Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
He tried to but he failed to get support from his own constituents. That's the only reason. I see you can't admit it either.
What do you expect when almost half of republicans believe the president is a 'Muslim.'Recently, a friend reminded me of a poll taken last January, where more than HALF of republicans actually "think" that the war ON Iraq actually yielded the finding of caches of Weapons of Mass Destruction.....
In a Public Mind poll from Fairleigh Dickinson University released [in mid-January, 2015], more than half of Republicans — 51 percent — and half of those who watch Fox News — 52 percent — say that they believe it to be “definitely true” or “probably true” that American forces found an active weapons of mass destruction program in Iraq.
Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2015/01/poll-republicans-wmds-iraq-114016#ixzz3omZWIa8l
What scares me, is that many of these respondents will actually show up to vote next November, 2016....and take their darn stupidity with them to actually cast a ballot.
I already gave you one but if you need more...He tried to but he failed to get support from his own constituents. That's the only reason. I see you can't admit it either.Can't you just admit it was the Clinton administration who started the movement to oust Saddam and advanced the notion that he had weapons of mass destruction? Come on, man, be honest.Diversion alert. How many of them voted to invade Iraq? Can you say "Hillary Clinton"?
True. one of the several reasons why I'm not a Hillary fan......HOWEVER, here's my question:
If someone tells you a LIE, and you repeat it thinking it to be TRUTH, ultimately, WHO is the liar?
But he didn't start a war with Iraq.
Have a link?
He tried to but he failed to get support from his own constituents. That's the only reason. I see you can't admit it either.
He said the same fucking thing Bush said, you disingenuous fuck.He tried to but he failed to get support from his own constituents. That's the only reason. I see you can't admit it either.
Why does this entire issue have to turn to either support or criticism of Bill Clinton?
Yes, Clinton did not start a war with Iraq NOR would he have gathered much support for it......HOWEVER, to his "credit", he did NOT make up lies to convince others to invade.
No, he's trying – and failing – to go off topic in a moronic effort to deflect, given the fact he has nothing of substance to contribute, just the same tired rightwing lies.He said the same fucking thing Bush said, you disingenuous fuck.
Since Clinton did NOT invade and GWB certainly DID....are you stating that Bush's lies were BETTER than Clinton's?
No, I'm stating you're a disingenuous fucking hack who can't admit YOUR guy made the same case Bush made. You don't have the integrity to be honest, do you?He said the same fucking thing Bush said, you disingenuous fuck.
Since Clinton did NOT invade and GWB certainly DID....are you stating that Bush's lies were BETTER than Clinton's?
Fuck you, Clinton tried to make the case to invade Iraq long before Bush became president. He just didn't have the balls to do it. His WIFE, however voted to invade (under Bush).No, he's trying – and failing – to go off topic in a moronic effort to deflect, given the fact he has nothing of substance to contribute, just the same tired rightwing lies.He said the same fucking thing Bush said, you disingenuous fuck.
Since Clinton did NOT invade and GWB certainly DID....are you stating that Bush's lies were BETTER than Clinton's?
Is that your way of excusing Hillary for voting to invade Iraq, fucker?Rather than simply accepting the castigation for the failure that was the Iraq war decision, R-W'ers try to stupidly cast the blame as wide as possible. Moronic.
No, I'm stating you're a disingenuous fucking hack who can't admit YOUR guy made the same case Bush made. You don't have the integrity to be honest, do you?
You could start by acknowledging that, yes. You won't, however, because that would be honest, and honesty isn't something you're capable of.No, I'm stating you're a disingenuous fucking hack who can't admit YOUR guy made the same case Bush made. You don't have the integrity to be honest, do you?
So, your "conclusion" then is that Clinton is EQUALLY as guilty as Bush for the Iraq war invasion....Got it !!!
There ya go, sling some shit instead of addressing your own thread.I think you need another drink, S.J.
Yaaaaaaaaaaaaawwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn
Perhaps one of your most salient posts...Congrats.
Both you and the person that told you the lie.Diversion alert. How many of them voted to invade Iraq? Can you say "Hillary Clinton"?
True. one of the several reasons why I'm not a Hillary fan......HOWEVER, here's my question:
If someone tells you a LIE, and you repeat it thinking it to be TRUTH, ultimately, WHO is the liar?
Recently, a friend reminded me of a poll taken last January, where more than HALF of republicans actually "think" that the war ON Iraq actually yielded the finding of caches of Weapons of Mass Destruction.....
In a Public Mind poll from Fairleigh Dickinson University released [in mid-January, 2015], more than half of Republicans — 51 percent — and half of those who watch Fox News — 52 percent — say that they believe it to be “definitely true” or “probably true” that American forces found an active weapons of mass destruction program in Iraq.
Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2015/01/poll-republicans-wmds-iraq-114016#ixzz3omZWIa8l
What scares me, is that many of these respondents will actually show up to vote next November, 2016....and take their darn stupidity with them to actually cast a ballot.
