How journalists see the world

[PurpleOwl]

ill give this atleast your honest, nothing more pathetic than an open racist who spends 99% of his time denying that he's racist

If he's denying it he's not open, is he?

As it turns out, you fall into the 99 percent category of those who deny they are racist but actually are. Everyone is racist, just like everyone is familyist. They are the same thing, in point of fact.

abolish the family, the family is only a tool of the bourgeoisie

I should have guessed it. PimpleOw! is a Bolshi.

Abolition [Aufhebung] of the family! Even the most radical flare up at this infamous proposal of the Communists.

On what foundation is the present family, the bourgeois family, based? On capital, on private gain. In its completely developed form, this family exists only among the bourgeoisie. But this state of things finds its complement in the practical absence of the family among the proletarians, and in public prostitution.

The bourgeois family will vanish as a matter of course when its complement vanishes, and both will vanish with the vanishing of capital.

Do you charge us with wanting to stop the exploitation of children by their parents? To this crime we plead guilty.

But, you say, we destroy the most hallowed of relations, when we replace home education by social.

And your education! Is not that also social, and determined by the social conditions under which you educate, by the intervention direct or indirect, of society, by means of schools, &c.? The Communists have not invented the intervention of society in education; they do but seek to alter the character of that intervention, and to rescue education from the influence of the ruling class.

The bourgeois clap-trap about the family and education, about the hallowed co-relation of parents and child, becomes all the more disgusting, the more, by the action of Modern Industry, all the family ties among the proletarians are torn asunder, and their children transformed into simple articles of commerce and instruments of labour.

Communist Manifesto (Chapter 2)

Bleak, dead-souled garbage.

disproves your shitty theory that everyone is a racist because everyone is a famlyist doesn't it?

 

[cnelsen]

If he's denying it he's not open, is he?

As it turns out, you fall into the 99 percent category of those who deny they are racist but actually are. Everyone is racist, just like everyone is familyist. They are the same thing, in point of fact.

abolish the family, the family is only a tool of the bourgeoisie

I should have guessed it. PimpleOw! is a Bolshi.

Abolition [Aufhebung] of the family! Even the most radical flare up at this infamous proposal of the Communists.

On what foundation is the present family, the bourgeois family, based? On capital, on private gain. In its completely developed form, this family exists only among the bourgeoisie. But this state of things finds its complement in the practical absence of the family among the proletarians, and in public prostitution.

The bourgeois family will vanish as a matter of course when its complement vanishes, and both will vanish with the vanishing of capital.

Do you charge us with wanting to stop the exploitation of children by their parents? To this crime we plead guilty.

But, you say, we destroy the most hallowed of relations, when we replace home education by social.

And your education! Is not that also social, and determined by the social conditions under which you educate, by the intervention direct or indirect, of society, by means of schools, &c.? The Communists have not invented the intervention of society in education; they do but seek to alter the character of that intervention, and to rescue education from the influence of the ruling class.

The bourgeois clap-trap about the family and education, about the hallowed co-relation of parents and child, becomes all the more disgusting, the more, by the action of Modern Industry, all the family ties among the proletarians are torn asunder, and their children transformed into simple articles of commerce and instruments of labour.

Communist Manifesto (Chapter 2)

Bleak, dead-souled garbage.

disproves your shitty theory that everyone is a racist because everyone is a famlyist doesn't it?

No, PimpleOw!, it doesn't. Communists aren't human.

 

[cnelsen]

Andrew Neil

✔ @afneil
What has neutral Sweden done to deserve this?

• Never in Mid-East war
• Non-Nato
• Most welcoming of Muslim refugees.
• Massive foreign aid

=============================================

You see? Importing an alien and historically hostile culture should be no problemo as long as you are really nice and don't do anything to upset them and send them lots of money.

The US, on the other hand,

• bombs as fast as Israeli blood lust can finger targets
• NATO member
• fairly unwelcoming of Muslim refugees
• lion's share of the massive foreign aid goes to Israel.

Clearly, the US deserves every attack it suffers.

i love when lying jew hating loons make up things in their head that they pretend other people "think" and then rage against what they've made up in their heads.

quiet.

israeli blood lust? stfu antisemite freak.

