Hamas vs Israel

[Book of Jeremiah]

This speech given by Dennis Prager is based on the subject of Oxford University having made the decision that Hamas was a greater obstacle to peace than Israel Was there ever any question? In this speech, Prager asks the right questions. Why would the world accept without question that Isis is a greater obstacle to peace than Europe? That Al Qaeda a great obstacle to peace than the USA? Why is it that only when it comes to Israel did they have to first question and "decide" which was a greater obstacle to peace?

I believe that Prager answered his own question long ago in a discussion about the religion of the Left and how they are led by their feelings. It is quite apparent that if one were to remove the feelings denominator, one would quickly be able to identify who is right and who is wrong without any struggle or need for discussion.

Without further ado, here is Prager. Listen closely:

 

[Book of Jeremiah]

The proposition:

This house believes that Hamas is a greater obstacle to peace than Israel. - Oxford University

Perhaps their next proposition should be -

This house believes that ISIS is a greater obstacle to peace than France. - Oxford University

 

[MJB12741]

The proposition:

This house believes that Hamas is a greater obstacle to peace than Israel. - Oxford University

Perhaps their next proposition should be -

This house believes that ISIS is a greater obstacle to peace than France. - Oxford University

Have you heard the latest from America's & Israel's enemies? The Zionists attacked Paris.

 

[P F Tinmore]

This speech given by Dennis Prager is based on the subject of Oxford University having made the decision that Hamas was a greater obstacle to peace than Israel Was there ever any question? In this speech, Prager asks the right questions. Why would the world accept without question that Isis is a greater obstacle to peace than Europe? That Al Qaeda a great obstacle to peace than the USA? Why is it that only when it comes to Israel did they have to first question and "decide" which was a greater obstacle to peace?

I believe that Prager answered his own question long ago in a discussion about the religion of the Left and how they are led by their feelings. It is quite apparent that if one were to remove the feelings denominator, one would quickly be able to identify who is right and who is wrong without any struggle or need for discussion.

Without further ado, here is Prager. Listen closely:

Why didn't this propagandist putz mention that before the Zionist project there was peace and there has been nothing but death and destruction since? Why wasn't this obvious common denominator addressed?

How can he say that it is Hamas that is the obstacle to peace when there was no peace for decades before there was a Hamas?

 

[Hollie]

Why don't you islamo-propaganda mouthpieces do your islamo-homework? There has never been peace among islamo-fascists.

I think you somehow missed the email about Shia/ Sunni hatreds dating back more than a thousand years, that Muhammedans, all of them, have fought civil wars with other muhammedans and muhammedan rebels, that half of the “rightly guided" Caliphs were assassinated by other Muhammedans. We see demonstration of this dynamic in Iraq, Syria and across the Middle East today. The Shia/ Sunni hatreds are boiling over with insensate rage and the body count in Syria alone may be 300,000.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Why don't you islamo-propaganda mouthpieces do your islamo-homework? There has never been peace among islamo-fascists.

I think you somehow missed the email about Shia/ Sunni hatreds dating back more than a thousand years, that Muhammedans, all of them, have fought civil wars with other muhammedans and muhammedan rebels, that half of the “rightly guided" Caliphs were assassinated by other Muhammedans. We see demonstration of this dynamic in Iraq, Syria and across the Middle East today. The Shia/ Sunni hatreds are boiling over with insensate rage and the body count in Syria alone may be 300,000.

Nice deflection. How many attacks were there against the Jews in Palestine before the Zionist project?

 

[montelatici]

Why don't you islamo-propaganda mouthpieces do your islamo-homework? There has never been peace among islamo-fascists.

I think you somehow missed the email about Shia/ Sunni hatreds dating back more than a thousand years, that Muhammedans, all of them, have fought civil wars with other muhammedans and muhammedan rebels, that half of the “rightly guided" Caliphs were assassinated by other Muhammedans. We see demonstration of this dynamic in Iraq, Syria and across the Middle East today. The Shia/ Sunni hatreds are boiling over with insensate rage and the body count in Syria alone may be 300,000.

