I hope Hispanics are taking note !!!

PHP:
Does it matter? It was a news report.

So far all indications Point to zimmermans account of what happened as accurate.

Now what do you have that is at least as credible?

Facts mean nothing to him at this point. He's been whipped into a frenzy and nothing will quench his thirst for vengeance but the blood of Zimmerman flowing through the streets of Sanford. Forget law and order, trial by jury of peers.

He wants this mans head on a stick, justice be damned.

You havent presented any facts....You claim that Matin slammed his head repeatedly based on the evidence and 10 posts in, you havent posted that evidence. Either you're a liar or you cant find the "evidence". Which one is it champ?

You're acting like a moron. I presented evidence and facts anyone with two brain cells to rub together could find. Just stop. You're really looking buffoonish right now.
 
Does it matter? It was a news report.

So far all indications Point to zimmermans account of what happened as accurate.

Now what do you have that is at least as credible?

Facts mean nothing to him at this point. He's been whipped into a frenzy and nothing will quench his thirst for vengeance but the blood of Zimmerman flowing through the streets of Sanford. Forget law and order, trial by jury of peers.

He wants this mans head on a stick, justice be damned.

He doesnt have anything credible. That is my point.
Funny how he says I didn't provide facts. He must live in a bubble. Link, link, link, source, source,source.... He keeps repeating that without providing a single fact that makes what I've presented obsolete. Just emotional outbursts and drivel.
 
Facts mean nothing to him at this point. He's been whipped into a frenzy and nothing will quench his thirst for vengeance but the blood of Zimmerman flowing through the streets of Sanford. Forget law and order, trial by jury of peers.

He wants this mans head on a stick, justice be damned.

He doesnt have anything credible. That is my point.
Funny how he says I didn't provide facts. He must live in a bubble. Link, link, link, source, source,source.... He keeps repeating that without providing a single fact that makes what I've presented obsolete. Just emotional outbursts and drivel.

What's wrong with asking someone (you) to back up their assertions with a link or a source? When I made my assertion and statement about what one of the authors of that "Stand your ground" bill stated about Zimmerman and what the director of Florida Carry said, I provided a quote and linked to the source, that way it erases any doubt.
 
You're being petty. John said he saw Martin on top and Zimmerman on the ground. He didn't say he saw him slamming his head and his description of what he saw wasn't lengthy.

I'm going by the evidence and John's description of what he saw.

uh huh
Listen you damn fool. The evidence and facts are Zimmerman's broken nose, the wound on the back of his head, the eye witness report of trayvon being on top of him and Zimmerman calling for help. All widely reported online, you dumb truck.

Now, prove those arent facts or STFU with your pathetic excuses for arguments. It's getting old. Fast. You're starting to annoy me and if you do not start acting like you have some sense, I will put you on ignore.

You've got one more post.
 
He doesnt have anything credible. That is my point.
Funny how he says I didn't provide facts. He must live in a bubble. Link, link, link, source, source,source.... He keeps repeating that without providing a single fact that makes what I've presented obsolete. Just emotional outbursts and drivel.

What's wrong with asking someone (you) to back up their assertions with a link or a source? When I made my assertion and statement about what one of the authors of that "Stand your ground" bill stated about Zimmerman and what the director of Florida Carry said, I provided a quote and linked to the source, that way it erases any doubt.

There is only one situation where someone would think that asking for proof is unreasonable.. Give ya 3 guesses :D
 
He doesnt have anything credible. That is my point.
Funny how he says I didn't provide facts. He must live in a bubble. Link, link, link, source, source,source.... He keeps repeating that without providing a single fact that makes what I've presented obsolete. Just emotional outbursts and drivel.

What's wrong with asking someone (you) to back up their assertions with a link or a source? When I made my assertion and statement about what one of the authors of that "Stand your ground" bill stated about Zimmerman and what the director of Florida Carry said, I provided a quote and linked to the source, that way it erases any doubt.

