The day Bill Clinton said that about not killing bin Laden he needed a liar fix the same way a drug addict needs a fix. He hasnt stopped lying since then. The Clintons would be broke if he had to pay a pusher every time he needed a fix. Happily for both Clintons, lies are free; so they can supply their own fixes. It would not be a pretty picture if Bubba went cold turkey and just stopped lying.
To be fair, the media will never drive a Democrat out of office for lying. That is why the Democrat party is the party of liars. They lie knowing they will never be held accountable then they laugh at the fools who defend the lies. Setting the record straight is the best the public can expect. Michael Scheuer does just that in this video:
First, Scheuer resurrecting Sandy Burglar for a brief moment probably means nothing to younger Americans, but his theft was a big story for a few days. To this day the public does not know what he stole. Ann Coulter did a humorous and informative column at the time:
When Berger got caught the mainstream press decided that his larceny had to be covered for the sake of credibility, but dropped very quickly. I assumed Bergers flirtation with sneak thievery did not meet the Washington Posts criterion for third-rate burglaries à la Watergate.
At the time I suggested that the FBI check out any pumpkin patches in the vicinity of Bergers home. The Soviet Union wasnt involved as in the Alger Hiss case; so I was puzzled as to why the Clintons would sanction such a stupid thing? The media was spreading around mountains of legacy horse manure but I never bought it.
NOTE: Alger Hiss was the only big name Democrat who ever went to jail for lying. Democrats will never make that mistake again as Eric Holder proves time after time. So you could say that Hiss is the tarnished gold standard for the party of liars.
Why Berger? was the question I asked myself. My answer: Berger was knowledgeable enough, loyal enough, and high enough to use, but not so high he couldnt be sacrificed if things went sour which they did. After all, the Clintons couldnt very well send in Madeleine Albright to do a sneak job for such a shallow reason as saving the Clinton legacy. Berger fit the gig to perfection. If he wasnt such a clutz he would have a top government job today.
Whitewashing Clinton Administration fiascos so then-Senator Clinton could move on up had some validity at the time. There was no firing squad involved unless Communist China is mentioned in the missing literature; the Clinton White House was tight with Peking. Well never know for sure precisely because the documents are gone forever. (Ill bet that Lois Lerner wishes it was hard copies and not computer records.)
The missing documents turned out to be a blessing in disguise for Clinton detractors because speculating about what was in the papers Berger lost continues to this day among policy wonks.
My take has always been that there was something in the missing papers that would damage the UN. You have to remember what the Clintons stand for on this one. In my view, the following excerpt from Phyllis Schlaflys column of July 5, 2004 best explains what the Clintons were hiding:
Until Barack Taqiyya came along, former President Clinton was the most anti-American person to ever live in the White House. Trivializing Clinton because he enjoyed an intern nibbling on his joint like an ear of corn does him a favor. Nobody is afraid of a fool. Clinton is a lot of things but he is not a fool. Americans should of feared him when he was speaking against his own country in the former Soviet Union during the Vietnam War.
You can be sure that anyone who is in the Clinton inner circle is just as devoted to an omnipotent UN as are the Clintons. The UN is their universe; their future; their hopes; their dreams of a brave new world with them in charge. Thats why I have to believe that the UN was threatened enough by a few documents for Berger to risk losing his reputation, and possibly doing some jail time, just to remove those documents.
It also occurred to me that any number of legitimate documents damaging Clinton loyalists can now be inserted in the record. What is Berger going to do about it? Call them forgeries! Who would believe him? or believe anybody from the Clinton White House, no matter what they say now?
By the way, Kerrys never-ending insistence on submitting to the UN is a continuation of the Clinton policy for an America controlled by the UN.
Back to Michael Scheuer
In the video Mr. Michael Scheuer mentioned inflaming a billion Muslims in relation to Clinton not killing bin Laden. I believe that that was Clinton policy at the time, but not for the altruism the Butcher of Waco would have us believe. The United Nations is always the reason. The United Nations is the reason this Administration will sell out Israel in a heartbeat.
I can best explain my interpretation by pointing out the United Nations is nothing more than a business. Member states do not own the business. They are customers of the of the people who own the United Nations. They should be viewed as customers. Put it this way:
There are 49 Muslim countries out of a total number of 192 member states in the United Nations. If you owned a business that had 49 customers who all sold the same product, and 1 customer the 49 wanted to get rid of who would you placate?
Finally, if every Muslim country walks out of the United Nations because of Israels continued existence the business goes bankrupt.
Last edited by a moderator:
