How the brexiteers echo the Nazis

[xyz]

O.k., so you think Christianity is horrible, and belongs to the Romans, so you are a Christian yourself because you like contradictions.

I don't think you've heard of the Orthodox branch of Christianity. That doesn't mean you'll believe it exists, you'll probably deny that it does.

 

[Phoenall]

O.k., so you think Christianity is horrible, and belongs to the Romans, so you are a Christian yourself because you like contradictions.

I don't think you've heard of the Orthodox branch of Christianity. That doesn't mean you'll believe it exists, you'll probably deny that it does.

Which branch of Orthodox Christianity is that then as Greek Orthodox is Roman Catholic in essence ................


I dont think you look anywhere else but the hate sites for your evidence and so ignore the truth most of the time.

 

[anotherlife]

Small groups, like yours, the Jews, although it is not that small, usually realize pretty quickly, that they must manipulate the apparatus of totalitarian governments, if they want to stay afloat. So the real war is about the control of bureaucracy, not some refugee camp.

Another moron that thinks I am a Jew, even though I have stated often enough that I am English and a Christian. I deplore and detest all forms of extremist religious ideologies from N.K. to IS and neo marxism and would like to see them eradicated. Yes as the way to control the refugee camps is through bureaucracy as then you control the leaders

Now this is interesting, because all those guys and girls that are shooting back at Isis have already said that it is the popular ground support that makes Isis that big. And the same is true with the European socialists too. So, then your point can be questioned with this. Do you have to kill the popular support to stop these extremists? I think the answer may be a yes, but that means war crime. Some dilemma, what say you?

So no comment on you getting it wrong and showing that you are a very poor judge of people.

How is shooting back at those trying to kill you a war crime, this sounds like team palestine justifying the terrorism of the arab muslims by condemning the response by Israel. No dilemma when looked at with an open mind, any support shown to terrorists is a terrorist act in itself and as such means the culprit is liable to be shot. Apply it equally across the board and you start to understand that taking the wrong side leads to massive problems.

So what do you call the wrong side? When Afghanistan was sponsored by Saudi Arabia or Yemen to attack the World Trade Center of New York on 9/11 2001, then the USA went and stomped Afghanistan as a just defense war, agreed worldwide. But when Serbia was sponsored by France to attack the arch duke of Austria-Hungary in 1914, then Austria-Hungary was denied the right to go and stomp Serbia, which was a just defense war, but not agreed worldwide.

So, do I understand, that as per your post, genocide is legal under two conditions, one that it is defensive, and two that it is approved by global finance?

Any side that is used for political gain of course.

See this new conspiracy theory is from the wrong side, the Saudis did not sponsor Afghanistan to attack the WTC, It was islamic extremists with lots of money like bin Laden.

Your comparison is not even close to being the same, unless black is now white

And you understand wrongly while once again putting words in my posts that are not there. It is perfectly acceptable to fire back at terrorists with superior force and the intent to eradicate them. It is not a genocide by any means as only the terrorists would be affected nor the remaining population. By global finance you mean Jewish bankers dont you, so why havent they already given the orders to remove islam from the planet ?



Your jew hatred is seeping out of the holes in your posts again

No. Jew or not, terrorism doesn't develop from a vacuum, be it Serbian terrorism or Islamic terrorism. The super powers are determining again, that like in ww1, as well as now, they want "population shifts" aka genocides, to control the terrorists that the super powers themselves create.

So, what terrorist do you want to fight back at?

By the way, it is typical to Judeo communist hacks such as yourself, to deny that identical things in history were identical.

 

[Phoenall]

Another moron that thinks I am a Jew, even though I have stated often enough that I am English and a Christian. I deplore and detest all forms of extremist religious ideologies from N.K. to IS and neo marxism and would like to see them eradicated. Yes as the way to control the refugee camps is through bureaucracy as then you control the leaders

Now this is interesting, because all those guys and girls that are shooting back at Isis have already said that it is the popular ground support that makes Isis that big. And the same is true with the European socialists too. So, then your point can be questioned with this. Do you have to kill the popular support to stop these extremists? I think the answer may be a yes, but that means war crime. Some dilemma, what say you?

So no comment on you getting it wrong and showing that you are a very poor judge of people.

How is shooting back at those trying to kill you a war crime, this sounds like team palestine justifying the terrorism of the arab muslims by condemning the response by Israel. No dilemma when looked at with an open mind, any support shown to terrorists is a terrorist act in itself and as such means the culprit is liable to be shot. Apply it equally across the board and you start to understand that taking the wrong side leads to massive problems.

So what do you call the wrong side? When Afghanistan was sponsored by Saudi Arabia or Yemen to attack the World Trade Center of New York on 9/11 2001, then the USA went and stomped Afghanistan as a just defense war, agreed worldwide. But when Serbia was sponsored by France to attack the arch duke of Austria-Hungary in 1914, then Austria-Hungary was denied the right to go and stomp Serbia, which was a just defense war, but not agreed worldwide.

So, do I understand, that as per your post, genocide is legal under two conditions, one that it is defensive, and two that it is approved by global finance?

Any side that is used for political gain of course.

See this new conspiracy theory is from the wrong side, the Saudis did not sponsor Afghanistan to attack the WTC, It was islamic extremists with lots of money like bin Laden.

Your comparison is not even close to being the same, unless black is now white

And you understand wrongly while once again putting words in my posts that are not there. It is perfectly acceptable to fire back at terrorists with superior force and the intent to eradicate them. It is not a genocide by any means as only the terrorists would be affected nor the remaining population. By global finance you mean Jewish bankers dont you, so why havent they already given the orders to remove islam from the planet ?



Your jew hatred is seeping out of the holes in your posts again

No. Jew or not, terrorism doesn't develop from a vacuum, be it Serbian terrorism or Islamic terrorism. The super powers are determining again, that like in ww1, as well as now, they want "population shifts" aka genocides, to control the terrorists that the super powers themselves create.

So, what terrorist do you want to fight back at?

By the way, it is typical to Judeo communist hacks such as yourself, to deny that identical things in history were identical.

Correct and in this case the majority of terrorism is caused by mainsream muslims following the commands in the koran. Starting with the overriding one that all the commands in the koran are as relevant today as they were the day they were spoken. That no muslim on pain of death can ignore or deny any of allah's commands. When you see the religious police walking the streets, and you will know them by their canes and sticks, beating muslims for not being at the mosque praying.

The super powers dont include the Jews as you claim because they too few in numbers and dont have a large enough bank balance. If any super power wanted a population shift all they need do is stop trading with them and let them starve. If the reasons are horrendous enough the worlds population will be swayed to turn against them.

All of them that are branded terrorists by the UN and are shown to have committed real war crimes, not the made up war crimes laid at the feet of the Jews by the hate sites.


Is this the new buzz word doing the rounds of the hate sites Judeo communist, found on this extremist right wing site amongst others
Justice4Poland


I constantly point out the identical things in history that keep happening, it is you that deny them because they happen to the Jews.

 

[anotherlife]

Now this is interesting, because all those guys and girls that are shooting back at Isis have already said that it is the popular ground support that makes Isis that big. And the same is true with the European socialists too. So, then your point can be questioned with this. Do you have to kill the popular support to stop these extremists? I think the answer may be a yes, but that means war crime. Some dilemma, what say you?

So no comment on you getting it wrong and showing that you are a very poor judge of people.

How is shooting back at those trying to kill you a war crime, this sounds like team palestine justifying the terrorism of the arab muslims by condemning the response by Israel. No dilemma when looked at with an open mind, any support shown to terrorists is a terrorist act in itself and as such means the culprit is liable to be shot. Apply it equally across the board and you start to understand that taking the wrong side leads to massive problems.

So what do you call the wrong side? When Afghanistan was sponsored by Saudi Arabia or Yemen to attack the World Trade Center of New York on 9/11 2001, then the USA went and stomped Afghanistan as a just defense war, agreed worldwide. But when Serbia was sponsored by France to attack the arch duke of Austria-Hungary in 1914, then Austria-Hungary was denied the right to go and stomp Serbia, which was a just defense war, but not agreed worldwide.

So, do I understand, that as per your post, genocide is legal under two conditions, one that it is defensive, and two that it is approved by global finance?

Any side that is used for political gain of course.

See this new conspiracy theory is from the wrong side, the Saudis did not sponsor Afghanistan to attack the WTC, It was islamic extremists with lots of money like bin Laden.

Your comparison is not even close to being the same, unless black is now white

And you understand wrongly while once again putting words in my posts that are not there. It is perfectly acceptable to fire back at terrorists with superior force and the intent to eradicate them. It is not a genocide by any means as only the terrorists would be affected nor the remaining population. By global finance you mean Jewish bankers dont you, so why havent they already given the orders to remove islam from the planet ?



Your jew hatred is seeping out of the holes in your posts again

No. Jew or not, terrorism doesn't develop from a vacuum, be it Serbian terrorism or Islamic terrorism. The super powers are determining again, that like in ww1, as well as now, they want "population shifts" aka genocides, to control the terrorists that the super powers themselves create.

So, what terrorist do you want to fight back at?

By the way, it is typical to Judeo communist hacks such as yourself, to deny that identical things in history were identical.

Correct and in this case the majority of terrorism is caused by mainsream muslims following the commands in the koran. Starting with the overriding one that all the commands in the koran are as relevant today as they were the day they were spoken. That no muslim on pain of death can ignore or deny any of allah's commands. When you see the religious police walking the streets, and you will know them by their canes and sticks, beating muslims for not being at the mosque praying.

The super powers dont include the Jews as you claim because they too few in numbers and dont have a large enough bank balance. If any super power wanted a population shift all they need do is stop trading with them and let them starve. If the reasons are horrendous enough the worlds population will be swayed to turn against them.

All of them that are branded terrorists by the UN and are shown to have committed real war crimes, not the made up war crimes laid at the feet of the Jews by the hate sites.


Is this the new buzz word doing the rounds of the hate sites Judeo communist, found on this extremist right wing site amongst others
Justice4Poland


I constantly point out the identical things in history that keep happening, it is you that deny them because they happen to the Jews.

I didn't know that a website called Justice4Poland existed, but Poland does need justice. I don't want to make this about the Jews because the problem is now much bigger than that.

Here is the bottom line of justice in Europe. And this is not just for Poland but all the countries that Western Europe and the soviets pillaged.

The bottom line is country borders. So this is in the domain of philosophies of brexit.

Until the pre ww1 country borders are restored, both for Poland and Hungary, and for Italy, and for Finland, ... and so on, including all the occupied states within the old Russian empire, there is not going to be justice in Europe. And if there is no justice in Europe, then we just keep issuing licenses to communist's and nationalists, to keep population shifting any people they don't like, in other words we sponsor genocide.

This is the legacy, still ongoing, that the brexiters have signed up to with their votes.

So, do you want to talk about justice? Then let's begin with the injustice, that started it all, right with the peace dictates of ww1. This is the exact conversation that no European power wants to happen, especially nationalists and socialists don't want it to happen, because then they have to admit, that they caused the birth of like ~ 50 million people on Earth to this day, for no other purpose than to prop their 90 year long crime.

