Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
You have said that he used shoddy research, but you have not explained how it was shoddy. Neither has anyone else.I've explained it multiple times. He used shoddy research, in some cases unethically gathered, and has been renounced by the university that employed him.
For you the delusions of woke political correctness seem to be status symbols.
By mouthing the fashionable nonsense of fashionable people you think you have risen above your humble beginnings.
With your obscene words, and your lack of literacy and learning you expose the truth about yourself.
It is characteristic of you that you use the persecution of Jews in Czarist Russia and Nazi Germany, not to condemn the persecution, but the Jews.
You have said that he used shoddy research, but you have not explained how it was shoddy. Neither has anyone else.
What he has said is that Orientals tend to be more intelligent, obedient to the law, and monogamous than whites, who tend to have vastly more of these characteristics than Negroes. That is obvious. Look at the data.
You have posted links claiming that his research was shoddy and unethical. Those links did not explain how his research was shoddy and unethical. You have not either.I've posted dozens of links on his shoddy, unethical research.
Point is, his own University has denounced him.
Center for Equal OpportunityYeah, he also said Asians were less sexual, which is just nonsense...
as any white dude who has dated an Asian woman can tell you.
You have posted links claiming that his research was shoddy and unethical. Those links did not explain how his research was shoddy and unethical. You have not either.
Even his own university has not explained how is research was inaccurate.
Wow, you realize that it's possible to have sex and not make a baby, right?Center for Equal Opportunity
Percentage of Births to Unmarried Women
That is common in psychological experiments. Subjects are told that the experiment is for one reason, when it is for another reason. Two things are important here: the findings are still valid; the subjects are not harmed.Well, yes, they did. For starters, he collected data from his own students without their consent or informing them what he was collecting data for.
Racism Is Part of the Survival Instinct. For Inferior Races, It Is Part of the Death Wish.I feel morally superior because I've overcome the prejudices our society is built on.
Um, wow, you kind of took what I said and made it sound crazier.. Good job.
Hypocrisy HeiristocracyUm, wow, you kind of took what I said and made it sound crazier.. Good job.
Are you arguing for paying students to be students?
That is common in psychological experiments. Subjects are told that the experiment is for one reason, when it is for another reason. Two things are important here: the findings are still valid; the subjects are not harmed.
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc()/business-people-talking-in-meeting-595349799-5727b5275f9b589e34df3064.jpg)
how is 'looking at history' gonna predict the complicated futures in different parts around the world?A political thinker should be read for insight, rather than doctrine. Most people like what a political thinker says, and agree with all of it, or they dislike it, and assume that it is all mistaken.
Edmund Burke and Karl Marx are seen as polar opposites. Burke favored slow, evolutionary changes, respecting what already existed.
Nevertheless, Burke idealized the French aristocracy and monarchy that existed before the French Revolution. When he wrote Reflections on the Revolution in France Louis XVI was still the king of FRance. The Reign of Terror had not begun yet. France was doing what England had accomplished a century earlier: France was developing a representative democracy with a Constitutional monarch.
The execution of Louis XVII and the Reign of Terror happened under the pressure of an invasion of Russia and Austria. If the rest of the world had let the French work out their differences peacefully, I believe that France would still have a Constitutional monarch, and the Napoleonic wars would not have happened.
From Burke I lean that there is often wisdom in tradition, and that we should be pessimistic about human nature and human potential. For a modern treatise on human nature I recommend Sociobiology, the New Synthessis, by E.O.Wilson. For a modern treatise on human potential and its limitations I recommend The Bell Curve, by Professor Richard Herrnstein and Charles Murray.
My study of Marx includes a fascinating seminar I took on Das Kapital, under the aegis of the American Communist Party. I think Marx had two valid insights. These explain the Great Depression, and the current rise in economic inequality. First, the natural tendency of un or lightly regulated capitalism is to accumulate wealth and income at the top. Second, partly as a result of this capitalist economies experience increasingly destructive economic downturns.
Everything else Marx asserted was mistaken. His most egregious mistake was to assert that loyalties of class are more powerful than loyalties of race, nation, and ethnicity. For most people, most of the time, the opposite is true. The writings of Marx do not explain the First World War, the rise of Italian Fascism and German Nazism, and the fact that America's white working class is a Republican constituency.
