How They Lie, And How They Are Exposed....

[PoliticalChic]

And we find this sort of parroting of the Democrat line throughout recent posts:

""For example, a key fact ignored in criticisms of Clinton’s supposed involvement in the deal is that the uranium was not — nor could it be — exported,..."
Human Nature Never Changes

What was not included in the quote was "as stipulated in the agreement". The fact that the agreement was subsequently modified doesn't mean the quote was incorrect at the time it was made. We're a nation of laws and contracts, both can be and usually are amended.

It wasn't modified....it accomplished exactly as bought and paid for.


.....why did your side lie about it?



2. [Democrats and their simpleton trainees] "repeated the oft-quoted narrative that the “company changed hands, but the uranium that is mined in the United States cannot leave the United States." The NRC license now shows now that Uranium One was, in fact, allowed to export American uranium."
Uranium One deal led to some exports to Europe, memos show



And we find this sort of parroting of the Democrat line throughout recent posts:

"And I know it is not in Iran as we speak because it has never left the good old USA."
Now For The Last Nail In This Coffin....



""For example, a key fact ignored in criticisms of Clinton’s supposed involvement in the deal is that the uranium was not — nor could it be — exported,..."
Human Nature Never Changes

 

[depotoo]

Honey, I was talking about you and nycarbineer...

Amazing how they want to change the subject.

Appears I've hit a nerve among the fifth columnists.....

Further posts may be even more painful.


Excellent.

Honey, it has to do with the lies. The fact you find that acceptable by your party over and over and over just tells me who you are. No paranoia here, dear.



you have noticed that as well also how she goes into evade mode when pesky facts are shown how corrupt the republicans are.

 

[depotoo]

I think a lot of both.

Honey, facts are things you always ignore. You still carry water for those that even members within your party are beginning to dump that water on.

You can repeat these dishonest rants as often as you want but their not going to save your rapist lover, Donald Trump.

_____________________________

Contrast this post with the litany of sources and quotes given by the O. P.

It is a typical response by half-wit liberals to an educated conservative.

Not just typical. Nearly universal.

One group is engaged in intelligent debate on the serious issues of the day; the other is on the elementary school playground.

Mac.....you allowing them to plead ignorance.

It's far worse.

They are practiced enemies of this nation.


"The deniers first deceive themselves that they are sincere in their adherence to falsehoods. Thus they cannot be faulted for acting on genuinely held views. But in truth, they have cultivated an ignorance of the facts, what Thomas Aquinas called ignorantia affectata. An ignorance so useful that one protects it at all costs, in order to continue using it in one’s own self interest. This ignorance is not exculpatory, but inculpatory.
Forgive them not, for they know full well what they do."
RICHARD BADALAMENTE

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

ignorantia affectata

I like it but I may not be able to remember it.

Would you agree that it applies when every Asshole on CNN and MSNBC pretends that it was "The Republicans" first hired that Fusion outfit to contact the British spy and the Russians and dig bogus dirt on Trump.......when in fact it has been shown over and over again in even such as the Washington Post....that the British spy was NOT hired and the Russians NOT contacted UNTIL after the Never Trump Republicans quit and the Democrats took over?

It that ignorantia affectata or just damn lies?

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

 

[dudmuck]

And we find this sort of parroting of the Democrat line throughout recent posts:

""For example, a key fact ignored in criticisms of Clinton’s supposed involvement in the deal is that the uranium was not — nor could it be — exported,..."
Human Nature Never Changes

What was not included in the quote was "as stipulated in the agreement". The fact that the agreement was subsequently modified doesn't mean the quote was incorrect at the time it was made. We're a nation of laws and contracts, both can be and usually are amended.

It wasn't modified....it accomplished exactly as bought and paid for.


.....why did your side lie about it?



2. [Democrats and their simpleton trainees] "repeated the oft-quoted narrative that the “company changed hands, but the uranium that is mined in the United States cannot leave the United States." The NRC license now shows now that Uranium One was, in fact, allowed to export American uranium."
Uranium One deal led to some exports to Europe, memos show



And we find this sort of parroting of the Democrat line throughout recent posts:

"And I know it is not in Iran as we speak because it has never left the good old USA."
Now For The Last Nail In This Coffin....



""For example, a key fact ignored in criticisms of Clinton’s supposed involvement in the deal is that the uranium was not — nor could it be — exported,..."
Human Nature Never Changes

The license dated March 16, 2012, when congress was in control by republicans. The article says "The move escaped notice in Congress" in reference to the 60% increase that the NRC allowed on already existing export license. And export to europe?! oh no! who got it, France?

Russia has more uranium capacity that it needs, and they sure have never needed our uranium.