So, how do we provide justice with such a number disadvantage? With a genocide?

The best demonstration of this is the Crimea war with its western coverage.

If I was a brexiter, I would study both the ww1 and ww2 peace dictates very carefully, because that is what brexit signs up to.

 

[xyz]

Is this the new buzz word doing the rounds of the hate sites Judeo communist, found on this extremist right wing site amongst others
Justice4Poland

It looks like a shit pro-Trumputin site. I'm surprised you don't like it.

 

[Phoenall]

So no comment on you getting it wrong and showing that you are a very poor judge of people.

How is shooting back at those trying to kill you a war crime, this sounds like team palestine justifying the terrorism of the arab muslims by condemning the response by Israel. No dilemma when looked at with an open mind, any support shown to terrorists is a terrorist act in itself and as such means the culprit is liable to be shot. Apply it equally across the board and you start to understand that taking the wrong side leads to massive problems.

So what do you call the wrong side? When Afghanistan was sponsored by Saudi Arabia or Yemen to attack the World Trade Center of New York on 9/11 2001, then the USA went and stomped Afghanistan as a just defense war, agreed worldwide. But when Serbia was sponsored by France to attack the arch duke of Austria-Hungary in 1914, then Austria-Hungary was denied the right to go and stomp Serbia, which was a just defense war, but not agreed worldwide.

So, do I understand, that as per your post, genocide is legal under two conditions, one that it is defensive, and two that it is approved by global finance?

Any side that is used for political gain of course.

See this new conspiracy theory is from the wrong side, the Saudis did not sponsor Afghanistan to attack the WTC, It was islamic extremists with lots of money like bin Laden.

Your comparison is not even close to being the same, unless black is now white

And you understand wrongly while once again putting words in my posts that are not there. It is perfectly acceptable to fire back at terrorists with superior force and the intent to eradicate them. It is not a genocide by any means as only the terrorists would be affected nor the remaining population. By global finance you mean Jewish bankers dont you, so why havent they already given the orders to remove islam from the planet ?



Your jew hatred is seeping out of the holes in your posts again

No. Jew or not, terrorism doesn't develop from a vacuum, be it Serbian terrorism or Islamic terrorism. The super powers are determining again, that like in ww1, as well as now, they want "population shifts" aka genocides, to control the terrorists that the super powers themselves create.

So, what terrorist do you want to fight back at?

By the way, it is typical to Judeo communist hacks such as yourself, to deny that identical things in history were identical.

Correct and in this case the majority of terrorism is caused by mainsream muslims following the commands in the koran. Starting with the overriding one that all the commands in the koran are as relevant today as they were the day they were spoken. That no muslim on pain of death can ignore or deny any of allah's commands. When you see the religious police walking the streets, and you will know them by their canes and sticks, beating muslims for not being at the mosque praying.

The super powers dont include the Jews as you claim because they too few in numbers and dont have a large enough bank balance. If any super power wanted a population shift all they need do is stop trading with them and let them starve. If the reasons are horrendous enough the worlds population will be swayed to turn against them.

All of them that are branded terrorists by the UN and are shown to have committed real war crimes, not the made up war crimes laid at the feet of the Jews by the hate sites.


Is this the new buzz word doing the rounds of the hate sites Judeo communist, found on this extremist right wing site amongst others
Justice4Poland


I constantly point out the identical things in history that keep happening, it is you that deny them because they happen to the Jews.

I didn't know that a website called Justice4Poland existed, but Poland does need justice. I don't want to make this about the Jews because the problem is now much bigger than that.

Here is the bottom line of justice in Europe. And this is not just for Poland but all the countries that Western Europe and the soviets pillaged.

The bottom line is country borders. So this is in the domain of philosophies of brexit.

Until the pre ww1 country borders are restored, both for Poland and Hungary, and for Italy, and for Finland, ... and so on, including all the occupied states within the old Russian empire, there is not going to be justice in Europe. And if there is no justice in Europe, then we just keep issuing licenses to communist's and nationalists, to keep population shifting any people they don't like, in other words we sponsor genocide.

This is the legacy, still ongoing, that the brexiters have signed up to with their votes.

So, do you want to talk about justice? Then let's begin with the injustice, that started it all, right with the peace dictates of ww1. This is the exact conversation that no European power wants to happen, especially nationalists and socialists don't want it to happen, because then they have to admit, that they caused the birth of like ~ 50 million people on Earth to this day, for no other purpose than to prop their 90 year long crime.

So, how do we provide justice with such a number disadvantage? With a genocide?

The best demonstration of this is the Crimea war with its western coverage.

If I was a brexiter, I would study both the ww1 and ww2 peace dictates very carefully, because that is what brexit signs up to.

More crap from the hate sites that try and sell the idea it was all the fault of the Jewish bankers who carved up Europe to suit their families. Then you come out with the canard " I dont want to make this about the Jews" when you obviously do and cant find a way to slip in the latest anti semitic hate mantra.

Forget pre WW1 unless you want to go back to the depths of pre history, unless you want to start putting right the wrongs against the Jews

The bottom line is control of our existing current borders, so why do you neo marxists want to say it isnt, will this give you better chances of demonising the Jews in your eyes.

Why the pre WW1 borders, why not the pre Goth borders or the Paleolithic borders. Does your cut of date give you an advantage you dont have now ? Is this your plan for the future ? Does what the people living there not count or are you prepared to eliminate them to achieve your end ?

BULLSHIT this is the legacy YOU have left us to sort out and now we are sorting it our way you dont like it. It leaves you disenfranchised and surrounded by enemies who will rise up against you and hammer you down.

