anotherlife
Gold Member
fuck off. How about this...worthless welfare recipients can have all the food stamps they want...as long as they piss clean and work.Shouldn't the school at least teach the children at length what food is good and bad for them? I mean the school teaching. Like teaching is what schools are invented for.
Sure, I'd have NO problem with the schools teaching about healthy lifestyle choices in the classroom. But not to take away a students lunch that was brought from home because it didn't meet with the schools expectations. If the parent packed the lunch, then that is the parents responsibility. IF, IF, IF the school were to ever step in.......would be if the parent consistently packed candy, chips & soda or crap like that with absolutely NO nutritional value. But even then start with a call or note to the parent of their concerns.
No because the OP says this thread is not about throwing away the lunch. More importantly, both the school and the parent is programmed to junk you to crap, as long as they are all insured to do it.
No, because if they already have a 300 pound pot belly, then they have already eaten enough, don't you think?
I'm not for food stamps, but usually fat people eat less than people in great shape (assuming the people in great shape are working out). When I played college hockey I ate like an animal, but I ate all healthy foods and worked out everyday. People on food stamps probably have to buyer cheaper food, which is oftentimes loaded with trans-fats and sugar/salt.
This IS true. Obesity is mostly restricted to the middle class of America, exactly for this reason. If you can afford only cheap food, then you poison yourself with those chemicals. It is amazing that technology replaced food prices with obesity. How do you fight that? I think impossible. Final degeneration?