Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Or in another words, baby hitlers lock workers out of their jobs for a year while bleeding heart libs save the day through government handoutsStimulus is taking money from the rich and giving it to working class people.
Only people infected with marxist dogma could see the logic of that
Trickle down is not just a term, is a definition of the direction that economic benefits travel in.Trickle down economics is just a term. For those who think rationally it's really up & down, an exchange of money ongoing. If that shit don't work, then explain why economic stimulus is different, go!
Because stimulus is TRICKLE UP ECONMICS-----Billionaires/BANKERS/CHI-COMMS wind up with the lion share of the stimulus money eventually.. Hence why these groups get richer with every stimulus along with of course, the politicians pushing this nonsense.The left loves stimulus, so long as it's driven by dementia instead of the orange man.
But the left hates trickle down. In their minds the more you take from employers the more likely employees are to get a raise. Let's call it what it is instead, they desire govt. entitlements, because that's the only other direction, and that starves a country under socialism. But the PROGS talk anyway, they do that a lot. In PROG, the less money you make the better car you drive, debt & bad decisions are personal too.
Trickle down economics is just a term. For those who think rationally it's really up & down, an exchange of money ongoing. If that shit don't work, then explain why economic stimulus is different, go!
No one has to be poor for longIn our system some people have to be poor.
The left loves stimulus, so long as it's driven by dementia instead of the orange man.
But the left hates trickle down. In their minds the more you take from employers the more likely employees are to get a raise. Let's call it what it is instead, they desire govt. entitlements, because that's the only other direction, and that starves a country under socialism. But the PROGS talk anyway, they do that a lot. In PROG, the less money you make the better car you drive, debt & bad decisions are personal too.
Trickle down economics is just a term. For those who think rationally it's really up & down, an exchange of money ongoing. If that shit don't work, then explain why economic stimulus is different, go!
Stimulus is the opposite of "Trickle Down". Stimulus is taking money from the rich and giving it to working class people. (Which is only sensible, since the rich stole it from them to start with). Trickle down is not taxing the rich and hoping they share some of the wealth with poor people.
They don't.
View attachment 494518
No one has to be poor for long
Capitalism creates wealth
and the poor in America have more wealth than people in some dysfunctional countries in the 3rd world
I'll give it a go.The left loves stimulus, so long as it's driven by dementia instead of the orange man.
But the left hates trickle down. In their minds the more you take from employers the more likely employees are to get a raise. Let's call it what it is instead, they desire govt. entitlements, because that's the only other direction, and that starves a country under socialism. But the PROGS talk anyway, they do that a lot. In PROG, the less money you make the better car you drive, debt & bad decisions are personal too.
Trickle down economics is just a term. For those who think rationally it's really up & down, an exchange of money ongoing. If that shit don't work, then explain why economic stimulus is different, go!
You are conflating 2 different things.
Economic stimulis is giving money to people or businesses who qualify for it by a predetermined set of standards.
Trickle down economics is the idea that as profit increases so do wages of those employed.
The first is predictable and easily quantified in its outcome. The second is a philosophy that is neither.
As to your first paragraph.
Yes, we want more entitlements. The reason being that unlike trickledown economics the available funds are guaranteed to help the employed and... yes also the unemployed and other people in need. It doesn't "starve" a country as countless Western countries have proved. It leads to a higher standard of living and more happiness of the populace on the whole.
Economic stimulis is giving money to people or businesses who qualify for it by a predetermined set of standards. Same applies to all economic conditions, established standards. The only difference is the govt. is spreading the money generating public debt with among other things hope to generate growth. Or if PROG language because "people are hurting".
Trickle down economics is the idea that as profit increases so do wages of those employed. Again, it's up and down, down causes up, back down again etc. etc. The idea for stimulus is exactly the same.
The first is predictable and easily quantified in its outcome. No shit predictable huh? Then why all the hiring signs? Under O'bummer we had stimulus while O'bummercare stagnated growth and raised taxes. It was predictable alright, the money went into govt. programs for O'bummercare, ask me how I know, govt. buildings, ask me how I know, and govt. infrastructure where a days work took weeks ask me how I know, and giant steel animals they call art ask me how I know.
The second is a philosophy that is neither. Reflecting on the OP, since trickle down is just a philosophy then it's safe to say you're more likely to receive a raise if the govt. takes more money.
As to your first paragraph.
Yes, we want more entitlements. The reason being that unlike trickledown economics the available funds are guaranteed to help the employed and... yes also the unemployed and other people in need.
It doesn't "starve" a country as countless Western countries have proved. Say goodbye to USA military force those countries depend on yo cover their ass. Yeah, let's give everything to China, sounds about right. There has been a recent trend of rising homelessness in England. Over the 2016/17 period, 59,110 people were considered homeless, this is a 9% increase over the 2014/15 numbers. Homelessness among vulnerable groups has also increased by 75% since 2010 (Shelter, 2019).
On any given night, there are 4,000 people sleeping rough (Shelter, 2019). Households in temporary accommodation has risen from 48,330 in 2011 to 78,170 in 2017 (EOH, 2018). 57% of private renters say they struggle to cover housing costs (Shelter, 2019).
There is no official strategy for gathering information on homelessness in Greece. The UN Human Rights Council reports 21,216 people as homeless (FEANTSA, 2017).
Currently 34.8% of the population, 3.7 million people, are considered to be living below the poverty line (Kathimerini, 2018). The country also has the highest level of unemployment in Europe at 18.5% (Eurostat, 2019) .
Since the start of the financial crisis evictions have risen by nearly 70%.