Eat me, guy, you brain-dead ninny.

 

[PurpleOwl]

abolish the family, the family is only a tool of the bourgeoisie

I should have guessed it. PimpleOw! is a Bolshi.

Abolition [Aufhebung] of the family! Even the most radical flare up at this infamous proposal of the Communists.

On what foundation is the present family, the bourgeois family, based? On capital, on private gain. In its completely developed form, this family exists only among the bourgeoisie. But this state of things finds its complement in the practical absence of the family among the proletarians, and in public prostitution.

The bourgeois family will vanish as a matter of course when its complement vanishes, and both will vanish with the vanishing of capital.

Do you charge us with wanting to stop the exploitation of children by their parents? To this crime we plead guilty.

But, you say, we destroy the most hallowed of relations, when we replace home education by social.

And your education! Is not that also social, and determined by the social conditions under which you educate, by the intervention direct or indirect, of society, by means of schools, &c.? The Communists have not invented the intervention of society in education; they do but seek to alter the character of that intervention, and to rescue education from the influence of the ruling class.

The bourgeois clap-trap about the family and education, about the hallowed co-relation of parents and child, becomes all the more disgusting, the more, by the action of Modern Industry, all the family ties among the proletarians are torn asunder, and their children transformed into simple articles of commerce and instruments of labour.

Communist Manifesto (Chapter 2)

Bleak, dead-souled garbage.

disproves your shitty theory that everyone is a racist because everyone is a famlyist doesn't it?

No, PimpleOw!, it doesn't. Communists aren't human.

lol so why dont you spend all your time denying your a racist like the others?

 

[cnelsen]

I should have guessed it. PimpleOw! is a Bolshi.

Abolition [Aufhebung] of the family! Even the most radical flare up at this infamous proposal of the Communists.

On what foundation is the present family, the bourgeois family, based? On capital, on private gain. In its completely developed form, this family exists only among the bourgeoisie. But this state of things finds its complement in the practical absence of the family among the proletarians, and in public prostitution.

The bourgeois family will vanish as a matter of course when its complement vanishes, and both will vanish with the vanishing of capital.

Do you charge us with wanting to stop the exploitation of children by their parents? To this crime we plead guilty.

But, you say, we destroy the most hallowed of relations, when we replace home education by social.

And your education! Is not that also social, and determined by the social conditions under which you educate, by the intervention direct or indirect, of society, by means of schools, &c.? The Communists have not invented the intervention of society in education; they do but seek to alter the character of that intervention, and to rescue education from the influence of the ruling class.

The bourgeois clap-trap about the family and education, about the hallowed co-relation of parents and child, becomes all the more disgusting, the more, by the action of Modern Industry, all the family ties among the proletarians are torn asunder, and their children transformed into simple articles of commerce and instruments of labour.

Communist Manifesto (Chapter 2)

Bleak, dead-souled garbage.

disproves your shitty theory that everyone is a racist because everyone is a famlyist doesn't it?

No, PimpleOw!, it doesn't. Communists aren't human.

lol so why dont you spend all your time denying your a racist like the others?

Because I'm not a racist like the others.

 

[PurpleOwl]

Abolition [Aufhebung] of the family! Even the most radical flare up at this infamous proposal of the Communists.

On what foundation is the present family, the bourgeois family, based? On capital, on private gain. In its completely developed form, this family exists only among the bourgeoisie. But this state of things finds its complement in the practical absence of the family among the proletarians, and in public prostitution.

The bourgeois family will vanish as a matter of course when its complement vanishes, and both will vanish with the vanishing of capital.

Do you charge us with wanting to stop the exploitation of children by their parents? To this crime we plead guilty.

But, you say, we destroy the most hallowed of relations, when we replace home education by social.

And your education! Is not that also social, and determined by the social conditions under which you educate, by the intervention direct or indirect, of society, by means of schools, &c.? The Communists have not invented the intervention of society in education; they do but seek to alter the character of that intervention, and to rescue education from the influence of the ruling class.

The bourgeois clap-trap about the family and education, about the hallowed co-relation of parents and child, becomes all the more disgusting, the more, by the action of Modern Industry, all the family ties among the proletarians are torn asunder, and their children transformed into simple articles of commerce and instruments of labour.

