- Thread starter
- Banned
- #61
What's the highest atmospheric CO2 levels you've found in the last 10,000 years, ie during the course of human civilization?
Hint: the date is on your desk calendar and you probably don't even have to flip a page.
Who cares. CO2 lags temperature so it clearly has nothing to do with anything. The Holocene Thermal Maximum of 8000 years ago was WAY hotter than today and the CO2 levels were low.
What more evidence do you need to show you that CO2 is meaningless?
How about some evidence that actually supports your contention?
You claim to be a reasonably intelligent fellow. Yet you reject the Greenhouse Effect.
No one in climate science has ever rejected the idea that increasing heat will lead to increased CO2 in the atmosphere. But explain to me how THAT gives any indication at all that CO2, which unquestionably absorbs infrared radiation, cannot increase global temperatures.
Last edited: