Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Your such a tool, Ms. zona. I really doubt you believe half of what you post...nobody is that stupid.
He is not stupid, He is a lying partisan hack. There is a difference.
Kettle...black....blah blah.
Your such a tool, Ms. zona. I really doubt you believe half of what you post...nobody is that stupid.
He is not stupid, He is a lying partisan hack. There is a difference.
Kettle...black....blah blah.
Bush spent more. He and his fellow CON$ ran up 5 TRILLION of DEBT. 8 of the 10 trillion in debt passed to Obama came from Reagan, Bush I and Bush II. CON$ervatism and debt are synonymous.Were they spending as much as the libs? Well? Were they?So you fully support them, even though they're not doing the job they were hired to do?
Were you this loud for 8 years of bush? Seriously, were you?
Secondly, did the GOP have a near supermajority like the libs? Yes? No. And they got fucked out of their majority status cause they didn't want to get kicked out of the georgetown cocktail circuit and shared a lot of the leadership roles for the first chunk of W's term, and then had to cede it in the Senate thanks to Jumpin Jim Jeffords. So, really, was it a conservative senate till 2006? No. Not hardly. Only in the House was there any clear majority and that couldn't hold together for shit because of too many damn RINOs in there.
Nothing like no memory to let you sleep at night.
America's Anchorman: Republicans Lost, But Conservatism Did Not
November 8, 2006
RUSH: Republicans lost last night but conservatism did not, and that is, to me, one of the fundamental elements of last night's results. Conservatism did not lose; Republicans lost last night. In fact, Republicanism, being a political party first rather than an ideological movement, is what lost.
There was conservatism yesterday in the election, and it was to be found on the Democratic side of the aisle.
But conservatism won when it was tried yesterday. Conservatism won fairly big when it was tried
Thomas Sowell put this very well. He said the latest example of "election fraud" is actually what the Democrats did. They nominated a bunch of moderate and conservative Democrats
Charles Krauthammer - Only a Minor Earthquake - washingtonpost.com
Only a Minor Earthquake
By Charles Krauthammer
Friday, November 10, 2006; Page A31
This is not realignment. As has been the case for decades, American politics continues to be fought between the 40-yard lines. The Europeans fight goal line to goal line, from socialist left to ultra-nationalist right. On the American political spectrum, these extremes are negligible. American elections are fought on much narrower ideological grounds. In this election the Democrats carried the ball from their own 45-yard line to the Republican 45-yard line.
The fact that the Democrats crossed midfield does not make this election a great anti-conservative swing. Republican losses included a massacre of moderate Republicans in the Northeast and Midwest. And Democratic gains included the addition of many conservative Democrats, brilliantly recruited by Rep. Rahm Emanuel with classic Clintonian triangulation. Hence Heath Shuler of North Carolina, antiabortion, pro-gun, anti-tax -- and now a Democratic House member.
The result is that both parties have moved to the right. The Republicans have shed the last vestiges of their centrist past, the Rockefeller Republicans. And the Democrats have widened their tent to bring in a new crop of blue-dog conservatives.
Bush spent more. He and his fellow CON$ ran up 5 TRILLION of DEBT. 8 of the 10 trillion in debt passed to Obama came from Reagan, Bush I and Bush II. CON$ervatism and debt are synonymous.Were they spending as much as the libs? Well? Were they?Were you this loud for 8 years of bush? Seriously, were you?
Secondly, did the GOP have a near supermajority like the libs? Yes? No. And they got fucked out of their majority status cause they didn't want to get kicked out of the georgetown cocktail circuit and shared a lot of the leadership roles for the first chunk of W's term, and then had to cede it in the Senate thanks to Jumpin Jim Jeffords. So, really, was it a conservative senate till 2006? No. Not hardly. Only in the House was there any clear majority and that couldn't hold together for shit because of too many damn RINOs in there.
Nothing like no memory to let you sleep at night.
Congress moved to the RIGHT after the 2006 election and the debt got worse. CON$ervatism fails every time it is tried.
America's Anchorman: Republicans Lost, But Conservatism Did Not
November 8, 2006
RUSH: Republicans lost last night but conservatism did not, and that is, to me, one of the fundamental elements of last night's results. Conservatism did not lose; Republicans lost last night. In fact, Republicanism, being a political party first rather than an ideological movement, is what lost.
There was conservatism yesterday in the election, and it was to be found on the Democratic side of the aisle.
But conservatism won when it was tried yesterday. Conservatism won fairly big when it was tried
Thomas Sowell put this very well. He said the latest example of "election fraud" is actually what the Democrats did. They nominated a bunch of moderate and conservative Democrats
Charles Krauthammer - Only a Minor Earthquake - washingtonpost.com
Only a Minor Earthquake
By Charles Krauthammer
Friday, November 10, 2006; Page A31
This is not realignment. As has been the case for decades, American politics continues to be fought between the 40-yard lines. The Europeans fight goal line to goal line, from socialist left to ultra-nationalist right. On the American political spectrum, these extremes are negligible. American elections are fought on much narrower ideological grounds. In this election the Democrats carried the ball from their own 45-yard line to the Republican 45-yard line.
The fact that the Democrats crossed midfield does not make this election a great anti-conservative swing. Republican losses included a massacre of moderate Republicans in the Northeast and Midwest. And Democratic gains included the addition of many conservative Democrats, brilliantly recruited by Rep. Rahm Emanuel with classic Clintonian triangulation. Hence Heath Shuler of North Carolina, antiabortion, pro-gun, anti-tax -- and now a Democratic House member.
The result is that both parties have moved to the right. The Republicans have shed the last vestiges of their centrist past, the Rockefeller Republicans. And the Democrats have widened their tent to bring in a new crop of blue-dog conservatives.
Bush spent more. He and his fellow CON$ ran up 5 TRILLION of DEBT. 8 of the 10 trillion in debt passed to Obama came from Reagan, Bush I and Bush II. CON$ervatism and debt are synonymous.Were they spending as much as the libs? Well? Were they?Were you this loud for 8 years of bush? Seriously, were you?
Secondly, did the GOP have a near supermajority like the libs? Yes? No. And they got fucked out of their majority status cause they didn't want to get kicked out of the georgetown cocktail circuit and shared a lot of the leadership roles for the first chunk of W's term, and then had to cede it in the Senate thanks to Jumpin Jim Jeffords. So, really, was it a conservative senate till 2006? No. Not hardly. Only in the House was there any clear majority and that couldn't hold together for shit because of too many damn RINOs in there.
Nothing like no memory to let you sleep at night.
Congress moved to the RIGHT after the 2006 election and the debt got worse. CON$ervatism fails every time it is tried.
America's Anchorman: Republicans Lost, But Conservatism Did Not
November 8, 2006
RUSH: Republicans lost last night but conservatism did not, and that is, to me, one of the fundamental elements of last night's results. Conservatism did not lose; Republicans lost last night. In fact, Republicanism, being a political party first rather than an ideological movement, is what lost.
There was conservatism yesterday in the election, and it was to be found on the Democratic side of the aisle.
But conservatism won when it was tried yesterday. Conservatism won fairly big when it was tried
Thomas Sowell put this very well. He said the latest example of "election fraud" is actually what the Democrats did. They nominated a bunch of moderate and conservative Democrats
Charles Krauthammer - Only a Minor Earthquake - washingtonpost.com
Only a Minor Earthquake
By Charles Krauthammer
Friday, November 10, 2006; Page A31
This is not realignment. As has been the case for decades, American politics continues to be fought between the 40-yard lines. The Europeans fight goal line to goal line, from socialist left to ultra-nationalist right. On the American political spectrum, these extremes are negligible. American elections are fought on much narrower ideological grounds. In this election the Democrats carried the ball from their own 45-yard line to the Republican 45-yard line.