Communist Manifesto (Chapter 2)

Bleak, dead-souled garbage.

disproves your shitty theory that everyone is a racist because everyone is a famlyist doesn't it?

No, PimpleOw!, it doesn't. Communists aren't human.

lol so why dont you spend all your time denying your a racist like the others?

Because I'm not a racist like the others.

do you think hitler was racist?

 

[cnelsen]

Bleak, dead-souled garbage.

disproves your shitty theory that everyone is a racist because everyone is a famlyist doesn't it?

No, PimpleOw!, it doesn't. Communists aren't human.

lol so why dont you spend all your time denying your a racist like the others?

Because I'm not a racist like the others.

do you think hitler was racist?

yep. so was disraeli and balfour and wilson and brandeis

 

[Unkotare]

What do you have against Israel?

he's a neonazi why do you think?

Brilliant response.

ill give this atleast your honest, nothing more pathetic than an open racist who spends 99% of his time denying that he's racist

If he's denying it he's not open, is he?

As it turns out, you fall into the 99 percent category of those who deny they are racist but actually are. Everyone is racist, just like everyone is familyist. They are the same thing, in point of fact.

abolish the family, the family is only a tool of the bourgeoisie

Marxist humor?

 

[Mudda]

Andrew Neil

✔ @afneil
What has neutral Sweden done to deserve this?

• Never in Mid-East war
• Non-Nato
• Most welcoming of Muslim refugees.
• Massive foreign aid

=============================================

You see? Importing an alien and historically hostile culture should be no problemo as long as you are really nice and don't do anything to upset them and send them lots of money.

The US, on the other hand,

• bombs as fast as Israeli blood lust can finger targets
• NATO member
• fairly unwelcoming of Muslim refugees
• lion's share of the massive foreign aid goes to Israel.

Clearly, the US deserves every attack it suffers.

What do you have against Israel?

Getting us into the Iraq War, for one thing. The constant warmongering. The blood lust. Working through AIPAC to push us into war with Iran. And Russia.

Israel had nothing to do with the Iraq wars. Granted, they were happy about it.

 

[cnelsen]

Andrew Neil

✔ @afneil
What has neutral Sweden done to deserve this?

• Never in Mid-East war
• Non-Nato
• Most welcoming of Muslim refugees.
• Massive foreign aid

=============================================

You see? Importing an alien and historically hostile culture should be no problemo as long as you are really nice and don't do anything to upset them and send them lots of money.

The US, on the other hand,

• bombs as fast as Israeli blood lust can finger targets
• NATO member
• fairly unwelcoming of Muslim refugees
• lion's share of the massive foreign aid goes to Israel.

Clearly, the US deserves every attack it suffers.

What do you have against Israel?

Getting us into the Iraq War, for one thing. The constant warmongering. The blood lust. Working through AIPAC to push us into war with Iran. And Russia.

Israel had nothing to do with the Iraq wars. Granted, they were happy about it.

AIPAC did, and the bogus WMD intel was fed by Mossad to dual citizens in Cheney's office.

 

[Mudda]

Andrew Neil

✔ @afneil
What has neutral Sweden done to deserve this?

• Never in Mid-East war
• Non-Nato
• Most welcoming of Muslim refugees.
• Massive foreign aid

=============================================

You see? Importing an alien and historically hostile culture should be no problemo as long as you are really nice and don't do anything to upset them and send them lots of money.

The US, on the other hand,

• bombs as fast as Israeli blood lust can finger targets
• NATO member
• fairly unwelcoming of Muslim refugees
• lion's share of the massive foreign aid goes to Israel.

Clearly, the US deserves every attack it suffers.

What do you have against Israel?

Getting us into the Iraq War, for one thing. The constant warmongering. The blood lust. Working through AIPAC to push us into war with Iran. And Russia.

Israel had nothing to do with the Iraq wars. Granted, they were happy about it.

AIPAC did, and the bogus WMD intel was fed by Mossad to dual citizens in Cheney's office.

Oh, it's a fantasy. Got it.