 

[PoliticalChic]

And we find this sort of parroting of the Democrat line throughout recent posts:

""For example, a key fact ignored in criticisms of Clinton’s supposed involvement in the deal is that the uranium was not — nor could it be — exported,..."
Human Nature Never Changes

What was not included in the quote was "as stipulated in the agreement". The fact that the agreement was subsequently modified doesn't mean the quote was incorrect at the time it was made. We're a nation of laws and contracts, both can be and usually are amended.

It wasn't modified....it accomplished exactly as bought and paid for.


.....why did your side lie about it?



2. [Democrats and their simpleton trainees] "repeated the oft-quoted narrative that the “company changed hands, but the uranium that is mined in the United States cannot leave the United States." The NRC license now shows now that Uranium One was, in fact, allowed to export American uranium."
Uranium One deal led to some exports to Europe, memos show



And we find this sort of parroting of the Democrat line throughout recent posts:

"And I know it is not in Iran as we speak because it has never left the good old USA."
Now For The Last Nail In This Coffin....



""For example, a key fact ignored in criticisms of Clinton’s supposed involvement in the deal is that the uranium was not — nor could it be — exported,..."
Human Nature Never Changes

The license dated March 16, 2012, when congress was in control by republicans. The article says "The move escaped notice in Congress" in reference to the 60% increase that the NRC allowed on already existing export license. And export to europe?! oh no! who got it, France?

Russia has more uranium capacity that it needs, and they sure have never needed our uranium.

Wait.....you're trying to claim that it was Republicans who were bribed into authorizing the selling of the uranium to Russia???


Gads....these threads seem to act as flypaper for morons.

 

[Siete]

And we find this sort of parroting of the Democrat line throughout recent posts:

""For example, a key fact ignored in criticisms of Clinton’s supposed involvement in the deal is that the uranium was not — nor could it be — exported,..."
Human Nature Never Changes

What was not included in the quote was "as stipulated in the agreement". The fact that the agreement was subsequently modified doesn't mean the quote was incorrect at the time it was made. We're a nation of laws and contracts, both can be and usually are amended.

It wasn't modified....it accomplished exactly as bought and paid for.


.....why did your side lie about it?



2. [Democrats and their simpleton trainees] "repeated the oft-quoted narrative that the “company changed hands, but the uranium that is mined in the United States cannot leave the United States." The NRC license now shows now that Uranium One was, in fact, allowed to export American uranium."
Uranium One deal led to some exports to Europe, memos show



And we find this sort of parroting of the Democrat line throughout recent posts:

"And I know it is not in Iran as we speak because it has never left the good old USA."
Now For The Last Nail In This Coffin....



""For example, a key fact ignored in criticisms of Clinton’s supposed involvement in the deal is that the uranium was not — nor could it be — exported,..."
Human Nature Never Changes

The license dated March 16, 2012, when congress was in control by republicans. The article says "The move escaped notice in Congress" in reference to the 60% increase that the NRC allowed on already existing export license. And export to europe?! oh no! who got it, France?

Russia has more uranium capacity that it needs, and they sure have never needed our uranium.

Wait.....you're trying to claim that it was Republicans who were bribed into authorizing the selling of the uranium to Russia???


Gads....these threads seem to act as flypaper for morons.

nobody transferred uranium to anyone

yawnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn

 

[BlindBoo]

.....why did your side lie about it?

As was stated earlier in this thread the NYT reported the fact in 2015.

"Asked about that, the commission confirmed that Uranium One has, in fact, shipped yellowcake to Canada even though it does not have an export license. Instead, the transport company doing the shipping, RSB Logistic Services, has the license. A commission spokesman said that “to the best of our knowledge” most of the uranium sent to Canada for processing was returned for use in the United States. A Uranium One spokeswoman, Donna Wichers, said 25 percent had gone to Western Europe and Japan. At the moment, with the uranium market in a downturn, nothing is being shipped from the Wyoming mines."

Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal

So instead of your usual personal insults, care to address the facts I presented about the US importing hundreds of tons of uranium from Russia between 1993 and 2013? Or the fact that the mines in question produce about 4% of what we use in any given year?

1. At the very least, you apologists for Democrat fifth columnists deserve 'personal insults.'.....and perhaps a trip to gitmo.


2.And I use the Leftist NYTimes as the source:


"....despite assurances by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission that uranium could not leave the country without Uranium One or ARMZ obtaining an export license — which they do not have — yellowcake from his property was routinely packed into drums and trucked off to a processing plant in Canada.


Asked about that, the commission confirmed that Uranium One has, in fact, shipped yellowcake to Canada even though it does not have an export license."
Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal



" A commission spokesman said that “to the best of our knowledge” [read 'we don't have a clue'] most of the uranium sent to Canada for processing was returned for use in the United States. A Uranium One spokeswoman, Donna Wichers, said 25 percent had gone to Western Europe and Japan."
Ibid.


The uranium left the United States....off to Canada....and thence, no one knows where it went.
No One!

Ah yes, more of your baseless insults and partisan talking points, so I'll take that as a no.

.....why did your side lie about it?



