If this isn't collusion what would you call it?

[berg80]

"A former top Trump campaign official on Tuesday testified that President Donald Trump talked to political trickster Roger Stone about WikiLeaks during the 2016 campaign.

That testimony by Rick Gates at Stone’s trial contrasts with Trump’s claim last November that he did not recall speaking to Stone about WikiLeaks, the document disclosure group that during the 2016 campaign released emails stolen from the Democratic Party and Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton’s own campaign chief.

Gates testified in U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C., that less than a minute after finishing a July 2016 call from Stone, Trump indicated that “more information would be coming” from Wikileaks."

Trump talked to Roger Stone about WikiLeaks, Rick Gates says in testimony contradicting the president

Trump had told special counsel Robert Mueller last November in a written response, "I do not recall discussing WikiLeaks with" Roger Stone.

www.cnbc.com

............................................................................................................................
"Federal campaign finance law prohibits a candidate campaign committee from coordinating with a foreign national on any expenditure made by the foreign national for the purpose of influencing a U.S. election. More specifically, federal law treats an expenditure made in coordination with a candidate as a “contribution” to such candidate. Foreign nationals are prohibited from making contributions to U.S. candidates, and U.S. candidates are prohibited from receiving contributions from foreign nationals. “Coordinated” is defined in the law to mean “in cooperation, consultation, or concert with, or at the request or suggestion of a candidate, his authorized political committee, or their agents.” Papadopoulos was an agent of the Trump campaign. If any Russian made any expenditure to disseminate the stolen emails for the purpose of influencing the 2016 presidential election, and did so in cooperation or consultation with or at the request or suggestion of Papadopoulos, then both the Russian and the Trump campaign violated federal law."

Gates contradiction of President Trump while under oath, sounds like a open-shut case of perjury against Gates. The Fact that Rick Gates is an ADMITTED liar who confessed in open court to spewing falsehoods means that he really can't be believed in this.

Gates contradiction of President Trump while under oath, sounds like a open-shut case of perjury against Trump.

 

[Oddball]

March 21, 2016. Russian hackers from the GRU gain access to Podesta’s account and steal over 50,000 emails.

Fake nooz.

There is absolutely NO evidence that RUSSIA! hacked the DNC server...This is a matter of sworn testimony from Shawn Henry.

If you were Trump, and you couldn't disprove these facts, what would you do?

Create a lot of smoke around Misfud. Accuse him of being a member of a western intel service. Make up a fiction that Podesta wasn't hacked by the Russians.

IOW, fabricate a lot of horseshit around a fairly straightforward, factual story to confuse the weak minded rubes who adore you.

So you know all, and the sworn testimony of the President of CrowdStrike is bullshit.

Gotcha.

 

[Polishprince]

March 21, 2016. Russian hackers from the GRU gain access to Podesta’s account and steal over 50,000 emails.

There is no proof of that at all. First of all, it wasn't a "hacking" at all, it was "phishing" as trained intelligence chief Podesta used the word "Password" as his password and they guessed.

Second off, we don't know if it was Russians or not. The Russian Federation denies it, the FBI was refused access to the DNC computer to figure it out, and most knowledgable people think it was a whistleblower in the DNC itself, not the Russians who did it.

 

[Polishprince]

"A former top Trump campaign official on Tuesday testified that President Donald Trump talked to political trickster Roger Stone about WikiLeaks during the 2016 campaign.

That testimony by Rick Gates at Stone’s trial contrasts with Trump’s claim last November that he did not recall speaking to Stone about WikiLeaks, the document disclosure group that during the 2016 campaign released emails stolen from the Democratic Party and Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton’s own campaign chief.

Gates testified in U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C., that less than a minute after finishing a July 2016 call from Stone, Trump indicated that “more information would be coming” from Wikileaks."

