How far have we already gone?

Queen of all bitches with wieners, do you suppose after all the conditioning we have experienced, since any acid-resistant forms evolved, we are somehow not going to suffer a Mass Extinction? Do you think hermaphrodites get to remain oblivious, to MEE6?

Mass extinction due to CO2? Geez bob, do you really believe that there will be mass extinctions because of CO2? All you have to do is look back in history to see that it simply isn't going to happen.

Watch the vid and do your own math, Wienerbitch. Mass extinction went down, before, it will go down, again, and it's going down, NOW, all the time, while we watch, and you bitch out. Ever ride in a helicopter, Wienerbitch? What do you suppose happens to those, all the time?

The population is up, too high, for the declining human and animal habitat to support. Like a helicopter with the tail rotor compromised, a forced landing is necessary, and something fatal is likely to happen. Your usual method of flapping won't save you, from a chopper-type crash or from a dose of HIV, moving to full-blown AIDS, which are like the problems, posed by global warming. We've been over why you are into AIDS-type dilemmas.

This helicopter-analogy is fresh, and it fits our current situation, as if some chopper pilot is up, with his ass on fire, and he is in denial, about what will happen, when that rotor fails.

Why don't you go out and find us a nice graph, at 4 am in the morning, since you keep posting crap, at that time?






So, riddle me this queer boy (or do you prefer poofter?), how do you claim this is an extinction when well over 20,000 NEW species have been discovered in the last 5 years?

Your math should be quite amusing.
 
The population is up, too high, for the declining human and animal habitat to support. Like a helicopter with the tail rotor compromised, a forced landing is necessary, and something fatal is likely to happen. Your usual method of flapping won't save you, from a chopper-type crash or from a dose of HIV, moving to full-blown AIDS, which are like the problems, posed by global warming. We've been over why you are into AIDS-type dilemmas.

So, riddle me this queer boy (or do you prefer poofter?), how do you claim this is an extinction when well over 20,000 NEW species have been discovered in the last 5 years?

Your math should be quite amusing.

With your Wally-head up your asshole, while living in a Nevada closet, you start to ass-u-me. When you assume, you project your own denials, about your closet and the similarity of the HIV/AIDS epidemic, to your denial, about dangerous climate change.

If I were queer, Wallyfucktard, I wouldn't live in a closet and rant at straight people, like you do. I'd get out and freak. I would not be both gay and stupid, like your fellow Log Cabin Club freak, Q-bag, who outed himself, posted smilies, and ran off.

I don't do either gay or queer lifestyles, and I resent your redundant denials and crude accusations, which impose your queer agenda, on any part of the public, gay or straight. You closet queens need to be deposed, if you won't be outed, since you are like the dead queers, who shot speed and tricked HIV all the way, through AIDS, to death. While you are at your pansy-rants, try to type, without skipping 8 lines, first.

You might want to suck balls over at wattsupwiththat and load your buddy's graph, or are you committed to mere rants, over here? Go get us a graph, regal bitch!

Since you are absolutely queer, you somehow reason because species are still being discovered, habitat and extinction must not be evident. But you are stupid, first, queer, second. If you were queer, first, maybe you'd step out, admit you are gay, and fuck off.

Since you are stupid, first, you will eat shit, and die, no doubt.
 
The population is up, too high, for the declining human and animal habitat to support. Like a helicopter with the tail rotor compromised, a forced landing is necessary, and something fatal is likely to happen. Your usual method of flapping won't save you, from a chopper-type crash or from a dose of HIV, moving to full-blown AIDS, which are like the problems, posed by global warming. We've been over why you are into AIDS-type dilemmas.

So, riddle me this queer boy (or do you prefer poofter?), how do you claim this is an extinction when well over 20,000 NEW species have been discovered in the last 5 years?

Your math should be quite amusing.

With your Wally-head up your asshole, while living in a Nevada closet, you start to ass-u-me. When you assume, you project your own denials, about your closet and the similarity of the HIV/AIDS epidemic, to your denial, about dangerous climate change.

If I were queer, Wallyfucktard, I wouldn't live in a closet and rant at straight people, like you do. I'd get out and freak. I would not be both gay and stupid, like your fellow Log Cabin Club freak, Q-bag, who outed himself, posted smilies, and ran off.

