Hunter Biden's Attorneys Just Went Scorched Earth on IRS Whistleblowers

[Doc7505]

Hunter Biden's Attorneys Just Went Scorched Earth on IRS Whistleblowers​

Hunter Biden's Attorneys Just Went Scorched Earth on IRS Whistleblowers

townhall.com

18 Sep 2023 ~~ By Katie Pavlich

Hunter Biden is suing the Internal Revenue Service, arguing whistleblower testimony from career agents was meant to embarrass him and was a violation of his privacy.
Congress and news reporters about their concerns that the case was not being managed properly, they violated his privacy rights as a taxpayer," the Washington Post reports. "Biden charges in the lawsuit that when two IRS agents went to Congress and news organizations complaining of alleged mishandling of the investigation by Justice Department officials, they disclosed information about the investigation, and about Biden’s taxes, that the law aims to keep secret."
George Washington University Law Professor Jonathan Turley is crying foul and classifying the move as whistleblower intimidation.

**********

**********

**********

​

Commentary:
How dare they invade Hunter`s privacy while he was committing crimes.
This is pure unbridled lawfare. They are discouraging the hundreds of people that know about the Biden crime family and their crimes from testifying.
Maoist/DSA Democrats continually go scorched earth, always the nuclear option from them. Meanwhile, The GOP tries to make the media like them by being so called bipartisan i.e., assisting the Democrats.
This seems like some sort of flip-side to the old “We can't say anything because it's under investigation”. Here you have whistleblowers — who, by definition, are saying something. And I guess that's “illegal” because they are contributing to the investigation about which nothing can be said.

Remember when Democrats were sure Trump was guilty of something and demanded his tax returns.

Democrats Demand to See Trump’s Tax Returns | National Review

More than a few Republicans will suspect that the real goal is to get Trump’s tax returns, look for anything embarrassing, and then leak that.

www.nationalreview.com

**********​

https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2022/11/23/trump-taxes-supreme-court/

**********​

Here's how Democrats plan to get Donald Trump's tax returns

A 1924 law says the Treasury secretary "shall furnish" tax returns of any person for private review by the chairs of the House and Senate tax committees.

www.nbcnews.com

 

[MarathonMike]

Who is paying for Hunter Biden's attorneys? That would be an interesting list of names.

 

[Votto]

Hunter Biden's Attorneys Just Went Scorched Earth on IRS Whistleblowers​

Hunter Biden's Attorneys Just Went Scorched Earth on IRS Whistleblowers

townhall.com

18 Sep 2023 ~~ By Katie Pavlich

Hunter Biden is suing the Internal Revenue Service, arguing whistleblower testimony from career agents was meant to embarrass him and was a violation of his privacy.
Congress and news reporters about their concerns that the case was not being managed properly, they violated his privacy rights as a taxpayer," the Washington Post reports. "Biden charges in the lawsuit that when two IRS agents went to Congress and news organizations complaining of alleged mishandling of the investigation by Justice Department officials, they disclosed information about the investigation, and about Biden’s taxes, that the law aims to keep secret."
George Washington University Law Professor Jonathan Turley is crying foul and classifying the move as whistleblower intimidation.

**********

**********

**********

​

Commentary:
How dare they invade Hunter`s privacy while he was committing crimes.
This is pure unbridled lawfare. They are discouraging the hundreds of people that know about the Biden crime family and their crimes from testifying.
Maoist/DSA Democrats continually go scorched earth, always the nuclear option from them. Meanwhile, The GOP tries to make the media like them by being so called bipartisan i.e., assisting the Democrats.
This seems like some sort of flip-side to the old “We can't say anything because it's under investigation”. Here you have whistleblowers — who, by definition, are saying something. And I guess that's “illegal” because they are contributing to the investigation about which nothing can be said.

Remember when Democrats were sure Trump was guilty of something and demanded his tax returns.

Democrats Demand to See Trump’s Tax Returns | National Review

More than a few Republicans will suspect that the real goal is to get Trump’s tax returns, look for anything embarrassing, and then leak that.

www.nationalreview.com

**********​

https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2022/11/23/trump-taxes-supreme-court/

**********​

Here's how Democrats plan to get Donald Trump's tax returns

A 1924 law says the Treasury secretary "shall furnish" tax returns of any person for private review by the chairs of the House and Senate tax committees.

www.nbcnews.com

Democrats need to make an example of any whistleblowers that come against them to discourage anyone else from doing it.

Makes sense.

 

[Doc7505]

Democrats need to make an example of any whistleblowers that come against them to discourage anyone else from doing it.