Nothing would be wrong with that if he wasn't acting like he knows enough about the case to speak on it, yet hasn't read zimmermans statement, doesn't know zimmerman had a broken nose, a bloody wound on the back of his head, and grass stains on the back of his shirt, and that that has been confirmed and that the eye witness saw Zimmerman on the ground being attacked by Martin.

That just shows he's an ignorant moron who hasnt followed the story. And he should shut up about it until he's up to speed with the rest of us.

I don't suffer fools well.
 
You're being petty. John said he saw Martin on top and Zimmerman on the ground. He didn't say he saw him slamming his head and his description of what he saw wasn't lengthy.

I'm going by the evidence and John's description of what he saw.

uh huh
Listen you damn fool. The evidence and facts are Zimmerman's broken nose, the wound on the back of his head, the eye witness report of trayvon being on top of him and Zimmerman calling for help. All widely reported online, you dumb truck.

Now, prove those arent facts or STFU with your pathetic excuses for arguments. It's getting old. Fast. You're starting to annoy me and if you do not start acting like you have some sense, I will put you on ignore.

You've got one more post.

I'm just noticing how you said John saw his head was being slammed on the ground but John didnt say his head was being slammed on the ground. :thup:

I guess he saw both of those things happening huh Locke
 
You're being petty. John said he saw Martin on top and Zimmerman on the ground. He didn't say he saw him slamming his head and his description of what he saw wasn't lengthy.

I'm going by the evidence and John's description of what he saw.

uh huh
Listen you damn fool. The evidence and facts are Zimmerman's broken nose, the wound on the back of his head, the eye witness report of trayvon being on top of him and Zimmerman calling for help. All widely reported online, you dumb truck.

Now, prove those arent facts or STFU with your pathetic excuses for arguments. It's getting old. Fast. You're starting to annoy me and if you do not start acting like you have some sense, I will put you on ignore.

You've got one more post.

He's mad because you won't fall for the libtard trick of making you prove everything you say to their satisfaction -- Fifty times.

While they completely ignore the FACTS.

Then, ten minutes later, turn and ask you to prove it again.

They know what you're saying is true. Their only objective is to annoy you, to try to get you angry, to make you say or do something unwise.

Then they run to the Mods and accuse you of everything from posting childporn to sinking the Titanic.

It's how libtards work. It's how they ALL work.
 
Funny how he says I didn't provide facts. He must live in a bubble. Link, link, link, source, source,source.... He keeps repeating that without providing a single fact that makes what I've presented obsolete. Just emotional outbursts and drivel.

What's wrong with asking someone (you) to back up their assertions with a link or a source? When I made my assertion and statement about what one of the authors of that "Stand your ground" bill stated about Zimmerman and what the director of Florida Carry said, I provided a quote and linked to the source, that way it erases any doubt.

Nothing would be wrong with that if he wasn't acting like he knows enough about the case to speak on it, yet hasn't read zimmermans statement, doesn't know zimmerman had a broken nose, a bloody wound on the back of his head, and grass stains on the back of his shirt, and that that has been confirmed and that the eye witness saw Zimmerman on the ground being attacked by Martin.

That just shows he's an ignorant moron who hasnt followed the story. And he should shut up about it until he's up to speed with the rest of us.

I don't suffer fools well.

You see, it's my fault he hasnt posted the evidence. See?
 
Funny how he says I didn't provide facts. He must live in a bubble. Link, link, link, source, source,source.... He keeps repeating that without providing a single fact that makes what I've presented obsolete. Just emotional outbursts and drivel.

What's wrong with asking someone (you) to back up their assertions with a link or a source? When I made my assertion and statement about what one of the authors of that "Stand your ground" bill stated about Zimmerman and what the director of Florida Carry said, I provided a quote and linked to the source, that way it erases any doubt.

There is only one situation where someone would think that asking for proof is unreasonable.. Give ya 3 guesses :D
Moron. Google is your friend. Go catch up on the story and come back and argue your points. Until then... You're on ignore.
 
What's wrong with asking someone (you) to back up their assertions with a link or a source? When I made my assertion and statement about what one of the authors of that "Stand your ground" bill stated about Zimmerman and what the director of Florida Carry said, I provided a quote and linked to the source, that way it erases any doubt.

