- Moderator
- #1
Why doesn’t she file charges against the people threatening her? Threatening a congrsssional witness is a federal crime. The FBI would have to investigate it
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why doesn’t she file charges against the people threatening her? Threatening a congrsssional witness is a federal crime. The FBI would have to investigate it
Why doesn’t she file charges against the people threatening her? Threatening a congrsssional witness is a federal crime. The FBI would have to investigate it
This is my point on this matter…
If it is important enough to warrant an FBI investigation today, it was important enough to warrant a LEO investigation back then. That it wasn’t then makes me think it isn’t now. She could be telling the truth 100%. I don’t know. But the way our society works (or should work) is that if you are violated, you call the police, they handle the matter and justice is served. Does it always happen? No. Of course not. But that she didn’t even take the first step disqualifies her from coming back 35 years later.
Sorry.
I doubt the FBI will investigate. They refused to investigate the letter DF tried to give them.
This case, if it even happened, is 36 years old. Way past the statute of limitations so even local law enforcement won't investigate it.
That moron should have told her parents and had it on record 36 years ago. That's when it should have been investigated. Not 36 years later.
Its just a she said he said. If they have the votes the Reps should cast the votes and get Kav on the SC. Never mind all this Ford bullshit.
She's not a congressional witness and the FBI doesn't investigate sex crimes. Nice try.Why doesn’t she file charges against the people threatening her? Threatening a congrsssional witness is a federal crime. The FBI would have to investigate it
Why doesn’t she file charges against the people threatening her? Threatening a congrsssional witness is a federal crime. The FBI would have to investigate it
This is my point on this matter…
If it is important enough to warrant an FBI investigation today, it was important enough to warrant a LEO investigation back then. That it wasn’t then makes me think it isn’t now. She could be telling the truth 100%. I don’t know. But the way our society works (or should work) is that if you are violated, you call the police, they handle the matter and justice is served. Does it always happen? No. Of course not. But that she didn’t even take the first step disqualifies her from coming back 35 years later.
Sorry.
Agreed. Even if there were a crime here, it is well outside of the statute of limitations.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
She doesn’t want an FBI investigation. She wants to delay the nomination vote. I say to give her the investigation but allow the vote to proceed as originally scheduled.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Why doesn’t she file charges against the people threatening her? Threatening a congrsssional witness is a federal crime. The FBI would have to investigate it
This is my point on this matter…
If it is important enough to warrant an FBI investigation today, it was important enough to warrant a LEO investigation back then. That it wasn’t then makes me think it isn’t now. She could be telling the truth 100%. I don’t know. But the way our society works (or should work) is that if you are violated, you call the police, they handle the matter and justice is served. Does it always happen? No. Of course not. But that she didn’t even take the first step disqualifies her from coming back 35 years later.
Sorry.
Agreed. Even if there were a crime here, it is well outside of the statute of limitations.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Well, the SOL is a different matter; thats legal.
What it definitely is in addition to what you wrote is outside the parameters of right and wrong. As I’ve said, if we have a fight at work today and then we go our separate ways, 35 years from now when you are up for a medal of honor, I can’t come back and call it assault if I didn’t pursue the standard and customary channels of justice that are open to me… Not only notification of Law enforcement but a security guard at the office, our boss, etc...
I doubt the FBI will investigate. They refused to investigate the letter DF tried to give them.
This case, if it even happened, is 36 years old. Way past the statute of limitations so even local law enforcement won't investigate it.
That moron should have told her parents and had it on record 36 years ago. That's when it should have been investigated. Not 36 years later.
Its just a she said he said. If they have the votes the Reps should cast the votes and get Kav on the SC. Never mind all this Ford bullshit.
Why doesn’t she file charges against the people threatening her? Threatening a congrsssional witness is a federal crime. The FBI would have to investigate it
This is my point on this matter…
If it is important enough to warrant an FBI investigation today, it was important enough to warrant a LEO investigation back then. That it wasn’t then makes me think it isn’t now. She could be telling the truth 100%. I don’t know. But the way our society works (or should work) is that if you are violated, you call the police, they handle the matter and justice is served. Does it always happen? No. Of course not. But that she didn’t even take the first step disqualifies her from coming back 35 years later.
Sorry.
I doubt the FBI will investigate. They refused to investigate the letter DF tried to give them.
This case, if it even happened, is 36 years old. Way past the statute of limitations so even local law enforcement won't investigate it.
That moron should have told her parents and had it on record 36 years ago. That's when it should have been investigated. Not 36 years later.
Its just a she said he said. If they have the votes the Reps should cast the votes and get Kav on the SC. Never mind all this Ford bullshit.
The threats, however, are only days old
She's not a congressional witness and the FBI doesn't investigate sex crimes. Nice try.Why doesn’t she file charges against the people threatening her? Threatening a congrsssional witness is a federal crime. The FBI would have to investigate it
Why doesn’t she file charges against the people threatening her? Threatening a congrsssional witness is a federal crime. The FBI would have to investigate it
This is my point on this matter…
If it is important enough to warrant an FBI investigation today, it was important enough to warrant a LEO investigation back then. That it wasn’t then makes me think it isn’t now. She could be telling the truth 100%. I don’t know. But the way our society works (or should work) is that if you are violated, you call the police, they handle the matter and justice is served. Does it always happen? No. Of course not. But that she didn’t even take the first step disqualifies her from coming back 35 years later.
Sorry.
The theats are a separate matter though. They allegedly happened days ago
Invited.She's not a congressional witness and the FBI doesn't investigate sex crimes. Nice try.Why doesn’t she file charges against the people threatening her? Threatening a congrsssional witness is a federal crime. The FBI would have to investigate it
She has been invited by the Senate to testify. How is she not a Congressional witness?
Invited.She's not a congressional witness and the FBI doesn't investigate sex crimes. Nice try.Why doesn’t she file charges against the people threatening her? Threatening a congrsssional witness is a federal crime. The FBI would have to investigate it
She has been invited by the Senate to testify. How is she not a Congressional witness?