Weatherman2020
Diamond Member
That’s what happens when you parse my quotes. You start lying about what I said.Okay. I'll play your game, Weatherman2020 .The fact you ignore my questions answers that.
Reply to what? Your belief children commit no evil or your belief God does not take care of innocents?
No, you don't have to reply to any of that, because none of that has been claimed. I conceded children, but never infants. You conceded that children were, most likely, not guilty. However, you never said God "takes care of the innocent". In fact, wouldn't "taking care of the innocent" mean that God would have protected them from the genocide that he commanded? No. You said he would "make it right" for the slaughtered innocent babies who had done nothing wrong. In order to make something right, it first has to be wrong. What could possibly have been wrong for those Canaanite babies? And who perpetrated that wrong? And by who's command? Oh. That's right. They were slaughtered. By the Israelites. At. God's. Command. As soon as you acknowledge that God is going to "make" that "right for them" with after-life lollies, you concede that it was wrong to slaughter them, in the first place. God. Acted. Immorally.
How and why can people ignore their God’s immoral ways?