Explain this to me... You are anti-abortion, or pro-life and you fight for the unborn child. If you are consistant with this message of every child deserves the right to be born, should you not also be in favor of financially supporting these programs... - WIC - Head Start - School lunch programs - Child vaccinations for every child (even for those parents who believe it causes autism) - Welfare (so said children can be housed, fed, and clothed) - Increasing the budget for child protective services - Increasing the budget for foster care (as poor mothers will be putting their children up for adoptions if there is no abortion option) As a financial conservative it costs more to raise a child in a poor, disfunctional home than it does to abort. As a social liberal, women along with the father should have the choice of weather to abort or not, it doesn't become my business until I'm asked to pay for it. As a human being I would hope all pregnancies go full term, but realistically I know they won't. I also know what it would take for me to be involved in one and the thought put into such a descision. It is not for me to decide what is best for someone elses life, just like I don't want the government deciding whats best for mine. How do fiscal conservatives justify the anti abortion stance, and the cutting of all social programs?