How to drive an irrational leftist insane

[Faun]

He had authority to declassify them himself, he didn't have to ask.

So? That doesn't actually refute what he said.

 

[Marener]

He had authority to declassify them himself, he didn't have to ask.

.

Do you honestly think he actually declassified the information in all of the hundreds of documents he took?

Honestly?

 

[candycorn]

DNyuz - Latest Breaking U.S. News

Latest Breaking News, U.S. and World Politics, Crime, Business, Science, Technology, Autos, Entertainment, Culture, Movie, Music, Sports.

dnyuz.com

The left will now cry and weep and moan and groan that this judge shouldn’t be permitted to keep the case.



Oh no. A judge who might just take the job of reviewing a motion to dismiss an indictment on various legal grounds … seriously. How unfair.

306>232

 

[Billo_Really]

So that's the only case she has ever presided over? Are you so stupid as to not know what "all decisions" implies?

.

All her decisions in that case. Are you so stupid to think I was referring to all her cases?

 

[BackAgain]

306>232

Zzz. Your standard very mindless reply doesn’t mean a thing in this context.

 

[candycorn]

I'm sorry...does it drive you crazy?

 

[bodecea]

She wasn’t biased in the slightest much less “egregiously” biased.

She made a ruling. She tried to accord the accused some procedural fairness. Other judges said, “Nyet.” Bfd. Judges make rulings all the time. Higher courts occasionally reverse those rulings. It’s part of the process of how law is made.

Again, it gauls libbies that a judge might be fair.

A lawyer, my potooti.

 

[bodecea]

Zzz. No no, jerkoffgoat. She got reversed on a ruling. Once again, BFD.

You libturds are terrified of justice and fairness.

And got soundly slapped.

 

[OKTexas]

Do you honestly think he actually declassified the information in all of the hundreds of documents he took?

Honestly?

He said he did.

.

 

[OKTexas]

All her decisions in that case. Are you so stupid to think I was referring to all her cases?

Perhaps you should have been more concise in your speech.

.

 

[j-mac]

And got soundly slapped.

And is now the presiding judge here in this case….poor you.

 

[Marener]

He said he did.

.

He says lots of things.

And you believe him?

 

[OKTexas]

He says lots of things.

And you believe him?

I have no reason not to.

I bet you believed xiden when he said he never discussed hunters foreign business. Didn't you?

.

 

[Concerned American]

All it takes to send you running with your tail between your legs is an 'e'?

Well that was easy.

If you ever manage the courage to address the question, I'll be around.

As soon as you locate an appellant court. When you can construct a proper question, maybe I'll address it.

 

[Billo_Really]

About your false claim about having been clear? I already did. I quoted you, you moron.

What did I say that would give any inclination that I was referring to ALL her cases?

 

[Skylar]

As soon as you locate an appellant court. When you can construct a proper question, maybe I'll address it.

So you refuse to answer the question.

I accept your concession with all the grace and patience it deserves.

Look out, buddy! There's an 'e'...its got a knife! Run!

 

[BackAgain]

What did I say that would give any inclination that I was referring to ALL her cases?

The word “all.”

 

[Billo_Really]

The word “all.”

All her decisions on the Trump case. That's what we were discussing. Only a MAGA moron would try to re-frame the discussion to something more palatable.

 

[BackAgain]

All her decisions on the Trump case.

Thats not what you said. No qualification.

Your post was, at best, unclear.

That's what we were discussing.

We were discussing the proceeding in front of her. That much is true. But you alleged that she was a ****. And you spoke about what a ooor judge she was. And that’s the context in which you used the word “all” in describing her rulings.

You’re a retard.

Only a MAGA moron would try to re-frame the discussion to something more palatable.

Nope. Own it, bitch. You did in fact post unclearly. I can’t make you admit it. But I can join in the criticism of your inept posting style.

It’s ok. It’s all your own fault. You’re an imbecile.

 

[Billo_Really]

Thats not what you said. No qualification.

Your post was, at best, unclear.

We were discussing the proceeding in front of her. That much is true. But you alleged that she was a ****. And you spoke about what a ooor judge she was. And that’s the context in which you used the word “all” in describing her rulings.

You’re a retard.

Nope. Own it, bitch. You did in fact post unclearly. I can’t make you admit it. But I can join in the criticism of your inept posting style.

It’s ok. It’s all your own fault. You’re an imbecile.

Nice try!