Why is it this injustice and no other, didnt we have injustice before the end of WW1 when the victors negotiated terms with the losers that were meant to stop any further wars being started by you lot. Why not the injustice that saw you lot mass murdering innocents in the name of your new world order, and now trying to hide the evidence

 

[Phoenall]

Is this the new buzz word doing the rounds of the hate sites Judeo communist, found on this extremist right wing site amongst others
Justice4Poland

It looks like a shit pro-Trumputin site. I'm surprised you don't like it.

It is where the terms you used came from, so pointing to you as being the one going there

 

[anotherlife]

So what do you call the wrong side? When Afghanistan was sponsored by Saudi Arabia or Yemen to attack the World Trade Center of New York on 9/11 2001, then the USA went and stomped Afghanistan as a just defense war, agreed worldwide. But when Serbia was sponsored by France to attack the arch duke of Austria-Hungary in 1914, then Austria-Hungary was denied the right to go and stomp Serbia, which was a just defense war, but not agreed worldwide.

So, do I understand, that as per your post, genocide is legal under two conditions, one that it is defensive, and two that it is approved by global finance?

Any side that is used for political gain of course.

See this new conspiracy theory is from the wrong side, the Saudis did not sponsor Afghanistan to attack the WTC, It was islamic extremists with lots of money like bin Laden.

Your comparison is not even close to being the same, unless black is now white

And you understand wrongly while once again putting words in my posts that are not there. It is perfectly acceptable to fire back at terrorists with superior force and the intent to eradicate them. It is not a genocide by any means as only the terrorists would be affected nor the remaining population. By global finance you mean Jewish bankers dont you, so why havent they already given the orders to remove islam from the planet ?



Your jew hatred is seeping out of the holes in your posts again

No. Jew or not, terrorism doesn't develop from a vacuum, be it Serbian terrorism or Islamic terrorism. The super powers are determining again, that like in ww1, as well as now, they want "population shifts" aka genocides, to control the terrorists that the super powers themselves create.

So, what terrorist do you want to fight back at?

By the way, it is typical to Judeo communist hacks such as yourself, to deny that identical things in history were identical.

Correct and in this case the majority of terrorism is caused by mainsream muslims following the commands in the koran. Starting with the overriding one that all the commands in the koran are as relevant today as they were the day they were spoken. That no muslim on pain of death can ignore or deny any of allah's commands. When you see the religious police walking the streets, and you will know them by their canes and sticks, beating muslims for not being at the mosque praying.

The super powers dont include the Jews as you claim because they too few in numbers and dont have a large enough bank balance. If any super power wanted a population shift all they need do is stop trading with them and let them starve. If the reasons are horrendous enough the worlds population will be swayed to turn against them.

All of them that are branded terrorists by the UN and are shown to have committed real war crimes, not the made up war crimes laid at the feet of the Jews by the hate sites.


Is this the new buzz word doing the rounds of the hate sites Judeo communist, found on this extremist right wing site amongst others
Justice4Poland


I constantly point out the identical things in history that keep happening, it is you that deny them because they happen to the Jews.

I didn't know that a website called Justice4Poland existed, but Poland does need justice. I don't want to make this about the Jews because the problem is now much bigger than that.

Here is the bottom line of justice in Europe. And this is not just for Poland but all the countries that Western Europe and the soviets pillaged.

The bottom line is country borders. So this is in the domain of philosophies of brexit.

Until the pre ww1 country borders are restored, both for Poland and Hungary, and for Italy, and for Finland, ... and so on, including all the occupied states within the old Russian empire, there is not going to be justice in Europe. And if there is no justice in Europe, then we just keep issuing licenses to communist's and nationalists, to keep population shifting any people they don't like, in other words we sponsor genocide.

This is the legacy, still ongoing, that the brexiters have signed up to with their votes.

So, do you want to talk about justice? Then let's begin with the injustice, that started it all, right with the peace dictates of ww1. This is the exact conversation that no European power wants to happen, especially nationalists and socialists don't want it to happen, because then they have to admit, that they caused the birth of like ~ 50 million people on Earth to this day, for no other purpose than to prop their 90 year long crime.

So, how do we provide justice with such a number disadvantage? With a genocide?

The best demonstration of this is the Crimea war with its western coverage.

If I was a brexiter, I would study both the ww1 and ww2 peace dictates very carefully, because that is what brexit signs up to.

More crap from the hate sites that try and sell the idea it was all the fault of the Jewish bankers who carved up Europe to suit their families. Then you come out with the canard " I dont want to make this about the Jews" when you obviously do and cant find a way to slip in the latest anti semitic hate mantra.

Forget pre WW1 unless you want to go back to the depths of pre history, unless you want to start putting right the wrongs against the Jews

The bottom line is control of our existing current borders, so why do you neo marxists want to say it isnt, will this give you better chances of demonising the Jews in your eyes.

Why the pre WW1 borders, why not the pre Goth borders or the Paleolithic borders. Does your cut of date give you an advantage you dont have now ? Is this your plan for the future ? Does what the people living there not count or are you prepared to eliminate them to achieve your end ?

BULLSHIT this is the legacy YOU have left us to sort out and now we are sorting it our way you dont like it. It leaves you disenfranchised and surrounded by enemies who will rise up against you and hammer you down.

Why is it this injustice and no other, didnt we have injustice before the end of WW1 when the victors negotiated terms with the losers that were meant to stop any further wars being started by you lot. Why not the injustice that saw you lot mass murdering innocents in the name of your new world order, and now trying to hide the evidence

Okay, obviously history was not your prime subject in school, but don't worry, I am not a social science student either. Only common sense. And by the way you are painting the Jews like they are the only losers. This is not important though, because like I said in my previous post, the problem is much bigger.

The ww1 point is important, because that was the 1st war in Europe, where civilians were considered combatant. Before that time, formal wars with formal peace treaties were negotiated between armies, and little did anyone care which serf had assets where or in what language. So it is ww1 that is the turning point.

Also, genocide before ww1 wasn't a crime and wasn't declared a war crime. It was just business as usual. It was ww1 that suddenly created laws about genocide. For what purpose? For the purpose of legalizing genocide if the entente does it, and make it a crime if others do it. This is an additional reason why ww1 is the point in question.

And do you really think you can isolate your country from the adverse effects of what you yourself perpetrated on the entire world, e.g. on Poland, by brexiting them out into oblivion? Historic question: what is the result on you when you do divide and conquer?

 

[Phoenall]

Any side that is used for political gain of course.

See this new conspiracy theory is from the wrong side, the Saudis did not sponsor Afghanistan to attack the WTC, It was islamic extremists with lots of money like bin Laden.

Your comparison is not even close to being the same, unless black is now white

And you understand wrongly while once again putting words in my posts that are not there. It is perfectly acceptable to fire back at terrorists with superior force and the intent to eradicate them. It is not a genocide by any means as only the terrorists would be affected nor the remaining population. By global finance you mean Jewish bankers dont you, so why havent they already given the orders to remove islam from the planet ?



Your jew hatred is seeping out of the holes in your posts again

No. Jew or not, terrorism doesn't develop from a vacuum, be it Serbian terrorism or Islamic terrorism. The super powers are determining again, that like in ww1, as well as now, they want "population shifts" aka genocides, to control the terrorists that the super powers themselves create.

So, what terrorist do you want to fight back at?

By the way, it is typical to Judeo communist hacks such as yourself, to deny that identical things in history were identical.

Correct and in this case the majority of terrorism is caused by mainsream muslims following the commands in the koran. Starting with the overriding one that all the commands in the koran are as relevant today as they were the day they were spoken. That no muslim on pain of death can ignore or deny any of allah's commands. When you see the religious police walking the streets, and you will know them by their canes and sticks, beating muslims for not being at the mosque praying.

The super powers dont include the Jews as you claim because they too few in numbers and dont have a large enough bank balance. If any super power wanted a population shift all they need do is stop trading with them and let them starve. If the reasons are horrendous enough the worlds population will be swayed to turn against them.

All of them that are branded terrorists by the UN and are shown to have committed real war crimes, not the made up war crimes laid at the feet of the Jews by the hate sites.


Is this the new buzz word doing the rounds of the hate sites Judeo communist, found on this extremist right wing site amongst others
Justice4Poland


I constantly point out the identical things in history that keep happening, it is you that deny them because they happen to the Jews.

I didn't know that a website called Justice4Poland existed, but Poland does need justice. I don't want to make this about the Jews because the problem is now much bigger than that.

Here is the bottom line of justice in Europe. And this is not just for Poland but all the countries that Western Europe and the soviets pillaged.

The bottom line is country borders. So this is in the domain of philosophies of brexit.

Until the pre ww1 country borders are restored, both for Poland and Hungary, and for Italy, and for Finland, ... and so on, including all the occupied states within the old Russian empire, there is not going to be justice in Europe. And if there is no justice in Europe, then we just keep issuing licenses to communist's and nationalists, to keep population shifting any people they don't like, in other words we sponsor genocide.

This is the legacy, still ongoing, that the brexiters have signed up to with their votes.

So, do you want to talk about justice? Then let's begin with the injustice, that started it all, right with the peace dictates of ww1. This is the exact conversation that no European power wants to happen, especially nationalists and socialists don't want it to happen, because then they have to admit, that they caused the birth of like ~ 50 million people on Earth to this day, for no other purpose than to prop their 90 year long crime.

So, how do we provide justice with such a number disadvantage? With a genocide?

The best demonstration of this is the Crimea war with its western coverage.

If I was a brexiter, I would study both the ww1 and ww2 peace dictates very carefully, because that is what brexit signs up to.

More crap from the hate sites that try and sell the idea it was all the fault of the Jewish bankers who carved up Europe to suit their families. Then you come out with the canard " I dont want to make this about the Jews" when you obviously do and cant find a way to slip in the latest anti semitic hate mantra.

Forget pre WW1 unless you want to go back to the depths of pre history, unless you want to start putting right the wrongs against the Jews

The bottom line is control of our existing current borders, so why do you neo marxists want to say it isnt, will this give you better chances of demonising the Jews in your eyes.

Why the pre WW1 borders, why not the pre Goth borders or the Paleolithic borders. Does your cut of date give you an advantage you dont have now ? Is this your plan for the future ? Does what the people living there not count or are you prepared to eliminate them to achieve your end ?

BULLSHIT this is the legacy YOU have left us to sort out and now we are sorting it our way you dont like it. It leaves you disenfranchised and surrounded by enemies who will rise up against you and hammer you down.

Why is it this injustice and no other, didnt we have injustice before the end of WW1 when the victors negotiated terms with the losers that were meant to stop any further wars being started by you lot. Why not the injustice that saw you lot mass murdering innocents in the name of your new world order, and now trying to hide the evidence

Okay, obviously history was not your prime subject in school, but don't worry, I am not a social science student either. Only common sense. And by the way you are painting the Jews like they are the only losers. This is not important though, because like I said in my previous post, the problem is much bigger.

The ww1 point is important, because that was the 1st war in Europe, where civilians were considered combatant. Before that time, formal wars with formal peace treaties were negotiated between armies, and little did anyone care which serf had assets where or in what language. So it is ww1 that is the turning point.

