Happy Holidays California city demands church stop feeding the homeless

MindWars

Diamond Member
Oct 14, 2016
42,227
10,744
2,040
It’s tough to say when our societal values shifted so dramatically, but for some reason now, government at large has decided that charity for the homeless is a crime. In a society with such stunning abundance, efforts to feed the homeless are being met with legal challenges and even police action in America. This is a disturbing trend which has been gaining steam in recent years.

Happy Holidays – California City Demands Church Stop Feeding the Homeless
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Leave it to the oh so loving leftards. Oh they love and want fairness for everyone don't they . Oh wait if you are white you don't count, if you are not a moron democrat like them you don't count.

I hope who ever wants this , finds Karma and ends up in the same situation.
 
No, I get why the city banned the feeding of homeless. It’s like stray dogs or cats, if you feed them they just hang around. If you don’t want a bunch of strays hanging around, don’t feed them, and they will leave.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #3
No, I get why the city banned the feeding of homeless. It’s like stray dogs or cats, if you feed them they just hang around. If you don’t want a bunch of strays hanging around, don’t feed them, and they will leave.

Still a pathetic excuse, what happens when one of us go hungry or end up homeless shall we enjoy being told get fkd and starve.

Being homeless is happening in horrific numbers esp. in Cali.
 
Why in the hell would a city stop a church from feeding the less fortunate? Total insanity
 
Leftie cities always seem to have the largest populations of homeless, as well as do everything they can to run them out. Causation is obvious, yet they don’t want it to be visible, for a reason...
 
Private charities have been stopped from feeding the homeless because it is dangerous to the homeless. No one knows what's in the food, how it's prepared. Especially in California where the nutritional content and calories have to be in writing for every meal. The food could be spoiled, or contain allergens.

The homeless still have rights and if one has an ill effect from a supplied meal there are a dozen lawyers to sue the charity providing the food and the city for permitting the food to be served.
 
Private charities have been stopped from feeding the homeless because it is dangerous to the homeless. No one knows what's in the food, how it's prepared. Especially in California where the nutritional content and calories have to be in writing for every meal. The food could be spoiled, or contain allergens.

The homeless still have rights and if one has an ill effect from a supplied meal there are a dozen lawyers to sue the charity providing the food and the city for permitting the food to be served.

BS, Churches are insured. This is just stupid
 
The elites don't want look out of their ocean-front homes and see homeless people wandering around their beach paradise.
 
Private charities have been stopped from feeding the homeless because it is dangerous to the homeless. No one knows what's in the food, how it's prepared. Especially in California where the nutritional content and calories have to be in writing for every meal. The food could be spoiled, or contain allergens.

The homeless still have rights and if one has an ill effect from a supplied meal there are a dozen lawyers to sue the charity providing the food and the city for permitting the food to be served.

BS, Churches are insured. This is just stupid
The cities are usually self insured. It might be stupid to you, but it is not stupid to the agencies that say no feeding of the homeless.
 
Private charities have been stopped from feeding the homeless because it is dangerous to the homeless. No one knows what's in the food, how it's prepared. Especially in California where the nutritional content and calories have to be in writing for every meal. The food could be spoiled, or contain allergens.

The homeless still have rights and if one has an ill effect from a supplied meal there are a dozen lawyers to sue the charity providing the food and the city for permitting the food to be served.

BS, Churches are insured. This is just stupid
The cities are usually self insured. It might be stupid to you, but it is not stupid to the agencies that say no feeding of the homeless.

What the hell does cities being self insured have to do with it?
 
Private charities have been stopped from feeding the homeless because it is dangerous to the homeless. No one knows what's in the food, how it's prepared. Especially in California where the nutritional content and calories have to be in writing for every meal. The food could be spoiled, or contain allergens.

The homeless still have rights and if one has an ill effect from a supplied meal there are a dozen lawyers to sue the charity providing the food and the city for permitting the food to be served.

BS, Churches are insured. This is just stupid
The cities are usually self insured. It might be stupid to you, but it is not stupid to the agencies that say no feeding of the homeless.

What the hell does cities being self insured have to do with it?
They prohibit the feeding of the homeless to minimize their liability. There isn't an insurance company to write that check. It's the city itself. Taxpayer money.
 
The elites don't want look out of their ocean-front homes and see homeless people wandering around their beach paradise.

THAT^^^

It's cruel. We have program at a church where I volunteer that provides bag lunches to the homeless and less fortunate six days a week. They've been doing this program since the Great Depression. We give out about 100 a day.
 
Private charities have been stopped from feeding the homeless because it is dangerous to the homeless. No one knows what's in the food, how it's prepared. Especially in California where the nutritional content and calories have to be in writing for every meal. The food could be spoiled, or contain allergens.

