danielpalos
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #241
UC can solve for simple poverty as that form of insurance. Why do you insist on wasting money on a program that has not solved poverty for over thirty years?The law is the law. Employment is at the will of either party.This is not means tested welfare. UC solves simple poverty instead of having to waste money indefinitely on a fake war on poverty.That is what means tested welfare is for, not more market friendly UC.Employment is at the will of either party. Why would someone with a million dollars in the bank not learn how to invest instead of applying for UC?I am not claiming that. I am claiming the State has to fund UC not employers.UC on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States.Equal application and protection of the laws can solve simple poverty on an at-will basis to promote and provide for the general welfare.There can be no lawful requirement to work in an at-will employment State. States cannot arbitrarily change that.No, I do not. If you have skills that are in demand, you are paid more. If you have nothing to offer, not even a willingness to work, you will not be compensated.
True. And there can be no lawful requirement to provide UC for someone who does not qualify and is not seeking employment.
How so?
But you are not asking for equality. In your version, employers have to continue to pay after you cease to provide your labor. That is not equality.
You want tax dollars to be paid to people who refuse to work. And that this be done without them having to show they need the money. You could have a million dollars in the bank, but not be working and you demand pay from tax payers?
Why would someone object to showing a need before tax dollars were spent providing them an income?
There is nothing market friendly about forcing others to pay you and income and you refusing to show you need it.
Oh, so having the applicant fill out a form is wasting money, but giving tax dollars to people who do not need it is not?
We have wasted enough time on derailing this topic.
I never denied it was. But the income is based on trading your labor for their money. You want the money without providing the labor. That is inequality.