Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well, sure - if caught driving them on the road.No, if you get caught driving them.They have? Pulled out of peoples' garages and stuff?Cars have been confiscated if they are not registered or the registration expired.
On what grounds,and in what state? You don't need to register that's not driven on public property.They will however tow your car off of your property if the car doesn't have current plates.
In CA you have to register a road vehicle no matter driven or not. If not, it must be registered then as INOP. Oh, and by the way, some jurisdictions have Plate Readers that drive around hunting for victims. Some agencies have their own, other's contract it out. If your plate throw's up a flag it then get's reported to DMV, which can identify whether you are in arrears whether it be non-payment to DMV, child support, stolen, etc. If you have any issues, I don't suggest leaving your vehicle anywhere in sight of Big Brother. CA reg is a fucking racket.Well, sure - if caught driving them on the road.No, if you get caught driving them.They have? Pulled out of peoples' garages and stuff?Cars have been confiscated if they are not registered or the registration expired.
On what grounds,and in what state? You don't need to register that's not driven on public property.They will however tow your car off of your property if the car doesn't have current plates.
I am a liberal and I own four guns. WTF are you talking about?The tenure among most Liberals is that they don’t like private citizens owning guns. Yet, if you had your way and everyone turned over their guns, that would leave police and criminals having guns. Liberals are also the first to attack the police. How is it you are okay with police having guns and how would you get guns from criminals?
Excuse me for jumping in, but that is so condescending yet my liberal friends (and I) have as many guns as the other guys. Right wing does NOT have a lock on who owns what. But that seems to be your train of thought. Not commonality.I am a liberal and I own four guns. WTF are you talking about?The tenure among most Liberals is that they don’t like private citizens owning guns. Yet, if you had your way and everyone turned over their guns, that would leave police and criminals having guns. Liberals are also the first to attack the police. How is it you are okay with police having guns and how would you get guns from criminals?
Nothing towards the absolute. Clearly, you are exceptional.
Excuse me for jumping in, but that is so condescending yet my liberal friends (and I) have as many guns as the other guys. Right wing does NOT have a lock on who owns what. But that seems to be your train of thought. Not commonality.I am a liberal and I own four guns. WTF are you talking about?The tenure among most Liberals is that they don’t like private citizens owning guns. Yet, if you had your way and everyone turned over their guns, that would leave police and criminals having guns. Liberals are also the first to attack the police. How is it you are okay with police having guns and how would you get guns from criminals?
Nothing towards the absolute. Clearly, you are exceptional.
Excuse me for jumping in, but that is so condescending yet my liberal friends (and I) have as many guns as the other guys. Right wing does NOT have a lock on who owns what. But that seems to be your train of thought. Not commonality.I am a liberal and I own four guns. WTF are you talking about?The tenure among most Liberals is that they don’t like private citizens owning guns. Yet, if you had your way and everyone turned over their guns, that would leave police and criminals having guns. Liberals are also the first to attack the police. How is it you are okay with police having guns and how would you get guns from criminals?
Nothing towards the absolute. Clearly, you are exceptional.
The original post was an opinion based on perception. Tell me, how many conservatives talk of taking guns?
Many. A lot. Matter's how you phrase "taking." Whether it's worry about taking or actually taking, which the latter hasn't happened and doubt it will. The word should be "getting" and that will probably happen, as in some not for sale in the future.Excuse me for jumping in, but that is so condescending yet my liberal friends (and I) have as many guns as the other guys. Right wing does NOT have a lock on who owns what. But that seems to be your train of thought. Not commonality.I am a liberal and I own four guns. WTF are you talking about?The tenure among most Liberals is that they don’t like private citizens owning guns. Yet, if you had your way and everyone turned over their guns, that would leave police and criminals having guns. Liberals are also the first to attack the police. How is it you are okay with police having guns and how would you get guns from criminals?
Nothing towards the absolute. Clearly, you are exceptional.
The original post was an opinion based on perception. Tell me, how many conservatives talk of taking guns?
Ah. California. That explains it. I understand they also plan to tax the air you breathe.In CA you have to register a road vehicle no matter driven or not. If not, it must be registered then as INOP.Well, sure - if caught driving them on the road.No, if you get caught driving them.They have? Pulled out of peoples' garages and stuff?Cars have been confiscated if they are not registered or the registration expired.
On what grounds,and in what state? You don't need to register that's not driven on public property.They will however tow your car off of your property if the car doesn't have current plates.
Like what?A mandatory year of military service would have several beneficial results, one of which would be fire arms training. One other, undoing some of the leftist indoctrination and giving them a crash course on how to be an adult instead of a perpetually offended little hyper sensitive democrat cry baby.Making someone get training is nowhere in the same ballpark as forcing them to devote a year of their lives in involuntary servitude that may result in their death in armed conflict, hyperbole or not.Awesome hyperbole.Well, that would require people to serve and die in bullshit regime-change wars against their will. Mandatory school training is much less intrusive.
.
.
I spent 8 years in the AF and I'm not dead.
Some career fields require up to a year in training (not to mention getting mission qualified at the unit level).
I was an 'Integrated Avionics Instrumentation/Flight Controls System Specialist on the F-16, and there was only one school harder than that in the Air Force and that was Missiles, and those schools are no longer than a couple months. The new Missile and Space Systems Maintenance course in the Air Force is only 70 days, and it's the hardest school there is.
I know of no military training that takes a year in any branch.
