
Saudi Grand Mufti Ibn Baz repudiated violence. He stated:

From that which is known to everyone who has the slightest bit of common sense is that hijacking airplanes and kidnapping children and the like are extremely great crimes, the world over. Their evil effects are far and wide, as is the great harm and inconvenience caused to the innocent; the total effect of which none can comprehend except Allaah.
​

[84]
Terrorism

Main article: Islam and terrorism
Islamic terrorism is terrorism[85] committed by Islamists, and aimed at achieving varying political ends[86] and the advancement of Islamist goals; for example, Osama bin Laden's stated goal of ending American military presence in the Middle East and the Arabian Peninsula,[87][87] overthrowing Arab regimes he considers corrupt and insufficiently religious,[87] and stopping American support for Israel.[88] Bombing in London 7/7 are said to be in retaliation for UK's support in the war in Iraq that began in 2003, though it can't be linked as a motive for Islamic terror plots on London, December, 2001.[89][90] The Islamic terrorism attack in Madrid were "explained" as "inspired by al-Qaeda's call to punish Spain's government for supporting the Iraq war," another motive was given that Spain holds a strong appeal to Islamic militants because the southern region of Andalucia was under Muslim control for almost 800 years, and "Al-Qaeda has called on jihadists to reconquer Spain as part of a broader Muslim caliphate, or kingdom under Islamic rule."[91][92]
At the 2008 Mumbai attacks, the Islamic terrorists were told by their handlers in Pakistan "that the lives of Jews were worth 50 times those of non-Jews."[93]
The Qur'an: (8:12): "...cast terror in their hearts and strike upon their necks."[94] The commanded to terrorize the disbelievers have been cited in motivation of Jihadi terror.[95][96][97][98]
A Jihadi cleric:

"Another aim and objective of jihad is to drive terror in the hearts of the [infidels]. To terrorize them. Did you know that we were commanded in the Qur'an with terrorism? ...Allah said, and prepare for them to the best of your ability with power, and with horses of war. To drive terror in the hearts of my enemies, Allah's enemies, and your enemies. And other enemies which you don't know, only Allah knows them... So we were commanded to drive terror into the hearts of the [infidels], to prepare for them with the best of our abilities with power. Then the Prophet said, nay, the power is your ability to shoot. The power which you are commanded with here, is your ability to shoot. Another aim and objective of jihad is to kill the [infidels], to lessen the population of the [infidels]... it is not right for a Prophet to have captives until he makes the Earth warm with blood... so, you should always seek to lessen the population of the [infidels]."[99]
​

Observers have also argued that the attacks are aimed at propagating Islamic culture, society and values in opposition to perceived political, imperialistic, and/or cultural influences of non-Muslims, and the Western world in particular.[100][101]
There are also historical dimensions to the phenomenon, and the history of Western influence and control after the fall of the Ottoman Empire in 1918, is a common stated reason used within some terrorist groups to justify and explain its use of violence as resistive and retributive against western influences.
World domination

The strive to an 'Islamic Caliphate.' Caliph is translated from the Arabic Khalifa (&#1582;&#1604;&#1610;&#1601;&#1577; &#7830;al&#299;fä) meaning "successor", "substitute", or "lieutenant". It is used in the Qur'an to establish Adam's role as representative of Allah on earth. Kalifa is also used to describe the belief that man's role, in his real nature, is as khalifa or viceroy to Allah.[102] The word is also most commonly used for the Islamic leader of the Ummah; starting with Muhammad and his line of successors.
Indeed, domination is the ultimate goal of jihadists.[103][104] Al-Qaeda revealed its grand plan towards an Islamic caliphate,[105] - global domination.[106] Abu Musab al-Zarqawi's Al-Qaeda in Iraq, has released a statement in which it explains the reasons for its terror campaign:

"We are not fighting to chase out the occupier or to save national unity and keep the borders outlined by the infidels intact," [...] "We are fighting because it is a religious duty to do it, just as it is a duty to take the Sharia [Islamic law] to the government and create an Islamic state."[107]
​

"Al-Qaeda has called on jihadists to reconquer Spain as part of a broader Muslim caliphate, or kingdom under Islamic rule."[91] Explaining why even Hamas has an eye on Spain.[92] In the early 1990s, the GIA Algerian Armed Islamist Group, which is "well known for its radical positions and the barbaric violence of its operations, announced the restoration of the caliphate and the appointment of a caliph."[108] With Palestinian Islamic party Hamas victory in the 2007 election, a mass gathering followed with Hamas' spokesman calling for a Caliphate.[109] The official said Hamas seeks to create an "Islamic caliphate" in the land.[110][111]

 

[PoliticalStench]

No, you're bailing out because you got busted. I didn't bring up anybody's intelligence; I asked you to back up your post, and you can't do it. And now you're running away.

As I said, don't be coming in here unarmed.

I love it. LOL! Your mind is so closed that you can't see how your attitude would be off-putting, but because I didn't give you what you wanted, I backed off off due to your "busting" skills, according to you. Far from it. I got a whiff of your attitude and folded my arms.

Never said you USED the word intelligence. C-O-M-P-R-E-H-E-N-S-I-O-N.

Now you're just trolling. Fact is you made a claim and when it was challenged you bailed. You can't answer, because there isn't one. You painted yourself into a corner. I called your bluff and you lost.

See ya, loser.

Aww. Wah-wah. You think I'm a troll and a loser... Name calling... not surprised. My arguments don't qualify me as either. I just refuse to jump when you demand. Have a nice, misguided life.

 

[PoliticalStench]

Islam is the scourge of mankind. There is nothing legitimate about a so-called religion that calls on it's followers to kill their fellow man. What kind of sick sonofabitch defends that kind of perversion?

Christians.

I've heard it said that Islam now is where Christianity was during Inquisition.

Men are the number one cause of war. Islam now? Islam has been like this for centuries.

 

[PoliticalStench]

Muslims are not our enemy.

Terrorists are.

Period.

Why don't more Muslims speak out against terrorism and get rid of the radicalizing imams from among them?

 

[PoliticalStench]

christians are annoying, but they arent blowing themselves up, cutting off people's heads and committing the vast majority of terrorism worldwide.

now, calm down p.c. police dont get your panties in a wad i didnt say all but enough thats its a damn problem

when was the last time a christian said, the bible said verse and chapter thats jesus gave me permission to murder my daughter for sleeping with her bf, for honor (sarcasm)

or i can beat my wife cause the bible says so

or jesus said the abortion clinic was ok to bomb

even the bullshit about timothy mcveigh

i swear the p.c. drivel coming out of your some of your mouths convinces me you couldnt

rub two brains cells together if you tried

What about the American soldiers in Iraq who raped and murdered an Iraqi girl, and murdered her whole family? Do you think that kind of thing is an isolated incident?

Yes, it's isolated...rare. OR else every soldier in the four branches of the military would be doing it. It's not US policy. But doing harm to the infidel is policy of the Islamists. It's in their handbook.