Much more peaceful than the intra-Christian civil wars, wars and World Wars, to be fair.

 

[Hollie]

Why don't you islamo-propaganda mouthpieces do your islamo-homework? There has never been peace among islamo-fascists.

I think you somehow missed the email about Shia/ Sunni hatreds dating back more than a thousand years, that Muhammedans, all of them, have fought civil wars with other muhammedans and muhammedan rebels, that half of the “rightly guided" Caliphs were assassinated by other Muhammedans. We see demonstration of this dynamic in Iraq, Syria and across the Middle East today. The Shia/ Sunni hatreds are boiling over with insensate rage and the body count in Syria alone may be 300,000.

Nice deflection. How many attacks were there against the Jews in Palestine before the Zionist project?

Pointless muhammedan drivel. What would you call the muhammedan conquest of the region by the Ottoman's?

 

[Hollie]

Why don't you islamo-propaganda mouthpieces do your islamo-homework? There has never been peace among islamo-fascists.

I think you somehow missed the email about Shia/ Sunni hatreds dating back more than a thousand years, that Muhammedans, all of them, have fought civil wars with other muhammedans and muhammedan rebels, that half of the “rightly guided" Caliphs were assassinated by other Muhammedans. We see demonstration of this dynamic in Iraq, Syria and across the Middle East today. The Shia/ Sunni hatreds are boiling over with insensate rage and the body count in Syria alone may be 300,000.

Much more peaceful than the intra-Christian civil wars, wars and World Wars, to be fair.

Much more pointless than your usual tripe.

The prayer leader at your madrassah is not going to provide you with an objective account of islamo-history and its 1,400 year long war against both itself and humanity.

But then, you islamo-taqiyya types have a vested interest in misinformation and deceit.

 

[montelatici]

Has Hasbara instructed you to claim that anyone you disagree with is a Muslim?

Intra-Muslim war and conflict pales in comparison to Intra-Christian war and conflict, so you begin with a false premiss.

 

[Hollie]

Has Hasbara instructed you to claim that anyone you disagree with is a Muslim?

Intra-Muslim war and conflict pales in comparison to Intra-Christian war and conflict, so you begin with a false premiss.

Which is the same drivel you cut and pasted elsewhere. You ailed to support you spam elsewhere, now here.

Two time loser.

 

[montelatici]

Projection by the forum's loser. LOL

Providing documented fact to support an assertion is the way one carries on a dialogue in this forum. Spouting undocumented bullshit, as you do is actually not Kosher.

From the way you are writing it appears you are already on the sauce.


BTW, providing documented fact to support an assertion is the way one carries on a dialogue in this forum. Spouting undocumented bullshit, as you do is actually not Kosher.

 

[Hollie]

Projection by the forum's loser. LOL

Providing documented fact to support an assertion is the way one carries on a dialogue in this forum. Spouting undocumented bullshit, as you do is actually not Kosher.

From the way you are writing it appears you are already on the sauce.


BTW, providing documented fact to support an assertion is the way one carries on a dialogue in this forum. Spouting undocumented bullshit, as you do is actually not Kosher.

Documented facts would be nice. Your cutting and pasting of YouTube videos falls short of documented fact.

Tell your friends at the mosque.

 

[montelatici]

Documented fact from UN and other archives are what I usually provide. Videos, when provided, are in response to the Hasbara produced videos posted by your lot.

Tell that to your dual-citizen compatriots.

 

[Hollie]

Documented fact from UN and other archives are what I usually provide. Videos, when provided, are in response to the Hasbara produced videos posted by your lot.

Tell that to your dual-citizen compatriots.

You mistake cutting and pasting from YouTube with objective data.

That's OK, though. Islamist taqiyya is your best offering.