Also, genocide before ww1 wasn't a crime and wasn't declared a war crime. It was just business as usual. It was ww1 that suddenly created laws about genocide. For what purpose? For the purpose of legalizing genocide if the entente does it, and make it a crime if others do it. This is an additional reason why ww1 is the point in question.

And do you really think you can isolate your country from the adverse effects of what you yourself perpetrated on the entire world, e.g. on Poland, by brexiting them out into oblivion? Historic question: what is the result on you when you do divide and conquer?

It might not have been my prime subject but it does not mean that I did not get told the facts. You are trying to re-write history and re-draw the borders to suit your nationalist tendencies and forgetting that those you are trying to steal from will oppose you all the way. Why do you stop at pre WW1 for your cut off date why not pre islamic invasion or pre Roman empire. Is it because they would give you nothing as your country did not exist back then, or is it that you wont get the cream of the land to steal.

All wars in Europe had the civilians as combatants, it is how wars were fought right up until WW1 when it stopped and clear lines were drawn. Well I want the paleolithic as the turning point because it give me an advantage over you. Dont like it then get a life.

It still wasnt a crime in reality as the law was never ratified, leaving you with STUPID engraved in your forehead. And it was post WW2 that saw any attempts at formalising war and genocide as a war crime, Again showing that you are far from being educated in the reality.

I have perpetrated nothing on anyone, it was those who came before me and I am not guilty of their crimes. So dig them up, resurrect them and tell them your woes. But how will the UK leaving the neo marxist ran EU cause any problems for anyone that is prepared to work at making it better. Why should I be denied health care that I have paid for yet scroungers and criminals from Poland get it on demand and they have not paid a penny. When you understand this then you will see that Brexit is right and proper for the UK. And sod the rest of Europe that will lose the UK welfare that kept them afloat, start going after your leaders for the money they have secreted into swiss bank accounts for when the bubble bursts.

Therer will be no result as there is no divide and conquer, we are not as devious as you are we just want control back where it belongs. IN OUR HANDS

 

[xyz]

Phoenall, question, do you support these blokes:

?

 

[NoNukes]

The fear and desperation of these idiots is overwhelming.

View attachment 97053

Are you moving there after the recounts?

 

[NoNukes]

The fear and desperation of these idiots is overwhelming.

View attachment 97053

Why would Trump supporters want to go to Canada?

They will be heading north after the recount. They will not head south because Mexicans are murderers and rapists.

 

[Phoenall]

Phoenall, question, do you support these blokes:

?

Why do you ?


I support my family and country, and if more people did we would not have the troubles we do today

 

[xyz]

Phoenall, question, do you support these blokes:

?

Why do you ?


I support my family and country, and if more people did we would not have the troubles we do today

I asked you if you support them, I do not. They share your point of view about Britain, Brexit, Polish people, and other matters, so it was a legitimate question.

Often I'm thinking you are posting from a mental institution that allows some patients access to the internet.

 

[Pete7469]

Funny coming from a bed wetter whose profile pic looks like hitler's faggot nephew.

 

[anotherlife]

No. Jew or not, terrorism doesn't develop from a vacuum, be it Serbian terrorism or Islamic terrorism. The super powers are determining again, that like in ww1, as well as now, they want "population shifts" aka genocides, to control the terrorists that the super powers themselves create.

So, what terrorist do you want to fight back at?

By the way, it is typical to Judeo communist hacks such as yourself, to deny that identical things in history were identical.

Correct and in this case the majority of terrorism is caused by mainsream muslims following the commands in the koran. Starting with the overriding one that all the commands in the koran are as relevant today as they were the day they were spoken. That no muslim on pain of death can ignore or deny any of allah's commands. When you see the religious police walking the streets, and you will know them by their canes and sticks, beating muslims for not being at the mosque praying.

The super powers dont include the Jews as you claim because they too few in numbers and dont have a large enough bank balance. If any super power wanted a population shift all they need do is stop trading with them and let them starve. If the reasons are horrendous enough the worlds population will be swayed to turn against them.

All of them that are branded terrorists by the UN and are shown to have committed real war crimes, not the made up war crimes laid at the feet of the Jews by the hate sites.


Is this the new buzz word doing the rounds of the hate sites Judeo communist, found on this extremist right wing site amongst others
Justice4Poland


I constantly point out the identical things in history that keep happening, it is you that deny them because they happen to the Jews.

I didn't know that a website called Justice4Poland existed, but Poland does need justice. I don't want to make this about the Jews because the problem is now much bigger than that.

Here is the bottom line of justice in Europe. And this is not just for Poland but all the countries that Western Europe and the soviets pillaged.

The bottom line is country borders. So this is in the domain of philosophies of brexit.

Until the pre ww1 country borders are restored, both for Poland and Hungary, and for Italy, and for Finland, ... and so on, including all the occupied states within the old Russian empire, there is not going to be justice in Europe. And if there is no justice in Europe, then we just keep issuing licenses to communist's and nationalists, to keep population shifting any people they don't like, in other words we sponsor genocide.

This is the legacy, still ongoing, that the brexiters have signed up to with their votes.

So, do you want to talk about justice? Then let's begin with the injustice, that started it all, right with the peace dictates of ww1. This is the exact conversation that no European power wants to happen, especially nationalists and socialists don't want it to happen, because then they have to admit, that they caused the birth of like ~ 50 million people on Earth to this day, for no other purpose than to prop their 90 year long crime.

So, how do we provide justice with such a number disadvantage? With a genocide?

The best demonstration of this is the Crimea war with its western coverage.

If I was a brexiter, I would study both the ww1 and ww2 peace dictates very carefully, because that is what brexit signs up to.

