How Much You Wanna Bet We Put The Amount Of Troops Back In Iraq We Should've Left There?

If the neo-cons had power, the heavy units never would have left.

Kissinger's article Time explains why the neo-cons are bit players now.


Patently false idiot. No one wanted to keep 140,000 troops there IDIOT. The generals suggested about 30K so as to not squander the peace. (Even 10k could have helped.)

Let me repeat. Not squander the peace.

Let me repeat. Not squander the peace

Let me repeat. Not squander the peace

One more time, Fakey, not squander the peace like Obama has done.

Misfirection by you simply underlines your lack of understanding.

I said if the neo cons had had their way, the heavy units would not have left.

hint: they are not going back


You have no idea what you're talking about when you say "heavy units." You know nothing about military logistics either.

Your are wrong, as usual. Spend six years with 1st Cav and going to Europe every year, or go on spring maneuvers in Korea with 2d ID and the ROKS.

You were an office clerk in DC, nothing more.















Anytime now idiot.







Waiting for the bet to back your fat ass mouth up.
 
If the neo-cons had power, the heavy units never would have left.

Kissinger's article Time explains why the neo-cons are bit players now.


Patently false idiot. No one wanted to keep 140,000 troops there IDIOT. The generals suggested about 30K so as to not squander the peace. (Even 10k could have helped.)

Let me repeat. Not squander the peace.

Let me repeat. Not squander the peace

Let me repeat. Not squander the peace

One more time, Fakey, not squander the peace like Obama has done.

Misfirection by you simply underlines your lack of understanding.

I said if the neo cons had had their way, the heavy units would not have left.

hint: they are not going back


You have no idea what you're talking about when you say "heavy units." You know nothing about military logistics either.

Your are wrong, as usual. Spend six years with 1st Cav and going to Europe every year, or go on spring maneuvers in Korea with 2d ID and the ROKS.

You were an office clerk in DC, nothing more.














I'm waiting. Where'd ya go, coward?
 
You have given us nothing. Your affirmation, Specialist. You flatly know nothing about logistics, yet you claim you do.

Go for it.
 
You have given us nothing. Your affirmation, Specialist. You flatly know nothing about logistics, yet you claim you do.

Go for it.


Bluh, bluh, bluh, bluh, bluh, you sound like a blubbering whale.

I notice you switched stories now that I'm asking you to back your fat ass lies up with money. You said I was nothing but a desk blah blah in DC.



Now you're backing off that. FUCKING COWARD.


I'm waiting for you to back that up fucktard. Your implication is I've never been in Iraq and have been lying on this thread about my experience. Come on shit-for-brains, prove it.














crickets.
 
You have given us nothing. Your affirmation, Specialist. You flatly know nothing about logistics, yet you claim you do.

Go for it.



And what the fuck is an affirmation Specialist, retard??????????????

Understanding logistics is a key part to understanding the enemy dumb fuck. Understanding logistics is a key part to understanding the global economy, dumb ass. And you don't understand ANY of it.
 
Less than 24 hours from the OP and we have confirmation deploying troops is a real possibility. Looks pretty insightful to me.
 
So I ask Jakey Fakey to clarify his opinion on this subject and he responds with an accusation that I'm a poser. Ok, let's see him put money behind that accusation.

And let's see him explain what the hell "heavy troops" are.









But wait, his fat ass ran off..........................














What a fucking coward.





:banana2:
 
EconChick, once again, makes an affirmative statement about logistics without any evidence at all, then defies me to prove her wrong. The failure her, as it was for economic malaise, is that she thinks she gets to give an opinion as evidence then the other side has to give evidence against her opinion.

She was flatly nothing more than a SP4 in an office in DC, if that.
 
EconChick, once again, makes an affirmative statement about logistics without any evidence at all, then defies me to prove her wrong. The failure her, as it was for economic malaise, is that she thinks she gets to give an opinion as evidence then the other side has to give evidence against her opinion.

She was flatly nothing more than a SP4 in an office in DC, if that.



Yo beached whale, there your fat ass is.

I notice you're punting on the desk jockey thing......I don't see you putting up the G.

How about 2000 bucks now, fat ass???




Here's the deal, we'll use a moderator or someone both sides agree would be even handed.....I'll show them my cred's and reveal you're a pathetic liar.....and then you cough up the 2 grand, mother fucker.













I'm waiting.










And no, you're too stupid to understand logistics either.















































Crickets. You can't back it up. You're punting.
 
Econchick, you made an opinionated statement without evidence and you want me to rebut it with evidence.

That is what you did with "economic malaise" and were made to look like the fool of the day, and that is hard to do with some of the other reactionaries.

Now you made the affirmation (if you don't know what that means, you are not a graduate student in an economics doctoral program), so back it up.

I will take her cookie right now she is so melting.
 
Econchick, you made an opinionated statement without evidence and you want me to rebut it with evidence.

That is what you did with "economic malaise" and were made to look like the fool of the day, and that is hard to do with some of the other reactionaries.

Now you made the affirmation (if you don't know what that means, you are not a graduate student in an economics doctoral program), so back it up.

I will take her cookie right now she is so melting.


Hey fat ass, I'm willing to give you $2000 dollars if you're right about me being an SP4.

Why are you scurrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrred to take that bet, you punk ass wimp?

You know nothing about Iraq and now you're made a fool on your false accusation as well.







































I'm waiting for you to back it up with some money, honey.


































:ahole-1:
 
LOL. As usual, the libs can't win the debate. They never win it on this board.

Members are going along having a good debate, and then the scum like Jakey Fakey derail the thread so they can hide that they're losing.

You have no idea what you're talking about on this topic Fakey, that part's not a surprise, but now I'm holding you to the $2000 bucks.














You're welcome to donate it to USMB, blubber boy.






























































Crickets.

































LOL, Fakey's now trying to pretend he never said it.




















Too late Fakey, you owe 2 Gs.
 

Forum List

Back
Top