If the economy slides, how much blame would fall on a Democrat house?

[Ray From Cleveland]

The first year of Trump's presidency, it was pretty much just coasting on what Obama had gotten started

Yes, Obama, the guy that told us those jobs were not coming back, that Trump must think he had a magic wand to make that happen. And now that Trump did, Obama wants to take the credit.

 

[TheDude]

Some history most don't recognize. I guess "they" (media and voters) figure the POTUS controls everything (i.e. simpletons).


During Clinton's best economic years, the Republicans had the majority in the Senate and House.

During Bush's best economic years, the Republicans had the majority in the Senate and House.

During Bush's worst economic years, the Democrats had the majority in the Senate and House.

During Obama's worst economic years, the Democrats had the majority in the Senate and House.

During Obama's best economic years, the Democrats initially had the majority in the Senate, but the Republicans had taken the House. Matter of fact, we didn't experience any economic improvement until after the Reps. took the House......The economy then showed much improvement after the Republicans took the Senate majority as well.

Under Trump the Republicans had the majority in the House and Senate, and the economy was outstanding.

Interesting right? But of course the Democrats won the majority in the House, just because. So, if the economy is to enter a recession, would a Democrat house be the cause or part?

Hold the fucking phone. Under democrat rule in 2009, the recession Obama inherited ended and a string of job growth has occurred ever since.

LOL..........Billy change your avatar to something reflective, PLEASE. Something to the effect of uninformed, foolish, ignorant, cowardly and spastic.

Compare Today's Unemployment with the Past

 

[g5000]

Some history most don't recognize. I guess "they" (media and voters) figure the POTUS controls everything (i.e. simpletons).


During Clinton's best economic years, the Republicans had the majority in the Senate and House.

During Bush's best economic years, the Republicans had the majority in the Senate and House.

During Bush's worst economic years, the Democrats had the majority in the Senate and House.

During Obama's worst economic years, the Democrats had the majority in the Senate and House.

During Obama's best economic years, the Democrats initially had the majority in the Senate, but the Republicans had taken the House. Matter of fact, we didn't experience any economic improvement until after the Reps. took the House......The economy then showed much improvement after the Republicans took the Senate majority as well.

Under Trump the Republicans had the majority in the House and Senate, and the economy was outstanding.

Interesting right? But of course the Democrats won the majority in the House, just because. So, if the economy is to enter a recession, would a Democrat house be the cause or part?

Hold the fucking phone. Under democrat rule in 2009, the recession Obama inherited ended and a string of job growth has occurred ever since.

The market started rebounding in 2010 when it became obvious Republicans were going to retake the House.

BWA-HA-HA-HA-HA!

Why do you think you can make shit up and other people will eat it?

The market started rebounding in April 2009, retard. A few months after Obama took office.

So put that shit back up your ass whence you pulled it.

Christ, the balls on you tards! Your desperation reeks.

 

[percysunshine]

"If the economy slides, how much blame would fall on a Democrat house?"

Teflon protection. Pam spray....blame slides off all sticky surfaces ...

 

[TheDude]

Some history most don't recognize. I guess "they" (media and voters) figure the POTUS controls everything (i.e. simpletons).


During Clinton's best economic years, the Republicans had the majority in the Senate and House.

During Bush's best economic years, the Republicans had the majority in the Senate and House.

During Bush's worst economic years, the Democrats had the majority in the Senate and House.

During Obama's worst economic years, the Democrats had the majority in the Senate and House.

During Obama's best economic years, the Democrats initially had the majority in the Senate, but the Republicans had taken the House. Matter of fact, we didn't experience any economic improvement until after the Reps. took the House......The economy then showed much improvement after the Republicans took the Senate majority as well.

Under Trump the Republicans had the majority in the House and Senate, and the economy was outstanding.

Interesting right? But of course the Democrats won the majority in the House, just because. So, if the economy is to enter a recession, would a Democrat house be the cause or part?

Hold the fucking phone. Under democrat rule in 2009, the recession Obama inherited ended and a string of job growth has occurred ever since.

The market started rebounding in 2010 when it became obvious Republicans were going to retake the House.

BWA-HA-HA-HA-HA!

Why do you think you can make shit up and other people will eat it?

The market started rebounding in April 2009, retard. A few months after Obama took office.

So put that shit back up your ass whence you pulled it.

Christ, the balls on you tards! Your desperation reeks.

You should read the link I posted above. You talk a lot G5000, a real champion. You should consider running for office, San Francisco is a good fit for you, pun intended. Just tell them you're an angry turn-gender, be honest................for a change.

 

[g5000]

Some history most don't recognize. I guess "they" (media and voters) figure the POTUS controls everything (i.e. simpletons).


During Clinton's best economic years, the Republicans had the majority in the Senate and House.

