Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Of course it was meant as a joke. Or in that same vein as contrarians do, meant to mock some holy cow or other. But these homosexual sphincter licking sperm drinking soulless contrarians don't like being mocked. They are sensitive about their perversion being called out...Why would that be? What is good for the proverbial goose..not so good for the gay gander. And the hate speech thing, that's another matter. Whatever that IS.So it's not ok to celebrate normalcy but it's just fine to celebrate perversion and mental illness!
https://boston.cbslocal.com/2019/06/05/straight-pride-parade-boston-group-planned/
Don't know where you are getting your history from....can you link a few of the writings of these historians for us? And yes, Rohm was homosexual...and died in the Night of the Long Knives partially for that. And let's not forget the thousands of gays who ended up in the concentration camps. Bet you forgot about them, didn't you?
Actually , historians now agree that Mr. Hitler was a proud and open homosexual. It was always acknowledged even by Hitler's most devout socialistic supporters that HItler's #2 man Ernst Rohm took it in the ass. But now its more and more acknowledged that Adolf liked it in the caboose as well.
An Italian gentleman I knew who has since passed, a WWII vet who marched with Patton's Army during the Battle of the Bulge, told me way back in the early 1980's that it was common knowledge among the GI's that Hitler was "as queer as a $3 bill".
This paisan I knew, Dominic was an old timer died 8 years ago, and actually FOUGHT Hitler. Know thy enemy, is the key to successful fighting.
I don't see how you can say that Hitler was a straight arrow when the man's contemporaries knew otherwise.
We could say the same about Jews who are about 5 % of the country too.Let me see here. Homosexuals are a tiny fraction of the country. 5% at best. According to say, even the Pew Institute. But it seems they have this HUGE influence outside of their numbers and way beyond anything I can justify so I am wondering from whence does their influence really come from? Gays are wealthy intellectual leftists. It seems that they have found a way to co-opt democracy. Socrates hated democracy, said it was a tool for wealthy demagogues. Gays are proving his point.
Patton knew Hitler? When did he meet him? (Of course this whole conversation is hysterical)You don't suppose you knew anyone who knew Hitler personally, did you?Don't know where you are getting your history from....can you link a few of the writings of these historians for us? And yes, Rohm was homosexual...and died in the Night of the Long Knives partially for that. And let's not forget the thousands of gays who ended up in the concentration camps. Bet you forgot about them, didn't you?
Actually , historians now agree that Mr. Hitler was a proud and open homosexual. It was always acknowledged even by Hitler's most devout socialistic supporters that HItler's #2 man Ernst Rohm took it in the ass. But now its more and more acknowledged that Adolf liked it in the caboose as well.
An Italian gentleman I knew who has since passed, a WWII vet who marched with Patton's Army during the Battle of the Bulge, told me way back in the early 1980's that it was common knowledge among the GI's that Hitler was "as queer as a $3 bill".
This paisan I knew, Dominic was an old timer died 8 years ago, and actually FOUGHT Hitler. Know thy enemy, is the key to successful fighting.
I don't see how you can say that Hitler was a straight arrow when the man's contemporaries knew otherwise.
I'm afraid not. But the commanding officer of the 3rd Army, George S. Patton did know Mr. Hitler, and explained to the men serving under him that the German fuhrer was a "Hun Cock Sucker", clearly indicating the man's sexual orientation.
Not con-servative republican christians....that's for sure.and at the end of the day
who gives a fig about liberals ????
who?
liberals being livid? LOL who gives a shit?
I am quite aware of the similarities. Actually Jews are like 3%. But we digress. 15% are left handed.. But gays have a over all higher IQ and income level. So.... Left handers or Jews haven't created a entire month devoted accepting and normalizing to their "predilections". Seems something isn't adding up here...We could say the same about Jews who are about 5 % of the country too.Let me see here. Homosexuals are a tiny fraction of the country. 5% at best. According to say, even the Pew Institute. But it seems they have this HUGE influence outside of their numbers and way beyond anything I can justify so I am wondering from whence does their influence really come from? Gays are wealthy intellectual leftists. It seems that they have found a way to co-opt democracy. Socrates hated democracy, said it was a tool for wealthy demagogues. Gays are proving his point.
Could you be so nice and be more specific? Describing what gay men actually do is bad, or mocking it is bad? I might have missed the subtleties here. I don't have buku bucks gays do to hire lawyers or PR firms or political action committees to spin my message...Sorry, don't have that clout gays seem to have now. If only reality had that same pull...Of course it was meant as a joke. Or in that same vein as contrarians do, meant to mock some holy cow or other. But these homosexual sphincter licking sperm drinking soulless contrarians don't like being mocked. They are sensitive about their perversion being called out...Why would that be? What is good for the proverbial goose..not so good for the gay gander. And the hate speech thing, that's another matter. Whatever that IS.So it's not ok to celebrate normalcy but it's just fine to celebrate perversion and mental illness!
https://boston.cbslocal.com/2019/06/05/straight-pride-parade-boston-group-planned/
If you want to know what hate speech is, read your post.
Research? I love liberals, I am a liberal! I resent how some people hijacked liberalism and perverted it into something else, like some kind of modern day Robespierre. Sell out quislings. Moral equivocating cowards. I have long ago lost my faith in modern liberalism.Could you be so nice and be more specific? Describing what gay men actually do is bad, or mocking it is bad? I might have missed the subtleties here. I don't have buku bucks gays do to hire lawyers or PR firms or political action committees to spin my message...Sorry, don't have that clout gays seem to have now. If only reality had that same pull...Of course it was meant as a joke. Or in that same vein as contrarians do, meant to mock some holy cow or other. But these homosexual sphincter licking sperm drinking soulless contrarians don't like being mocked. They are sensitive about their perversion being called out...Why would that be? What is good for the proverbial goose..not so good for the gay gander. And the hate speech thing, that's another matter. Whatever that IS.So it's not ok to celebrate normalcy but it's just fine to celebrate perversion and mental illness!
https://boston.cbslocal.com/2019/06/05/straight-pride-parade-boston-group-planned/
If you want to know what hate speech is, read your post.
Denigrating, demeaning, and well-spoken. You've certainly done you research on the psychometrics of language and how to twist words into weapons.
Well, because, that's what modern liberals do now: Advocate for degenerate causes. Used to be they actually fought for human rights and being contrarians against the lowest common denominator. Now? They ARE the devil and the lowest common denominator rolled into one. And those that oppose them liberals call Haters, Bigots or XXXphobes in the lexicon of the liberal overlords. Like the boy that cried wolf. Orwell must be laughing in his grave at liberals now...Why should people get upset about promoting normalcy and health instead of abnormal and sexual perversion? Gender fluidity and gender neutrality is grossly abnormal. GAY may as well stand for got aids yet?
Those who promote the false moral values of the homosexual agenda got the arses tweaked and deservedly so.
Patton knew Hitler? When did he meet him? (Of course this whole conversation is hysterical)You don't suppose you knew anyone who knew Hitler personally, did you?Don't know where you are getting your history from....can you link a few of the writings of these historians for us? And yes, Rohm was homosexual...and died in the Night of the Long Knives partially for that. And let's not forget the thousands of gays who ended up in the concentration camps. Bet you forgot about them, didn't you?Actually , historians now agree that Mr. Hitler was a proud and open homosexual. It was always acknowledged even by Hitler's most devout socialistic supporters that HItler's #2 man Ernst Rohm took it in the ass. But now its more and more acknowledged that Adolf liked it in the caboose as well.
An Italian gentleman I knew who has since passed, a WWII vet who marched with Patton's Army during the Battle of the Bulge, told me way back in the early 1980's that it was common knowledge among the GI's that Hitler was "as queer as a $3 bill".
This paisan I knew, Dominic was an old timer died 8 years ago, and actually FOUGHT Hitler. Know thy enemy, is the key to successful fighting.
I don't see how you can say that Hitler was a straight arrow when the man's contemporaries knew otherwise.
I'm afraid not. But the commanding officer of the 3rd Army, George S. Patton did know Mr. Hitler, and explained to the men serving under him that the German fuhrer was a "Hun Cock Sucker", clearly indicating the man's sexual orientation.
Why should people get upset about promoting normalcy and health instead of abnormal and sexual perversion? Gender fluidity and gender neutrality is grossly abnormal. GAY may as well stand for got aids yet?
Those who promote the false moral values of the homosexual agenda got the arses tweaked and deservedly so.
So...you think Patton called Hitler a faggot because he really was one? Based on what evidence? Or do you think he called him that as an insult as many CRCs on this forum do with no real evidence other than their hate?Patton knew Hitler? When did he meet him? (Of course this whole conversation is hysterical)You don't suppose you knew anyone who knew Hitler personally, did you?Don't know where you are getting your history from....can you link a few of the writings of these historians for us? And yes, Rohm was homosexual...and died in the Night of the Long Knives partially for that. And let's not forget the thousands of gays who ended up in the concentration camps. Bet you forgot about them, didn't you?
This paisan I knew, Dominic was an old timer died 8 years ago, and actually FOUGHT Hitler. Know thy enemy, is the key to successful fighting.
I don't see how you can say that Hitler was a straight arrow when the man's contemporaries knew otherwise.
I'm afraid not. But the commanding officer of the 3rd Army, George S. Patton did know Mr. Hitler, and explained to the men serving under him that the German fuhrer was a "Hun Cock Sucker", clearly indicating the man's sexual orientation.
I don't know if Gen. Patton met Hitler personally. But he did have information about the leader from his military intelligence sources. So whether Patton gathered the info straight from the homosexual's mouth or from spies, I don't see where it makes a difference. Patton announced to the 3rd Army that Hitler was a homosexual, and wouldn't have done so if it was a lie. Remember his speech to the 3rd Army was a SECRET speech at the time. He had no propaganda reason to lie to his own men.
And there you are, every single time, like a dog hearing a bell....hmmmm...BTW, that still can't paper over the fact that nearly every thread you post and participate in has to do with homos....A curious obsession for someone who claims to be straight.
So...you think Patton called Hitler a faggot because he really was one? Based on what evidence?
You aren't serious...for a while I thought you were.So...you think Patton called Hitler a faggot because he really was one? Based on what evidence?
Military Intelligence reports. General Patton had a very high rank in the US Army and was privy to this information and shared it with the men.
Patton may have used the term "faggot" because it was acceptable language in his day and not considered to be offensive in the 1940's. If he was around today, he would have used the term "LGBTQQAAI+" instead.
Someone you might know:Why should people get upset about promoting normalcy and health instead of abnormal and sexual perversion? Gender fluidity and gender neutrality is grossly abnormal. GAY may as well stand for got aids yet?
Those who promote the false moral values of the homosexual agenda got the arses tweaked and deservedly so.
That might well be true, I don't know.
Was the term "gay" used for anal intercourse before aids became fantastically popular in the 1980's?