More crap from the hate sites that try and sell the idea it was all the fault of the Jewish bankers who carved up Europe to suit their families. Then you come out with the canard " I dont want to make this about the Jews" when you obviously do and cant find a way to slip in the latest anti semitic hate mantra.

Forget pre WW1 unless you want to go back to the depths of pre history, unless you want to start putting right the wrongs against the Jews

The bottom line is control of our existing current borders, so why do you neo marxists want to say it isnt, will this give you better chances of demonising the Jews in your eyes.

Why the pre WW1 borders, why not the pre Goth borders or the Paleolithic borders. Does your cut of date give you an advantage you dont have now ? Is this your plan for the future ? Does what the people living there not count or are you prepared to eliminate them to achieve your end ?

BULLSHIT this is the legacy YOU have left us to sort out and now we are sorting it our way you dont like it. It leaves you disenfranchised and surrounded by enemies who will rise up against you and hammer you down.

Why is it this injustice and no other, didnt we have injustice before the end of WW1 when the victors negotiated terms with the losers that were meant to stop any further wars being started by you lot. Why not the injustice that saw you lot mass murdering innocents in the name of your new world order, and now trying to hide the evidence

Okay, obviously history was not your prime subject in school, but don't worry, I am not a social science student either. Only common sense. And by the way you are painting the Jews like they are the only losers. This is not important though, because like I said in my previous post, the problem is much bigger.

The ww1 point is important, because that was the 1st war in Europe, where civilians were considered combatant. Before that time, formal wars with formal peace treaties were negotiated between armies, and little did anyone care which serf had assets where or in what language. So it is ww1 that is the turning point.

Also, genocide before ww1 wasn't a crime and wasn't declared a war crime. It was just business as usual. It was ww1 that suddenly created laws about genocide. For what purpose? For the purpose of legalizing genocide if the entente does it, and make it a crime if others do it. This is an additional reason why ww1 is the point in question.

And do you really think you can isolate your country from the adverse effects of what you yourself perpetrated on the entire world, e.g. on Poland, by brexiting them out into oblivion? Historic question: what is the result on you when you do divide and conquer?

It might not have been my prime subject but it does not mean that I did not get told the facts. You are trying to re-write history and re-draw the borders to suit your nationalist tendencies and forgetting that those you are trying to steal from will oppose you all the way. Why do you stop at pre WW1 for your cut off date why not pre islamic invasion or pre Roman empire. Is it because they would give you nothing as your country did not exist back then, or is it that you wont get the cream of the land to steal.

All wars in Europe had the civilians as combatants, it is how wars were fought right up until WW1 when it stopped and clear lines were drawn. Well I want the paleolithic as the turning point because it give me an advantage over you. Dont like it then get a life.

It still wasnt a crime in reality as the law was never ratified, leaving you with STUPID engraved in your forehead. And it was post WW2 that saw any attempts at formalising war and genocide as a war crime, Again showing that you are far from being educated in the reality.

I have perpetrated nothing on anyone, it was those who came before me and I am not guilty of their crimes. So dig them up, resurrect them and tell them your woes. But how will the UK leaving the neo marxist ran EU cause any problems for anyone that is prepared to work at making it better. Why should I be denied health care that I have paid for yet scroungers and criminals from Poland get it on demand and they have not paid a penny. When you understand this then you will see that Brexit is right and proper for the UK. And sod the rest of Europe that will lose the UK welfare that kept them afloat, start going after your leaders for the money they have secreted into swiss bank accounts for when the bubble bursts.

Therer will be no result as there is no divide and conquer, we are not as devious as you are we just want control back where it belongs. IN OUR HANDS

Apart from that I have already answered your points here in my previous post, I can only say that you make a liar out of yourself by repeating the lies that the nationalists of the entente have been drilling into your head for the latest 100 years.

When you take other people's money (or land), they will come for it. No matter how many lies you convince yourself of, to keep your loot.

I suggest you read about your prime minister Chamberlain, the one you and your fellow goons love to hate.

 

[Phoenall]

Phoenall, question, do you support these blokes:

?

Why do you ?


I support my family and country, and if more people did we would not have the troubles we do today

I asked you if you support them, I do not. They share your point of view about Britain, Brexit, Polish people, and other matters, so it was a legitimate question.

Often I'm thinking you are posting from a mental institution that allows some patients access to the internet.

Actually they dont, and you dont know what my real position is either. You are going on what you perceive it to be not what I am saying .

And as usual when you left wing idiots start to lose the argument you resort to false accusations of mental health problems in a wink, wink nudge,nudge way to try and garner support for your POV. Better people than you have tried this and failed, and are now worried about their activity getting back to their friends and family

 

[Phoenall]

Correct and in this case the majority of terrorism is caused by mainsream muslims following the commands in the koran. Starting with the overriding one that all the commands in the koran are as relevant today as they were the day they were spoken. That no muslim on pain of death can ignore or deny any of allah's commands. When you see the religious police walking the streets, and you will know them by their canes and sticks, beating muslims for not being at the mosque praying.

The super powers dont include the Jews as you claim because they too few in numbers and dont have a large enough bank balance. If any super power wanted a population shift all they need do is stop trading with them and let them starve. If the reasons are horrendous enough the worlds population will be swayed to turn against them.

All of them that are branded terrorists by the UN and are shown to have committed real war crimes, not the made up war crimes laid at the feet of the Jews by the hate sites.


Is this the new buzz word doing the rounds of the hate sites Judeo communist, found on this extremist right wing site amongst others
Justice4Poland


I constantly point out the identical things in history that keep happening, it is you that deny them because they happen to the Jews.

I didn't know that a website called Justice4Poland existed, but Poland does need justice. I don't want to make this about the Jews because the problem is now much bigger than that.

