ihopehefails
VIP Member
- Oct 3, 2009
- 3,384
- 228
- 83
- Banned
- #1
After many years of hear liberals being upset that the rich are so rich and equating it to a social evil that has to be wiped out and hearing the same thing about drugs, assisted suicide, and other victomless crimes I came to the conclusion that these behaviors, although could be construed as immoral by some, are a part of your natural freedoms. And both sides object over said behavior for the same reason when said behavior is a 'crime against the moral fabric of society'. The only difference is what behaviors we are objecting to.
This does not mean that there is no moral constraint that would stop you from doing those things but whatever moral restraint you choose is the one you choose for yourself and your 'freedom' is restrained by that.
This means that you have the right to become a greedy rich person, drug user, kill yourself, and screw a prostitute if you want because it is a part of your pursuit of happiness.
This does not mean that there is no moral constraint that would stop you from doing those things but whatever moral restraint you choose is the one you choose for yourself and your 'freedom' is restrained by that.
This means that you have the right to become a greedy rich person, drug user, kill yourself, and screw a prostitute if you want because it is a part of your pursuit of happiness.
Last edited: