Hillary represents everything the democrats pretend they oppose! Best candidate ever!

[SassyIrishLass]

She's an elitist..campaigning on behalf of the little people. She's a one percenter..campaigning on the premise that one percenters should be stripped of their privilege and income. Tell us how that works out for you, folks. Maybe it will work out as well for you as the Obama did.

"Clinton embodies all the things Democrats supposedly reject. But she's got money and powerful allies in politics, the media and K Street — and for these reasons, Democratic voters appear ready to settle for her."

"Sen. Clinton, of course, voted for the Iraq war and spoke on the Senate floor in defense of it. But it's not just Iraq. Her entire record is pro-war. Her husband launched wars in Bosnia and Kosovo. When he was getting impeached in 1998, he launched missile attacks on Iraq.
"As Obama's Secretary of State, Clinton was one of the three Obama aides most responsible for the illegal pre-emptive war in Libya. "We came, we saw, he died," she gloated after the U.S. helped depose dictator Moammar Qadhafi."

"Clinton-world is full of names that hardly scream good government: Terry McAuliffe, Rahm Emanuel, Mark Penn, Sandy Berger and Lanny Davis. These are the people Democrats are inviting back into the inner circles of power if they send another Clinton to the White House.
"Finally, there's her total resistance to transparency — a necessary pillar of good government. Clinton is famously and stubbornly closed to media. She refused to use the State Department's email system, instead creating her own email system, which was scrubbed totally clean once congressional digging got too close.
"At worst, the email saga shows that Hillary is covering up something. At best, it shows she suffers from a paranoid obsession with secrecy.
"Are America's Democrats really ready to put up with four years of war, corporatism and power-hungry secrecy?"

Yes, yes they are. Because they aren't putting up for it..they've always been fanatically in SUPPORT of it. People make a mistake when they think that what democrats SAY is what they mean. They're compulsive, accomplished liars, and to understand them, you must assume that they mean the polar opposite of any sentence they utter. Particularly if they are REALLY passionate about whatever they're lying about.

When did she ever say the one percent should be stripped of all their privilege? It's amazing how conservatives twist words. Democrats have never been quoted as saying we should strip all of the income of the wealthy. It's always been about fair wages for the poor and middle class. You can't have fair wages AND a wage gap of CEO's making 300x more a year. Even America isn't wealthy enough for that. No dem has ever proposed we pay everyone the same. It is simply about paying the lower classes realistically. If that means cutting the ridiculous egregious pay of the top CEOs, then so be it.

It's not the governments business nor does it have the authority to cut the pay of a corporation's CEO. LOL

The issue isn't about cutting their pay. It's about paying people fairly. If CEO's can getaway with paying people realistically and keeping their pay then more power to them.

The government has no authority to make that happen either. It's simple, if you don't like what a corporation pays then don't work for that corporation.

And don't buy what they sell.
LIBS love boycotting don't they?

The Liberal's problem is they never fully think things out and then when it blows up in their faces they are flummoxed

 

[koshergrl]

When did she ever say the one percent should be stripped of all their privilege? It's amazing how conservatives twist words. Democrats have never been quoted as saying we should strip all of the income of the wealthy. It's always been about fair wages for the poor and middle class. You can't have fair wages AND a wage gap of CEO's making 300x more a year. Even America isn't wealthy enough for that. No dem has ever proposed we pay everyone the same. It is simply about paying the lower classes realistically. If that means cutting the ridiculous egregious pay of the top CEOs, then so be it.

It's not the governments business nor does it have the authority to cut the pay of a corporation's CEO. LOL

The issue isn't about cutting their pay. It's about paying people fairly. If CEO's can getaway with paying people realistically and keeping their pay then more power to them.

The government has no authority to make that happen either. It's simple, if you don't like what a corporation pays then don't work for that corporation.

And don't buy what they sell.
LIBS love boycotting don't they?

The Liberal's problem is they never fully think things out and then when it blows up in their faces they are flummoxed

Not for long, they believe "the end justifies the means". When their legal methods don't work, they just flip over to committing felonies...and don their stormtrooper uniforms.

 

[Billy000]

When did she ever say the one percent should be stripped of all their privilege? It's amazing how conservatives twist words. Democrats have never been quoted as saying we should strip all of the income of the wealthy. It's always been about fair wages for the poor and middle class. You can't have fair wages AND a wage gap of CEO's making 300x more a year. Even America isn't wealthy enough for that. No dem has ever proposed we pay everyone the same. It is simply about paying the lower classes realistically. If that means cutting the ridiculous egregious pay of the top CEOs, then so be it.

It's not the governments business nor does it have the authority to cut the pay of a corporation's CEO. LOL

The issue isn't about cutting their pay. It's about paying people fairly. If CEO's can getaway with paying people realistically and keeping their pay then more power to them.

The government has no authority to make that happen either. It's simple, if you don't like what a corporation pays then don't work for that corporation.

Umm yes it does. It's called raising the minimum wage.

That's not working out so well for you communists, we warned you it wouldn't.

You don't even know what communism is.

 

[RandallFlagg]

She's an elitist..campaigning on behalf of the little people. She's a one percenter..campaigning on the premise that one percenters should be stripped of their privilege and income. Tell us how that works out for you, folks. Maybe it will work out as well for you as the Obama did.

"Clinton embodies all the things Democrats supposedly reject. But she's got money and powerful allies in politics, the media and K Street — and for these reasons, Democratic voters appear ready to settle for her."

"Sen. Clinton, of course, voted for the Iraq war and spoke on the Senate floor in defense of it. But it's not just Iraq. Her entire record is pro-war. Her husband launched wars in Bosnia and Kosovo. When he was getting impeached in 1998, he launched missile attacks on Iraq.
"As Obama's Secretary of State, Clinton was one of the three Obama aides most responsible for the illegal pre-emptive war in Libya. "We came, we saw, he died," she gloated after the U.S. helped depose dictator Moammar Qadhafi."

"Clinton-world is full of names that hardly scream good government: Terry McAuliffe, Rahm Emanuel, Mark Penn, Sandy Berger and Lanny Davis. These are the people Democrats are inviting back into the inner circles of power if they send another Clinton to the White House.
"Finally, there's her total resistance to transparency — a necessary pillar of good government. Clinton is famously and stubbornly closed to media. She refused to use the State Department's email system, instead creating her own email system, which was scrubbed totally clean once congressional digging got too close.
"At worst, the email saga shows that Hillary is covering up something. At best, it shows she suffers from a paranoid obsession with secrecy.
"Are America's Democrats really ready to put up with four years of war, corporatism and power-hungry secrecy?"

Yes, yes they are. Because they aren't putting up for it..they've always been fanatically in SUPPORT of it. People make a mistake when they think that what democrats SAY is what they mean. They're compulsive, accomplished liars, and to understand them, you must assume that they mean the polar opposite of any sentence they utter. Particularly if they are REALLY passionate about whatever they're lying about.

When did she ever say the one percent should be stripped of all their privilege? It's amazing how conservatives twist words. Democrats have never been quoted as saying we should strip all of the income of the wealthy. It's always been about fair wages for the poor and middle class. You can't have fair wages AND a wage gap of CEO's making 300x more a year. Even America isn't wealthy enough for that. No dem has ever proposed we pay everyone the same. It is simply about paying the lower classes realistically. If that means cutting the ridiculous egregious pay of the top CEOs, then so be it.

It's not the governments business nor does it have the authority to cut the pay of a corporation's CEO. LOL

take this to the bank: if these leftists had their way, these CEOs would be hanged in the public square. Hell, I despise the idea that we have lost our way in this country (the idea that CEOs make 300 times what their AVERAGE employee makes) but if their Board of Directors agree to that, so be it. This country is so far upside down that I truly do not believe that there is any way to save the Republic.

Bad, bad times are ahead for what is left of the middle class....

 

[RandallFlagg]

It's not the governments business nor does it have the authority to cut the pay of a corporation's CEO. LOL

The issue isn't about cutting their pay. It's about paying people fairly. If CEO's can getaway with paying people realistically and keeping their pay then more power to them.

The government has no authority to make that happen either. It's simple, if you don't like what a corporation pays then don't work for that corporation.

Umm yes it does. It's called raising the minimum wage.

That's not working out so well for you communists, we warned you it wouldn't.

You don't even know what communism is.

I'll guarantee you a thousand bucks that I know what communism is. I lived and worked in the Soviet Union for 5 years. Want to take me up on it?

Oh, but then, you are probably talking about that hypothetical communism that does not now, or has ever existed, right?

 

[Billy000]

The issue isn't about cutting their pay. It's about paying people fairly. If CEO's can getaway with paying people realistically and keeping their pay then more power to them.

The government has no authority to make that happen either. It's simple, if you don't like what a corporation pays then don't work for that corporation.

Umm yes it does. It's called raising the minimum wage.

That's not working out so well for you communists, we warned you it wouldn't.

You don't even know what communism is.

I'll guarantee you a thousand bucks that I know what communism is. I lived and worked in the Soviet Union for 5 years. Want to take me up on it?

Oh, but then, you are probably talking about that hypothetical communism that does not now, or has ever existed, right?

I wouldn't necessarily doubt you know what communism is but you would still way off the map to compare communism to today's American system.

 

[RandallFlagg]

The government has no authority to make that happen either. It's simple, if you don't like what a corporation pays then don't work for that corporation.

Umm yes it does. It's called raising the minimum wage.

That's not working out so well for you communists, we warned you it wouldn't.

You don't even know what communism is.

I'll guarantee you a thousand bucks that I know what communism is. I lived and worked in the Soviet Union for 5 years. Want to take me up on it?

Oh, but then, you are probably talking about that hypothetical communism that does not now, or has ever existed, right?

I wouldn't necessarily doubt you know what communism is but you would still way off the map to compare communism to today's American system.

I post this video from time to time for those folks who still believe that we are still "The land of the free". It has taken me most of my life (unfortunately) to figure it out and it wasn't until a recent Alumni meeting of former DIA agents (we talked at length about this very subject) that I finally came to my own heartbreaking conclusion.

If you have the time, watch it. It will make you understand in an hour, what took me far too long to realize: