- Nov 14, 2011
- 121,477
- 67,929
- 2,635
That's not actually a better question since you lied and got called out on it. But I understand why you don't want to answer my question.Why would I say you didn't lie when you did?You truly are dumb enough to believe that if you describe something, your description isn't what you're describing."IT DIDN'T MATTER WHAT THE GOP DID THAT FIRST YEAR...THEY DIDN'T HAVE THE VOTES TO STOP THE DEMOCRATS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"
^^^ definition of a super majority ^^^
Only in your mind. Where does it say super majority in that sentence?
The words, "super majority, " don't have to appear there. What you described IS a super majority. I don't have to use the words "lunar module" to describe how we landed on the moon, but if I describe how we did, I would clearly be talking about the lunar module.
That's precisely what you did -- you described a super majority and now you're crying like a little bitch that you didn't use the words, "super majority."
So you claim that I said the Democrats had super majorities for the first two years...then backed off that claim because I never said that...then you backed off the claim that I said they had super majorities for the first year because I never said that either...and now you're claiming that I "described" a super majority and in your mind that's the same thing as SAYING super majority?
Can't bring yourself to admit that I didn't lie...can you?
A better question would be why won't you admit that you shouldn't have accused me of that in the first place?