Trump talked to Roger Stone about WikiLeaks, Rick Gates says in testimony contradicting the president

Trump had told special counsel Robert Mueller last November in a written response, "I do not recall discussing WikiLeaks with" Roger Stone.

www.cnbc.com

............................................................................................................................
"Federal campaign finance law prohibits a candidate campaign committee from coordinating with a foreign national on any expenditure made by the foreign national for the purpose of influencing a U.S. election. More specifically, federal law treats an expenditure made in coordination with a candidate as a “contribution” to such candidate. Foreign nationals are prohibited from making contributions to U.S. candidates, and U.S. candidates are prohibited from receiving contributions from foreign nationals. “Coordinated” is defined in the law to mean “in cooperation, consultation, or concert with, or at the request or suggestion of a candidate, his authorized political committee, or their agents.” Papadopoulos was an agent of the Trump campaign. If any Russian made any expenditure to disseminate the stolen emails for the purpose of influencing the 2016 presidential election, and did so in cooperation or consultation with or at the request or suggestion of Papadopoulos, then both the Russian and the Trump campaign violated federal law."

Gates contradiction of President Trump while under oath, sounds like a open-shut case of perjury against Gates. The Fact that Rick Gates is an ADMITTED liar who confessed in open court to spewing falsehoods means that he really can't be believed in this.

Gates contradiction of President Trump while under oath, sounds like a open-shut case of perjury against Trump.

Gates is the ADMITTED, CONVICTED liar. Not President Trump.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

If the corrupt FBI had anything at all on Papadopolous he would have gotten more than ten days for misremembering a date.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

There is absolutely NO evidence that RUSSIA! hacked the DNC server...This is a matter of sworn testimony from Shawn Henry

That is a total lie and not what he said. You are one gullible little goober.

 

[Oddball]

March 21, 2016. Russian hackers from the GRU gain access to Podesta’s account and steal over 50,000 emails.

There is no proof of that at all. First of all, it wasn't a "hacking" at all, it was "phishing" as trained intelligence chief Podesta used the word "Password" as his password and they guessed.

Second off, we don't know if it was Russians or not. The Russian Federation denies it, the FBI was refused access to the DNC computer to figure it out, and most knowledgable people think it was a whistleblower in the DNC itself, not the Russians who did it.

Sworn testimony from the President of CrowdStrike, which our little jooboi is required to completely ignore in order to make his tin foil hat RUSSIA! conspiracy theory fly.

Lawless Arizona Governor Katie Hobbs Vetoes Bill to Require Proof of Residency for Voting

Arizona Governor Katie Hobbs on Tuesday vetoed legislation that would define residency in Arizona and require proof of residency, such as a home rental agreement or ownership, to vote in the state’s elections. Hobbs stole the 2022 election for Governor from Kari Lake, and she is getting ready to...

ussanews.com

 

[Oddball]

There is absolutely NO evidence that RUSSIA! hacked the DNC server...This is a matter of sworn testimony from Shawn Henry

That is a total lie and not what he said. You are one gullible little goober.

You're even more full of shit than jooboi, and that's no mean feat.

Henry reiterated his claim on multiple occasions:

• “There are times when we can see data exfiltrated, and we can say conclusively. But in this case it appears it was set up to be exfiltrated, but we just don’t have the evidence that says it actually left.”
• “There’s not evidence that they were actually exfiltrated. There’s circumstantial evidence but no evidence that they were actually exfiltrated.”
• “There is circumstantial evidence that that data was exfiltrated off the network… We didn’t have a sensor in place that saw data leave. We said that the data left based on the circumstantial evidence. That was the conclusion that we made.”
• “Sir, I was just trying to be factually accurate, that we didn’t see the data leave, but we believe it left, based on what we saw.”
• Asked directly if he could “unequivocally say” whether “it was or was not exfiltrated out of DNC,” Henry told the committee: “I can’t say based on that.”

Lawless Arizona Governor Katie Hobbs Vetoes Bill to Require Proof of Residency for Voting

Arizona Governor Katie Hobbs on Tuesday vetoed legislation that would define residency in Arizona and require proof of residency, such as a home rental agreement or ownership, to vote in the state’s elections. Hobbs stole the 2022 election for Governor from Kari Lake, and she is getting ready to...

ussanews.com

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

March 21, 2016. Russian hackers from the GRU gain access to Podesta’s account and steal over 50,000 emails.

