- Banned
- #1
Obviously whoever the nominee is against Obama, gets my vote,simply because he is the worst WH occupier in history,actions alone.
But,here's my analysis on all....
NEWT GINGRICH-I cannot stand him. He's a program in sheep's clothing. Regardless of what ANYONE says,anyone with the kind of morals he has in his personal life,tends to have the same approach to other areas. Plus,voting record,flipflopped more than a damn pancake. No,thanks.
MITT ROMNEY-got a taste of him on Massachusetts. He made cuts,but didn't truly achieve budget greatness because he egregiously increased fees and other items to makeup for the cuts,a true financier can accomplish this without having to raise fees. Socially,a liberal with an "R",like bush second term.
RON PAUL-makes it for me,and wins all across the board in the end the fed and domestic policy,but fails with the recognition of international threats and terrorism.
RICK SANTORUM-fails with his voting record,liberal spending,and no abortion for rape and life threatening matters,which is otherwiseIT should be,illegal otherwise.
Help
But,here's my analysis on all....
NEWT GINGRICH-I cannot stand him. He's a program in sheep's clothing. Regardless of what ANYONE says,anyone with the kind of morals he has in his personal life,tends to have the same approach to other areas. Plus,voting record,flipflopped more than a damn pancake. No,thanks.
MITT ROMNEY-got a taste of him on Massachusetts. He made cuts,but didn't truly achieve budget greatness because he egregiously increased fees and other items to makeup for the cuts,a true financier can accomplish this without having to raise fees. Socially,a liberal with an "R",like bush second term.
RON PAUL-makes it for me,and wins all across the board in the end the fed and domestic policy,but fails with the recognition of international threats and terrorism.
RICK SANTORUM-fails with his voting record,liberal spending,and no abortion for rape and life threatening matters,which is otherwiseIT should be,illegal otherwise.
Help