 

[montelatici]

Documented fact from UN and other archives are what I usually provide. Videos, when provided, are in response to the Hasbara produced videos posted by your lot.

Tell that to your dual-citizen compatriots.

You mistake cutting and pasting from YouTube with objective data.

That's OK, though. Islamist taqiyya is your best offering.

Oh dear, desperation sets in. Any disagreement with the dual citizen is Islamic. Grow up.

 

[member]

This speech given by Dennis Prager is based on the subject of Oxford University having made the decision that Hamas was a greater obstacle to peace than Israel Was there ever any question? In this speech, Prager asks the right questions. Why would the world accept without question that Isis is a greater obstacle to peace than Europe? That Al Qaeda a great obstacle to peace than the USA? Why is it that only when it comes to Israel did they have to first question and "decide" which was a greater obstacle to peace?

I believe that Prager answered his own question long ago in a discussion about the religion of the Left and how they are led by their feelings. It is quite apparent that if one were to remove the feelings denominator, one would quickly be able to identify who is right and who is wrong without any struggle or need for discussion.

Without further ado, here is Prager. Listen closely:

Why didn't this propagandist putz mention that before the Zionist project there was peace and there has been nothing but death and destruction since? Why wasn't this obvious common denominator addressed?

How can he say that it is Hamas that is the obstacle to peace when .....there was no peace for decades before there was a Hamas?

The terrorist apologist... tf pitmore....

- ya sick bastard

 

[Book of Jeremiah]

This speech given by Dennis Prager is based on the subject of Oxford University having made the decision that Hamas was a greater obstacle to peace than Israel Was there ever any question? In this speech, Prager asks the right questions. Why would the world accept without question that Isis is a greater obstacle to peace than Europe? That Al Qaeda a great obstacle to peace than the USA? Why is it that only when it comes to Israel did they have to first question and "decide" which was a greater obstacle to peace?

I believe that Prager answered his own question long ago in a discussion about the religion of the Left and how they are led by their feelings. It is quite apparent that if one were to remove the feelings denominator, one would quickly be able to identify who is right and who is wrong without any struggle or need for discussion.

Without further ado, here is Prager. Listen closely:

Why didn't this propagandist putz mention that before the Zionist project there was peace and there has been nothing but death and destruction since? Why wasn't this obvious common denominator addressed?

How can he say that it is Hamas that is the obstacle to peace when there was no peace for decades before there was a Hamas?

How is he a propagandist putz? What has he said that isn't true?

As for who is the obstacle to peace? Hamas is only one of the terrorist groups (not the only one) that has been an obstacle to peace since the Jews have returned to their homeland of Israel - add to Hamas, PLA, Hizbollah, Muslim Brotherhood, Fatah, ISIS.....

If what you claim is true?

There were no settlements prior to 1967, why wasn't there peace? Because it isn't about settlements, or 1967 borders. It's about obliterating Israel and driving the Jews into the sea.

 

[member]

Projection by the forum's loser. LOL

Providing documented fact to support an assertion is the way one carries on a dialogue in this forum. Spouting undocumented bullshit, as you do is actually not Kosher.

From the way you are writing it appears you are already on the sauce.


BTW, providing documented fact to support an assertion is the way one carries on a dialogue in this forum. Spouting undocumented bullshit, as you do is actually not Kosher.

Documented facts would be nice. Your cutting and pasting of YouTube videos falls short of documented fact.

"Tell your friends at the mosque."

he/she is probably afraid most of the times to go to the mosque....



you never know when......ahem....one of 'em is gonna have a breakdown in the mosque (or by the entrance)..............

 

[Book of Jeremiah]

To be clear - no where in the video is Dennis Prager attacking the Arab people - his entire focus is on the subject of terrorist groups and defining what is an obstacle to peace - giving examples - to prove his point.

I think this thread went off the rails somewhere. Perhaps watching the video in the OP before commenting would be helpful? Or a novel idea maybe?
Thanks.