The fact that the Democrats crossed midfield does not make this election a great anti-conservative swing. Republican losses included a massacre of moderate Republicans in the Northeast and Midwest. And Democratic gains included the addition of many conservative Democrats, brilliantly recruited by Rep. Rahm Emanuel with classic Clintonian triangulation. Hence Heath Shuler of North Carolina, antiabortion, pro-gun, anti-tax -- and now a Democratic House member.
The result is that both parties have moved to the right. The Republicans have shed the last vestiges of their centrist past, the Rockefeller Republicans. And the Democrats have widened their tent to bring in a new crop of blue-dog conservatives.
CON$ervatives never do!!!Bush spent more. He and his fellow CON$ ran up 5 TRILLION of DEBT. 8 of the 10 trillion in debt passed to Obama came from Reagan, Bush I and Bush II. CON$ervatism and debt are synonymous.Were they spending as much as the libs? Well? Were they?
Secondly, did the GOP have a near supermajority like the libs? Yes? No. And they got fucked out of their majority status cause they didn't want to get kicked out of the georgetown cocktail circuit and shared a lot of the leadership roles for the first chunk of W's term, and then had to cede it in the Senate thanks to Jumpin Jim Jeffords. So, really, was it a conservative senate till 2006? No. Not hardly. Only in the House was there any clear majority and that couldn't hold together for shit because of too many damn RINOs in there.
Nothing like no memory to let you sleep at night.
Congress moved to the RIGHT after the 2006 election and the debt got worse. CON$ervatism fails every time it is tried.
Charles Krauthammer - Only a Minor Earthquake - washingtonpost.com
Only a Minor Earthquake
By Charles Krauthammer
Friday, November 10, 2006; Page A31
This is not realignment. As has been the case for decades, American politics continues to be fought between the 40-yard lines. The Europeans fight goal line to goal line, from socialist left to ultra-nationalist right. On the American political spectrum, these extremes are negligible. American elections are fought on much narrower ideological grounds. In this election the Democrats carried the ball from their own 45-yard line to the Republican 45-yard line.
The fact that the Democrats crossed midfield does not make this election a great anti-conservative swing. Republican losses included a massacre of moderate Republicans in the Northeast and Midwest. And Democratic gains included the addition of many conservative Democrats, brilliantly recruited by Rep. Rahm Emanuel with classic Clintonian triangulation. Hence Heath Shuler of North Carolina, antiabortion, pro-gun, anti-tax -- and now a Democratic House member.
The result is that both parties have moved to the right. The Republicans have shed the last vestiges of their centrist past, the Rockefeller Republicans. And the Democrats have widened their tent to bring in a new crop of blue-dog conservatives.
You are missing the point. If they were spending like that and driving up the debt. Then they were not acting conservatively at all.
So you are saying that Stuttering LimpTard and Krauthammer&sickle are LIARS.Bush spent more. He and his fellow CON$ ran up 5 TRILLION of DEBT. 8 of the 10 trillion in debt passed to Obama came from Reagan, Bush I and Bush II. CON$ervatism and debt are synonymous.Were they spending as much as the libs? Well? Were they?
Secondly, did the GOP have a near supermajority like the libs? Yes? No. And they got fucked out of their majority status cause they didn't want to get kicked out of the georgetown cocktail circuit and shared a lot of the leadership roles for the first chunk of W's term, and then had to cede it in the Senate thanks to Jumpin Jim Jeffords. So, really, was it a conservative senate till 2006? No. Not hardly. Only in the House was there any clear majority and that couldn't hold together for shit because of too many damn RINOs in there.
Nothing like no memory to let you sleep at night.
Congress moved to the RIGHT after the 2006 election and the debt got worse. CON$ervatism fails every time it is tried.
Charles Krauthammer - Only a Minor Earthquake - washingtonpost.com
Only a Minor Earthquake
By Charles Krauthammer
Friday, November 10, 2006; Page A31
This is not realignment. As has been the case for decades, American politics continues to be fought between the 40-yard lines. The Europeans fight goal line to goal line, from socialist left to ultra-nationalist right. On the American political spectrum, these extremes are negligible. American elections are fought on much narrower ideological grounds. In this election the Democrats carried the ball from their own 45-yard line to the Republican 45-yard line.
The fact that the Democrats crossed midfield does not make this election a great anti-conservative swing. Republican losses included a massacre of moderate Republicans in the Northeast and Midwest. And Democratic gains included the addition of many conservative Democrats, brilliantly recruited by Rep. Rahm Emanuel with classic Clintonian triangulation. Hence Heath Shuler of North Carolina, antiabortion, pro-gun, anti-tax -- and now a Democratic House member.
The result is that both parties have moved to the right. The Republicans have shed the last vestiges of their centrist past, the Rockefeller Republicans. And the Democrats have widened their tent to bring in a new crop of blue-dog conservatives.
Excuse the fuck out of me, but the Left took control of Congress after the elections of 06. DUH
So you are saying that Stuttering LimpTard and Krauthammer&sickle are LIARS.Bush spent more. He and his fellow CON$ ran up 5 TRILLION of DEBT. 8 of the 10 trillion in debt passed to Obama came from Reagan, Bush I and Bush II. CON$ervatism and debt are synonymous.
Congress moved to the RIGHT after the 2006 election and the debt got worse. CON$ervatism fails every time it is tried.
Excuse the fuck out of me, but the Left took control of Congress after the elections of 06. DUH
Thank you.
You don't know diddley. There is no Left. The Dems may not be as far to the right as the GOP, but there is no way you can pass off the Dems as the Left!!!So you are saying that Stuttering LimpTard and Krauthammer&sickle are LIARS.Excuse the fuck out of me, but the Left took control of Congress after the elections of 06. DUH
Thank you.
I'm saying I disagree. I don't listen to talking heads . What I know is that the left took over congress Jan 07. We all know this as fact. And i don't give a shit who says they were left but further right. BS. We are spending more money that we don't have every year, and it is getting worse every year. And there are no talking heads or anyone else who can honestly deny that.
The GOP Dumps on Conservatives, Then Blames Us for Their Losses
May 14, 2008
RUSH: This thing down in Mississippi, the special election, regardless of party, conservatives could have voted for the Republican down there, doesn't matter. In two of the three of these cases, in two of the three of these House Republican congressional losses, they have been beaten by conservative Democrats, big-time conservative, social conservative Democrats. The Republican Party is ceding conservatism in the South to the Democrat Party. You know, yesterday was a very frustrating day, as you know.
You don't know diddley. There is no Left. The Dems may not be as far to the right as the GOP, but there is no way you can pass off the Dems as the Left!!!So you are saying that Stuttering LimpTard and Krauthammer&sickle are LIARS.
Thank you.
I'm saying I disagree. I don't listen to talking heads . What I know is that the left took over congress Jan 07. We all know this as fact. And i don't give a shit who says they were left but further right. BS. We are spending more money that we don't have every year, and it is getting worse every year. And there are no talking heads or anyone else who can honestly deny that.
With the special elections in 2008 the Congress moved even farther right.
The GOP Dumps on Conservatives, Then Blames Us for Their Losses
May 14, 2008
RUSH: This thing down in Mississippi, the special election, regardless of party, conservatives could have voted for the Republican down there, doesn't matter. In two of the three of these cases, in two of the three of these House Republican congressional losses, they have been beaten by conservative Democrats, big-time conservative, social conservative Democrats. The Republican Party is ceding conservatism in the South to the Democrat Party. You know, yesterday was a very frustrating day, as you know.
House Democrats Deem Faux $1.1 Trillion Budget as Passed - HUMAN EVENTS
Never before -- since the creation of the Congressional budget process -- has the House failed to pass a budget, failed to propose a budget then deemed the non-existent budget as passed as a means to avoid a direct, recorded vote on a budget, but still allow Congress to spend taxpayer money.
Un-fucking-believable.
<----CONGRESSIONAL DEMOCRATS
You first.You don't know diddley. There is no Left. The Dems may not be as far to the right as the GOP, but there is no way you can pass off the Dems as the Left!!!I'm saying I disagree. I don't listen to talking heads . What I know is that the left took over congress Jan 07. We all know this as fact. And i don't give a shit who says they were left but further right. BS. We are spending more money that we don't have every year, and it is getting worse every year. And there are no talking heads or anyone else who can honestly deny that.
With the special elections in 2008 the Congress moved even farther right.
The GOP Dumps on Conservatives, Then Blames Us for Their Losses
May 14, 2008
RUSH: This thing down in Mississippi, the special election, regardless of party, conservatives could have voted for the Republican down there, doesn't matter. In two of the three of these cases, in two of the three of these House Republican congressional losses, they have been beaten by conservative Democrats, big-time conservative, social conservative Democrats. The Republican Party is ceding conservatism in the South to the Democrat Party. You know, yesterday was a very frustrating day, as you know.
Seek professional help.
To a Marxist, a socialist is a fundy rethuglican. Comrade.You don't know diddley. There is no Left. The Dems may not be as far to the right as the GOP, but there is no way you can pass off the Dems as the Left!!!
And jackhole leftists have the nerve to call libertarians anarchists?House Democrats Deem Faux $1.1 Trillion Budget as Passed - HUMAN EVENTS
Never before -- since the creation of the Congressional budget process -- has the House failed to pass a budget, failed to propose a budget then deemed the non-existent budget as passed as a means to avoid a direct, recorded vote on a budget, but still allow Congress to spend taxpayer money.
Un-fucking-believable.
More of that "cynicism" --NOT!-- from one of our leading bootlicking toadies of the far left.edtheparrot said:You don't know diddley. There is no Left. The Dems may not be as far to the right as the GOP, but there is no way you can pass off the Dems as the Left!!!
House Democrats Deem Faux $1.1 Trillion Budget as Passed - HUMAN EVENTS
Never before -- since the creation of the Congressional budget process -- has the House failed to pass a budget, failed to propose a budget then deemed the non-existent budget as passed as a means to avoid a direct, recorded vote on a budget, but still allow Congress to spend taxpayer money.
Un-fucking-believable.
Whatever you need to make yourself sleep at night.
You must have lost your mind in 2008. Go dems, go Mr. Obama.
CON$ervatives never do!!!Bush spent more. He and his fellow CON$ ran up 5 TRILLION of DEBT. 8 of the 10 trillion in debt passed to Obama came from Reagan, Bush I and Bush II. CON$ervatism and debt are synonymous.
Congress moved to the RIGHT after the 2006 election and the debt got worse. CON$ervatism fails every time it is tried.
You are missing the point. If they were spending like that and driving up the debt. Then they were not acting conservatively at all.
And every time CON$ervatism fails CON$ say it failed because it wasn't CON$ervative enough. The fact remains, no matter how CON$ervative the Congress was, as it moved farther to the Right, the debt got worse.
CON$ervatives never do!!!You are missing the point. If they were spending like that and driving up the debt. Then they were not acting conservatively at all.
And every time CON$ervatism fails CON$ say it failed because it wasn't CON$ervative enough. The fact remains, no matter how CON$ervative the Congress was, as it moved farther to the Right, the debt got worse.
Now we have a Liberal congress (and have had since 07) and the debt has increased even more. That shows me that both sides are inept in balancing the budget and attempting to decrease the deficit. Do you agree? What would your solution be?
