Hillary Admits She Broke U.S. Law in Benghazi

Brooks beat the butch bitch like a red headed step child! Awesome!
Really? what hearing were you watching?
You are retarded. I don't agree with the op, as the beast bitch may not have contravened a criminal statute (she clearly did not), but she did lie to the American people, was involved in a conspiracy to utilize the media to mislead the electorate for political reasons, and obstructed a congressional (and probably Justice Department investigation).

Brooks lambasted Hillary. If you watched her interrogation and concluded otherwise then you may need to seek medical attention.
 
You people should really WATCH the hearings yourself....it's the best reality tv you will ever see!

Brietbard is paraphrasing ONLY most of what is ACTUALLY being said....

....not that any of you libtard Hillary excusers care about the facts anyway....
Hey asshat65 watching the hearing is how I know brietbart is lying.
 
Nevermind, that's not right. Hold on...

Here's that law you mentioned in the OP.

Explain to me how you think Hillary broke it.


The law was read in its entirety in the gearing. A waiver is required by law if security is going to be below a certain level, and it can only he signed by the Sect of State. Hillary admitted she never signed such a waiver, which again is required by law.

There is an entire article on it and will be many more.

Liberals are NOT denying that Stevens'security fell below required State Dept standards. They are desperately trying to refute that she broke the law. 'F*' Stevens' lack of security ...'we' have to PROTECT HILLARY at all costs!

Whatever....
 
Santimonious phoney ass conservatives . "People died ". Thousands of Americans died in the Mid East thanks to bush's superfluous wars . That never fazed you .

An ambassador dies in a super dangerous place and all of a sudden your so indignant . You act as if Hillary called for a hit on the guy!


Hey, which side are you on? Given their tendency to create conspiracies, these damn birchers would use your idea to state "Why Hillary did it!"

You are given the Wackobirds fresh ideas. Stop it.
 
Hillary Clinton admitted to the House Select Committee on Benghazi on Thursday evening that she broke the law in handling security for the U.S. consulate there.

Under patient but persistent questioning from Rep. Susan Brooks (R-IN), Clinton ADMITTED that she had NOT signed a waiver for security arrangements on the site, as required by the Secure Embassy Construction and Counterterrorism Act of 1999 (SECCA), 22 USC § 4865 2(B)(ii).

There is no 'grey area' here - she admitted she BROKE THE LAW!

this HTML class. Value is http://www.breitbart
Was that law passed after Reagan lost those 241 marines in Lebanon?
 
Stevens and all the rest knew and accepted the fact that they could be killed, no one forced them.

Stevens also believed his boss / the state department would do their best to protect him, not cut his security, deny his tequezts for additional security - or even the minimum level of security the LAW required, or that he would be abandoned to deny before his boss would lie her ass off about the real cause of his death....

....being murdeted was a helluva way to find out he was wrong....
False the number of security people was just what the law required.
It's amazing what the obsessed will believe.
 
Brooks beat the butch bitch like a red headed step child! Awesome!
Really? what hearing were you watching?
You are retarded. I don't agree with the op, as the beast bitch may not have contravened a criminal statute (she clearly did not), but she did lie to the American people, was involved in a conspiracy to utilize the media to mislead the electorate for political reasons, and obstructed a congressional (and probably Justice Department investigation).

Brooks lambasted Hillary. If you watched her interrogation and concluded otherwise then you may need to seek medical attention.
False, brooks repeated the same debunked bullshit that was spewd in last 150 Benghazi hearings.
 
Hillary Clinton admitted to the House Select Committee on Benghazi on Thursday evening that she broke the law in handling security for the U.S. consulate there.

Under patient but persistent questioning from Rep. Susan Brooks (R-IN), Clinton ADMITTED that she had NOT signed a waiver for security arrangements on the site, as required by the Secure Embassy Construction and Counterterrorism Act of 1999 (SECCA), 22 USC § 4865 2(B)(ii).

There is no 'grey area' here - she admitted she BROKE THE LAW!

this HTML class. Value is http://www.breitbart
:cuckoo:

Rubber Room is waiting for this thread

this is an old line of attack from 2014
Doesn't Hillary Clinton Know the Law?
 
Last edited:
Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) went deeper into the details of Blumenthal's testimony:

"Republicans asked more than 160 questions about Mr. Blumenthal's relationship and communications with the Clintons, but less than 20 questions about the Benghazi attacks. Republicans asked more than 50 questions about the Clinton foundation but only four questions about security in Benghazi. Republicans asked more than 270 questions about Mr. Blumenthal's alleged business activities in Libya, but no questions about the U.S. presence in Benghazi. And Republicans asked more than 45 questions about David Brock, Media Matters -- I have no idea what that is even -- and affiliated entities, but no questions, no questions about Ambassador Stevens and other U.S. personnel in Benghazi."
 
You are retarded. I don't agree with the op, as the beast bitch may not have contravened a criminal statute (she clearly did not).......

Of course you don't agree, and it is YOUR OPINION she did not break the law...

Yes, she lied...and she refused to testify under oathtbe 1st time so she COULD lie without going to jail...

Fact-check sites are already pointing out numerous things she said were false...which ahe will claim was mis-speak / errirs rather than perjury....

At the very 'best' Hillary has been exposed as an inwpt, incompetent, lying, clueless failure who didn't give a samn enough about her people to provide adequate security and who cared more about covering her own ass that she created her own cover-up / lies...someone who should NEVER be entrusted with another job in the US government again. At worst, she proved ahe violated / broke the law, lied to grieving family members and is still keepinf
G them in the dark, proving she doesn't give a damn about ANYONE other than herself who, again, should NEVER be entrusted with another govt job again!
 
Brooks beat the butch bitch like a red headed step child! Awesome!
Really? what hearing were you watching?
You are retarded. I don't agree with the op, as the beast bitch may not have contravened a criminal statute (she clearly did not), but she did lie to the American people, was involved in a conspiracy to utilize the media to mislead the electorate for political reasons, and obstructed a congressional (and probably Justice Department investigation).

Brooks lambasted Hillary. If you watched her interrogation and concluded otherwise then you may need to seek medical attention.
False, brooks repeated the same debunked bullshit that was spewd in last 150 Benghazi hearings.
You sure are an uppity prick for a bag of chips.
 
Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) went deeper into the details of Blumenthal's testimony:

"Republicans asked more than 160 questions about Mr. Blumenthal's relationship and communications with the Clintons, but less than 20 questions about the Benghazi attacks. Republicans asked more than 50 questions about the Clinton foundation but only four questions about security in Benghazi. Republicans asked more than 270 questions about Mr. Blumenthal's alleged business activities in Libya, but no questions about the U.S. presence in Benghazi. And Republicans asked more than 45 questions about David Brock, Media Matters -- I have no idea what that is even -- and affiliated entities, but no questions, no questions about Ambassador Stevens and other U.S. personnel in Benghazi."

BS - that is a lie! GOP asjed questions about Stevens, especially about his e-mails Dems spent more time bitching about tbe hearing and in defending Hillary than doing their job, which was SUPPOSED to be participating in the investigation by asking questions....
 
Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) went deeper into the details of Blumenthal's testimony:

"Republicans asked more than 160 questions about Mr. Blumenthal's relationship and communications with the Clintons, but less than 20 questions about the Benghazi attacks. Republicans asked more than 50 questions about the Clinton foundation but only four questions about security in Benghazi. Republicans asked more than 270 questions about Mr. Blumenthal's alleged business activities in Libya, but no questions about the U.S. presence in Benghazi. And Republicans asked more than 45 questions about David Brock, Media Matters -- I have no idea what that is even -- and affiliated entities, but no questions, no questions about Ambassador Stevens and other U.S. personnel in Benghazi."

BS - that is a lie! GOP asjed questions about Stevens, especially about his e-mails Dems spent more time bitching about tbe hearing and in defending Hillary than doing their job, which was SUPPOSED to be participating in the investigation by asking questions....
:cuckoo:
Idiot! You are cutting and pasting stuff

you NEVER watched , heard , or read the hearing.

That is about Blumenthal's transcript that the GOP refuses to release
this is an old line of attack from 2014
Doesn't Hillary Clinton Know the Law?
 
Last edited:
If anyone ever needed to know how low liberals will stoop to protect their corrupt leaders, this thread should show you there is no level too low. They've stooped so low the ants could piss on them.
 

Forum List

Back
Top