Back to puberty for Republicans, none for Demrats. That is our two tier justice system.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Back to puberty for Republicans, none for Demrats. That is our two tier justice system.
Conservatives are always pushing to try adolescents as adults. If a 13 year old can be tried as an adult, why shouldn't a 17 year old be held accountable for his actions?
Puberty? You're optimistic. I'm thinking that any Republican man that was breast fed is soon to be considered a predator.Back to puberty for Republicans, none for Demrats. That is our two tier justice system.
Conservatives are always pushing to try adolescents as adults. If a 13 year old can be tried as an adult, why shouldn't a 17 year old be held accountable for his actions?
Some states have automatic transfer laws that allow juvenile defendants to be tried as adults in serious cases such as rape and murder. If a 16 year old can be tried for rape as an adult, shouldn't a 17 year old be held accountable for attempted rape?Conservatives are always pushing to try adolescents as adults. If a 13 year old can be tried as an adult, why shouldn't a 17 year old be held accountable for his actions?
What crime?
Some states have automatic transfer laws that allow juvenile defendants to be tried as adults in serious cases such as rape and murder. If a 16 year old can be tried for rape as an adult, shouldn't a 17 year old be held accountable for attempted rape?Conservatives are always pushing to try adolescents as adults. If a 13 year old can be tried as an adult, why shouldn't a 17 year old be held accountable for his actions?
What crime?
Yeah, I have to agree. If he was going to be held accountable, it should have been then, not decades later. Now it's just a he said she said thing. Kind of troubling though to potentially have someone on the Supreme court that might have committed such a thing.Some states have automatic transfer laws that allow juvenile defendants to be tried as adults in serious cases such as rape and murder. If a 16 year old can be tried for rape as an adult, shouldn't a 17 year old be held accountable for attempted rape?Conservatives are always pushing to try adolescents as adults. If a 13 year old can be tried as an adult, why shouldn't a 17 year old be held accountable for his actions?
What crime?
Yeah, if it happened and then, when he's 17... not 36 years later. This is going nowhere as there is and will be no evidence he did anything.
Why would he admit to that, if he honestly doesn't believe it happened?
Lie detectors do not detect lies.Lie detectors?sexual harassment is not the same as attempted sexual assault
It sure isn't! But can you PROVE ANYTHING? If you can't, you are taking on persons word over the other, and that is DISCRIMINATION!
she has 2 people that can back her up as far as her account & a lie detector test saying she was truthful. brett only has his word. you would think a buddy would help him out....
Really?
You believe that malarkey?
Lie Detectors Don’t Work as Advertised and They Never Did | Smart News | Smithsonian
uh-huh. someone with PTSD couldn't beat a lie detector & make the outcome to her benefit.
/---/ Because it's not what the FBI does. How many times does that have to be explained to you LIbtards?sexual harassment is not the same as attempted sexual assault
It sure isn't! But can you PROVE ANYTHING? If you can't, you are taking on persons word over the other, and that is DISCRIMINATION!
she has 2 people that can back her up as far as her account & a lie detector test saying she was truthful. brett only has his word. you would think a buddy would help him out....
she has 2 people that can back her up as far as her account & a lie detector test saying she was truthful.
If she BELIEVES it happened, even if it didn't, a lie detector test is useless.
brett only has his word.
If Brett took a lie detector test, and it proved him innocent, would you believe it?
why not bring in the witness'? why not have the FBI check it out? because there's a question of who to believe. & brett should have no problem with that but he does & so does grassley.
why?
sure.Some states have automatic transfer laws that allow juvenile defendants to be tried as adults in serious cases such as rape and murder. If a 16 year old can be tried for rape as an adult, shouldn't a 17 year old be held accountable for attempted rape?Conservatives are always pushing to try adolescents as adults. If a 13 year old can be tried as an adult, why shouldn't a 17 year old be held accountable for his actions?
What crime?
it's a lot more troubling we have a senator who will take unverified evidence to the court of public opinion in an attempt to destroy a mans life for no other reason than their politics do not align. doesn't it bother you then that we already have those people "in power" doing such things we excuse cause we don't like their politics either?Yeah, I have to agree. If he was going to be held accountable, it should have been then, not decades later. Now it's just a he said she said thing. Kind of troubling though to potentially have someone on the Supreme court that might have committed such a thing.Some states have automatic transfer laws that allow juvenile defendants to be tried as adults in serious cases such as rape and murder. If a 16 year old can be tried for rape as an adult, shouldn't a 17 year old be held accountable for attempted rape?Conservatives are always pushing to try adolescents as adults. If a 13 year old can be tried as an adult, why shouldn't a 17 year old be held accountable for his actions?
What crime?
Yeah, if it happened and then, when he's 17... not 36 years later. This is going nowhere as there is and will be no evidence he did anything.
Why would he admit to that, if he honestly doesn't believe it happened?
Is that what he honestly believes? Or is he just sticking to a story.
Is that what he honestly believes? Or is he just sticking to a story.
Same could be said for her.
Lie detector?
she talked herself into believing it happened, of course she passed the lie detector
it's a lot more troubling we have a senator who will take unverified evidence to the court of public opinion in an attempt to destroy a mans life for no other reason than their politics do not align. doesn't it bother you then that we already have those people "in power" doing such things we excuse cause we don't like their politics either?