“Hell yes we are going to take your AR-15”

[BULLDOG]

I never had a problem pulling it from his cold dead hands, but you would have to dig him up first.

We see you didn’t try to take it when he was alive..

Yet we were still accused of it. I say if we are going to get accused of it anyway......

Someone accused of walking up to Heston and trying to take a gun out of his hands?? Lol really any video?? Lol

Well yes, I guess he did include himself when he said Liberals were out to take his guns. I'm not sure about the walking up to him part, because it was just another bullshit gun nut lie at that point.

 

[Jitss617]

I never had a problem pulling it from his cold dead hands, but you would have to dig him up first.

We see you didn’t try to take it when he was alive..

Yet we were still accused of it. I say if we are going to get accused of it anyway......

Someone accused of walking up to Heston and trying to take a gun out of his hands?? Lol really any video?? Lol

Well yes, I guess he did include himself when he said Liberals were out to take his guns. I'm not sure about the walking up to him part, because it was just another bullshit gun nut lie at that point.

Yea I didn’t think so lol

 

[BluesLegend]

Go right ahead, amend the constitution...oh wait you don't have nearly enough votes.

Don't need to.

Yes you do. Just like a stupid libtard to think otherwise. Idiot.

We limited access to fully automatic weapons without an amendment. How is this different?

No you didn't, any law abiding citizen can apply for the tax stamp and own one.

Yes, after a background check, and a long list of rules and regulations determining where and when you can transport it or use it.

I'm right and you are wrong, which is typical. Good that you finally admit you know jack shit.

 

[BULLDOG]

Don't need to.

Yes you do. Just like a stupid libtard to think otherwise. Idiot.

We limited access to fully automatic weapons without an amendment. How is this different?

No you didn't, any law abiding citizen can apply for the tax stamp and own one.

Yes, after a background check, and a long list of rules and regulations determining where and when you can transport it or use it.

I'm right and you are wrong, which is typical. Good that you finally admit you know jack shit.

Nice try BooBoo.

 

[beagle9]

Don't need a car that goes 100mph either, but they make and sell them

And:

- heavily restrict where you can drive them
- restrict how fast you can drive them
- require written and performance tests for them
- register every sale and register every vehicle that leaves your property
- make you renew your license to operate them, requiring a relevant background check every time you renew

Yes, please, continue comparing cars and guns.

Owning a car is not a right.

Of course it is. Anyone can own a car. Operating one off of your private property, however,is regulated.

Furthermore, owning any and all guns and operating them where and how you like most certainly is not a right.

Having a gun off of your private property is also regulated. It's called the CWP. Good folks have these, but bad folks could care less about any regulations be it guns, auto insurance etc. How many people have encountered non-insured drivers in accidents, and ended up screwed because of it ???? Hundreds of thousands over the years. Just watch these cop shows to see the bullcrap that goes on out there. Oh and private property is off limits to government unless a crime has been comitted or other such investigations are warranted. My guns are in a safe, and all security measures are taken. Responsible gun ownership is imperative. It's a privilege and a right. Gotta be smart with all our liberties and freedoms. Most are, but a few here and there might screw up, but they don't represent the masses. Using small numbers or stats to justify oppression is a road this country needs to stop going in the direction of.

 

[Cellblock2429]

The country decided gay people had a right to get married, and we got gay marriage. The country decided weed should be legalized, and weed is being legalized. The country decided we need universal background checks and a ban on large capacity magazines and guns designed for combat. The NRA and gun nuts will whine, but we will achieve that too.

/——/ I never voted for or against that? When was the vote?

You didn't have to.

/—-/ Then don’t say America voted for it.

When did I say that?

/——/ “When did I say that?”’
post #4 “The country decided gay people had a right to get married,”

 

[DOTR]

 

[DOTR]

The country decided gay people had a right to get married, and we got gay marriage. The country decided weed should be legalized, and weed is being legalized. The country decided we need universal background checks and a ban on large capacity magazines and guns designed for combat. The NRA and gun nuts will whine, but we will achieve that too.