Quite a retreat on your part from this:


2. [Democrats and their simpleton trainees] "repeated the oft-quoted narrative that the “company changed hands, but the uranium that is mined in the United States cannot leave the United States." The NRC license now shows now that Uranium One was, in fact, allowed to export American uranium."
Uranium One deal led to some exports to Europe, memos show

And we find this sort of parroting of the Democrat line throughout recent posts:

"And I know it is not in Iran as we speak because it has never left the good old USA."
Now For The Last Nail In This Coffin....

""For example, a key fact ignored in criticisms of Clinton’s supposed involvement in the deal is that the uranium was not — nor could it be — exported,..."
Human Nature Never Changes

I can only speculate on why others say what they say. Perhaps they didn't read far enough in the Times article to realize that there was a small amount was exported to Canada for processing. But as you noted you consider the Times as part of the left so while some individuals may not have had the complete facts, the Times did not lie about it.

 

[PoliticalChic]

And we find this sort of parroting of the Democrat line throughout recent posts:

""For example, a key fact ignored in criticisms of Clinton’s supposed involvement in the deal is that the uranium was not — nor could it be — exported,..."
Human Nature Never Changes

What was not included in the quote was "as stipulated in the agreement". The fact that the agreement was subsequently modified doesn't mean the quote was incorrect at the time it was made. We're a nation of laws and contracts, both can be and usually are amended.

It wasn't modified....it accomplished exactly as bought and paid for.


.....why did your side lie about it?



2. [Democrats and their simpleton trainees] "repeated the oft-quoted narrative that the “company changed hands, but the uranium that is mined in the United States cannot leave the United States." The NRC license now shows now that Uranium One was, in fact, allowed to export American uranium."
Uranium One deal led to some exports to Europe, memos show



And we find this sort of parroting of the Democrat line throughout recent posts:

"And I know it is not in Iran as we speak because it has never left the good old USA."
Now For The Last Nail In This Coffin....



""For example, a key fact ignored in criticisms of Clinton’s supposed involvement in the deal is that the uranium was not — nor could it be — exported,..."
Human Nature Never Changes

The license dated March 16, 2012, when congress was in control by republicans. The article says "The move escaped notice in Congress" in reference to the 60% increase that the NRC allowed on already existing export license. And export to europe?! oh no! who got it, France?

Russia has more uranium capacity that it needs, and they sure have never needed our uranium.

Wait.....you're trying to claim that it was Republicans who were bribed into authorizing the selling of the uranium to Russia???


Gads....these threads seem to act as flypaper for morons.

nobody transferred uranium to anyone

yawnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn

In the last several day's we've learned
a. The Russians paid $145 million to the Clinton Crime Family, and in return appropriated a large portion of our uranium.
They have energy....so it in to be used for weapons......
Against whom?
Us.


b. Bill was slipped $500,000 to give a fake speech.
See a. above.

c. " Former Hillary Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta exits after ... a company that received $35 million from the Russian government..."
http://nypost.com/2017/07/05/uncovering-the-russia-ties-of-hillarys-campaign-chief/

d. "WASHINGTON — Tony Podesta and the Podesta Group are now the subjects of a federal investigation being led by Special Counsel Robert Mueller,...violated the Foreign Agents Registration Act, known as FARA."
Mueller now investigating Democratic lobbyist Tony Podesta
Russian spies influencing the Obama/Clinton administration via bribes.

e. In 11 months of thorough investigations, there has not been a smidgen of evidence of any connections of Trump to the Russians.


oh....and
f. We've learned that you are a compete imbecile.

 

[PoliticalChic]

7. ... it wasn't just the Clintons and Hussein who were in on it......


"Damning new evidence appears to show that Hillary Clinton used her office as Secretary of State to confer benefits to Russia in exchange for millions of dollars in donations to her foundation and cash to her husband.

But there’s more. It seems it was all covered up for years by the same three people who are now involved in the investigation of President Donald Trump over so-called Russian “collusion.”

The corrupt scheme is said to have been financed by the Russians through bribes, kickbacks, extortion and money laundering. The FBI and the Department of Justice reportedly had the evidence in their possession before the uranium sale, but kept the matter secret ...


..... the people who were in charge of the investigation and who knew of its explosive impact. Who are they?

....Robert Mueller was the FBI Director during the time of the Russian uranium probe, and so was his successor James Comey who took over in 2013 as the FBI was still developing the case. Rod Rosenstein, then-U.S. Attorney....

Holder, Mueller, Comey & Rosenstein"
Gregg Jarrett: The Clinton cover-up, brought to you by the same guys who are investigating Trump




Now we have the second explanation for the "Trump Colluded With Russia" fabrication



The first is to assuage the Hillary loss....


The second...and more important....to camouflage the fact that every major Democrat elite was both knowledgeable and a participant in the corruption: Muller, Comey and Rosenstein knew and probably wet their beaks in the payoffs.




