Hooters sign: Bob Filner won’t be served

[Kevin_Kennedy]

Hooters locations in San Diego will no longer be welcoming embattled San Diego Mayor Bob Filner into its doors, citing respect for women and a belief that people should have standards.

The Republican Party of San Diego Executive Director Francis Barraza tweeted a photo of the sign at one of the chain locations in Rancho Bernardo. “The mayor of San Diego will not be served in this establishment,” the sign stated.

Hooters sign: Bob Filner won?t be served - Breanna Edwards - POLITICO.com

Is this not a violation of Filner's rights? As a business that is open to the public should Hooters not be forced to serve Mayor Filner, rather than discriminate against him?

Of course not. It's their property, and if they don't want to serve him then why should they?

 

[bodecea]

How funny! But their food seriously sucks.

 

[ScienceRocks]

Filner should step down as he's trash.

 

[martybegan]

How funny! But their food seriously sucks.

Their wings are awesome, their burgers are pretty damn good, and the waitresses are scantily clad and hot.

If they only had beer.... Oh wait, they do.

Yep.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Hooters concerned about a ‘respect for women.’

Funny.

 

[ScienceRocks]

Hooters concerned about a ‘respect for women.’

Funny.

Woman should be able to do as they want...The problem with the extremist position is the want to stop something that isn't harming anyone.

 

[bodecea]

How funny! But their food seriously sucks.

Their wings are awesome, their burgers are pretty damn good, and the waitresses are scantily clad and hot.

If they only had beer.... Oh wait, they do.

Yep.

Their wings are horrid! Are you kidding me?

 

[martybegan]

Hooters concerned about a ‘respect for women.’

Funny.

I forgot to see the Hooters staffed by slaves expose on Hard Copy.

If ya got it, flaunt it.

 

[martybegan]

How funny! But their food seriously sucks.

Their wings are awesome, their burgers are pretty damn good, and the waitresses are scantily clad and hot.

If they only had beer.... Oh wait, they do.

Yep.

Their wings are horrid! Are you kidding me?

My girlfriend is a bigger fan of their wings than I am, and she isn't there for the scenery.

 

[Wry Catcher]

Hooters locations in San Diego will no longer be welcoming embattled San Diego Mayor Bob Filner into its doors, citing respect for women and a belief that people should have standards.

The Republican Party of San Diego Executive Director Francis Barraza tweeted a photo of the sign at one of the chain locations in Rancho Bernardo. “The mayor of San Diego will not be served in this establishment,” the sign stated.

Hooters sign: Bob Filner won?t be served - Breanna Edwards - POLITICO.com

Is this not a violation of Filner's rights? As a business that is open to the public should Hooters not be forced to serve Mayor Filner, rather than discriminate against him?

Of course not. It's their property, and if they don't want to serve him then why should they?

Rightly so. He's a dirt bag, that's evident.

 

[Kevin_Kennedy]

Hooters locations in San Diego will no longer be welcoming embattled San Diego Mayor Bob Filner into its doors, citing respect for women and a belief that people should have standards.

The Republican Party of San Diego Executive Director Francis Barraza tweeted a photo of the sign at one of the chain locations in Rancho Bernardo. “The mayor of San Diego will not be served in this establishment,” the sign stated.

Hooters sign: Bob Filner won?t be served - Breanna Edwards - POLITICO.com

Is this not a violation of Filner's rights? As a business that is open to the public should Hooters not be forced to serve Mayor Filner, rather than discriminate against him?

Of course not. It's their property, and if they don't want to serve him then why should they?

Rightly so. He's a dirt bag, that's evident.

So it's ok to discriminate against dirt bags?

 

[theHawk]

Hooters locations in San Diego will no longer be welcoming embattled San Diego Mayor Bob Filner into its doors, citing respect for women and a belief that people should have standards.

The Republican Party of San Diego Executive Director Francis Barraza tweeted a photo of the sign at one of the chain locations in Rancho Bernardo. “The mayor of San Diego will not be served in this establishment,” the sign stated.

Hooters sign: Bob Filner won?t be served - Breanna Edwards - POLITICO.com

Is this not a violation of Filner's rights? As a business that is open to the public should Hooters not be forced to serve Mayor Filner, rather than discriminate against him?

Of course not. It's their property, and if they don't want to serve him then why should they?

Every business has a right to refuse service to whoever they want.

 

[theHawk]

Hooters sign: Bob Filner won?t be served - Breanna Edwards - POLITICO.com

Is this not a violation of Filner's rights? As a business that is open to the public should Hooters not be forced to serve Mayor Filner, rather than discriminate against him?

Of course not. It's their property, and if they don't want to serve him then why should they?

Rightly so. He's a dirt bag, that's evident.

So it's ok to discriminate against dirt bags?

Ain't freedom a bitch?

 

[Oldstyle]

Hooters concerned about a ‘respect for women.’

Funny.

Democrats faux concern over a "war on women" when they've got the likes of Weiner, Filner and Bill Clinton on their team...even funnier!

 

[Kevin_Kennedy]

Rightly so. He's a dirt bag, that's evident.

So it's ok to discriminate against dirt bags?

Ain't freedom a bitch?

Not to me. I fully support Hooters in this. Property rights should be absolute, in my opinion. The point I'm trying to make is that some people are not being consistent.

 

[bodecea]

Hooters concerned about a ‘respect for women.’

Funny.

Democrats faux concern over a "war on women" when they've got the likes of Weiner, Filner and Bill Clinton on their team...even funnier!

Not a supporter of Weiner and Filner. And Bill Clinton had a consensual affair...wrong but not illegal nor impeachable. It's funny to see what that did to the Republicans in the next election.

 

[Montrovant]

So it's ok to discriminate against dirt bags?

Ain't freedom a bitch?

Not to me. I fully support Hooters in this. Property rights should be absolute, in my opinion. The point I'm trying to make is that some people are not being consistent.

Perhaps it is the difference between discriminating against a group of people and denying service to a particular person based on their individual actions.

I get what you are saying, but I think this is a fairly poor example.

 

[Avatar4321]

Hooters concerned about a ‘respect for women.’

Funny.

Democrats not concerned about respect for women. Just sad.

 

[Avatar4321]

Hooters concerned about a ‘respect for women.’

Funny.

Democrats faux concern over a "war on women" when they've got the likes of Weiner, Filner and Bill Clinton on their team...even funnier!

Not a supporter of Weiner and Filner. And Bill Clinton had a consensual affair...wrong but not illegal nor impeachable. It's funny to see what that did to the Republicans in the next election.

You mean by giving Republicans the Presidency for the next 8 years and allowing them to retain control of Congress for another 6 years?

 

[Sallow]

How funny! But their food seriously sucks.

Their wings are awesome, their burgers are pretty damn good, and the waitresses are scantily clad and hot.

If they only had beer.... Oh wait, they do.

Yep.

Food sucks.

But the view is nice.