How to un-rig our election process and restore election integrity.

Voting has nothing to do with you paying your bills....Total non-sequitur....The French don't do mail-in exactly because it is a prime target for fraud.

It has never ever been about the sainted pooooooor, you sniveling little bitch.

It's about Democracy, you snivelling twit.

You guys are afraid that the 60% of the population that controls less than 4% of the wealth in this country might want to change that.
 
  • Funny
Reactions: DBA
It's about Democracy, you snivelling twit.

You guys are afraid that the 60% of the population that controls less than 4% of the wealth in this country might want to change that.
Fuck you, sniveling asshole....You don't give a fuck about the sainted poooooor, as anything more than a political prop to hide behind.
 
.

For those sincerely interested in maintain the integrity of our election process, a good starting point is to assess our current situation in light of a Harper’s Magazine article, How to Rig an Election . . . The G.O.P. aims to paint the country red, 2012, which takes a deep-dive into vote rigging in the United States.

Not only does the article recall New York City’s Tammany Hall vote rigging machine, “ . . . which bought off judges, politicians, and ward captains”, but also highlights “. . . the outsourcing of our elections to a handful of corporations that operate in the shadows, with little oversight or accountability. . . ”, and this has occurred without the people’s knowledge or consent.

One significant question mentioned in the article is: “Who controls the new technology of Election Night?” Another unanswered question being, “Why would someone who owns a voting-machine company want to run for office?”

Keep in mind, a significance feature of the article is, it was written long before our current politically inspired and partisan big media folk relentlessly condemn anyone who dares to question today’s election process, integrity or results.

While it is obvious the author is sympathetic to democrats, one cannot deny the clarity in which she demonstrates weaknesses in the then, election process, which today have not only been augmented and is exacerbated by the use of no-excuse mail-in ballot voting, but no-excuse mail-in ballot voting has flung open the door to countless undetectable clever ways for vote stealing and government perpetrated election fraud. Perhaps that is why so many democratic run countries have banned mail-in voting, LINK, and returned to paper ballots, strict voter ID and in-person voting as a rule.

JWK

The troubling truth about allowing no-excuse mail-in voting in one state is, when acts of corruption infect an electoral process in one jurisdiction “they transcend mere local concern and extend a contaminating influence into the national domain.” Justice DOUGLAS in United States v. Classic (1941)”.

The dems cheated in the tens of millions column in 20 and 22 and there’s nothing to stop them from cheating again in November
 
Working class citizens are not able to vote with one day voting and absentee voting only for cause?

No wonder the Dems have abandoned them.
It's the dems that have tried to make it easier for them to vote. The cult has been trying to reduce turnout. Let's be clear.
 
We do our taxes by mostly by mail. We do censuses mostly by mail.

Nobody claims that those are invalid because they are done by mail.

The only reason why the right is upset with mail-in ballots is it makes it easier for poor people to vote.

Makes it easier for Progressive Fascist to cheat
 
I have results, dumbfuck....All you have are blabbering points for morons.
Maybe you're just a frightened idiot. Beats me what your issue is. But you've been spreading ignorant D/R propaganda, trying to discredit RCV. Guess you just love establishment politics for some reason.
 
Maybe you're just a frightened idiot. Beats me what your issue is. But you've been spreading ignorant D/R propaganda, trying to discredit RCV. Guess you just love establishment politics for some reason.
Results aren't on your side....You obviously don't want to address that, so you flaccidly try to make it about me.

The results of rigged choice voting speak for themselves: It sucks.
 
Results aren't on your side....You obviously don't want to address that, so you flaccidly try to make it about me.
Because you parroting idiotic bullshit straight from D/R talking points. You seem to have lost the ability to think for yourself.
The results of rigged choice voting speak for itself: It sucks.
No, they don't. Despite your harping.
 
Because you parroting idiotic bullshit straight from D/R talking points. You seem to have lost the ability to think for yourself.

No, they don't. Despite your harping.
Janet Mills, Lisa Murkowski, and Mary Pelota....Three low horsepower mediocrities, if there ever were....Those are your avatars for rigged choice voting.

Go piss up a rope.
 
Janet Mills, Lisa Murkowski, and Mary Pelota....Three low horsepower mediocrities, if there ever were....Those are your avatars for rigged choice voting.

Go piss up a rope.
You don't even understand ranked choice voting. You've made that clear with your inane "critique". Instead, you're fixated on one election in Alaska where Palin's idiocy (she told her supporters to not rank candidates) submarined her chances.

Why are you so heavily invested in the Republican party anyway? Do you think they're actually making a "better world"? Have you just fallen for their silly fear mongering? What gives?
 
You don't even understand ranked choice voting. You've made that clear with your inane "critique". Instead, you're fixated on one election in Alaska where Palin's idiocy (she told her supporters to not rank candidates) submarined her chances.

Why you're so heavily invested in the Republican party anyway? Do you think they're actually making a "better world"? Have you just fallen for their silly fear mongering? What gives?
Making it about me can't paper over the shit results....I'd want to change the subject if those were my results too.
 

Forum List

Back
Top