Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Should the Major General be disciplined?I wonder if Panetta's personal security guards were also disarmed? Either way, this is shameful, IMO.
The order for the Marines to put down their weapons came from Major Gen. Mark Gurganus, according to a press pool report.Should the Major General be disciplined?I wonder if Panetta's personal security guards were also disarmed? Either way, this is shameful, IMO.
Anyone that would seek to disarm Marines in a war zone should be disciplined.
I'd like to say I'm shocked but nothing surprises me about the Obama's Administrations outright contempt and hatred for our culture and institutions
Afghan guards in the room, along with other foreign troops, were also unarmed during Panetta's address. A defense official told reporters there was no heightened threat, but that the order to disarm was done to be "consistent" so that Americans troops wouldn't be the only ones carrying weapons. The request reportedly did not come from Panetta or his team.
The order for the Marines to put down their weapons came from Major Gen. Mark Gurganus, according to a press pool report.
Gurganus said that since the Afghan soldiers were unarmed, he did not want them treated differently, but said it was not because of the shooting this weekend
here is one moron
The order for the Marines to put down their weapons came from Major Gen. Mark Gurganus, according to a press pool report.Should the Major General be disciplined?
Anyone that would seek to disarm Marines in a war zone should be disciplined.
*****************************************************
Tell that to MAJOR GEN. Gurganus.
If it's true that Leon Panetta had Marines disarm before being in a room with him, he should resign.
You don't put your desire for personal safety above the honor of the United States Marine Corp.
Story to come, I'm sure.
WH admin.
Afghan guards in the room, along with other foreign troops, were also unarmed during Panetta's address. A defense official told reporters there was no heightened threat, but that the order to disarm was done to be "consistent" so that Americans troops wouldn't be the only ones carrying weapons. The request reportedly did not come from Panetta or his team.
The order for the Marines to put down their weapons came from Major Gen. Mark Gurganus, according to a press pool report.
Gurganus said that since the Afghan soldiers were unarmed, he did not want them treated differently, but said it was not because of the shooting this weekend
4
General Gurganus told reporters later that he wanted a consistent policy for everyone in the tent. “You’ve got one of the most important people in the world in the room,” he said. He insisted that his decision had nothing to do with the shooting on Sunday. “This is not a big deal,” he said.
WH admin.
Afghan guards in the room, along with other foreign troops, were also unarmed during Panetta's address. A defense official told reporters there was no heightened threat, but that the order to disarm was done to be "consistent" so that Americans troops wouldn't be the only ones carrying weapons. The request reportedly did not come from Panetta or his team.
The order for the Marines to put down their weapons came from Major Gen. Mark Gurganus, according to a press pool report.
Gurganus said that since the Afghan soldiers were unarmed, he did not want them treated differently, but said it was not because of the shooting this weekend
4
That's right. We wouldn't want to treat AMERICAN MARINES different from Afghanis.
When a situation is flammable that's when Marines should be armed.
Fuck the General. What a dumbass.
Afghan guards in the room, along with other foreign troops, were also unarmed during Panetta's address. A defense official told reporters there was no heightened threat, but that the order to disarm was done to be "consistent" so that Americans troops wouldn't be the only ones carrying weapons. The request reportedly did not come from Panetta or his team.
The order for the Marines to put down their weapons came from Major Gen. Mark Gurganus, according to a press pool report.
Gurganus said that since the Afghan soldiers were unarmed, he did not want them treated differently, but said it was not because of the shooting this weekend
here is one moron
And this never happened until the Obama's Jihad on American culture and institutions came to town, Fluffer
I'm sure it never happened until Obama came into office.
You truly are a stupid fuck.
Does anyone read anything? From KG's link:
General Gurganus told reporters later that he wanted a consistent policy for everyone in the tent. Youve got one of the most important people in the world in the room, he said. He insisted that his decision had nothing to do with the shooting on Sunday. This is not a big deal, he said.
They had disarmed the afghans who were in the room and wanted everyone treated the same so as not to inflame an already inflammatory situation. It wasn't Panetta who requested this, it ws the General.
Afghan guards in the room, along with other foreign troops, were also unarmed during Panetta's address. A defense official told reporters there was no heightened threat, but that the order to disarm was done to be "consistent" so that Americans troops wouldn't be the only ones carrying weapons. The request reportedly did not come from Panetta or his team.
The order for the Marines to put down their weapons came from Major Gen. Mark Gurganus, according to a press pool report.
Gurganus said that since the Afghan soldiers were unarmed, he did not want them treated differently, but said it was not because of the shooting this weekend
.
4
That's right. We wouldn't want to treat AMERICAN MARINES different from Afghanis.
in this particular situation, no... you wouldn't. the point of the visit was to try to work out a problem.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/15/world/asia/panetta-visits-afghanistan-following-massacre.htmlDoes anyone read anything? From KG's link:
General Gurganus told reporters later that he wanted a consistent policy for everyone in the tent. Youve got one of the most important people in the world in the room, he said. He insisted that his decision had nothing to do with the shooting on Sunday. This is not a big deal, he said.
They had disarmed the afghans who were in the room and wanted everyone treated the same so as not to inflame an already inflammatory situation. It wasn't Panetta who requested this, it ws the General.
Sure, it was. Sure it was.
And if the General told you wolverines made great house pets you'd believe him too, right?
That's right. We wouldn't want to treat AMERICAN MARINES different from Afghanis.
in this particular situation, no... you wouldn't. the point of the visit was to try to work out a problem.
And this is why people like KG don't run policy and never would be able to become a general in the first place.
Afghan guards in the room, along with other foreign troops, were also unarmed during Panetta's address. A defense official told reporters there was no heightened threat, but that the order to disarm was done to be "consistent" so that Americans troops wouldn't be the only ones carrying weapons. The request reportedly did not come from Panetta or his team.
The order for the Marines to put down their weapons came from Major Gen. Mark Gurganus, according to a press pool report.
Gurganus said that since the Afghan soldiers were unarmed, he did not want them treated differently, but said it was not because of the shooting this weekend
here is one moron
And this never happened until the Obama's Jihad on American culture and institutions came to town, Fluffer
I'm sure it never happened until Obama came into office.
You truly are a stupid fuck.