There is only one situation where someone would think that asking for proof is unreasonable.. Give ya 3 guesses :D
Moron. Google is your friend. Go catch up on the story and come back and argue your points. Until then... You're on ignore.

Google is my friend...facebook is my acquaintence. But friendships aside, wheres your proof you said you were relying on?

You know the one that said John said Martin slamming his head on the ground but didnt see Martin slamming his head on the ground. Where is that evidence?:badgrin:
 
Here, I decided to help the slow folks here with a quick google search, some beginners links if you will. Anyone arguing with emotional appeals should check these articles out before they open their mouthes:

Search Results
News for trayvon martin george zimmerman

Does police incident report upend Trayvon Martin case?
Christian Science Monitor* - 1 hour ago
Trayvon Martin punched George Zimmerman first and knocked him down, then sat on the fallen ...
Trayvon Martin: George Zimmerman's account to police of ...
articles.orlandosentinel.com/.../os-trayvon- ...
1 day ago – With a single punch, Trayvon Martin decked the Neighborhood Watch volunteer who ...
Trayvon Martin: George Zimmerman's account to police of ...
articles.orlandosentinel.com/.../os-trayvon- ...
19 hours ago – With a single punch, Trayvon Martin decked the Neighborhood Watch volunteer who ...
Trayvon Martin Case: George Zimmerman Told Police ...
http://www.usmessageboard.com/politics/www.huffingtonpost.com/.../trayvon-marti...
18 hours ago – Nearly a month after Trayvon Martin's killing, the account of what occurred the night of ...
Trayvon Martin/George Zimmerman--a charitable, tragic ...
Democratic Underground ...
14 hours ago – Trayvon Martin/George Zimmerman--a charitable, tragic reading. It saddens me that all ...
Trayvon Martin: George Zimmerman Expeled From ...
newsone.com/.../trayvon-martin-george- ...
4 days ago – George Zimmerman Seminole State College has decided to expel George Zimmerman ...
Trayvon Martin Killing Lead Prosecutor Says George ...
abcnews.go.com › US
1 day ago – The nationwide clamor for an arrest notwithstanding, the lead prosecutor in the Trayvon ...
Trayvon Martin Killing: George Zimmerman's ... - ABC News
abcnews.go.com › US
1 day ago – The attorney counseling George Zimmerman, who shot unarmed black teenager ...
Trayvon Martin vs. George Zimmerman: What really ...
theweek.com/.../trayvon-martin-vs-george- ...
19 hours ago – The Florida shooting case that has roiled the nation for weeks took an unexpected turn ...
Registered Democrat George Zimmerman Says Trayvon ...
6 hours ago – A witness says Trayvon Martin attacked George Zimmerman… Who happens to be a ...
Trayvon Martin Attacked George Zimmerman, Report Says ...
latino.foxnews.com/.../trayvon-martin- ...
20 hours ago – Trayvon Martin hit George Zimmerman in the face and left him bloodied and battered ...
 
Last edited:
Funny how he says I didn't provide facts. He must live in a bubble. Link, link, link, source, source,source.... He keeps repeating that without providing a single fact that makes what I've presented obsolete. Just emotional outbursts and drivel.

What's wrong with asking someone (you) to back up their assertions with a link or a source? When I made my assertion and statement about what one of the authors of that "Stand your ground" bill stated about Zimmerman and what the director of Florida Carry said, I provided a quote and linked to the source, that way it erases any doubt.

Nothing would be wrong with that if he wasn't acting like he knows enough about the case to speak on it, yet hasn't read zimmermans statement, doesn't know zimmerman had a broken nose, a bloody wound on the back of his head, and grass stains on the back of his shirt, and that that has been confirmed and that the eye witness saw Zimmerman on the ground being attacked by Martin.

That just shows he's an ignorant moron who hasnt followed the story. And he should shut up about it until he's up to speed with the rest of us.

I don't suffer fools well.

Just because zimmerman had a broken nose and a wound on the back of his head, doesn't mean that "he was attacked by Martin". Have you ever had a fight where someone came up on you and started attacking you and you stomped a mudhole in their ass? If so, does that mean that the aggressor that started everything has a right to now shoot you??? What about the girl that martin was speaking to and the conversation she recalled? "Speaking on the phone shortly before he was shot, Martin told the girl that someone was following him and that he was trying to get away, Crump said.

The girl said that, during the phone call, she heard someone ask Martin what he was doing and heard Martin ask why the person was following him, Crump said. The girl then got the impression that there was an altercation in which the earpiece fell out of Martin's ear and the connection went dead, Crump said.

Based on what she heard, the girl believes that Martin was pushed, said Crump, who added that the girl did not hear any gunfire."


Another more detailed account:
"In a cell phone call moments before his death, Trayvon Martin told a teenage girl he “was being hounded by a strange man on a cellphone who ran after him, cornered him and confronted him.” The girl recounted the call, which is confirmed by phone logs, to ABC News:

“He said this man was watching him, so he put his hoodie on. He said he lost the man,” Martin’s friend said. “I asked Trayvon to run, and he said he was going to walk fast. I told him to run but he said he was not going to run.”

Eventually he would run, said the girl, thinking that he’d managed to escape. But suddenly the strange man was back, cornering Martin.

“Trayvon said, ‘What, are you following me for,’ and the man said, ‘What are you doing here.’ Next thing I hear is somebody pushing, and somebody pushed Trayvon because the head set just fell. "
 
Dewd, he's not interested in facts. He's only interested in pissing you off
 
What's wrong with asking someone (you) to back up their assertions with a link or a source? When I made my assertion and statement about what one of the authors of that "Stand your ground" bill stated about Zimmerman and what the director of Florida Carry said, I provided a quote and linked to the source, that way it erases any doubt.

Nothing would be wrong with that if he wasn't acting like he knows enough about the case to speak on it, yet hasn't read zimmermans statement, doesn't know zimmerman had a broken nose, a bloody wound on the back of his head, and grass stains on the back of his shirt, and that that has been confirmed and that the eye witness saw Zimmerman on the ground being attacked by Martin.

That just shows he's an ignorant moron who hasnt followed the story. And he should shut up about it until he's up to speed with the rest of us.

I don't suffer fools well.

Just because zimmerman had a broken nose and a wound on the back of his head, doesn't mean that "he was attacked by Martin". Have you ever had a fight where someone came up on you and started attacking you and you stomped a mudhole in their ass? If so, does that mean that the aggressor that started everything has a right to now shoot you??? What about the girl that martin was speaking to and the conversation she recalled? "Speaking on the phone shortly before he was shot, Martin told the girl that someone was following him and that he was trying to get away, Crump said.

The girl said that, during the phone call, she heard someone ask Martin what he was doing and heard Martin ask why the person was following him, Crump said. The girl then got the impression that there was an altercation in which the earpiece fell out of Martin's ear and the connection went dead, Crump said.

Based on what she heard, the girl believes that Martin was pushed, said Crump, who added that the girl did not hear any gunfire."


Another more detailed account:
"In a cell phone call moments before his death, Trayvon Martin told a teenage girl he “was being hounded by a strange man on a cellphone who ran after him, cornered him and confronted him.” The girl recounted the call, which is confirmed by phone logs, to ABC News:

“He said this man was watching him, so he put his hoodie on. He said he lost the man,” Martin’s friend said. “I asked Trayvon to run, and he said he was going to walk fast. I told him to run but he said he was not going to run.”

Eventually he would run, said the girl, thinking that he’d managed to escape. But suddenly the strange man was back, cornering Martin.

“Trayvon said, ‘What, are you following me for,’ and the man said, ‘What are you doing here.’ Next thing I hear is somebody pushing, and somebody pushed Trayvon because the head set just fell. "

I just know what you know. I'm not going to argue about it. Like I said, it's up to the jury if it comes to that. Why are you posting links to stuff I've already mentioned as if I'm not aware of them.

