headastate
Rookie
- Oct 21, 2008
- 17
- 1
- 1
i think this is great stuff. if he wants to boil down republican talking points to drivel, while the rest of us keep up with lucid conversation, i say let him.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Actually it is your inability to make a point without insulting someone. And my "tag line" is insulting to a group of people who choose their philosophy, not a specific individual.
Here's the reality. First, it was your inability to comprehend the point that was the problem. I had to present the exact same point three different ways before you could wrap your mind around it. Second, your first response to me included the icon representing "crazy", which is an insult. Not only is "crazy" an insult, but the sentence, "I can believe you are simple" is not technically a sentence declaring you are simple, rather it is a statement saying that your inability to comprehend the point I was making made it possible for me to believe you may be simple. Third, making a broad generalizing insult to a group is arguably worse than insulting a specific individual, since making a comment about an individual presents an opportunity for the individual to defend his or herself against the remark and creates the possiblity that the comment may be justified. Since there is no way you could have the information required to accurately make your claim about an entire group, it is a blatant attempt to disparage a large number of people.
I don't recall agreeing to your rules of "insult" = you win, and anyone who understands rational debate will tell you that while it does reflect poorly on the arguement, it does not invalidate the arguement. Furthermore, any rational person reading this exchange will see that your claim of an insult is weak at best.
So in the end, all you need to do to maintain at least some intellectual honesty and integrity, is say that your statement about the liberal using "gay" as an insult was inaccurate and retract it.
Geek? He played ball in high school, and skis. Besides, I'd bet he'd kick your ass. Just as this "typical conservative geek" would.
Men who fuck boys are gay. There are no straight guys in NAMBLA. Every one of them is gay. Again, its a simple point.
Are you heterosexual?
Of course.
No, just their moms.
No. An adult male attracted to little girls is a pervert. An adult male attracted to little boys is a gay pervert. Again, a simple concept.So you agree that being heterosexual and being attracted to little girls is not the same thing and are not interchangeable since you gave two different answers to the questions.
No. An adult male attracted to little girls is a pervert. An adult male attracted to little boys is a gay pervert. Again, a simple concept.
Don't you mean an adult male attracted to little girls is a heterosexual pervert?
And you didn't answer my question. Do you feel that being heterosexual and being attracted to little girls are interchangeable concepts?
The word "pervert" without the adjective gives an adequate description.
I answered your question, just not in the manner that you had hoped for.
Do you "feel" that guys that fuck boys are not gay?
Geek? He played ball in high school, and skis. Besides, I'd bet he'd kick your ass. Just as this "typical conservative geek" would.