Sooooo......the entire Trump investigation was simply to misdirect the public away from the real colluders.

 

[eddiew37]

The Democrats, and their government school trained fifth column.....

"A fifth column is any group of people who undermine a larger group from within, usually in favor of an enemy group or nation."
Fifth column - Wikipedia

1. Accepting money to sell out the interests and security of the United States is not a new phenomenon for the Democrats.
Bill Clinton did just that in the 1990s, selling our missile technology to Red China.
Biting on his line, Bill's wife sold our uranium to Russia, a nation with all the energy it needs, for multiple millions.
Where could the uranium go but into weapons....aimed at guess who.



2. [Democrats and their simpleton trainees] "repeated the oft-quoted narrative that the “company changed hands, but the uranium that is mined in the United States cannot leave the United States." The NRC license now shows now that Uranium One was, in fact, allowed to export American uranium."
Uranium One deal led to some exports to Europe, memos show

And we find this sort of parroting of the Democrat line throughout recent posts:

"And I know it is not in Iran as we speak because it has never left the good old USA."
Now For The Last Nail In This Coffin....

""For example, a key fact ignored in criticisms of Clinton’s supposed involvement in the deal is that the uranium was not — nor could it be — exported,..."
Human Nature Never Changes


These fifth columnists care not about the future of our nation, ...only the pat on the head they get from their Leftist masters.


In a remarkable piece of journalistic endeavor, The Hill exposes the lying left in the following posts.



3. "After the Obama administration approved the sale of a Canadian mining company with significant U.S. uranium reserves to a firm owned by Russia’s government, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission assured Congress and the public the new owners couldn’t export any raw nuclear fuel from America’s shores.

“No uranium produced at either facility may be exported,” the NRC declared in a November 2010 press release....
A year later, the nuclear regulator repeated the assurance....

The NRC never issued an export license to the Russian firm, a fact so engrained in the narrative of the Uranium One controversy that it showed up in The Washington Post’s official fact-checker site this week. “We have noted repeatedly that extracted uranium could not be exported by Russia without a license, which Rosatom does not have,” the Post reported ....


Yet NRC memos reviewed by The Hill show that it did approve the shipment of yellowcake uranium — the raw material used to make nuclear fuel and weapons — from the Russian-owned mines in the United States to Canada in 2012 through a third party. Later, the Obama administration approved some of that uranium going all the way to Europe,.....


NRC officials said they could not disclose the total amount...
....of that nuclear fuel eventually made its way outside North America to Europe and Asia, ....



4. .....despite pledges to the contrary, U.S. uranium made its way overseas as a part of the Uranium One deal," Grassley said in the statement. "What’s more disturbing, those transactions were apparently made possible by various Obama Administration agencies while the Democrat-controlled Congress turned a blind eye.

The 2015 Times article included a single reference to Uranium One officials saying they believed some of its American uranium made its way to Europe and Japan without any reference to how that occurred."



"So are they all, all honourable men--"

PC is getting more like Axis Sally every day

 

[PoliticalChic]

The Democrats, and their government school trained fifth column.....

"A fifth column is any group of people who undermine a larger group from within, usually in favor of an enemy group or nation."
Fifth column - Wikipedia

1. Accepting money to sell out the interests and security of the United States is not a new phenomenon for the Democrats.
Bill Clinton did just that in the 1990s, selling our missile technology to Red China.
Biting on his line, Bill's wife sold our uranium to Russia, a nation with all the energy it needs, for multiple millions.
Where could the uranium go but into weapons....aimed at guess who.



2. [Democrats and their simpleton trainees] "repeated the oft-quoted narrative that the “company changed hands, but the uranium that is mined in the United States cannot leave the United States." The NRC license now shows now that Uranium One was, in fact, allowed to export American uranium."
Uranium One deal led to some exports to Europe, memos show

And we find this sort of parroting of the Democrat line throughout recent posts:

"And I know it is not in Iran as we speak because it has never left the good old USA."
Now For The Last Nail In This Coffin....

""For example, a key fact ignored in criticisms of Clinton’s supposed involvement in the deal is that the uranium was not — nor could it be — exported,..."
Human Nature Never Changes


These fifth columnists care not about the future of our nation, ...only the pat on the head they get from their Leftist masters.


In a remarkable piece of journalistic endeavor, The Hill exposes the lying left in the following posts.



3. "After the Obama administration approved the sale of a Canadian mining company with significant U.S. uranium reserves to a firm owned by Russia’s government, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission assured Congress and the public the new owners couldn’t export any raw nuclear fuel from America’s shores.

“No uranium produced at either facility may be exported,” the NRC declared in a November 2010 press release....
A year later, the nuclear regulator repeated the assurance....

The NRC never issued an export license to the Russian firm, a fact so engrained in the narrative of the Uranium One controversy that it showed up in The Washington Post’s official fact-checker site this week. “We have noted repeatedly that extracted uranium could not be exported by Russia without a license, which Rosatom does not have,” the Post reported ....


