He is so deep inside her tiny little mind

Bwahahahahahaha!!! Man....you DID just pull a muscle there. That "information" had ZERO value. They are clear that it is monetary value.

You just got bent over in front of everyone, and then you tried like hell to stand back up with that ridiculous stretch! :lmao: :lmao: :lmao:
it was a thing of value to them when they were told it was 'dirt on hillary'..............
Key word there sweetie.... “them”. It had 0 value on the open market or even the black market. Zero.

Just stop already. You two are humiliating yourselves. You sound so absurd Googling legal jargon you don’t even understand and then stretching like hell to make it apply to the situation. It doesn’t.
 
Trying to obtain stolen "goods" in a secret meeting is not above board and illegal.
A “secret meeting”. :lmao:

So when Perkins Coi met with the Russians for the fake dossier, did they make a public announcement about it? How about when they met with Fusion GPS? Anither public announcement? Their meeting was about as secret as it gets, sweetie.

Nope. The Clinton campaign legally hired a law firm. The Trump campaign tried to get stolen information from the crooks that stole it.
 
Bwahahahahahaha!!! Man....you DID just pull a muscle there. That "information" had ZERO value. They are clear that it is monetary value.

You just got bent over in front of everyone, and then you tried like hell to stand back up with that ridiculous stretch! :lmao: :lmao: :lmao:
it was a thing of value to them when they were told it was 'dirt on hillary'..............
Key word there sweetie.... “them”. It had 0 value on the open market or even the black market. Zero.

Just stop already. You two are humiliating yourselves. You sound so absurd Googling legal jargon you don’t even understand and then stretching like hell to make it apply to the situation. It doesn’t.

It DOES NOT matter if it has a value on any market. It was of value to the Trump campaign.
 
Bwahahahahahaha!!! Man....you DID just pull a muscle there. That "information" had ZERO value. They are clear that it is monetary value.

You just got bent over in front of everyone, and then you tried like hell to stand back up with that ridiculous stretch! :lmao: :lmao: :lmao:
it was a thing of value to them when they were told it was 'dirt on hillary'..............
Key word there sweetie.... “them”. It had 0 value on the open market or even the black market. Zero.

Just stop already. You two are humiliating yourselves. You sound so absurd Googling legal jargon you don’t even understand and then stretching like hell to make it apply to the situation. It doesn’t.

It DOES NOT matter if it has a value on any market. It was of value to the Trump campaign.

Amazing that you actually have to explain this to them, isn't it?
.
.
.
 
Bwahahahahahaha!!! Man....you DID just pull a muscle there. That "information" had ZERO value. They are clear that it is monetary value.

You just got bent over in front of everyone, and then you tried like hell to stand back up with that ridiculous stretch! :lmao: :lmao: :lmao:
it was a thing of value to them when they were told it was 'dirt on hillary'..............
Key word there sweetie.... “them”. It had 0 value on the open market or even the black market. Zero.

Just stop already. You two are humiliating yourselves. You sound so absurd Googling legal jargon you don’t even understand and then stretching like hell to make it apply to the situation. It doesn’t.

if they were to take possession of information that would bury hillary & sway the election in their favor........... they committed election fraud. if it was from a foreign national who worked for an adversarial hostile nation--- that is a much bigger crime.

tic toc tic toc tic fucking toc.
 
if they were to take possession of information that would bury hillary & sway the election in their favor........... they committed election fraud.
3473E66C-D716-4C28-AF6C-26FC60567233.gif
 
if they were to take possession of information that would bury hillary & sway the election in their favor........... they committed election fraud.
Is there anything more comical than armchair lawyers? :lmao:

Sweetie...what you just said is 100% inaccurate.
 
Trying to obtain stolen "goods" in a secret meeting is not above board and illegal.
A “secret meeting”. :lmao:

So when Perkins Coie met with the Russians for the fake dossier, did they make a public announcement about it? How about when they met with Fusion GPS? Anither public announcement? Their meeting was about as secret as it gets, sweetie.
Nope.
Exactly, you partisan hyperbole queen. Nope. This was not some “secret” meeting (any more than Clinton’s meeting with Perkins Coie was “secret”). You’re so desperate to make something stick, you’re trying to make mundane action sound ominous.
 
It DOES NOT matter if it has a value on any market. It was of value to the Trump campaign.
That’s not what the law states, you high school dropout. :lmao:

It’s about campaign finance - not emotional “value”. :lmao:

Sorry puppy, your pretzel twisting isn't going to work. When Russia offered "dirt" on Clinton, that dirt was of value. And you're even wrong about the information having monetary value. A GOP operative by the name of Peter Smith was willing to pay hackers lots of money to get at the info the Russians had.
 
Trying to obtain stolen "goods" in a secret meeting is not above board and illegal.
A “secret meeting”. :lmao:

So when Perkins Coie met with the Russians for the fake dossier, did they make a public announcement about it? How about when they met with Fusion GPS? Anither public announcement? Their meeting was about as secret as it gets, sweetie.
Nope.
Exactly, you partisan hyperbole queen. Nope. This was not some “secret” meeting (any more than Clinton’s meeting with Perkins Coie was “secret”). You’re so desperate to make something stick, you’re trying to make mundane action sound ominous.

Yes, Rottweiler old chap, it was a secret meeting that they lied about (repeatedly). Trump even dictated a false statement about it to reporters on Air Force One.

The Trumps' changing story on the Russia meeting
 
And you're even wrong about the information having monetary value.
I'm not wrong at all. You know even less about the law than you do economics. And that is saying a lot.

You're ignorant. Plain and simple. You Google shit and you desperately try to make it apply to any situation that you can declare is bad for Trump. You look like a fool.
 
And you're even wrong about the information having monetary value.
I'm not wrong at all. You know even less about the law than you do economics. And that is saying a lot.

You're ignorant. Plain and simple. You Google shit and you desperately try to make it apply to any situation that you can declare is bad for Trump. You look like a fool.

Says the football "star". :lol: I don't have to know anything about the law, smart lawyers are all over the internet.

Trump team meeting with Russian raises legal questions
 
Yes, Rottweiler old chap, it was a secret...
It was no more or less "secret" than the Clinton meeting with Perkins Coie or the Perkins Coie meeting with the Russians. :laugh:

The Clinton campaign legally hired a law firm and didn't repeatedly lie about it or dictate false stories about it. Your attempt at an equivalent fails yet again.
 
The Clinton campaign legally hired a law firm and didn't repeatedly lie about it or dictate false stories about it.
Your desperate attempt to paint “poor” Hitlery as a “victim” continues to fail.
Tucker Carlson just blew the cover off the 2016 election influence charade, after he read an internal email on Monday night's show from a senior Google employee who admitted to using company resources to make a "silent donation" to a liberal group that was creating ads and donating funds to bus Latinos to voting stations during the 2016 election in key swing states, in an effort to help Hillary Clinton win.
You people engaged in every tactic imaginable (voter fraud, Russian collusion, corporate collusion, etc.) in an attempt of to steal the election for Hitlery and she still got her ass kicked. :laugh:

Google Was "Working To Get Hillary Clinton Elected" With "Silent Donation" According To Leaked Internal Email
 
Last edited:
if they were to take possession of information that would bury hillary & sway the election in their favor........... they committed election fraud.
Is there anything more comical than armchair lawyers? :lmao:

Sweetie...what you just said is 100% inaccurate.

tic toc tickity tockity tic tic tic toc toc toc........................

& them thar tweets that it was all about 'russian adoptions' from air force one is gonna be part of the obstruction charges...
 

Forum List

Back
Top