Her Majesty's Uranium Connection

what has been done under Obama and Hillary is criminal. the middle east is exploding all around us, they are in bed with Russia evidently and Iran.
remember when Obama was caught off mic telling Russia: he'll have more flexibility when he RE-ELECTED?
what they are bringing down us we have yet to see

and yet people are still wanting to vote for her


OMG frikken criminal flexibility exploding raison oats okra chocolate chip pot wood shavings trailer court cookies dumb dumb dumb dumb demcraot voters deer leeder aaaaarrrrgh!!!!!!


:eek:


Now, to the worthless OP title:

NY Times: Cash flowed to Clinton Foundation as Russians pressed for control of uranium company


And when did Hillary Clinton receive this money personally? Hmmm?
You aren't really going to rely upon a defense summarized as:

"She did not receive those funds personally - it was only her foundation?"

Are you?

It's not enough.

It's nowhere near enough.

Just to be clear.
 
what has been done under Obama and Hillary is criminal. the middle east is exploding all around us, they are in bed with Russia evidently and Iran.
remember when Obama was caught off mic telling Russia: he'll have more flexibility when he RE-ELECTED?
what they are bringing down us we have yet to see

and yet people are still wanting to vote for her


OMG frikken criminal flexibility exploding raison oats okra chocolate chip pot wood shavings trailer court cookies dumb dumb dumb dumb demcraot voters deer leeder aaaaarrrrgh!!!!!!


:eek:


Now, to the worthless OP title:

NY Times: Cash flowed to Clinton Foundation as Russians pressed for control of uranium company


And when did Hillary Clinton receive this money personally? Hmmm?
Do you expect those with power and influence to leave a nice tidy trail to their corrupt deals that they make?
That is why politicians do not get called out on their blatant corruption – they funnel the money elsewhere.
It's why they keep their email on private servers, too, I expect.
 
what has been done under Obama and Hillary is criminal. the middle east is exploding all around us, they are in bed with Russia evidently and Iran.
remember when Obama was caught off mic telling Russia: he'll have more flexibility when he RE-ELECTED?
what they are bringing down us we have yet to see

and yet people are still wanting to vote for her


OMG frikken criminal flexibility exploding raison oats okra chocolate chip pot wood shavings trailer court cookies dumb dumb dumb dumb demcraot voters deer leeder aaaaarrrrgh!!!!!!


:eek:


Now, to the worthless OP title:

NY Times: Cash flowed to Clinton Foundation as Russians pressed for control of uranium company


And when did Hillary Clinton receive this money personally? Hmmm?
You aren't really going to rely upon a defense summarized as:

"She did not receive those funds personally - it was only her foundation?"

Are you?

It's not enough.

It's nowhere near enough.

Just to be clear.
Have a little sympathy for Stat. He's very emotionally involved with Hilary and wants her as president so terribly bad. As this corruption unfolds, he my be very traumatized once, if ever, he gets past his denial
 
When the NYT is calling Her Majesty's involvement with Russia and foreign businessmen 'odiferous' you know another 'Clintonland' shady deal has been exposed.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/u...ssed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html?_r=1
The biggest and most criminal scams will not be revealed until a month before the election.
Someone should advise 'HM' to slink away now before she and 'The Love Muscle' are charged with fifty criminal offences.
I can see HM doing some Martha Stewart time.
All it's going to take is for some whistleblowers to come forward with the emails.


I hate to break it to you....nothing is going to happen......she is a criminal...her husband is a criminal....they have obviously broken the law with what she did at the state dept....but it would require someone to actually pursue it to actually get her in trouble.....this is only a story to the democrat controlled press...the New York Times will do stories...the others will do stories.....and then it will go away....and then....when the average American starts paying attention right before the election...the NYT and the others will say...yeah...we covered it....nothing to see here......

They are just inoculating hilary right now.....get the story out now......down play it later, defend her later, and then get your pulitzer after she is in office.......

just wait till it is hilary vs. a republican....they will dig up dirt and use it just before the election..when it will actually hurt the republican.....
 
The more the haters attack Clinton, the more support she gets.

people are so sick of you haters. seriously. the left and the right -- you freaks cancel each other out


the only people who listen to you are the media who use you to sell ads
 
The more the haters attack Clinton, the more support she gets.

people are so sick of you haters. seriously. the left and the right -- you freaks cancel each other out


Yes...those haters at the New York Times.........really...you need to pull your head out of her ass....so you can actually see what she is doing and why she should be in jail........
 
The more the haters attack Clinton, the more support she gets.

people are so sick of you haters. seriously. the left and the right -- you freaks cancel each other out


Yes...those haters at the New York Times.........really...you need to pull your head out of her ass....so you can actually see what she is doing and why she should be in jail........


those are the media selling ads by appealing to your hate

gawd, you're a simpleton

and in general, the media never liked the Clintons
 
The more the haters attack Clinton, the more support she gets.

people are so sick of you haters. seriously. the left and the right -- you freaks cancel each other out


Yes...those haters at the New York Times.........really...you need to pull your head out of her ass....so you can actually see what she is doing and why she should be in jail........


those are the media selling ads by appealing to your hate

gawd, you're a simpleton

and in general, the media never liked the Clintons


And you are fucking moron....hilary is a monster...has been from day one.....has been when they were selling secrets to the Chinese for cash....remember Wang Jun, Charlie Trie, and John Wang...the oldies but the goodies.......White Water, the FBI files they used on their political enemies, the private detectives used against their enemies, especially the women bill assaulted..........
 
The more the haters attack Clinton, the more support she gets.

people are so sick of you haters. seriously. the left and the right -- you freaks cancel each other out


the only people who listen to you are the media who use you to sell ads
Very nice, I'm sure...

Now...

Do you have anything substantive to add, in connection with this uranium business?
 
The more the haters attack Clinton, the more support she gets.

people are so sick of you haters. seriously. the left and the right -- you freaks cancel each other out


the only people who listen to you are the media who use you to sell ads
Very nice, I'm sure...

Now...

Do you have anything substantive to add, in connection with this uranium business?
Free Markets and invisible hands
 
The more the haters attack Clinton, the more support she gets.

people are so sick of you haters. seriously. the left and the right -- you freaks cancel each other out


the only people who listen to you are the media who use you to sell ads
Very nice, I'm sure...

Now...

Do you have anything substantive to add, in connection with this uranium business?
Free Markets and invisible hands
Free markets and invisible hands, in connection with strategic materials such as uranium? Really?
 
The more the haters attack Clinton, the more support she gets.

people are so sick of you haters. seriously. the left and the right -- you freaks cancel each other out


the only people who listen to you are the media who use you to sell ads
Very nice, I'm sure...

Now...

Do you have anything substantive to add, in connection with this uranium business?
Free Markets and invisible hands
Free markets and invisible hands, in connection with strategic materials such as uranium? Really?
It's all Monica's fault
 
The more the haters attack Clinton, the more support she gets.

people are so sick of you haters. seriously. the left and the right -- you freaks cancel each other out


the only people who listen to you are the media who use you to sell ads
Very nice, I'm sure...

Now...

Do you have anything substantive to add, in connection with this uranium business?
Free Markets and invisible hands
Free markets and invisible hands, in connection with strategic materials such as uranium? Really?
It's all Monica's fault
What has this to do with the Clinton Foundation taking money while Hillary Clinton was serving as Secretary of State, from stake-holders to a transaction designed to place part of the interest in U.S. strategic uranium assets into the hands of the Russian Federation?

That private e-mail server starts making more and more sense, from Hillary's vantage point, all of a sudden - although certainly not in the nation's best interests.
 
The more the haters attack Clinton, the more support she gets.

people are so sick of you haters. seriously. the left and the right -- you freaks cancel each other out


the only people who listen to you are the media who use you to sell ads
Very nice, I'm sure...

Now...

Do you have anything substantive to add, in connection with this uranium business?
Free Markets and invisible hands
Free markets and invisible hands, in connection with strategic materials such as uranium? Really?
It's all Monica's fault
What has this to do with the Clinton Foundation taking money while Hillary Clinton was serving as Secretary of State, from stake-holders to a transaction designed to place part of the interest in U.S. strategic uranium assets into the hands of the Russian Federation?

That private e-mail server starts making more and more sense, from Hillary's vantage point, all of a sudden - although certainly not in the nation's best interests.
"the Clinton Foundation taking money while Hillary Clinton was serving as Secretary of State, from stake-holders to a transaction designed to place part of the interest in U.S. strategic uranium assets into the hands of the Russian Federation"?????

Wow! Lots of smoke. Must be a barbeque. I mean it is so very unusual. It must be assumed that the Clintons are evil and selling out America. Damn, why didn't we know this about the Clintons earlier?

thank gawd, you and some reporters are on to this.

btw, does this have anything to do with the drug dealing and Vince Foster murder, or the stand Down order? :popcorn:
 
what has been done under Obama and Hillary is criminal. the middle east is exploding all around us, they are in bed with Russia evidently and Iran.
remember when Obama was caught off mic telling Russia: he'll have more flexibility when he RE-ELECTED?
what they are bringing down us we have yet to see

and yet people are still wanting to vote for her


OMG frikken criminal flexibility exploding raison oats okra chocolate chip pot wood shavings trailer court cookies dumb dumb dumb dumb demcraot voters deer leeder aaaaarrrrgh!!!!!!


:eek:


Now, to the worthless OP title:

NY Times: Cash flowed to Clinton Foundation as Russians pressed for control of uranium company


And when did Hillary Clinton receive this money personally? Hmmm?
Breaking down the Russian uranium deal hanging over Hillary Clinton s campaign Quartz
What are the allegations?
You can pay Bill to get to Hillary. In 2010, then-US secretary of state Hillary Clinton was part of a US government committee that approves foreign purchases of US assets. She signed off on a deal that allowed Russia’s atomic energy agency to purchase Uranium One, a mining company behind one-fifth of US uranium production. Since 2005, investors in the mining concern, and specifically a financier named Frank Giustra, gave tens of millions to the Clinton Global Foundation, and in 2010, while the committee was considering the deal, a Russian investment bank paid Bill Clinton $500,000 for a speech.



What’s new?
Failure to disclose. The Clinton Global Foundation had not previously disclosed $2.35 million donations from the Canadian chairman of Uranium One between 2009 and 2013, as Russia’s energy agency negotiated first a minority stake and eventually majority ownership of the company. This is despite an agreement with the Obama administration to disclose foreign donations.
 
Uh oh! or Uh huh?

multiple United States agencies, as well as the Canadian government, had signed off on the deal and that, in general, such matters were handled at a level below the secretary. “To suggest the State Department, under then-Secretary Clinton, exerted undue influence in the U.S. government’s review of the sale of Uranium One is utterly baseless,” he added.
 

Forum List

Back
Top