Yet NRC memos reviewed by The Hill show that it did approve the shipment of yellowcake uranium — the raw material used to make nuclear fuel and weapons — from the Russian-owned mines in the United States to Canada in 2012 through a third party. Later, the Obama administration approved some of that uranium going all the way to Europe,.....


NRC officials said they could not disclose the total amount...
....of that nuclear fuel eventually made its way outside North America to Europe and Asia, ....



4. .....despite pledges to the contrary, U.S. uranium made its way overseas as a part of the Uranium One deal," Grassley said in the statement. "What’s more disturbing, those transactions were apparently made possible by various Obama Administration agencies while the Democrat-controlled Congress turned a blind eye.

The 2015 Times article included a single reference to Uranium One officials saying they believed some of its American uranium made its way to Europe and Japan without any reference to how that occurred."



"So are they all, all honourable men--"

PC is getting more like Axis Sally every day

If you could find any way to dispute anything I've posted.....you would.


Hence, your post....which simply moves you into the 'weeping Liberals' category, eddie.
Tissue?


In effect, you've helped verify that Democrats have become the party of money grubbing traitors.


You should re-think your commitments.
Have a nice day, ol' pal.

 

[BlindBoo]

From your link:

"Their dogged reporting reveals that the FBI gathered a multitude of documents, secret recordings, intercepted emails, financial records, and eyewitnesses accounts showing that Russian nuclear officials directed millions of dollars to the Clinton Foundation and hundreds of thousands of dollars to Bill Clinton during the very time that Hillary Clinton presided over a governing body which unanimously approved the sale of one-fifth of America’s uranium supply to Russia."

Simply not true.

"The Secretary of the Treasury is the Chairperson of CFIUS, and notices to CFIUS are received, processed, and coordinated at the staff level by the Staff Chairperson of CFIUS, who is the Director of the Office of Investment Security in the Department of the Treasury."

Composition of CFIUS

Furthermore not only did the above group have to approve the deal, so did the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and Utah’s nuclear regulator.

Fox is just trying to run interference for the Great Grabber in Chief by rehashing these old debunked lies. It's no surprise, it's just what they do.

 

[Siete]

The Democrats, and their government school trained fifth column.....

"A fifth column is any group of people who undermine a larger group from within, usually in favor of an enemy group or nation."
Fifth column - Wikipedia

1. Accepting money to sell out the interests and security of the United States is not a new phenomenon for the Democrats.
Bill Clinton did just that in the 1990s, selling our missile technology to Red China.
Biting on his line, Bill's wife sold our uranium to Russia, a nation with all the energy it needs, for multiple millions.
Where could the uranium go but into weapons....aimed at guess who.



2. [Democrats and their simpleton trainees] "repeated the oft-quoted narrative that the “company changed hands, but the uranium that is mined in the United States cannot leave the United States." The NRC license now shows now that Uranium One was, in fact, allowed to export American uranium."
Uranium One deal led to some exports to Europe, memos show

And we find this sort of parroting of the Democrat line throughout recent posts:

"And I know it is not in Iran as we speak because it has never left the good old USA."
Now For The Last Nail In This Coffin....

""For example, a key fact ignored in criticisms of Clinton’s supposed involvement in the deal is that the uranium was not — nor could it be — exported,..."
Human Nature Never Changes


These fifth columnists care not about the future of our nation, ...only the pat on the head they get from their Leftist masters.


In a remarkable piece of journalistic endeavor, The Hill exposes the lying left in the following posts.



3. "After the Obama administration approved the sale of a Canadian mining company with significant U.S. uranium reserves to a firm owned by Russia’s government, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission assured Congress and the public the new owners couldn’t export any raw nuclear fuel from America’s shores.

“No uranium produced at either facility may be exported,” the NRC declared in a November 2010 press release....
A year later, the nuclear regulator repeated the assurance....

The NRC never issued an export license to the Russian firm, a fact so engrained in the narrative of the Uranium One controversy that it showed up in The Washington Post’s official fact-checker site this week. “We have noted repeatedly that extracted uranium could not be exported by Russia without a license, which Rosatom does not have,” the Post reported ....


Yet NRC memos reviewed by The Hill show that it did approve the shipment of yellowcake uranium — the raw material used to make nuclear fuel and weapons — from the Russian-owned mines in the United States to Canada in 2012 through a third party. Later, the Obama administration approved some of that uranium going all the way to Europe,.....


NRC officials said they could not disclose the total amount...
....of that nuclear fuel eventually made its way outside North America to Europe and Asia, ....



4. .....despite pledges to the contrary, U.S. uranium made its way overseas as a part of the Uranium One deal," Grassley said in the statement. "What’s more disturbing, those transactions were apparently made possible by various Obama Administration agencies while the Democrat-controlled Congress turned a blind eye.

