I have my problems with ALL THE CANDIDATES...

[Ed Spacer]

Obviously whoever the nominee is against Obama, gets my vote,simply because he is the worst WH occupier in history,actions alone.

But,here's my analysis on all....
NEWT GINGRICH-I cannot stand him. He's a program in sheep's clothing. Regardless of what ANYONE says,anyone with the kind of morals he has in his personal life,tends to have the same approach to other areas. Plus,voting record,flipflopped more than a damn pancake. No,thanks.
MITT ROMNEY-got a taste of him on Massachusetts. He made cuts,but didn't truly achieve budget greatness because he egregiously increased fees and other items to makeup for the cuts,a true financier can accomplish this without having to raise fees. Socially,a liberal with an "R",like bush second term.
RON PAUL-makes it for me,and wins all across the board in the end the fed and domestic policy,but fails with the recognition of international threats and terrorism.
RICK SANTORUM-fails with his voting record,liberal spending,and no abortion for rape and life threatening matters,which is otherwiseIT should be,illegal otherwise.

Help

 

[g5000]

Obviously whoever the nominee is against Obama, gets my vote

And that sums up why our country is so fucked up in only 10 words.

 

[Ed Spacer]

I'm sorry,but,this country is in deep shit if he stays in four more,Romney also did socialized medicine.

 

[techieny]

Yeah I know that Hillary is a bitch !

 

[Ed Spacer]

The only approach I agree with Gingrich,Romney,and Santorum on is Iran,but my approach would not be a full-scale war.precise missions,no nation building. Just use up our nifty tech we have not used yet.

 

[Katzndogz]

Who ever is perfect for me won't be perfect to 99% of anyone else. Whoever is perfect to you, isn't going to be perfect for me. It takes an evaluation. If I get 75 to 80% of what's on my political wish list, I'm happy. I'll vote for anyone not obama. Not obama is an automatic 50%.

 

[syrenn]

Obviously whoever the nominee is against Obama, gets my vote,simply because he is the worst WH occupier in history,actions alone.

But,here's my analysis on all....
NEWT GINGRICH-I cannot stand him. He's a program in sheep's clothing. Regardless of what ANYONE says,anyone with the kind of morals he has in his personal life,tends to have the same approach to other areas. Plus,voting record,flipflopped more than a damn pancake. No,thanks.
MITT ROMNEY-got a taste of him on Massachusetts. He made cuts,but didn't truly achieve budget greatness because he egregiously increased fees and other items to makeup for the cuts,a true financier can accomplish this without having to raise fees. Socially,a liberal with an "R",like bush second term.
RON PAUL-makes it for me,and wins all across the board in the end the fed and domestic policy,but fails with the recognition of international threats and terrorism.
RICK SANTORUM-fails with his voting record,liberal spending,and no abortion for rape and life threatening matters,which is otherwiseIT should be,illegal otherwise.

Help

write in candidate... or vote against the worst of the two choices.

 

[The T]

The only approach I agree with Gingrich,Romney,and Santorum on is Iran,but my approach would not be a full-scale war.precise missions,no nation building. Just use up our nifty tech we have not used yet.

Just set them back a few decades to where it will be impossible for them to catch up...by then, the people will have had thier fill of the weird-beards and overthrow them...Obama had his chance back when I'mainajhiad's 'election' was being contested and protested...but he (Obama ) said we shouldn't interefere...

All Obama had to state was that he supported the people...but here we are...

 

[Ed Spacer]

Who,though......that's the thing.....

 

[Ed Spacer]

The only approach I agree with Gingrich,Romney,and Santorum on is Iran,but my approach would not be a full-scale war.precise missions,no nation building. Just use up our nifty tech we have not used yet.

Just set them back a few decades to where it will be impossible for them to catch up...by then, the people will have had thier fill of the weird-beards and overthrow them...Obama had his chance back when I'mainajhiad's 'election' was being contested and protested...but he (Obama ) said we shouldn't interefere...

All Obama had to state was that he supported the people...but here we are...

I like your way of thinking.....right on.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

Obviously whoever the nominee is against Obama, gets my vote

And that sums up why our country is so fucked up in only 10 words.

Yabut, the pubs don't want what President Obama has to offer.

You know ... useless stuff like more than 3 million NEW jobs along with several million saved jobs, almost three years of economic growth ...

In short, the only jobs or economic growth we have seen in more than 10 years has been since President Obama was duly elected.

BUT - the pubs want to go back to the glorious days of Ronnie Ray-Gun and The Shrub, when they peed on us from their thrones on high and called it trickle down economics.

And oh what a wondrous time that was ... gas prices went up, inflation went up and not a new job could be found.

The GObP/Clown Car Candidates have promised us more of the same so of course, the obedient rw's are poised to vote for whatever R loser gets the nod.

 

[Ed Spacer]

Economic growth?I don't think so....laughable at best.....

 

[Luddly Neddite]

The only approach I agree with Gingrich,Romney,and Santorum on is Iran,but my approach would not be a full-scale war.precise missions,no nation building. Just use up our nifty tech we have not used yet.

Oh, you mean EXACTLY what President Obama has done.

The clown Car Candidates say they want full out war.

Our president managed to do what no Repub could do - took out bin Laden, al-Awaki, Gaddafi, many Taliban and ql-Qeada leaders - all without one drop of American blood shed and no women and children killed.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

The only approach I agree with Gingrich,Romney,and Santorum on is Iran,but my approach would not be a full-scale war.precise missions,no nation building. Just use up our nifty tech we have not used yet.

Oh, you mean EXACTLY what President Obama has done.

The clown Car Candidates say they want full out war.

Our president managed to do what no Repub could do - took out bin Laden, al-Awaki, Gaddafi, many Taliban and ql-Qeada leaders - all without one drop of American blood shed and no women and children killed.

 

[syrenn]

Who,though......that's the thing.....

 

[Missourian]

I think it's down to Santorum or Romney.

Santorum is a leader. He says what he believes, even though it is unpopular.

Romney is a fake...a windsock that points in whatever direction his political audiences opinion blows.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

Economic growth?I don't think so....laughable at best.....

Please post PROOF of that.

Betcha can't.

Bet you'll do another of your idiotic 143 page pdf weasel jobs, slinking away because you shoot of your mouth and have no fricking clue what you're saying.

BTW, when I say "PROOF", I don't mean what lushbo or Beck is telling you to say. I mean REAL PROOF.

Go ahead ... I'll wait.

LOL

 

[Ed Spacer]

I can prove it.
Closing down production industry.
Closing and/or blocking energy resources
Overregulation,union Gestapo professional industrial rule.
Globalization of certain trades.
Wasting of tax dollars on failed alternative energy experiments.
Even WITH COOKED BOOKS,unemployment increase..
Original design to crush the transportation industry by forcing up prices of gas nationally,by way of not allowing the access to national resources and leaving us at OPECS mercy and prices,which are geared by their board to support third world garbage nations.
Plus,allowance of illegal trash to live here and take benefits and jobs....


Shall I continue?

 

[g5000]

Who ever is perfect for me won't be perfect to 99% of anyone else. Whoever is perfect to you, isn't going to be perfect for me. It takes an evaluation. If I get 75 to 80% of what's on my political wish list, I'm happy. I'll vote for anyone not obama. Not obama is an automatic 50%.

"Not Obama" is a ridiculous metric. As much as I detest Obama, it is possible for the GOP to conjure up someone worse. Like Gingrich.

In fact, of those who remain, I can't see any of them doing better than Obama. And that is why I will not vote. I do not see anyone who deserves my vote.

Obama's socialist agenda, if that is what you want to call it, is pretty much kiboshed. His hands are way too tied by the complete train wreck Bush left him to clean up. If Bush had handed off a healthy economy, we'd be well and truly screwed by Obama. But then again, if Bush had handed off a healthy economy, Obama wouldn't be President.

Obama was an automatic 100 percent "Not Bush". How'd that work out?

The only real danger Obama poses in the next 4 years is in his Supreme Court appointments. The bond markets will euthanize any socialist programs he has in mind.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

No sonny boy.

No your wacko opinions.

PROOF.

If you want me or anyone else to believe that President Obama did not create more than 3 MILLION jobs and save countless more, you'll need to do better than lushbo talking points.

You can't do it and you and I both know it.

Now go tell your mommy you're ready for din-din.