There is no proof of that at all. First of all, it wasn't a "hacking" at all, it was "phishing" as trained intelligence chief Podesta used the word "Password" as his password and they guessed.

Second off, we don't know if it was Russians or not. The Russian Federation denies it, the FBI was refused access to the DNC computer to figure it out, and most knowledgable people think it was a whistleblower in the DNC itself, not the Russians who did it.

Sworn testimony from the President of CrowdStrike, which our little jooboi is required to completely ignore in order to make his tin foil hat RUSSIA! conspiracy theory fly.

Lawless Arizona Governor Katie Hobbs Vetoes Bill to Require Proof of Residency for Voting

Arizona Governor Katie Hobbs on Tuesday vetoed legislation that would define residency in Arizona and require proof of residency, such as a home rental agreement or ownership, to vote in the state’s elections. Hobbs stole the 2022 election for Governor from Kari Lake, and she is getting ready to...

ussanews.com

Sorry, he did not testify that russians did not hack the server, or that there was no evidence they hacked the server. You are being fooled by people paid to fool gullible people like you.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

There is absolutely NO evidence that RUSSIA! hacked the DNC server...This is a matter of sworn testimony from Shawn Henry

That is a total lie and not what he said. You are one gullible little goober.

You're even more full of shit than jooboi, and that's no mean feat.

Henry reiterated his claim on multiple occasions:

• “There are times when we can see data exfiltrated, and we can say conclusively. But in this case it appears it was set up to be exfiltrated, but we just don’t have the evidence that says it actually left.”
• “There’s not evidence that they were actually exfiltrated. There’s circumstantial evidence but no evidence that they were actually exfiltrated.”
• “There is circumstantial evidence that that data was exfiltrated off the network… We didn’t have a sensor in place that saw data leave. We said that the data left based on the circumstantial evidence. That was the conclusion that we made.”
• “Sir, I was just trying to be factually accurate, that we didn’t see the data leave, but we believe it left, based on what we saw.”
• Asked directlpaid he could “unequivocally say” whether “it was or was not exfiltrated out of DNC,” Henry told the committee: “I can’t say based on that.”

Lawless Arizona Governor Katie Hobbs Vetoes Bill to Require Proof of Residency for Voting

Arizona Governor Katie Hobbs on Tuesday vetoed legislation that would define residency in Arizona and require proof of residency, such as a home rental agreement or ownership, to vote in the state’s elections. Hobbs stole the 2022 election for Governor from Kari Lake, and she is getting ready to...

ussanews.com

You dumbass...what he said was that the russians definitely hacked the server, but that there was not a monitor in place to track the data being taken off the server. He also testified that all the circumstantial evidence leads him to believe they did take the data. Not least of which is the fact that the data was leaked by another party known to be interacting with a russian hacker who claimed to have that very data.

 

[berg80]

There is no proof of that at all. First of all, it wasn't a "hacking" at all, it was "phishing" as trained intelligence chief Podesta used the word "Password" as his password and they guessed.

Second off, we don't know if it was Russians or not.

It's a semantic distinction without a material difference. Around 50K e-mails were illegally stolen. There is no credible case being made by anyone it wasn't the Russians who did the phishing. None.

But there is a lot of shit being thrown on the wall by Trump acolytes trying to cast doubt on what is known for an absolute certainty.

Ask yourself, why would Billy the Bagman so blatantly misrepresent Mueller's findings? Answer: to give Trump supporters to discredit anything and everything that was in the report. Including positive, unambiguous forensic evidence it was Russia behind the phishing and the hacking as well as Russia giving the material to Wikileaks for dissemination.

 

[berg80]

There is absolutely NO evidence that RUSSIA! hacked the DNC server...This is a matter of sworn testimony from Shawn Henry

That is a total lie and not what he said. You are one gullible little goober.

You're even more full of shit than jooboi, and that's no mean feat.