The 2015 Times article included a single reference to Uranium One officials saying they believed some of its American uranium made its way to Europe and Japan without any reference to how that occurred."



"So are they all, all honourable men--"

PC is getting more like Axis Sally every day

regardless how many facts are presented, RW liars choose to lie.

PC is leader of the pack.

 

[PoliticalChic]

From your link:

"Their dogged reporting reveals that the FBI gathered a multitude of documents, secret recordings, intercepted emails, financial records, and eyewitnesses accounts showing that Russian nuclear officials directed millions of dollars to the Clinton Foundation and hundreds of thousands of dollars to Bill Clinton during the very time that Hillary Clinton presided over a governing body which unanimously approved the sale of one-fifth of America’s uranium supply to Russia."

Simply not true.

"The Secretary of the Treasury is the Chairperson of CFIUS, and notices to CFIUS are received, processed, and coordinated at the staff level by the Staff Chairperson of CFIUS, who is the Director of the Office of Investment Security in the Department of the Treasury."

Composition of CFIUS

Furthermore not only did the above group have to approve the deal, so did the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and Utah’s nuclear regulator.

Fox is just trying to run interference for the Great Grabber in Chief by rehashing these old debunked lies. It's no surprise, it's just what they do.

Of course it's true.

In the news just today we find the news that Donna Brazile is turning on Hillary Clinton due to the corruption of the Clinton Crime Family.

"Inside Hillary Clinton’s Secret Takeover of the DNC"
Inside Hillary Clinton’s Secret Takeover of the DNC


Of course any who aren't blind...i.e., you.......know that the entire Democrat Party is just as corrupt and the Brazile revelations are simply some of the rats fleeing the sinking ship.





Let's remind all how Bill Clinton sold out the United States' advances in missile technology to the Red Chinese:

President Bill Clinton allowed Communist China to gain missile guidance technology, to be able to aim nuclear missiles at America, in return for campaign donations.


Bill Clinton, "Democrat in the White House betrayed America by working hand in hand with our Communist enemies in mainland China. As president, Bill Clinton essentially wiped out any strategic advantage the U.S. had by selling advanced U.S. missile technology to our enemy, the People’s Republic of China.

That “administration’s voluntary release of all the secrets of America’s nuclear tests, combined with the systematic theft of the secrets that were left as a result of its lax security controls, effectively wiped out America’s technological edge,” David Horowitz writes in the recently published, The Black Book of the American Left Volume 7: The Left in Power: Clinton to Obama.

.... accepted millions of dollars from the military and intelligence services of at least one hostile foreign power. All of this was done in exchange for illegal campaign contributions...." Flashback: Bill Clinton Gave China Missile Technology



Chinagate. Foreign countries funneled millions into Clinton's campaign. ".... Hillary then masterminded a scheme whereby the Clinton-Gore presidential campaign of 1996 took bribes from communist Chinese banks and their government to bankroll the president’s and the Democratic Party’s re-election efforts ."
http://www.wnd.com/2013/01/proof-hillary-isnt-fit-to-be-president/#sdOkMsPFKtC3oQzH.99


a. "When Bill Clinton took office in 1993, Chinese missiles were greatly limited in terms of their range and accuracy. But as journalist Richard Poe noted in 2003, “Thanks to Bill Clinton, China can now hit any city in the USA, using state-of-the-art, solid-fueled missiles with dead-accurate, computerized guidance systems and multiple warheads.”.... "'We like your president. We want to see him reelected,' former Chinese intelligence chief General Ji Shengde told Chinagate bagman Johnny Chung.

"Indeed, Chinese intelligence organized a massive covert operation aimed at tilting the 1996 election Clinton’s way.

"Clinton’s top campaign contributors for 1992 were Chinese agents; his top donors in 1996 were U.S. defense contractors selling missile technology to China.

"Clinton recieved funding directly from known or suspected Chinese intelligence agents, among them James and Mochtar Riady who own the Indonesian Lippo Group; John Huang; Charlie Trie; Ted Sioeng; Maria Hsia; Wang Jun and others."Bill Clinton - Discover the Networks


b. "Agents for the Chinese government and military funneled millions into President Clinton’s re-election campaign, the Clinton Legal Defense Fund and the DNC.

The DOJ reported “A pattern of events suggests a level of knowledge within the White House–including the President’s and First Lady’s offices–concerning the injection of foreign funds into the reelection effort.” Hillary Clinton A Career Criminal Video | LYBIO.NET Discover New Reading Content.



ChinaGate Against campaign finance law, China donated to Bill Clinton's campaign so as to influence US policies. Agents for the Chinese government, and the military, funneled millions into Clinton's campaign.

DoJ: ...knowledge within the President's and First Lady's Offices...concerning the injection of foreign funds in the reelection effort.






The sale of our uranium for $ millions by Hillary et al, is just one more chapter in this sordid history.

 

[PoliticalChic]

And, in Democrat Obama's election, we find the same sort of illegal campaign donations.....in this case by Muslim devotees of Hussein Obama.

1. Nearly $25k was contributed by Monir Edwan, listed on FEC documents as contributing from Rafah, Gaza. A refuge camp.
   1. “The Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) prohibits any foreign national from contributing, donating or spending funds in connection with any federal, state, or local election in the United States, either directly or indirectly. It is also unlawful to help foreign nationals violate that ban or to solicit, receive or accept contributions or donations from them. Persons who knowingly and willfully engage in these activities may be subject to fines and/or imprisonment.” http://www.fec.gov/law/feca/feca.pdf

b. When a federal political committee (a committee active in federal elections) receives a contribution it believes may be from a foreign national, it must: Return the contribution to the donor without depositing it; or Deposit the contribution and take steps to determine its legality, as described below. Either action must be taken within 10 days of the treasurer's receipt. 11 CFR 103.3(b)(1). Foreign nationals - FEC.gov

2. According to the FEC, contributions to the Obama campaign from three brothers, Osama, Monir and Hosam Edwan, all from Rafah, totaled $33,000.[ii] And they weren’t alone. Al-Jazeera reported on March 31, 2008 that Gazans were manning phone banks for the Obama campaign.[iii] The brothers were vocal in their “love” for Obama – which in itself spoke volumes to Obama’s campaign. The media showed no interest, but Obama pricked up his ears. He smelled trouble; even though no reporters asked him about these contributions, he answered anyway. The Obama campaign contended in the summer of 2008 that they had returned $33,500 in illegal contributions from Palestinians in Hamas-controlled Gaza – despite the fact that records do not show that it was returned, and the brothers said they did not receive any money. And indeed, Obama’s refunds and redesignations on file with the FEC show no refund to Osama, Hossam, or Monir Edwan in the Rafah refugee camp. Photocopies of said documents at this site: http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/...paign-cash-millions-form-foreing-sources.html

3. On Watchdog.net, a site that monitors campaign contributions, Monir Edwan is listed as Barack Obama’s Top Contributor, giving $24,313 between October 27, 2007 and November 11, 2007. However, although it gives zip codes and other details for the other four of Obama’s top five individual contributors, it provides no additional information at all for Monir Edwan — and Edwan’s link is the only dead one on the Watchdog page. Israel Matzav: Obama's illegal Gaza fundraiser

4. “When I confronted Congressman Jerrold Nadler (D-NY) about the Gaza phone banks issue in South Florida in early November 2008, he said that if there “really were phone banks in Gaza, that would be a major campaign issue.” But he laughed at the idea that Obama was receiving campaign contributions from Gaza. The mainstream media laughed with him, continuing its refusal to cover this explosive story.” http://libertypundits.net/article/o...tions-and-the-us-coc-is-a-reason-because-why/


Democrats.....corrupt scum who willingly sell out US security and US interests.

And those who close their eyes to it are just as bad.

 

[PoliticalChic]

The Democrats, and their government school trained fifth column.....

"A fifth column is any group of people who undermine a larger group from within, usually in favor of an enemy group or nation."
Fifth column - Wikipedia

1. Accepting money to sell out the interests and security of the United States is not a new phenomenon for the Democrats.
Bill Clinton did just that in the 1990s, selling our missile technology to Red China.
Biting on his line, Bill's wife sold our uranium to Russia, a nation with all the energy it needs, for multiple millions.
Where could the uranium go but into weapons....aimed at guess who.



2. [Democrats and their simpleton trainees] "repeated the oft-quoted narrative that the “company changed hands, but the uranium that is mined in the United States cannot leave the United States." The NRC license now shows now that Uranium One was, in fact, allowed to export American uranium."
Uranium One deal led to some exports to Europe, memos show

And we find this sort of parroting of the Democrat line throughout recent posts:

"And I know it is not in Iran as we speak because it has never left the good old USA."
Now For The Last Nail In This Coffin....

""For example, a key fact ignored in criticisms of Clinton’s supposed involvement in the deal is that the uranium was not — nor could it be — exported,..."
Human Nature Never Changes


These fifth columnists care not about the future of our nation, ...only the pat on the head they get from their Leftist masters.


In a remarkable piece of journalistic endeavor, The Hill exposes the lying left in the following posts.



3. "After the Obama administration approved the sale of a Canadian mining company with significant U.S. uranium reserves to a firm owned by Russia’s government, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission assured Congress and the public the new owners couldn’t export any raw nuclear fuel from America’s shores.

“No uranium produced at either facility may be exported,” the NRC declared in a November 2010 press release....
A year later, the nuclear regulator repeated the assurance....

The NRC never issued an export license to the Russian firm, a fact so engrained in the narrative of the Uranium One controversy that it showed up in The Washington Post’s official fact-checker site this week. “We have noted repeatedly that extracted uranium could not be exported by Russia without a license, which Rosatom does not have,” the Post reported ....


Yet NRC memos reviewed by The Hill show that it did approve the shipment of yellowcake uranium — the raw material used to make nuclear fuel and weapons — from the Russian-owned mines in the United States to Canada in 2012 through a third party. Later, the Obama administration approved some of that uranium going all the way to Europe,.....


NRC officials said they could not disclose the total amount...
....of that nuclear fuel eventually made its way outside North America to Europe and Asia, ....



4. .....despite pledges to the contrary, U.S. uranium made its way overseas as a part of the Uranium One deal," Grassley said in the statement. "What’s more disturbing, those transactions were apparently made possible by various Obama Administration agencies while the Democrat-controlled Congress turned a blind eye.

The 2015 Times article included a single reference to Uranium One officials saying they believed some of its American uranium made its way to Europe and Japan without any reference to how that occurred."



"So are they all, all honourable men--"

PC is getting more like Axis Sally every day

regardless how many facts are presented, RW liars choose to lie.

PC is leader of the pack.

"PC is leader of the pack."


Well.....I certainly like to be called a leader.



Any chance I could get Wagner's 'Entrance of the Gods' played in the background whenever I post???

 

[PoliticalChic]

8. “The uranium authorized for export is to be returned to the United States,” the NRC instructed in the export license amendment.

But that, too, didn’t happen.

....the whole supply chain scenario was made possible by the resubmission of Obama’s Section 123 agreement in 2010.


The Uranium One deal has been controversial since at least 2015, when The New York Times reported former President Bill Clinton received a $500,000 speech fee from a Russian bank and millions in donations to his charitable foundation from sources interested in the deal around the time the Uranium One sale was being reviewed by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s State Department and eight other federal agencies.


...the FBI had gathered extensive evidence in 2009 — before the mine sale was approved — that Rosatom’s main executive in the United States was engaged in a racketeering scheme that included bribery, kickbacks, extortion and money laundering.

The probe was enabled by an undercover informant working for the FBI inside the Russian nuclear industry, court records show. But the Justice Department did not make that evidence public until 2014, long after Rosatom benefited from multiple favorable decisions from the Obama administration.

.... the Justice Department has given approval for the undercover informant to testify for the first time about what he witnessed the Russians doing to influence Obama administration decisions favorable to Rosatom between 2009 and 2014.


.... the new revelation that the FBI knew that a Rosatom official was engaged in illegality on U.S. soil before the sale was approved could very well have affected the decision if that evidence had been made public"
Uranium One deal led to some exports to Europe, memos show

 

[alang1216]

What was not included in the quote was "as stipulated in the agreement". The fact that the agreement was subsequently modified doesn't mean the quote was incorrect at the time it was made. We're a nation of laws and contracts, both can be and usually are amended.

It wasn't modified....it accomplished exactly as bought and paid for.

.....why did your side lie about it?

The export licence was a public document that amended the original agreement. What part of that is a lie?

 

[PoliticalChic]

What was not included in the quote was "as stipulated in the agreement". The fact that the agreement was subsequently modified doesn't mean the quote was incorrect at the time it was made. We're a nation of laws and contracts, both can be and usually are amended.

It wasn't modified....it accomplished exactly as bought and paid for.

.....why did your side lie about it?

The export licence was a public document that amended the original agreement. What part of that is a lie?

Why these lies?





[Democrats and their simpleton trainees] "repeated the oft-quoted narrative that the “company changed hands, but the uranium that is mined in the United States cannot leave the United States." The NRC license now shows now that Uranium One was, in fact, allowed to export American uranium."
Uranium One deal led to some exports to Europe, memos show



And we find this sort of parroting of the Democrat line throughout recent posts:

"And I know it is not in Iran as we speak because it has never left the good old USA."
Now For The Last Nail In This Coffin....

And...
""For example, a key fact ignored in criticisms of Clinton’s supposed involvement in the deal is that the uranium was not — nor could it be — exported,..."
Human Nature Never Changes

 

[alang1216]

Why these lies?

[Democrats and their simpleton trainees] "repeated the oft-quoted narrative that the “company changed hands, but the uranium that is mined in the United States cannot leave the United States." The NRC license now shows now that Uranium One was, in fact, allowed to export American uranium."
Uranium One deal led to some exports to Europe, memos show

And we find this sort of parroting of the Democrat line throughout recent posts:

And...
""For example, a key fact ignored in criticisms of Clinton’s supposed involvement in the deal is that the uranium was not — nor could it be — exported,..."
Human Nature Never Changes

Things change in the real world.

"the uranium that is mined in the United States cannot leave the United States."
When this was said that was the truth.

"The NRC license now shows now that Uranium One was, in fact, allowed to export American uranium."
This was a later development and also true.

I'm writing this at night, my next post may be in the daytime. The two are different but both would be true.