Makes sense.

~~~~~~
Essentially you are correct. They will violate any law and ethic to gain and maintain their criminal tyrannical power over the people.

 

[marvin martian]

Hunter Biden's Attorneys Just Went Scorched Earth on IRS Whistleblowers​

Hunter Biden's Attorneys Just Went Scorched Earth on IRS Whistleblowers

townhall.com

18 Sep 2023 ~~ By Katie Pavlich

Hunter Biden is suing the Internal Revenue Service, arguing whistleblower testimony from career agents was meant to embarrass him and was a violation of his privacy.
Congress and news reporters about their concerns that the case was not being managed properly, they violated his privacy rights as a taxpayer," the Washington Post reports. "Biden charges in the lawsuit that when two IRS agents went to Congress and news organizations complaining of alleged mishandling of the investigation by Justice Department officials, they disclosed information about the investigation, and about Biden’s taxes, that the law aims to keep secret."
George Washington University Law Professor Jonathan Turley is crying foul and classifying the move as whistleblower intimidation.

**********

**********

**********

​

Commentary:
How dare they invade Hunter`s privacy while he was committing crimes.
This is pure unbridled lawfare. They are discouraging the hundreds of people that know about the Biden crime family and their crimes from testifying.
Maoist/DSA Democrats continually go scorched earth, always the nuclear option from them. Meanwhile, The GOP tries to make the media like them by being so called bipartisan i.e., assisting the Democrats.
This seems like some sort of flip-side to the old “We can't say anything because it's under investigation”. Here you have whistleblowers — who, by definition, are saying something. And I guess that's “illegal” because they are contributing to the investigation about which nothing can be said.

Remember when Democrats were sure Trump was guilty of something and demanded his tax returns.

Democrats Demand to See Trump’s Tax Returns | National Review

More than a few Republicans will suspect that the real goal is to get Trump’s tax returns, look for anything embarrassing, and then leak that.

www.nationalreview.com

**********​

https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2022/11/23/trump-taxes-supreme-court/

**********​

Here's how Democrats plan to get Donald Trump's tax returns

A 1924 law says the Treasury secretary "shall furnish" tax returns of any person for private review by the chairs of the House and Senate tax committees.

www.nbcnews.com

Hunter Biden going to war with his dad's IRS to expose their unethical/illegal behavior.

Are we SURE Hunter isn't actually working for Trump?

 

[jwoodie]

This could be laying the foundation of a sweetheart settlement/plea deal.

 

[sealybobo]

Who is paying for Hunter Biden's attorneys? That would be an interesting list of names.

Hunter's attorney made another great point. What changed? What changed between the day they were going to make a deal and the day the deal fell apart? Nothing except for the politics. So clearly Republican House members made the deal fall apart. So this is clearly politics.

Another great point is the gun question is unconstitutional. Was he on drugs the day he purchased the gun or filled out the form? Nope. So can a background check ask you if you have EVER used drugs and then tell you that you can't buy a gun if you have?

 

[marvin martian]

Hunter's attorney made another great point. What changed? What changed between the day they were going to make a deal and the day the deal fell apart? Nothing except for the politics. So clearly Republican House members made the deal fall apart. So this is clearly politics.

Another great point is the gun question is unconstitutional. Was he on drugs the day he purchased the gun or filled out the form? Nope. So can a background check ask you if you have EVER used drugs and then tell you that you can't buy a gun if you have?

Hunter's attorneys tried to slip a blanket immunity past the judge, and she caught them. That was the end of the "deal".

 

[sealybobo]

Hunter's attorneys tried to slip a blanket immunity past the judge, and she caught them. That was the end of the "deal".

And we know, as 2nd amendment advocates, what they are doing to Hunter is soooo unconstitutional

That paradox just scratches the surface of the unjust, illogical, and unconstitutional mess created by arbitrary federal restrictions on gun ownership.

How Hunter Biden's plea deal fell apart

A federal judge objected to two aspects of the agreement that seemed designed to shield Biden from the possibility that his father will lose reelection.

reason.com

We will use your love of guns to get Hunter off.

 

[marvin martian]

And we know, as 2nd amendment advocates, what they are doing to Hunter is soooo unconstitutional

That paradox just scratches the surface of the unjust, illogical, and unconstitutional mess created by arbitrary federal restrictions on gun ownership.

How Hunter Biden's plea deal fell apart

A federal judge objected to two aspects of the agreement that seemed designed to shield Biden from the possibility that his father will lose reelection.

reason.com

We will use your love of guns to get Hunter off.

I'm glad you've finally come out against the "gun control" bullshit, like background checks, you've been trying to foist on us for decades.

 

[sealybobo]

I'm glad you've finally come out against the "gun control" bullshit, like background checks, you've been trying to foist on us for decades.

It took Hunter to make me see it. LOL

 

[marvin martian]

It took Hunter to make me see it. LOL

^^^See folks, sometimes good things DO happen if you're in a cult!

 

[Flash]

Of course they did.

In a Banana Republic you are not allowed to criticize the ruling elite.