/——/ I never voted for or against that? When was the vote?

You didn't have to.

/—-/ Then don’t say America voted for it.

When did I say that?

/——/ “When did I say that?”’
post #4 “The country decided gay people had a right to get married,”

Actually the people decided gays *couldnt* pretend to marry. But the people were overturned by the ruling elite.

 

[JusticeHammer]

Yes you do. Just like a stupid libtard to think otherwise. Idiot.

We limited access to fully automatic weapons without an amendment. How is this different?

No you didn't, any law abiding citizen can apply for the tax stamp and own one.

Yes, after a background check, and a long list of rules and regulations determining where and when you can transport it or use it.

I'm right and you are wrong, which is typical. Good that you finally admit you know jack shit.

Nice try BooBoo.

Nice to see you know your're wrong.

 

[williepete]

View attachment 279287

My wish is for a hot microphone to be in front of Irish Bob and AOC 24/7. Those clowns are convincing more and more people to walk away.
#WalkAway Campaign

Yes, They Are Coming for Your Guns

For years, advocates of the right to keep and bear arms have suspected that confiscation was the endgame but have been rebuffed as paranoiacs in the press. Such a rebuffing is no longer possible. If it ever was, “Nobody is coming for your guns!” is no longer true — which means that a host of commonly posed inquiries now have the same simple answer. “Why do you oppose federal licensing?” Because leading Democrats are threatening confiscation. “Why do you oppose ‘universal’ background checks?” Because they would create a registry. “And why do you oppose a registry?” Because leading Democrats are threatening confiscation. Unwittingly or not, O’Rourke and his acolytes have stuck a dagger into the exquisitely calibrated gun-control messaging on which their party has worked for the better part of 20 years. No voter can now say he wasn’t warned.

Beto O'Rourke's Gun-Confiscation Proposal Is Unconstitutional but Clarifying | National Review

 

[pismoe]

course , heard a blurb of info about an hour ago and the goof 'beto' is trying to walk his words back for the Hard of Thinking Pete .

 

[regent]

He thinks it's a Military weapon. He knows nothing about it or guns in general. Would you hire someone to build your house that knows nothing about construction? What a fucking Dufus.

He's tearing down the house and needs only to know that.

 

[Uncensored2008]

The country decided gay people had a right to get married, and we got gay marriage.

The country didn't decide that, quite the opposite. 17 states passed defense of marriage by popular vote. The dictatorship of the Judiciary shit all over the will of the people and dictated law in favor homosexual marriage.

You really are quite stupid.

The country decided weed should be legalized, and weed is being legalized. The country decided we need universal background checks and a ban on large capacity magazines and guns designed for combat. The NRA and gun nuts will whine, but we will achieve that too.

The ONLY way you fascists will get the law you desire is if the dictatorship of the judiciary creates law out of thin air again. Doubtful with the current court.

You can describe it any silly way you want, but just be ready for it to happen.

How? Are you so sure Roberts will violate the Constitution? And if Ginsburg kicks, as she will soon, and your president appoints another American, how will you destroy the Constitution and the Republic?

 

[Uncensored2008]

The country decided gay people had a right to get married, and we got gay marriage. The country decided weed should be legalized, and weed is being legalized. The country decided we need universal background checks and a ban on large capacity magazines and guns designed for combat. The NRA and gun nuts will whine, but we will achieve that too.

The country is stupid.

Well, your part of it is.

No, the left is. Idiots all of you.

You are certainly entitled to your goofy opinion.

And you are entitled to any opinion your 40 IQ points can come up with....

 

[LordBrownTrout]

The country decided gay people had a right to get married, and we got gay marriage. The country decided weed should be legalized, and weed is being legalized. The country decided we need universal background checks and a ban on large capacity magazines and guns designed for combat. The NRA and gun nuts will whine, but we will achieve that too.

Come and take it snow flake

Oh, that would be easy. I could take away any of you nuts' guns using a baseball bat.

No, you couldn't.

I guess we'll see.

We might and it may not be pretty but I'll lay money on the guy who has a gun.

 

[rightwinger]

I actually would have supported Beto O’Rourke had this been primarily directed at criminals, unlawfuls, etc. but, no, it was directred at Law-abiding citizens. Here it comes: “but law-abiding citizens don’t need an AR-15”. Really? The criminals are using AR-15s and now the first step is too take it out of law-abiding citizens and put them at a further disadvantage with criminals who get to keep their guns of any and all size and automation?

I think many on the Left - not all - hate Law-abiding citizens having guns more than they do criminals having guns.

law-abiding citizens don’t need an AR-15”. Really?
Yes, really.

why are you worried about what law abiding citizens have?

Because liberals want to control citizens. The fact US Citizens can own guns pisses them off. If you look at most of the socialist and communist thought leaders in history, one of the first things they did was to take away guns from citizens. Notice how liberals don’t lose their shit when someone uses a car, a machete, or knife to kill innocents. Or, notice the difference when a non-citizen uses a gun to kill innocents vs. a citizen doing the same thing.

The fact that 32,000 Americans are killed by guns each year pisses us off. 20 six year olds killed at Sandy Hook pisses us off

 

[rightwinger]

Oops!

FLASHBACK: Beto O'Rourke EXPOSED for Flip-Flopping on AR-15, "If You Own it Keep It"

He is getting tougher since the slaughter in his home town

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Don't need a car that goes 100mph either, but they make and sell them

And:

- heavily restrict where you can drive them
- restrict how fast you can drive them
- require written and performance tests for them
- register every sale and register every vehicle that leaves your property
- make you renew your license to operate them, requiring a relevant background check every time you renew

Yes, please, continue comparing cars and guns.

Which Amendment in the Bill of Rights covers driving cars?

Which amendment in the bill of rights covers buying long rifles without a universal background check, or mandatory registration?

None.

the 2nd.

you should read it

Wrong. Wow, been in a coma? That argument lost long ago. The 2nd amendment does not guarantee you a right to own any firearm, nor a right to do so without a universal background check.

In fact, I could ban every single gun except for musket loaders, enforce the right of anyone to own one, and the second amendment will not have been violated, as stated.

Yeah, it guarantees my right to own a weapon.

 

[Uncensored2008]

The country decided gay people had a right to get married, and we got gay marriage. The country decided weed should be legalized, and weed is being legalized. The country decided we need universal background checks and a ban on large capacity magazines and guns designed for combat. The NRA and gun nuts will whine, but we will achieve that too.

Go right ahead, amend the constitution...oh wait you don't have nearly enough votes.

Don't need to.

Oh? So you think you can win a civil war?

 

[LordBrownTrout]

I actually would have supported Beto O’Rourke had this been primarily directed at criminals, unlawfuls, etc. but, no, it was directred at Law-abiding citizens. Here it comes: “but law-abiding citizens don’t need an AR-15”. Really? The criminals are using AR-15s and now the first step is too take it out of law-abiding citizens and put them at a further disadvantage with criminals who get to keep their guns of any and all size and automation?

I think many on the Left - not all - hate Law-abiding citizens having guns more than they do criminals having guns.

law-abiding citizens don’t need an AR-15”. Really?
Yes, really.

why are you worried about what law abiding citizens have?

Because liberals want to control citizens. The fact US Citizens can own guns pisses them off. If you look at most of the socialist and communist thought leaders in history, one of the first things they did was to take away guns from citizens. Notice how liberals don’t lose their shit when someone uses a car, a machete, or knife to kill innocents. Or, notice the difference when a non-citizen uses a gun to kill innocents vs. a citizen doing the same thing.

The fact that 32,000 Americans are killed by guns each year pisses us off. 20 six year olds killed at Sandy Hook pisses us off

Really, because you could care less about the millions who are killed each year through abortions. Your words are hollow.