regent
Gold Member
- Jan 30, 2012
- 10,459
- 1,148
- 245
It takes a certain kind of moron to imagine that the larger the font they use, the more import it has....and the more it can counter the truth.
Raise your paw.
As I have mentioned to you before, you must get this information to the noted historians and presidential experts that rate the presidents. Again and again they have rated Harding as one of the worst American presidents, something about stupidity and stealing. They wouldn't dare say Harding was one of the worst American presidents if they knew your truths. Don't let us down and please let us know how the historians respond.
"As I have mentioned to you before, you must get this information to the noted historians "
That is far too mild.....when faced with the documented material that I post, you mindlessly default to that 'historians' nonsense.
I chalk it up to both the inability to respond in a cogent manner, and to your infirmity, incessant perseveration.
See if this helps:
"Perseveration can be defined as the contextually inappropriate and unintentional repetition of a response or behavioral unit. In other words, the observed repetitiveness does not
meet the demands of the situation, is not the product ofdeliberation, and may even unfold despite counterintention."
http://schizophreniabulletin.oxfordjournals.org/content/23/1/63.full.pdf
Yeah, yeah.
Anyway, trying to convince a few posters that Harding was not a bad president seems to be a waste, whereas if you could convince a number of historians to change their opinion of Harding, textbooks might be changed, Rushmore might have a new figure. As it is, however, the textbooks continue pumping out the Harding gave away the navy's oil, and let his cronies sell VA medical supplies and so forth. I say, at least let the right-wing historians in on what you have because they do seem to hot for Harding either. Good luck.