E
eric
Guest
Now you are resorting to not addressing the issue anymore, would you please answer the question I posed to you.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
fine, give me a list of what you consider 'reputable' news sources so I can figure out what you'll believe and what you'll consider drivel.
while you may have quoted me word for word, you read it the way you wanted to. What you see and hear is not always whats being done and spoken. As for righting my 'spin' when you demanded facts, didn't happen. I simply clarified my remarks.
As for your 'proof' request, I admit that I can find no certifiable documentation stating that henry kissinger or ronald reagan knew, and admitted, that these weapons would fall in to the hands of children, does that make it any less true? probably, in your view of the world with 'reputable' news sources.
your welcome, I'll just consider all of your opinions worthless as well until you can provide reputable news sources.
You spoke earlier about terrorist having to be proved guilty, does the same not apply to our president?
Originally posted by jimnyc
Just post any links you have, it'll be better than what we're working with now.
The American population wants security but does not want to know how it needs to be achieved.
Originally posted by r3volut!on
eric, what you said in your last post makes sense, and to an extent I agree with you.
My question is this: Why can't Bush just be honest about the reasons for invading Iraq?