The homeless still have rights and if one has an ill effect from a supplied meal there are a dozen lawyers to sue the charity providing the food and the city for permitting the food to be served.

BS, Churches are insured. This is just stupid
The cities are usually self insured. It might be stupid to you, but it is not stupid to the agencies that say no feeding of the homeless.

What the hell does cities being self insured have to do with it?
They prohibit the feeding of the homeless to minimize their liability. There isn't an insurance company to write that check. It's the city itself. Taxpayer money.

The city isn't responsible for what a church does, good grief. The church is insured
 
The elites don't want look out of their ocean-front homes and see homeless people wandering around their beach paradise.

THAT^^^

It's cruel. We have program at a church where I volunteer that provides bag lunches to the homeless and less fortunate six days a week. They've been doing this program since the Great Depression. We give out about 100 a day.

We feed about 100 a day, breakfast. Plus dinner on Monday and Sunday.

Good for you on volunteering
 
Los Angeles prohibits all agencies from feeding homeless. The only thing these kitchens are allowed to provide are foods donated by restaurants. Leftovers which come complete with nutritional content and calories per serving.

Individuals "donate" to the homeless by buying them something from the many fast food outlets. One of these lawyers or stock brokers will go to Mc Ds and get a burger and incidentally pick up a Big Mac and fries for the overweight, "starving" homeless guy hanging around outside. The result is, this form of charity has caused mobs of homeless to hang around hoping for a hand out. If you aren't in a car going through the drive through, don't take a chance. If you walk in, you will be putting your little bag of lunch under a coat when you leave or expect that your lunch will be treated as a donation.

Yehhch keep this behavior away from parks and the beach.
 
Private charities have been stopped from feeding the homeless because it is dangerous to the homeless. No one knows what's in the food, how it's prepared. Especially in California where the nutritional content and calories have to be in writing for every meal. The food could be spoiled, or contain allergens.

The homeless still have rights and if one has an ill effect from a supplied meal there are a dozen lawyers to sue the charity providing the food and the city for permitting the food to be served.

BS, Churches are insured. This is just stupid
The cities are usually self insured. It might be stupid to you, but it is not stupid to the agencies that say no feeding of the homeless.

What the hell does cities being self insured have to do with it?
They prohibit the feeding of the homeless to minimize their liability. There isn't an insurance company to write that check. It's the city itself. Taxpayer money.

The city isn't responsible for what a church does, good grief. The church is insured

And the church AND the city will BOTH be sued. You do know you don't have to decide who to sue. Sue everyone for your gluten allergy.
 
BS, Churches are insured. This is just stupid
The cities are usually self insured. It might be stupid to you, but it is not stupid to the agencies that say no feeding of the homeless.

What the hell does cities being self insured have to do with it?
They prohibit the feeding of the homeless to minimize their liability. There isn't an insurance company to write that check. It's the city itself. Taxpayer money.

The city isn't responsible for what a church does, good grief. The church is insured

And the church AND the city will BOTH be sued. You do know you don't have to decide who to sue. Sue everyone for your gluten allergy.

You don't have the first clue on liability,
 
Uproar: Did The Mayor Ask A Church To Stop Feeding The Hungry? - Vets Day Ceremony Moves Indoors
It’s tough to say when our societal values shifted so dramatically, but for some reason now, government at large has decided that charity for the homeless is a crime. In a society with such stunning abundance, efforts to feed the homeless are being met with legal challenges and even police action in America. This is a disturbing trend which has been gaining steam in recent years.

Happy Holidays – California City Demands Church Stop Feeding the Homeless
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Leave it to the oh so loving leftards. Oh they love and want fairness for everyone don't they . Oh wait if you are white you don't count, if you are not a moron democrat like them you don't count.

I hope who ever wants this , finds Karma and ends up in the same situation.


The Homelessness Strategic Plan will coordinate Malibu's existing resources in a more effective way, find new opportunities to address the issue, and support the efforts of the Los Angeles region, the press release said. The grant is part of Los Angeles County's Measure H, an initiative approved by voters in March 2017 adding a 10-year, ¼ cent sales tax to help fund housing and support services for the homeless population throughout the County. The City Council unanimously approved sending a letter of support to the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors in support of Measure H in February 2017.

"The people of Malibu rightly recognize this as a humanitarian crisis and the City has made it a priority issue," Mayor Skylar Peak said. "We are collaborating intensively with non-profit service providers and the Sheriff's Department to support comprehensive services that really make a difference for people experiencing homelessness, while also addressing the public safety and public health impacts of homelessness on the community."


Homeless Issues Presentation To Malibu City Council
 

Forum List

Back
Top