 

[jillian]

ill give this atleast your honest, nothing more pathetic than an open racist who spends 99% of his time denying that he's racist

If he's denying it he's not open, is he?

As it turns out, you fall into the 99 percent category of those who deny they are racist but actually are. Everyone is racist, just like everyone is familyist. They are the same thing, in point of fact.

abolish the family, the family is only a tool of the bourgeoisie

I should have guessed it. PimpleOw! is a Bolshi.

Abolition [Aufhebung] of the family! Even the most radical flare up at this infamous proposal of the Communists.

On what foundation is the present family, the bourgeois family, based? On capital, on private gain. In its completely developed form, this family exists only among the bourgeoisie. But this state of things finds its complement in the practical absence of the family among the proletarians, and in public prostitution.

The bourgeois family will vanish as a matter of course when its complement vanishes, and both will vanish with the vanishing of capital.

Do you charge us with wanting to stop the exploitation of children by their parents? To this crime we plead guilty.

But, you say, we destroy the most hallowed of relations, when we replace home education by social.

And your education! Is not that also social, and determined by the social conditions under which you educate, by the intervention direct or indirect, of society, by means of schools, &c.? The Communists have not invented the intervention of society in education; they do but seek to alter the character of that intervention, and to rescue education from the influence of the ruling class.

The bourgeois clap-trap about the family and education, about the hallowed co-relation of parents and child, becomes all the more disgusting, the more, by the action of Modern Industry, all the family ties among the proletarians are torn asunder, and their children transformed into simple articles of commerce and instruments of labour.

Communist Manifesto (Chapter 2)

Bleak, dead-souled garbage.

it would probably help if you were educated as to the difference between liberalism and communism, particularly marxism, you brain dead ignorant uneducated loon

 

[cnelsen]

If he's denying it he's not open, is he?

As it turns out, you fall into the 99 percent category of those who deny they are racist but actually are. Everyone is racist, just like everyone is familyist. They are the same thing, in point of fact.

abolish the family, the family is only a tool of the bourgeoisie

I should have guessed it. PimpleOw! is a Bolshi.

Abolition [Aufhebung] of the family! Even the most radical flare up at this infamous proposal of the Communists.

On what foundation is the present family, the bourgeois family, based? On capital, on private gain. In its completely developed form, this family exists only among the bourgeoisie. But this state of things finds its complement in the practical absence of the family among the proletarians, and in public prostitution.

The bourgeois family will vanish as a matter of course when its complement vanishes, and both will vanish with the vanishing of capital.

Do you charge us with wanting to stop the exploitation of children by their parents? To this crime we plead guilty.

But, you say, we destroy the most hallowed of relations, when we replace home education by social.

And your education! Is not that also social, and determined by the social conditions under which you educate, by the intervention direct or indirect, of society, by means of schools, &c.? The Communists have not invented the intervention of society in education; they do but seek to alter the character of that intervention, and to rescue education from the influence of the ruling class.

The bourgeois clap-trap about the family and education, about the hallowed co-relation of parents and child, becomes all the more disgusting, the more, by the action of Modern Industry, all the family ties among the proletarians are torn asunder, and their children transformed into simple articles of commerce and instruments of labour.

Communist Manifesto (Chapter 2)

Bleak, dead-souled garbage.

it would probably help if you were educated as to the difference between liberalism and communism, particularly marxism, you brain dead ignorant uneducated loon

Yeah, I'll get right on that, lightweight.

 

[Brynmr]

The bombing needs to stop on all sides.

They can go first since they're the bad guys.

 

[cnelsen]

The bombing needs to stop on all sides.

They can go first since they're the bad guys.

The Israelis?

 

[defcon4]

The bourgeois clap-trap about the family and education, about the hallowed co-relation of parents and child, becomes all the more disgusting, the more, by the action of Modern Industry, all the family ties among the proletarians are torn asunder, and their children transformed into simple articles of commerce and instruments of labour.

I have read a similar approach to the concept of family:
"....in order to establish an absolute majority, which cannot be got from the educated propertied classes. In this way, by inculcating in all a sense of self-importance, we shall destroy the importance of the family and its educational value and remove the possibility of individual minds splitting off..."