And to CC. I didn't say John saw him bashing his head in the ground. If you have proof of me saying that, provide it. I know I didn't so the only way you'll be able to do that is by chopping up a post to look that way. That's against the rules by the way.
 
taking note of the left wing medias biased in the Zimmerman case that is !!! remember that when you vote in 2012 !!! i hope that the way the left is bringing politics into this incident blows up in their face !!! Obama said his son would have looked like Martin ....GIVE ME A FUCKING BREAK !!

Hispanics do not control the media - it important to the the powers that be that an awshit moment of this magnitude not be related to German, Austrian or Jewish individuals.

And that's the way it goes.

.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: Jos
Dewd, he's not interested in facts. He's only interested in pissing you off

I can see that. I just want him to provide the quote of me saying the witness said he saw Martin slamming his head into the ground. Because I never said that. I said the evidence is Zimmerman has a broken nose. A wound on the back of the head, and a grass stained back of his shirt and the fact the witness saw trayvon on top of Zimmerman. That's all we have really.
 
Nothing would be wrong with that if he wasn't acting like he knows enough about the case to speak on it, yet hasn't read zimmermans statement, doesn't know zimmerman had a broken nose, a bloody wound on the back of his head, and grass stains on the back of his shirt, and that that has been confirmed and that the eye witness saw Zimmerman on the ground being attacked by Martin.

That just shows he's an ignorant moron who hasnt followed the story. And he should shut up about it until he's up to speed with the rest of us.

I don't suffer fools well.

Just because zimmerman had a broken nose and a wound on the back of his head, doesn't mean that "he was attacked by Martin". Have you ever had a fight where someone came up on you and started attacking you and you stomped a mudhole in their ass? If so, does that mean that the aggressor that started everything has a right to now shoot you??? What about the girl that martin was speaking to and the conversation she recalled? "Speaking on the phone shortly before he was shot, Martin told the girl that someone was following him and that he was trying to get away, Crump said.

The girl said that, during the phone call, she heard someone ask Martin what he was doing and heard Martin ask why the person was following him, Crump said. The girl then got the impression that there was an altercation in which the earpiece fell out of Martin's ear and the connection went dead, Crump said.

Based on what she heard, the girl believes that Martin was pushed, said Crump, who added that the girl did not hear any gunfire."


Another more detailed account:
"In a cell phone call moments before his death, Trayvon Martin told a teenage girl he “was being hounded by a strange man on a cellphone who ran after him, cornered him and confronted him.” The girl recounted the call, which is confirmed by phone logs, to ABC News:

“He said this man was watching him, so he put his hoodie on. He said he lost the man,” Martin’s friend said. “I asked Trayvon to run, and he said he was going to walk fast. I told him to run but he said he was not going to run.”

Eventually he would run, said the girl, thinking that he’d managed to escape. But suddenly the strange man was back, cornering Martin.

“Trayvon said, ‘What, are you following me for,’ and the man said, ‘What are you doing here.’ Next thing I hear is somebody pushing, and somebody pushed Trayvon because the head set just fell. "

I just know what you know. I'm not going to argue about it. Like I said, it's up to the jury if it comes to that. Why are you posting links to stuff I've already mentioned as if I'm not aware of them.

And to CC. I didn't say John saw him bashing his head in the ground. If you have proof of me saying that, provide it. I know I didn't so the only way you'll be able to do that is by chopping up a post to look that way. That's against the rules by the way.

I'm posting the links so there's an understanding where they came from in case someone else questions the validity of the information and assertions I am presenting.
 
He doesnt have anything credible. That is my point.
Funny how he says I didn't provide facts. He must live in a bubble. Link, link, link, source, source,source.... He keeps repeating that without providing a single fact that makes what I've presented obsolete. Just emotional outbursts and drivel.

What's wrong with asking someone (you) to back up their assertions with a link or a source? When I made my assertion and statement about what one of the authors of that "Stand your ground" bill stated about Zimmerman and what the director of Florida Carry said, I provided a quote and linked to the source, that way it erases any doubt.

What's truly amusing is the fact that you won't link to anything that supports your contentions concerning this case. Zimmerman hit first, Martin was a great kid, link?
 

Forum List

Back
Top