If latest accuser is telling the truth, why was she hobnobbing with Cain at Teacon?

The real thing to investigate is how many degrees of separation between Buyalick and Obama/Soros
 
Ahhh, the Cain stories just ain't fun any more.

You can feel the heartbreak and let down of Obama's Mindless Zombies.
 
LOL why do the wingnuts defend the indefensible? Could it be that they are just ideology robots and consideration for the truth is nowhere to be found in their programmed heads? They whine well but when you get beyond their whining nothing is there. Next they'll be defending playing footsie under the men's lavatory stalls. Oh wait they already did that one. LOL

PS Nothing wrong with footsie so long as others can play too.
 
Last edited:
I'm curious to know who you rightwingloons think Allred represented that wasn't valid.....Nicole Simpson? The porn star in the Weiner scandal? Who?
 
LOL why do the wingnuts defend the indefensible? Could it be that they are just ideology robots and consideration for the truth is nowhere to be found in their programmed heads? They whine well but when you get beyond their whining nothing is there. Next they'll be defending playing footsie under the men's lavatory stalls. Oh wait they already did that one. LOL

PS Nothing wrong with footsie so long as others can play too.

Say Bill Clinton shouldn't have been President because of his sexual escapades right now ... say it.
 
» *UPDATED* Exclusive: Sources Confirm Latest Accuser Is a Republican Who Attended Teacon 2011 Where Herman Cain Was Featured Speaker - Big Government

Can anyone say Anita Hill?

Or is this really a case of dragging a 20 through a trailer park?

(remember that one?)
She, like the others, are lying to disgrace Cain because the left fear him, just like they still do Palin.

It’s possible your messiah did these things……

What would anyone be scared of that Cain offers? A lack of positions and understanding of what is going on in the world and how to deal with it?
 
From your article:
Part of Ms. Bialek’s statement included the description of a personal encounter she claimed to have had Mr. Cain at WIND’s Teacon in October of 2011. She claims to have confronted Mr. Cain and that he became uncomfortable after he recognized her.

I wouldn't call that hobnobbing.

Yeah, "confronted" doesn't equal "hobnobbing." Not by a long shot.
 
LOL why do the wingnuts defend the indefensible? Could it be that they are just ideology robots and consideration for the truth is nowhere to be found in their programmed heads? They whine well but when you get beyond their whining nothing is there. Next they'll be defending playing footsie under the men's lavatory stalls. Oh wait they already did that one. LOL

PS Nothing wrong with footsie so long as others can play too.

Say Bill Clinton shouldn't have been President because of his sexual escapades right now ... say it.

What you just said was fucking stupid. They made a huge deal of what Clinton did when they found out, he just happened to be President, not running for office.

I'm not a Clinton supporter or a Democrat and I can see that.
 
This ENTIRE thing being in the news is about destroying Cain, and deflecting us from all the scandals surrounding the Messiah in Chief. (Solyndra/fast & fyrious...yada yada)

As for the woman.... she is a money grubber.

If she is a Tea Party hack as she claims..... why Gloria Alred? WHY that bitch?

This is getting stinkier by the hour.

Considering Gloria Aldred WOULDN'T take up the case of Juanita Hill or Paula Jones.

But, she will take up THIS case?

It sounds very fishy.

All I know is, If I was a woman (and by the way I AM A WOMAN), and I was treated as this woman claims to have been treated by Herman Cain, I would have NOTHING TO DO WITH HIM.

I certainly wouldn't be attending any meeting or rally that Cain was speaking at.

And I would do everything in my power to let people know about the man.

But she keeps quiet until NOW?

It doesn't pass the smell test as far as I'm concerned.
 
What makes her recount more falsity than truth is that she had to read Gloria Allred's prepared statement word for word. She never looked up from her statement. It was like reading a story and it was.

I didn't know that, because I didn't watch this thing on TV. Good catch!

Now it REALLY doesn't pass the smell test!

:clap2::clap2::clap2::clap2:
 
» *UPDATED* Exclusive: Sources Confirm Latest Accuser Is a Republican Who Attended Teacon 2011 Where Herman Cain Was Featured Speaker - Big Government

Can anyone say Anita Hill?

Or is this really a case of dragging a 20 through a trailer park?

(remember that one?)

Personally, I think she is lying unlike Anita Hill.

It's the same pattern.

There's a reason Anita Hill didn't stop Clarence Thomas from being confirm, in a Senate that was (AT THE TIME) Democrat controlled.

It didn't pass the smell test.
 
LOL why do the wingnuts defend the indefensible? Could it be that they are just ideology robots and consideration for the truth is nowhere to be found in their programmed heads? They whine well but when you get beyond their whining nothing is there. Next they'll be defending playing footsie under the men's lavatory stalls. Oh wait they already did that one. LOL

PS Nothing wrong with footsie so long as others can play too.

Say Bill Clinton shouldn't have been President because of his sexual escapades right now ... say it.

What you just said was fucking stupid. They made a huge deal of what Clinton did when they found out, he just happened to be President, not running for office.

I'm not a Clinton supporter or a Democrat and I can see that.

Sounds like you are in denial what he did happened in 1978. Well before he was President for 2 terms.

Clinton accused of 1978 hotel rape | World news | guardian.co.uk
 
From your article:


I wouldn't call that hobnobbing.

I wouldn't call it the truth either.

Never calls the police, never does anything, now all of a sudden when Obama is worried about running against another black man, all these women pop up.

It's Anita Hill all over again.
Yeah, those lying Republican women just want to bring the black man down.

:rofl:


No, those lying Democrats. Anita Hill. SAME DEMOCRAT STRATEGY.

Apparently, any time there is a powerful black conservative, liberals are going to trot out this same plan of attack.
 
What makes her recount more falsity than truth is that she had to read Gloria Allred's prepared statement word for word. She never looked up from her statement. It was like reading a story and it was.

It's really unusual for people to use a prepared statements by their attorney in circumstances like this. :eusa_hand:

WHEN THEY ARE THE ACCUSED, NOT WHEN THEY ARE THE ACCUSERS!!!!!!!!

When you are the ACCUSER and you have to read from a statement it smacks of being COACHED!

Not very convincing!

Nice try!

:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:
 
Her credibility is ZERO.. She accused and went after a former lover extorting him for money..
 
What makes her recount more falsity than truth is that she had to read Gloria Allred's prepared statement word for word. She never looked up from her statement. It was like reading a story and it was.

I didn't know that, because I didn't watch this thing on TV. Good catch!

Now it REALLY doesn't pass the smell test!

:clap2::clap2::clap2::clap2:

Actually, it's common for someone to read prepared remarks by their attorney in circumstances like this.
Secondly, every time I see Allred I groan, "not another Allerd driven media circus"! But as Karl Rove stated:
“Credibility matters here, and Gloria Allred — while she is a Democrat and a liberal Democrat and openly so — nonetheless, has been involved in a number of high-profile cases like Tiger Woods and others, where the charges have been born out.
So this gives Ms. Bialek’s charges and accusations a little bit of credibility, and that’s what we’re talking about here — credibility.”


Love Allerd or hate her, she usually comes out on top. My guess is that Allerd vetted Bialek pretty thouroughly before associatting with Bialek's charge.
 

Forum List

Back
Top