During Bush's best economic years, the Republicans had the majority in the Senate and House.

During Bush's worst economic years, the Democrats had the majority in the Senate and House.

During Obama's worst economic years, the Democrats had the majority in the Senate and House.

During Obama's best economic years, the Democrats initially had the majority in the Senate, but the Republicans had taken the House. Matter of fact, we didn't experience any economic improvement until after the Reps. took the House......The economy then showed much improvement after the Republicans took the Senate majority as well.

Under Trump the Republicans had the majority in the House and Senate, and the economy was outstanding.

Interesting right? But of course the Democrats won the majority in the House, just because. So, if the economy is to enter a recession, would a Democrat house be the cause or part?

Hold the fucking phone. Under democrat rule in 2009, the recession Obama inherited ended and a string of job growth has occurred ever since.

LOL..........Billy change your avatar to something reflective, PLEASE. Something to the effect of uninformed, foolish, ignorant, cowardly and spastic.

Compare Today's Unemployment with the Past

Trump has yet to match the job growth of Obama's last five years. So the current unemployment was built mostly on the Obama years.

Trump is coasting on the hard work of his predecessor, and outspending him.

Take Obama's biggest budget.

Add one trillion dollars.

That's Trump.

 

[g5000]

Trump can't even match Obama's best quarterly GDP, even though he is juicing the GDP by massively increasing government spending.

Gross Domestic Product - GDP

GDP = C + G + I + NX. C is equal to all private consumption, or consumer spending, in a nation's economy, G is the sum of government spending, I is the sum of all the country's investment, including businesses capital expenditures and NX is the nation's total net exports, calculated as total exports minus total imports (NX = Exports - Imports).


Take Obama's biggest budget.

Add one trillion dollars.

That's Trump.

 

[TheDude]

Some history most don't recognize. I guess "they" (media and voters) figure the POTUS controls everything (i.e. simpletons).


During Clinton's best economic years, the Republicans had the majority in the Senate and House.

During Bush's best economic years, the Republicans had the majority in the Senate and House.

During Bush's worst economic years, the Democrats had the majority in the Senate and House.

During Obama's worst economic years, the Democrats had the majority in the Senate and House.

During Obama's best economic years, the Democrats initially had the majority in the Senate, but the Republicans had taken the House. Matter of fact, we didn't experience any economic improvement until after the Reps. took the House......The economy then showed much improvement after the Republicans took the Senate majority as well.

Under Trump the Republicans had the majority in the House and Senate, and the economy was outstanding.

Interesting right? But of course the Democrats won the majority in the House, just because. So, if the economy is to enter a recession, would a Democrat house be the cause or part?

Hold the fucking phone. Under democrat rule in 2009, the recession Obama inherited ended and a string of job growth has occurred ever since.

LOL..........Billy change your avatar to something reflective, PLEASE. Something to the effect of uninformed, foolish, ignorant, cowardly and spastic.

Compare Today's Unemployment with the Past

Trump has yet to match the job growth of Obama's last five years. So the current unemployment was built mostly on the Obama years.

Trump is coasting on the hard work of his predecessor, and outspending him.

Take Obama's biggest budget.

Add one trillion dollars.

That's Trump.

That's ONLY because you're stupid, intellectually dishonest and a liar.

 

[g5000]

The parroting rubes have prostrated themselves at the feet of one of the worst evil hucksters in history.

They have compromised every last one of the principles they claimed to hold, and now Trump has exposed them for the empty shells they really are.

 

[g5000]

Some history most don't recognize. I guess "they" (media and voters) figure the POTUS controls everything (i.e. simpletons).


During Clinton's best economic years, the Republicans had the majority in the Senate and House.

During Bush's best economic years, the Republicans had the majority in the Senate and House.

During Bush's worst economic years, the Democrats had the majority in the Senate and House.

During Obama's worst economic years, the Democrats had the majority in the Senate and House.

During Obama's best economic years, the Democrats initially had the majority in the Senate, but the Republicans had taken the House. Matter of fact, we didn't experience any economic improvement until after the Reps. took the House......The economy then showed much improvement after the Republicans took the Senate majority as well.

Under Trump the Republicans had the majority in the House and Senate, and the economy was outstanding.

Interesting right? But of course the Democrats won the majority in the House, just because. So, if the economy is to enter a recession, would a Democrat house be the cause or part?

Hold the fucking phone. Under democrat rule in 2009, the recession Obama inherited ended and a string of job growth has occurred ever since.

LOL..........Billy change your avatar to something reflective, PLEASE. Something to the effect of uninformed, foolish, ignorant, cowardly and spastic.

Compare Today's Unemployment with the Past

Trump has yet to match the job growth of Obama's last five years. So the current unemployment was built mostly on the Obama years.

Trump is coasting on the hard work of his predecessor, and outspending him.

Take Obama's biggest budget.

Add one trillion dollars.

That's Trump.

That's ONLY because you're stupid, intellectually dishonest and a liar.

Ispe dixit.

You can't dispute the facts, rube.

You are all endangering your sanity by desperately clinging to the delusions programmed into you by your propagandists.

 

[danielpalos]

"If the economy slides, how much blame would fall on a Democrat house?"

Teflon protection. Pam spray....blame slides off all sticky surfaces ...

real economists already predicted, tax cut economics really are worthless under any form of capitalism.

 

[percysunshine]

"If the economy slides, how much blame would fall on a Democrat house?"

Teflon protection. Pam spray....blame slides off all sticky surfaces ...

real economists already predicted, tax cut economics really are worthless under any form of capitalism.

Well...if we banish all forms of capitalism...who needs a tax cut?

 

[g5000]

"If the economy slides, how much blame would fall on a Democrat house?"

Teflon protection. Pam spray....blame slides off all sticky surfaces ...

real economists already predicted, tax cut economics really are worthless under any form of capitalism.

Well...if we banish all forms of capitalism...who needs a tax cut?

I'd rather banish all forms of cronyism, such as tax expenditures. But that's another story.

 

[TheDude]

The parroting rubes have prostrated themselves at the feet of one of the worst evil hucksters in history.

They have compromised every last one of the principles they claimed to hold, and now Trump has exposed them for the empty shells they really are.

Translated to mean the OP and data makes a turn-gender especially angry.

 

[danielpalos]

"If the economy slides, how much blame would fall on a Democrat house?"

Teflon protection. Pam spray....blame slides off all sticky surfaces ...

real economists already predicted, tax cut economics really are worthless under any form of capitalism.

Well...if we banish all forms of capitalism...who needs a tax cut?

comp. time.

 

[william the wie]

When the Blue states go into default a lot of energy resources will come online like the Santa Barbara field and the Marcellus field for NY.

 

[The Banker]

Some history most don't recognize. I guess "they" (media and voters) figure the POTUS controls everything (i.e. simpletons).


During Clinton's best economic years, the Republicans had the majority in the Senate and House.

During Bush's best economic years, the Republicans had the majority in the Senate and House.

During Bush's worst economic years, the Democrats had the majority in the Senate and House.

During Obama's worst economic years, the Democrats had the majority in the Senate and House.

During Obama's best economic years, the Democrats initially had the majority in the Senate, but the Republicans had taken the House. Matter of fact, we didn't experience any economic improvement until after the Reps. took the House......The economy then showed much improvement after the Republicans took the Senate majority as well.

Under Trump the Republicans had the majority in the House and Senate, and the economy was outstanding.

Interesting right? But of course the Democrats won the majority in the House, just because. So, if the economy is to enter a recession, would a Democrat house be the cause or part?

Hold the fucking phone. Under democrat rule in 2009, the recession Obama inherited ended and a string of job growth has occurred ever since.

The market started rebounding in 2010 when it became obvious Republicans were going to retake the House.

AHAHAHA!!!

The exact low of the stock market was March 6 2009, 2 weeks after Obama passed the stimulus.

No matter what the facts are republicans will always take credit for what they failed to do, and blame others for what they caused. You guys try to blame the 2006 Congress for the great recession that started 1 year later, this after 7 years of complete GOP failure on every single issue.

"The party of Personal Responsibility!!!"

 

[The Banker]

"If the economy slides, how much blame would fall on a Democrat house?"

Teflon protection. Pam spray....blame slides off all sticky surfaces ...

real economists already predicted, tax cut economics really are worthless under any form of capitalism.

Can we show where tax cuts have produced real deal PROLONGED growth that doesn't greatly raise deficits?


Kansas anyone????

The Bush tax cuts??

Even Reagan's cuts produced the era of massive out of control deficits.

Bill Clinton Raised taxes and look what happened there...

It's worked one time back when JFK did it an taxes were ABSURDLY high then. - 90% top bracket

 

[g5000]

The parroting rubes have prostrated themselves at the feet of one of the worst evil hucksters in history.

They have compromised every last one of the principles they claimed to hold, and now Trump has exposed them for the empty shells they really are.

Translated to mean the OP and data makes a turn-gender especially angry.

It's funny you tards can tell us what you stand for after I asked.

You don't stand for cutting spending or getting government interference out of the markets or balanced budgets or lower health care costs or family values or honoring our military or honesty. So what DO you stand for?

 

[g5000]

It was all fake. Every bit of it.

All the whining about deficits and massive government spending and golfing and skyrocketing health care costs and morality and honoring our vets while the black guy was in office.

It was all total bullshit.

We know that now, thanks to Trump.