I don't do either gay or queer lifestyles, and I resent your redundant denials and crude accusations, which impose your queer agenda, on any part of the public, gay or straight. You closet queens need to be deposed, if you won't be outed, since you are like the dead queers, who shot speed and tricked HIV all the way, through AIDS, to death. While you are at your pansy-rants, try to type, without skipping 8 lines, first.

You might want to suck balls over at wattsupwiththat and load your buddy's graph, or are you committed to mere rants, over here? Go get us a graph, regal bitch!

Since you are absolutely queer, you somehow reason because species are still being discovered, habitat and extinction must not be evident. But you are stupid, first, queer, second. If you were queer, first, maybe you'd step out, admit you are gay, and fuck off.

Since you are stupid, first, you will eat shit, and die, no doubt.







I believe what you are doing is called PROJECTION. Look it up junior.:lol::lol:
 
I believe what you are doing is called PROJECTION. Look it up junior.:lol::lol:

He sure likes talking about male genitals doesn't he? I thought the topic was climate change but he just keeps on and on about johnsons.

Why do you guys come over to threads like this, Wiener and Wally? Do you crave despicable camaraderie?

Wiener posted two graphs. One was shit, without labels for the plots. The other was Vostok core plots, for CO2 and temperature, but Wiener couldn't read it, and you wouldn't try, Wally, even though I invited you to read the graph. Wally doesn't post graphs. Wally likes to talk down to me. We know what you mean by that, don't we.

I've posted numerous graphs, but you guys don't comment, on those. So I've been commenting on how queer you stupid, aggressive, experienced, closet homosexuals are, since you offer nothing on-topic, see O.R.'s OP.

I'd be glad to write about how far we have gone, but how far did you guys go? All the way off-topic, and then you like the outing you get, so you come back for more. Wienerbitch, you are undeniably a hermaphrodite, who tries to pretend he's queen of science, but you are no damn good. Wallyfucktard is clearly a royal pussy, who won't load a graph, and he waits 8 lines, to write a reply, to darned near any quote in quote in quote.

When you guys get tired of hearing what shit you are, you can go act like shit, at some thread, with the OP, about how shitty you are, instead of hijacking environment pages.
 
Last edited:
The other was Vostok core plots, for CO2 and temperature, but Wiener couldn't read it, and you wouldn't try,

Well, one of us couldn't read it anyway bob. I provided 5 or 6 published, peer reviewed studies which stated, as I did, that the ice core data show that temperature increase preceeds an increase in atmospheric CO2 by at least 200 years.

You, on the other hand, talked a bit about my genitals, vented some of your repressed homosexuality, and I believe cut and pasted something that you didn't understand. In the grand and small scheme of things bob, I believe I win. Sorry guy.
 
The other was Vostok core plots, for CO2 and temperature, but Wiener couldn't read it, and you wouldn't try,

Well, one of us couldn't read it anyway bob. I provided 5 or 6 published, peer reviewed studies which stated, as I did, that the ice core data show that temperature increase preceeds an increase in atmospheric CO2 by at least 200 years.

You, on the other hand, talked a bit about my genitals, vented some of your repressed homosexuality, and I believe cut and pasted something that you didn't understand. In the grand and small scheme of things bob, I believe I win. Sorry guy.

I gave you the title of Wienerbitch, so I can stand to post stuff, for you to rant at. Since you can't deny you are a closet queen, you want to take the position of long-dead queers, who shot speed and tricked their HIV, all the way through AIDS, to death, and so now, you are a bitchin' conservative! Eat your own shit and die, geek!

Since you are still in the closet, with Wally, you guys think you can project your own preferences, onto others, while driving your dose, on the downlow.

Your "peer" reviewed studies are shit, to which you won't refer, simultaneously, with links and text, since you are a queer, claiming "peer," while masking your regal queenie tricks, in your downlow closet. You loaded one graph worth a shit, about Vostok cores, but you couldn't read that or the 400,000 year CO2-temperature trends, and Wallyfucktard wouldn't try to read them, since Wally is stupid, he knows you are stupid, he likes stupidity, so why should he try to read a graph?

Read Vostok posts, queer who claims "peer." Look at how you tried to get me to comment, on off-chart data.

You went and loaded that piece of shit, without labeled plots or Holocene data, so why would Wally read that, since you probably forgot to PM him, with a layoff advisement. The reason you forgot that is you are so stupid, you think a graph without labeled plots must somehow be worthwhile, if it comes from queerporn.org. But Wally was ready. He and suckassbil are plainly too stupid, to read a real graph, so why sort your shit?
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top