Like what?A mandatory year of military service would have several beneficial results, one of which would be fire arms training. One other, undoing some of the leftist indoctrination and giving them a crash course on how to be an adult instead of a perpetually offended little hyper sensitive democrat cry baby.Making someone get training is nowhere in the same ballpark as forcing them to devote a year of their lives in involuntary servitude that may result in their death in armed conflict, hyperbole or not.Awesome hyperbole.
.
I spent 8 years in the AF and I'm not dead.
Some career fields require up to a year in training (not to mention getting mission qualified at the unit level).
I was an 'Integrated Avionics Instrumentation/Flight Controls System Specialist on the F-16, and there was only one school harder than that in the Air Force and that was Missiles, and those schools are no longer than a couple months. The new Missile and Space Systems Maintenance course in the Air Force is only 70 days, and it's the hardest school there is.
I know of no military training that takes a year in any branch.
Linguists require up to a year or more of training.
U.S. Air Force - Career Detail - Cryptologic Language Analyst
Point is we don’t disagree on the concept just the length. That said, I’d like to see more of the population having some skin in the game too. You want federal aid for college....fine do a 2-4 year stint in the military or some other public service first.
Welcome to the collective… A progressive’s dreamLike what?A mandatory year of military service would have several beneficial results, one of which would be fire arms training. One other, undoing some of the leftist indoctrination and giving them a crash course on how to be an adult instead of a perpetually offended little hyper sensitive democrat cry baby.Making someone get training is nowhere in the same ballpark as forcing them to devote a year of their lives in involuntary servitude that may result in their death in armed conflict, hyperbole or not.
.
I spent 8 years in the AF and I'm not dead.
Some career fields require up to a year in training (not to mention getting mission qualified at the unit level).
I was an 'Integrated Avionics Instrumentation/Flight Controls System Specialist on the F-16, and there was only one school harder than that in the Air Force and that was Missiles, and those schools are no longer than a couple months. The new Missile and Space Systems Maintenance course in the Air Force is only 70 days, and it's the hardest school there is.
I know of no military training that takes a year in any branch.
Linguists require up to a year or more of training.
U.S. Air Force - Career Detail - Cryptologic Language Analyst
Point is we don’t disagree on the concept just the length. That said, I’d like to see more of the population having some skin in the game too. You want federal aid for college....fine do a 2-4 year stint in the military or some other public service first.
To add insult to injury, some kid goes to college that I end up paying for. He becomes a lawyer. Now when I need legal services, he charges me $500.00 an hour because he's a lawyer thanks to all that tax money I worked for.
the problem is they keep confusing liberal and leftist,,,,Excuse me for jumping in, but that is so condescending yet my liberal friends (and I) have as many guns as the other guys. Right wing does NOT have a lock on who owns what. But that seems to be your train of thought. Not commonality.I am a liberal and I own four guns. WTF are you talking about?The tenure among most Liberals is that they don’t like private citizens owning guns. Yet, if you had your way and everyone turned over their guns, that would leave police and criminals having guns. Liberals are also the first to attack the police. How is it you are okay with police having guns and how would you get guns from criminals?
Nothing towards the absolute. Clearly, you are exceptional.
the problem is they keep confusing liberal and leftist,,,,Excuse me for jumping in, but that is so condescending yet my liberal friends (and I) have as many guns as the other guys. Right wing does NOT have a lock on who owns what. But that seems to be your train of thought. Not commonality.I am a liberal and I own four guns. WTF are you talking about?The tenure among most Liberals is that they don’t like private citizens owning guns. Yet, if you had your way and everyone turned over their guns, that would leave police and criminals having guns. Liberals are also the first to attack the police. How is it you are okay with police having guns and how would you get guns from criminals?
Nothing towards the absolute. Clearly, you are exceptional.
I'm a classic liberal on most issues, and it would take me an hour to just find all my guns to count them,,,
this labeling people you dont even know causes a lot of misconceptions and failed opinions,,,
the problem is they keep confusing liberal and leftist,,,,Excuse me for jumping in, but that is so condescending yet my liberal friends (and I) have as many guns as the other guys. Right wing does NOT have a lock on who owns what. But that seems to be your train of thought. Not commonality.I am a liberal and I own four guns. WTF are you talking about?The tenure among most Liberals is that they don’t like private citizens owning guns. Yet, if you had your way and everyone turned over their guns, that would leave police and criminals having guns. Liberals are also the first to attack the police. How is it you are okay with police having guns and how would you get guns from criminals?
Nothing towards the absolute. Clearly, you are exceptional.
I'm a classic liberal on most issues, and it would take me an hour to just find all my guns to count them,,,
this labeling people you dont even know causes a lot of misconceptions and failed opinions,,,
Fair enough. Yet you people equally confuse labels by aligning GOPer with a Conservative and ignore the fact that many GOPers are Liberal.
the problem is they keep confusing liberal and leftist,,,,Excuse me for jumping in, but that is so condescending yet my liberal friends (and I) have as many guns as the other guys. Right wing does NOT have a lock on who owns what. But that seems to be your train of thought. Not commonality.I am a liberal and I own four guns. WTF are you talking about?
Nothing towards the absolute. Clearly, you are exceptional.
I'm a classic liberal on most issues, and it would take me an hour to just find all my guns to count them,,,
this labeling people you dont even know causes a lot of misconceptions and failed opinions,,,
Fair enough. Yet you people equally confuse labels by aligning GOPer with a Conservative and ignore the fact that many GOPers are Liberal.
who is ,,,YOU PEOPLE???
