Hillary obviously wants another Exxon Valdez accident....

healthmyths

Platinum Member
Sep 19, 2011
28,466
10,043
900
A day after announcing her opposition to the Keystone XL pipeline, Hillary Clinton is explaining how she came to her decision, writing in a post on Medium, that "the effects of climate change have grown more acute" since the application for the project was filed.
"I have come to feel I can't stay silent on an issue that matters so much to so many," Clinton wrote. "Though I wanted to give the president space to make a decision, the process has taken far longer than I expected.
I want the American people to know where I stand. That's why I am making it clear: I am opposed to the construction of the Keystone XL pipeline."
Hillary Clinton explains why she came out against Keystone - CNNPolitics.com

So what she is saying is she wants Canada to ship 1 million barrels a day via oil tankers in waters that are known as "winter hurricanes" every year!

Why is Hillary and the environmentalists so stupid as to contest a pipeline that in one mile holds less then 700 barrels while if NOT built Canada will ship the 1 million barrels in a tanker that travels one mile through Unimak Pass which is about 800 miles southwest of Anchorage.
David Mosley, public affairs specialist for the U.S. Coast Guard in Alaska, says that the thousands of ships that already navigate its waters each year face "winter hurricanes" with 40-foot seas and 100-knot winds that appear with little advanced notice.
In a typical year, at least one ship gets into trouble. "A vessel will have some sort of mechanical or physical issue that then puts them at the mercy of the weather and the waves."

The Dangers of Not Building Keystone XL

So now environmentalists want to add equivalent of 365 tankers carrying 365 million barrels into the waters known for "winter hurricanes"??
Makes NO SENSE ... but wait what the hell is the prime characteristic of environmentalists... they make no sense!

This is what Hillary/Obama and the ignorant environmentalists WANT to happen!!
 
The pipeline will head to the Gulf Coast where the oil will be put on ships for worldwide distribution

Same risk of Exon Valdez
 
It is not about tankers. It is about raising the price of oil to reduce consumption. Big Ears made that clear years ago.

Of course, like nearly everything proposed by the radical Left, it will hurt everyone but the extremely wealthy.
 
The pipeline will head to the Gulf Coast where the oil will be put on ships for worldwide distribution

Same risk of Exon Valdez


NO that is NOT true that there is the SAME risk!

FACTS FACTS FACTS!!!

Major Oil Spills in the Gulf and Other U.S. Waters

A total of 170,690 barrels from 1976 to 2010 from ships or barges.

Versus Exxon Valdez: 238,095

From 1990 to 2010 6 accidents...

You tell me the risks of tankers in the "Winter Hurricane" waters !


1990 – The Mega Borg spilled 5.1 million gallons of oil in the Gulf of Mexico, 57 miles south-southeast of Galveston, Texas, following a pump-room explosion and fire.

1993 – The Bouchard B155, Balsa 37, and Ocean 255 collided in Tampa Bay, causing the Bouchard to spill 336,000 gallons of No. 6 fuel oil.

2000 The Westchester ran aground near Port Sulphur, Louisiana, dumping 567,000 gallons of crude oil into the lower Mississippi River.
2008 – A barge carrying 419,000 gallons of heavy fuel collided with a 600-foot tanker in the Mississippi River, near New Orleans. Hundreds of thousands of gallons of fuel were spilled.

2009 – A 458-foot vessel struck a barge in the Houston Ship Channel, spilling 10,500 gallons of oil. In the same year, a supply vessel collided with a Liberian oil tanker, 40 miles offshore of Galveston, Texas, causing 18,000 gallons of oil to spill.

January 2010 – The Eagle Otome collided with a barge in the Sabine-Neches Waterway, near Port Arthur, Texas, spilling 462,000 gallons of oil.
 

Forum List

Back
Top