Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The President cannot violate the Constitution. Nor does he have the authority to decide what is (and is not) Constitutional. That's for the courts to decide. A government where a judge who has no jurisdiction over the President, is called a Dictatorship. And if you don't believe in the checks and balances our Fore Fathers set up, then you're a pretty shitty citizen.That judge needs impeached. Be lucky if not brought up on charges of "Aiding and abetting the enemy"
Enough's enough!
No Federal Judge has jurisidiction over the president of the US.
No.
These type of judges need to be routed ASAP. It's bad for everybody. (That's a US citizen)
The President cannot violate the Constitution. Nor does he have the authority to decide what is (and is not) Constitutional. That's for the courts to decide. A government where a judge who has no jurisdiction over the President, is called a Dictatorship. And if you don't believe in the checks and balances our Fore Fathers set up, then you're a pretty shitty citizen.That judge needs impeached. Be lucky if not brought up on charges of "Aiding and abetting the enemy"
Enough's enough!
No Federal Judge has jurisidiction over the president of the US.
No.
These type of judges need to be routed ASAP. It's bad for everybody. (That's a US citizen)
At least one part of our government is working as designed."Judge Theodore Chuang issued the order early Thursday, saying the ACLU and other groups were likely to prevail on their arguments that the ban was unconstitutional because it discriminates on the basis of religion."
"...Hawaii was likely to succeed on a claim that the ban violates First Amendment protections against religious discrimination."
"The groups argued that the underlying rationale of the ban was to discriminate against Muslims, making it unconstitutional. Chuang granted a preliminary injunction nationwide basis."
News from The Associated Press
At least one part of our government is working as designed."Judge Theodore Chuang issued the order early Thursday, saying the ACLU and other groups were likely to prevail on their arguments that the ban was unconstitutional because it discriminates on the basis of religion."
"...Hawaii was likely to succeed on a claim that the ban violates First Amendment protections against religious discrimination."
"The groups argued that the underlying rationale of the ban was to discriminate against Muslims, making it unconstitutional. Chuang granted a preliminary injunction nationwide basis."
News from The Associated Press
The executive branch does not determine the Constitutionality of a law. You don't like it, move to Weimar, Germany.Bullshit!
There's precedent for this and the judges are traitors that need strung up.
It's time to bring back public hanging for traitors.
Sup?
. If you don't think that our judicial system has now been compromised by the left and leftist agenda, then you are a stupid citizen.The President cannot violate the Constitution. Nor does he have the authority to decide what is (and is not) Constitutional. That's for the courts to decide. A government where a judge who has no jurisdiction over the President, is called a Dictatorship. And if you don't believe in the checks and balances our Fore Fathers set up, then you're a pretty shitty citizen.That judge needs impeached. Be lucky if not brought up on charges of "Aiding and abetting the enemy"
Enough's enough!
No Federal Judge has jurisidiction over the president of the US.
No.
These type of judges need to be routed ASAP. It's bad for everybody. (That's a US citizen)
I'm against capital punishment.What will you say when that traitorous judge, who is endangering all Americans is hung or faces the firing squad?
. Why move ? You leftist have imported Weimar Germany here.The executive branch does not determine the Constitutionality of a law. You don't like it, move to Weimar, Germany.Bullshit!
There's precedent for this and the judges are traitors that need strung up.
It's time to bring back public hanging for traitors.
Sup?
The executive branch does not determine the Constitutionality of a law. You don't like it, move to Weimar, Germany.Bullshit!
There's precedent for this and the judges are traitors that need strung up.
It's time to bring back public hanging for traitors.
Sup?
Aside from the Citizens United ruling, it seems to be working just fine.If you don't think that our judicial system has now been compromised by the left and leftist agenda, then you are a stupid citizen.
You do know threatening the life of a federal judge is a crime, don't you?Precedence does though. What that judge did amounts to treason. Deliberately undermining the safety and security of the citizens of the US.
That amounts to treason. I'm all for stringing up at this point. Tired of it.
I'm against capital punishment.What will you say when that traitorous judge, who is endangering all Americans is hung or faces the firing squad?
Would you like to explain that in a little more detail? How have "I leftist", imported Weimar?Why move ? You leftist have imported Weimar Germany here.
Well, that was worth the wait.Your personal opinion does not reflect the history of the US
. You do know that he's talking about after being convicted in a court of law don't you ?You do know threatening the life of a federal judge is a crime, don't you?Precedence does though. What that judge did amounts to treason. Deliberately undermining the safety and security of the citizens of the US.
That amounts to treason. I'm all for stringing up at this point. Tired of it.
You've been watching too much Walker, Texas Ranger.Your personal opinion does not reflect the history of the US. Historically:Traitors have been hung by the neck until dead.
. You accuse that which the left is guilty of. That's how the left works.Would you like to explain that in a little more detail? How have "I leftist", imported Weimar?Why move ? You leftist have imported Weimar Germany here.
Is he being tried for anything? Is he in a court of law, other than his own? You're advocating the killing of a federal judge. That's not what this country stands for.You do know that he's talking about after being convicted in a court of law don't you ?
This is the 2nd time I'm going to ask you, can you explain that in a little more detail?You accuse that which the left is guilty of. That's how the left works.