Here is the bottom line of justice in Europe. And this is not just for Poland but all the countries that Western Europe and the soviets pillaged.

The bottom line is country borders. So this is in the domain of philosophies of brexit.

Until the pre ww1 country borders are restored, both for Poland and Hungary, and for Italy, and for Finland, ... and so on, including all the occupied states within the old Russian empire, there is not going to be justice in Europe. And if there is no justice in Europe, then we just keep issuing licenses to communist's and nationalists, to keep population shifting any people they don't like, in other words we sponsor genocide.

This is the legacy, still ongoing, that the brexiters have signed up to with their votes.

So, do you want to talk about justice? Then let's begin with the injustice, that started it all, right with the peace dictates of ww1. This is the exact conversation that no European power wants to happen, especially nationalists and socialists don't want it to happen, because then they have to admit, that they caused the birth of like ~ 50 million people on Earth to this day, for no other purpose than to prop their 90 year long crime.

So, how do we provide justice with such a number disadvantage? With a genocide?

The best demonstration of this is the Crimea war with its western coverage.

If I was a brexiter, I would study both the ww1 and ww2 peace dictates very carefully, because that is what brexit signs up to.

More crap from the hate sites that try and sell the idea it was all the fault of the Jewish bankers who carved up Europe to suit their families. Then you come out with the canard " I dont want to make this about the Jews" when you obviously do and cant find a way to slip in the latest anti semitic hate mantra.

Forget pre WW1 unless you want to go back to the depths of pre history, unless you want to start putting right the wrongs against the Jews

The bottom line is control of our existing current borders, so why do you neo marxists want to say it isnt, will this give you better chances of demonising the Jews in your eyes.

Why the pre WW1 borders, why not the pre Goth borders or the Paleolithic borders. Does your cut of date give you an advantage you dont have now ? Is this your plan for the future ? Does what the people living there not count or are you prepared to eliminate them to achieve your end ?

BULLSHIT this is the legacy YOU have left us to sort out and now we are sorting it our way you dont like it. It leaves you disenfranchised and surrounded by enemies who will rise up against you and hammer you down.

Why is it this injustice and no other, didnt we have injustice before the end of WW1 when the victors negotiated terms with the losers that were meant to stop any further wars being started by you lot. Why not the injustice that saw you lot mass murdering innocents in the name of your new world order, and now trying to hide the evidence

Okay, obviously history was not your prime subject in school, but don't worry, I am not a social science student either. Only common sense. And by the way you are painting the Jews like they are the only losers. This is not important though, because like I said in my previous post, the problem is much bigger.

The ww1 point is important, because that was the 1st war in Europe, where civilians were considered combatant. Before that time, formal wars with formal peace treaties were negotiated between armies, and little did anyone care which serf had assets where or in what language. So it is ww1 that is the turning point.

Also, genocide before ww1 wasn't a crime and wasn't declared a war crime. It was just business as usual. It was ww1 that suddenly created laws about genocide. For what purpose? For the purpose of legalizing genocide if the entente does it, and make it a crime if others do it. This is an additional reason why ww1 is the point in question.

And do you really think you can isolate your country from the adverse effects of what you yourself perpetrated on the entire world, e.g. on Poland, by brexiting them out into oblivion? Historic question: what is the result on you when you do divide and conquer?

It might not have been my prime subject but it does not mean that I did not get told the facts. You are trying to re-write history and re-draw the borders to suit your nationalist tendencies and forgetting that those you are trying to steal from will oppose you all the way. Why do you stop at pre WW1 for your cut off date why not pre islamic invasion or pre Roman empire. Is it because they would give you nothing as your country did not exist back then, or is it that you wont get the cream of the land to steal.

All wars in Europe had the civilians as combatants, it is how wars were fought right up until WW1 when it stopped and clear lines were drawn. Well I want the paleolithic as the turning point because it give me an advantage over you. Dont like it then get a life.

It still wasnt a crime in reality as the law was never ratified, leaving you with STUPID engraved in your forehead. And it was post WW2 that saw any attempts at formalising war and genocide as a war crime, Again showing that you are far from being educated in the reality.

I have perpetrated nothing on anyone, it was those who came before me and I am not guilty of their crimes. So dig them up, resurrect them and tell them your woes. But how will the UK leaving the neo marxist ran EU cause any problems for anyone that is prepared to work at making it better. Why should I be denied health care that I have paid for yet scroungers and criminals from Poland get it on demand and they have not paid a penny. When you understand this then you will see that Brexit is right and proper for the UK. And sod the rest of Europe that will lose the UK welfare that kept them afloat, start going after your leaders for the money they have secreted into swiss bank accounts for when the bubble bursts.

Therer will be no result as there is no divide and conquer, we are not as devious as you are we just want control back where it belongs. IN OUR HANDS

Apart from that I have already answered your points here in my previous post, I can only say that you make a liar out of yourself by repeating the lies that the nationalists of the entente have been drilling into your head for the latest 100 years.

When you take other people's money (or land), they will come for it. No matter how many lies you convince yourself of, to keep your loot.

I suggest you read about your prime minister Chamberlain, the one you and your fellow goons love to hate.

And have you shown these lies to be that, or have you just shouted down anyone that disagrees with you. No evidence of them being lies makes you the LIAR

Sounds very much like the islamonazi mantra that the Jews have stolen the arab lands when the reality is the arab's never owned the land in the first place

What is there to read about him, he made a statement that was shown later to be false. Just like Blair did, and Brown after him. All politicians get caught out at some time or other, but it seems that left wing ones get caught out more often

 

[xyz]

Actually they dont, and you dont know what my real position is either.

Of course, it would help if you weren't a liar to begin with.