Henry reiterated his claim on multiple occasions:

• “There are times when we can see data exfiltrated, and we can say conclusively. But in this case it appears it was set up to be exfiltrated, but we just don’t have the evidence that says it actually left.”
• “There’s not evidence that they were actually exfiltrated. There’s circumstantial evidence but no evidence that they were actually exfiltrated.”
• “There is circumstantial evidence that that data was exfiltrated off the network… We didn’t have a sensor in place that saw data leave. We said that the data left based on the circumstantial evidence. That was the conclusion that we made.”
• “Sir, I was just trying to be factually accurate, that we didn’t see the data leave, but we believe it left, based on what we saw.”
• Asked directly if he could “unequivocally say” whether “it was or was not exfiltrated out of DNC,” Henry told the committee: “I can’t say based on that.”

Lawless Arizona Governor Katie Hobbs Vetoes Bill to Require Proof of Residency for Voting

Arizona Governor Katie Hobbs on Tuesday vetoed legislation that would define residency in Arizona and require proof of residency, such as a home rental agreement or ownership, to vote in the state’s elections. Hobbs stole the 2022 election for Governor from Kari Lake, and she is getting ready to...

ussanews.com

Our Work with the DNC: Setting the record straight

Get the key facts about CrowdStrike's work with the Democratic Natiional Committee in 2016 and debunk the false claims that have been made about our work.

www.crowdstrike.com

 

[Oddball]

There is absolutely NO evidence that RUSSIA! hacked the DNC server...This is a matter of sworn testimony from Shawn Henry

That is a total lie and not what he said. You are one gullible little goober.

You're even more full of shit than jooboi, and that's no mean feat.

Henry reiterated his claim on multiple occasions:

• “There are times when we can see data exfiltrated, and we can say conclusively. But in this case it appears it was set up to be exfiltrated, but we just don’t have the evidence that says it actually left.”
• “There’s not evidence that they were actually exfiltrated. There’s circumstantial evidence but no evidence that they were actually exfiltrated.”
• “There is circumstantial evidence that that data was exfiltrated off the network… We didn’t have a sensor in place that saw data leave. We said that the data left based on the circumstantial evidence. That was the conclusion that we made.”
• “Sir, I was just trying to be factually accurate, that we didn’t see the data leave, but we believe it left, based on what we saw.”
• Asked directly if he could “unequivocally say” whether “it was or was not exfiltrated out of DNC,” Henry told the committee: “I can’t say based on that.”

Lawless Arizona Governor Katie Hobbs Vetoes Bill to Require Proof of Residency for Voting

Arizona Governor Katie Hobbs on Tuesday vetoed legislation that would define residency in Arizona and require proof of residency, such as a home rental agreement or ownership, to vote in the state’s elections. Hobbs stole the 2022 election for Governor from Kari Lake, and she is getting ready to...

ussanews.com

Our Work with the DNC: Setting the record straight

Get the key facts about CrowdStrike's work with the Democratic Natiional Committee in 2016 and debunk the false claims that have been made about our work.

www.crowdstrike.com

Was that disinformation under oath and put into the public record?

Nope.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

So lets review the trump cult talking point:

The president of crowd strike is an expert, until he says that he believes the russians did exfiltrate the data. Then he is a deep state operative under threat by the clintons.

Just another day at the nuthouse....

 

[berg80]

Gates is the ADMITTED, CONVICTED liar. Not President Trump.

The only difference between the two is Trump has not been held accountable for his lies and crimes...................yet.

 

[berg80]

So lets review the trump cult talking point:

The president of crowd strike is an expert, until he says that he believes the russians did exfiltrate the data. Then he is a deep state operative under threat by the clintons.

Just another day at the nuthouse....

They make it up as they go.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

They make it up as they go.

Hell no they dont. Oddball , for example, doesnt have the depth or wit required to make any of this up. He simply looks for agreeable headlines and regurgitates them like a vegetable with echolalia.

 

[Marion Morrison]

This OP absolutely reeks of Eau de Desparación.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

This OP absolutely reeks of Eau de Desparación.

* as he desperately avoids the topic

 

[berg80]

Was that disinformation under oath and put into the public record?

Those are facts that have not been credibly refuted.