Liberals and media pundits of every stripe are telling us the Republican party has to change its wicked ways. Whenever liberal talking heads say “Republican party” they mean rank & file Republicans. Every liberal, and most pundits, should have an idiot light implanted in their foreheads —— one that lights up every time they say something stupid about conservatism. NOTE: True conservatives like Rush Limbaugh, Laura Ingraham, and a few others still tell it straight. Listen to Laura give Republican wimps what for in two brief videos: It’s no secret the Republican party’s leadership is infinitely closer to the Democrat party’s global and domestic agendas than they are to the US Constitution which is a core belief among Tea Partiers, yet television’s motor mouths are blaming Tea Partiers; i.e. conservatives, for Hussein’s second term. In fact, blame has become part of the scam; blame everybody and everything to hide the sameness of both major political parties: I’m not going spend the next few years talking about election fraud. Rigged elections in America are nothing more than parasites doing the same thing they did throughout history; i.e., destroy every civilization, every empire, every culture, every nation that ever was. John Adams and Thomas Jefferson could not have foreseen the modern welfare state, but they had a profound understanding of the destructive force of parasites: Not With a Bang but a Whimper Jim O’Neill Sunday, November 11, 2012 Not With a Bang but a Whimper Incidentally, America’s Founders had no use for democracy although I have no proof they ever connected parasites to democracy. I’m pretty sure they would see the connection today. I do not expect anyone to take my comments as the Holy Grail. Here's a small sampling of what people more knowledge than I thought about democracy: Most importantly, the parasite class relies on democracy for sustenance. They cannot coexist with the Constitution. Here are some observations that address the conflict without citing democracy: Media, most especially television, canonized big government icons from both parties. Between them they built and continue to empower and enrich the parasite class. If there is any chance of turning it around every rank and file Republican, along with every private sector American, has to decide if their political beliefs are closer to big government, or closer to the conservative ideals espoused by Tea Party conservatives. In order to make that decision the Democrat party’s treasonous anti-America agenda must be exposed in plain English —— not by contrived politically correct speech; we can all agree to disagree. Here’s how I agree to disagree: Hussein and every Democrat in Congress is a traitor. Every one of them will sell out this country faster than you can say “quislings.” Every one of them works to bring this country to totalitarian communism. Not a one of them harbors an ounce of loyalty to this country, or to the US Constitution they swear to support and defend. Fight them with the language of confrontation and let the traitors refute it with any language they care to use. Do it because conservatives will never convince parasites that their vested interest in communism will destroy them along with destroying the country. You can bet your ass Socialists do not want to agree to disagree on those terms. If both parties are the same why not defeat the Republican party as well? First Answer: The Republican party provides a framework for a return to limited government. Second Answer: Wealthy Republicans feed off of the things Socialists/Communists initiate. The Affordable Care Act is the biggest boondoggle ruling and parasite classes will ever see; hence, it is more important to defeat Socialists first. Beat them and establishment Republicans who are just as guilty go down, too. WWII is a good analogy. Japan bombed Pearl Harbor, but defeating Nazi Germany first was considered more important. Lincoln said the following about bankers; today, he would have to include their stooges in Congress: Socialists avoiding confrontational language is imperative on the question of loyalty. That is why media liberals never —— not once —— called out an American traitor in Congress. And heaven forbid that the loyalties of Presidents Clinton and Hussein should ever be questioned. Let a traitor working for the FBI, or the CIA, get caught and media is all over it like flies on a dung pile. NOTE: I usually call UN-loving traitors ‘quislings’ because they are working to hand the country to the United Nations the way Vidkun Quisling handed Norway to the Nazis then served them faithfully. I thought of calling them “burgesses” after British traitor Guy Burgess. I changed my mind because the word Burgess has a respectable meaning. For those too young to remember the huge scandal on both sides of the Atlantic, Guy Burgess betrayed his country for communism and the Soviet Union. American quislings do it for communism and the United Nations. Americans should be thankful they are not speaking Russian today because of the way Democrats behaved throughout the Cold War. Today’s top Democrats ——led by an America-hating, black racist, anti-Christian Communist —— are determined to make Mandarin the world’s official language. The insult is that freedom-loving Americans are supposed to treat the office of president with respect. The truth is: Americans treating Hussein with respect is the contemporary version of giving the headsman a gratuity. Incidentally, I wonder if MO is proud of her country today, or is a coronation required for her approval. In the recent election open borders and amnesty for illegal aliens were losing issues for Democrats among a vast majority of Americans, yet the losing wimp did not pick up one vote on open borders, or illegal immigration, or amnesty for illegals. Did Romney forget the public outrage triggered by Bush the Younger’s immigration policies, or that McCain supported amnesty for illegals although he called it something else. Before voting in future elections every American should ask “Do I want open borders? Do I want illegal aliens in the country?” Hussein & Company want both. Republican candidates better wake up to the fact that Latinos alone cannot decide presidential or Senate elections. Americans have to stop treating them as though they can —— that means conservative candidates must stop falling for media voting-bloc scare-tactics. Those tactics always end in catering to Democrats on illegal immigration and open borders. Instead of trying to please a voting bloc, work on getting individuals to examine their own beliefs on core issues. It’s just so easy to expose Democrats for the slime they are because of their anti-America beliefs, I am continually puzzled by the entire voting bloc mentality permeating the Republican party. Keeping score Every conservative who is thinking of running for Congress better make damn sure the people counting the votes are not Democrat operatives. Every conservative must tend to it as though their district, or state, is being cased by thieves planning a robbery, while Democrat party strategists can pick and choose which seats they want to steal in order to control Congress. They only have to steal a few as I believe they did in last week’s election. Before you doubt my cynicism consider SOSP: Soros and liberal groups seeking top election posts in battleground states By Chuck Neubauer The Washington Times 9:00 p.m., Thursday, June 23, 2011 Soros and liberal groups seeking top election posts in battleground states - Washington Times Has anyone in the media checked the results in those 11 states where “reform-minded progressive Democrats” controlled the vote count. One final thought. Should a viable conservative third party get up and running before 2014 —— 2016 those candidates will have to protect themselves from the score keepers in both major parties. Without that protection a conservative could get 90 percent of the vote and the score keepers will mark it up in favor of a Democrat or a Republican. Let me put it this way. Ross Perot got a confirmed 19 percent of the vote in 1992. If the same crowd that did the counting last Tuesday was in charge in 1992 the score card would have read: Clinton 55% Bush 44% Perot: 1%.