LogikAndReazon
Gold Member
- Feb 21, 2012
- 5,351
- 668
- 190
Kerouac, Salinger and Marx....now THOSE are reads......lmfao
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Calling yourself a comrade?Anyway, what exactly is it that you find creepy about the notion of personal responsibility and the promise to not accept charity that is forced from strangers?
Never really expected a straight forward answer. Typical of the leftists...just stick to emotional arguments and name calling. Avoid logic, reason and specificity at all costs.
Way to keep it in line comrade.
Brilliant! Take a good look at your role model, Libertarians and misguided conservatives. Pro-choice, anti-Reagan, anti-religion, anti-native Americans, pro-selfishness...you all picked a winner to emulate.
Why is she still a thing?
My guess us that in the left's never ending quest to distract Americans from the failure that is Barack Hussein Obama, you guys keep bringing her up.
At least two of your upcoming Republican candidates for president are slavish devotees to her weird views.
So how is she not relevant?
IF they are fans, do they bring her up as much as you do?
Who said she wasn't relevant? You asked a question, I answered it.
When your house catches fire, who do you call?Civil servants to the Rescue !!!!!!!!!!!! Lol
What a dangerously nazi-style crock of left wing, un-American, democrat socialist propaganda. And it isn't even clever. Just chopped up, out of context propaganda. You lefties must be feeling mighty threatened by the all American concept of individualism and intellectual property as opposed to your sheeple collective socialistic herd think.Brilliant! Take a good look at your role model, Libertarians and misguided conservatives. Pro-choice, anti-Reagan, anti-religion, anti-native Americans, pro-selfishness...you all picked a winner to emulate.
Her comment about Reagan was out of context? What's the correct context where she didn't belittle him?What a dangerously nazi-style crock of left wing, un-American, democrat socialist propaganda. And it isn't even clever. Just chopped up, out of context propaganda. You lefties must be feeling mighty threatened by the all American concept of individualism and intellectual property as opposed to your sheeple collective socialistic herd think.Brilliant! Take a good look at your role model, Libertarians and misguided conservatives. Pro-choice, anti-Reagan, anti-religion, anti-native Americans, pro-selfishness...you all picked a winner to emulate.
Creepy idiocy of the left. Only the mindless vote democrat these days.
Brilliant! Take a good look at your role model, Libertarians and misguided conservatives. Pro-choice, anti-Reagan, anti-religion, anti-native Americans, pro-selfishness...you all picked a winner to emulate.
Why is she still a thing?
My guess us that in the left's never ending quest to distract Americans from the failure that is Barack Hussein Obama, you guys keep bringing her up.
At least two of your upcoming Republican candidates for president are slavish devotees to her weird views.
So how is she not relevant?
IF they are fans, do they bring her up as much as you do?
Who said she wasn't relevant? You asked a question, I answered it.
I didn't ask a question. Try to pay attention between spews.
Of course they won't bring her up. While she is their guiding ideological light, they know that the rest of the country thinks she's batshit crazy. They don't want to highlight that while pushing her agenda of selfishness.
Atheism and objectivism are not incompatible. Railing against Reagan early in his presidency is very out of context thirty years later and abortion is a very complex issue.Her comment about Reagan was out of context? What's the correct context where she didn't belittle him?What a dangerously nazi-style crock of left wing, un-American, democrat socialist propaganda. And it isn't even clever. Just chopped up, out of context propaganda. You lefties must be feeling mighty threatened by the all American concept of individualism and intellectual property as opposed to your sheeple collective socialistic herd think.Brilliant! Take a good look at your role model, Libertarians and misguided conservatives. Pro-choice, anti-Reagan, anti-religion, anti-native Americans, pro-selfishness...you all picked a winner to emulate.
Creepy idiocy of the left. Only the mindless vote democrat these days.
What about her comment about God and reason?
What about her comment about abortion?
Clarify this for us.
Brilliant! Take a good look at your role model, Libertarians and misguided conservatives. Pro-choice, anti-Reagan, anti-religion, anti-native Americans, pro-selfishness...you all picked a winner to emulate.
Why is she still a thing?
My guess us that in the left's never ending quest to distract Americans from the failure that is Barack Hussein Obama, you guys keep bringing her up.
At least two of your upcoming Republican candidates for president are slavish devotees to her weird views.
So how is she not relevant?
IF they are fans, do they bring her up as much as you do?
Who said she wasn't relevant? You asked a question, I answered it.
I didn't ask a question. Try to pay attention between spews.
Of course they won't bring her up. While she is their guiding ideological light, they know that the rest of the country thinks she's batshit crazy. They don't want to highlight that while pushing her agenda of selfishness.
Yes you did ask a question. Look at your thread title dummy.
I still rail against Reagan early, middle, and late in his presidency. Most objective people do.Atheism and objectivism are not incompatible. Railing against Reagan early in his presidency is very out of context thirty years later and abortion is a very complex issue.Her comment about Reagan was out of context? What's the correct context where she didn't belittle him?What a dangerously nazi-style crock of left wing, un-American, democrat socialist propaganda. And it isn't even clever. Just chopped up, out of context propaganda. You lefties must be feeling mighty threatened by the all American concept of individualism and intellectual property as opposed to your sheeple collective socialistic herd think.Brilliant! Take a good look at your role model, Libertarians and misguided conservatives. Pro-choice, anti-Reagan, anti-religion, anti-native Americans, pro-selfishness...you all picked a winner to emulate.
Creepy idiocy of the left. Only the mindless vote democrat these days.
What about her comment about God and reason?
What about her comment about abortion?
Clarify this for us.
But let's have you clarify. You're the one referencing them. Meanwhile, no reasonable person would ever completely agree with another person. Only left wingers do that out of sheer groupthink.
Marxism comrades, is the answer....
Is that you John Galt?
OK.
She's not a thing.
Is that because she's been discredited?
I think you have to be pretty simple minded to take her seriously.
You two never read the book did ya'?
"Atlas Shrugged".
OK.
She's not a thing.
Is that because she's been discredited?
Discredited by whom? Intellectually stunted children who get their news from a comedian and their philosophy from hate sites funded by George Soros?
Anyway, what exactly is it that you find creepy about the notion of personal responsibility and the promise to not accept charity that is forced from strangers?
Never really expected a straight forward answer. Typical of the leftists...just stick to emotional arguments and name calling. Avoid logic, reason and specificity at all costs.
Way to keep it in line comrade.
How to answer someone who believes government helping those in need is theft?
Like many famous figures, Rand isn't a complete waste of time to read:
The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren't enough criminals, one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws.
Ayn Rand
Potentially, a government is the most dangerous threat to man's rights: it holds a legal monopoly on the use of physical force against legally disarmed victims.
Ayn Rand
Individual rights are not subject to a public vote; a majority has no right to vote away the rights of a minority; the political function of rights is precisely to protect minorities from oppression by majorities (and the smallest minority on earth is the individual).
Ayn Rand
others I didn't agree with so much and these from,
Ayn Rand Quotes- BrainyQuote
...but on the whole, her philosophy would lead to anarchy since just about any action by government can be perceived as a loss of freedom by someone.