You could move to Cuba???????????????
They should not be satisfied with government handoutsAs long as the poor in the greatest nation on earth are better off than people in the 3rd world, they should be happy?
I'll give it a go.The left loves stimulus, so long as it's driven by dementia instead of the orange man.
But the left hates trickle down. In their minds the more you take from employers the more likely employees are to get a raise. Let's call it what it is instead, they desire govt. entitlements, because that's the only other direction, and that starves a country under socialism. But the PROGS talk anyway, they do that a lot. In PROG, the less money you make the better car you drive, debt & bad decisions are personal too.
Trickle down economics is just a term. For those who think rationally it's really up & down, an exchange of money ongoing. If that shit don't work, then explain why economic stimulus is different, go!
You are conflating 2 different things.
Economic stimulis is giving money to people or businesses who qualify for it by a predetermined set of standards.
Trickle down economics is the idea that as profit increases so do wages of those employed.
The first is predictable and easily quantified in its outcome. The second is a philosophy that is neither.
As to your first paragraph.
Yes, we want more entitlements. The reason being that unlike trickledown economics the available funds are guaranteed to help the employed and... yes also the unemployed and other people in need. It doesn't "starve" a country as countless Western countries have proved. It leads to a higher standard of living and more happiness of the populace on the whole.
Economic stimulis is giving money to people or businesses who qualify for it by a predetermined set of standards. Same applies to all economic conditions, established standards. The only difference is the govt. is spreading the money generating public debt with among other things hope to generate growth. Or if PROG language because "people are hurting".
Trickle down economics is the idea that as profit increases so do wages of those employed. Again, it's up and down, down causes up, back down again etc. etc. The idea for stimulus is exactly the same.
The first is predictable and easily quantified in its outcome. No shit predictable huh? Then why all the hiring signs? Under O'bummer we had stimulus while O'bummercare stagnated growth and raised taxes. It was predictable alright, the money went into govt. programs for O'bummercare, ask me how I know, govt. buildings, ask me how I know, and govt. infrastructure where a days work took weeks ask me how I know, and giant steel animals they call art ask me how I know.
The second is a philosophy that is neither. Reflecting on the OP, since trickle down is just a philosophy then it's safe to say you're more likely to receive a raise if the govt. takes more money.
As to your first paragraph.
Yes, we want more entitlements. The reason being that unlike trickledown economics the available funds are guaranteed to help the employed and... yes also the unemployed and other people in need.
It doesn't "starve" a country as countless Western countries have proved. Say goodbye to USA military force those countries depend on yo cover their ass. Yeah, let's give everything to China, sounds about right. There has been a recent trend of rising homelessness in England. Over the 2016/17 period, 59,110 people were considered homeless, this is a 9% increase over the 2014/15 numbers. Homelessness among vulnerable groups has also increased by 75% since 2010 (Shelter, 2019).
On any given night, there are 4,000 people sleeping rough (Shelter, 2019). Households in temporary accommodation has risen from 48,330 in 2011 to 78,170 in 2017 (EOH, 2018). 57% of private renters say they struggle to cover housing costs (Shelter, 2019).
There is no official strategy for gathering information on homelessness in Greece. The UN Human Rights Council reports 21,216 people as homeless (FEANTSA, 2017).
Currently 34.8% of the population, 3.7 million people, are considered to be living below the poverty line (Kathimerini, 2018). The country also has the highest level of unemployment in Europe at 18.5% (Eurostat, 2019) .
Since the start of the financial crisis evictions have risen by nearly 70%.
You could move to Cuba???????????????
Why are you quoting a British study on Housing to discuss American economics? The "Shelter, 2019" link is to a UK study, "FEANTSA, 2017" is an study on homelessness in Greece.
This is stand with idiots on the right. Instead of looking at successful countries, like Norway, Canada, or New Zealand, you look at failed democracies like Greece.
If Republicans continue to under mine Democracy in the USA, and continue on the path to a white nationalist authoritarian dictatorship, you most likely will end up like Greece or Argentina, since Republican economic policies already have you well along that path right now.
But for now, let's look at what's happening in the USA under YOUR current tax codes and stop listening to bullshit about Greece.
No one has to be poor for longIn our system some people have to be poor.
Capitalism creates wealth
and the poor in America have more wealth than people in some dysfunctional countries in the 3rd world
But admittedly workers who lost their job because the evil globalists gave it away to china are no longer as well off as they used to be
And the person who drops out of school and begins selling drugs or sucking off welfare is not as wealthy as those who avoid those mistakes
So there is wealth disparity
But it is our own policy decisions that are hurting us rather than capitalism
You mean government handouts like free primary education?They should not be satisfied with government handouts
Which is the America that Democrats want to create for them
... and avoids stupid personal decisions like unwed pregnancies ...
You mean government handouts like free primary education?They should not be satisfied with government handouts
Which is the America that Democrats want to create for them
There's nothing wrong with foreign opinions. But he was applying what happened in a foreign country, and claiming the same held here.Yep, bet you hate it when foreigners opinions are given...dumbass.
They should not be satisfied with government handoutsAs long as the poor in the greatest nation on earth are better off than people in the 3rd world, they should be happy?
Which is the America that Democrats want to create for them
No one who works hard, gets an education, and avoids stupid personal decisions like unwed pregnancies or criminal behavior remains poor for long
There's nothing wrong with foreign opinions. But he was applying what happened in a foreign country, and claiming the same held here.Yep, bet you hate it when foreigners opinions are given...dumbass.
I think you mean primary miseducation. Private runs everything better.
