Billo_Really
Litre of the Band
Maybe you should state what my point is, back to me, to my satisfaction, before digging yourself into a deeper hole as a result of not understanding exactly what it is you're responding to?Except that writing something down and making it LAW is nothing like the illusion from placing an item in water, you epic fool....
The U.S. Constitution is not viewed through a glass of water. It's written in black & white, plain as day, it says exactly what is says, and it means exactly what it means.
The fact that you think you can reinterpret what someone else specifically wrote is evidence of both your arrogance and your ignorance.
This is why Sean Hannity complains that "words have no meaning to liberals". They believe if they don't like something, they can just claim that's not what was meant (even though what was meant is written in black & white).
My point had nothing to do with re-interpreting the Constitution. It was about other documents that played a role in the evolution of our system of government that eventually led to the creation of the Constitution that sheds additional light on some things that was written in the Supreme Law of our Land.
Last edited: