Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
On election night it gets pretty aggravating at times. You see the results and ask (WTF voted for him, or her, or whatever)?
In other words I think our country would be way better off if only people like us here in USMB were allowed to vote; people who know the issues and understand current events. Yet election after election, we end up with elections decided by people like this:
Again, says the guy who voted for the Reality TV Clown.
Why? She votes because she wants a phone. You vote because you hate black people. Neither is a particularly valid motive for voting, but there you are.
The ironic thing. She got a phone... you don't have health insurance. Good job.
Well maybe they're is a trade there as well.
We will let them ask questions to qualify owning a gun, and we get to have a short test before people can vote. Nothing too hard, just questions like who is the VP, what party are they from, who is the Speaker of the House, who has the majority in the Senate, just simple things like that.
If you can't pass the test, you can't vote. Good bye Democrat leadership forever.
Actually, I've found that most people who vote REpublican are equally piss ignorant, but voting is a right.
Compensating for a tiny pecker isn't. (The Second is about militias, not guns.)
And this is a good thing. You don't need a gun, and most people aren't comfortable with you having one.
At least he ran something before taking office. Ears never so much as operated a hotdog stand. Trump owned or operated over 500 businesses in his life.
We voted for Trump for a wall. You voted for a guy with a terrorist name simply because of the color of his skin.
Yeah, she votes because she wants a phone. That's why the Democrat party is the party of Santa Clause. Just give people things and they'll vote for you even if they don't know the difference between the Congress and courts.
And don't brag about heath insurance. Yours is garbage if they won't allow you to see a shrink about your severe OCD problems.
So now Joe knows more than Supreme Court justices. Good on you Joe.
I would be willing to bet that if we could have such a test, the left would go bonkers and we would be celebrating. Your voters aren't even smart enough to get an ID. And it's not us saying that, it's your very own leaders.
22,000 unenforceable gun laws. The way the NRA designed them to be. Is it unconstitutional to ban the sale of guns in vending machines?We've already compromised our Rights with 22,000 restrictive gun laws already on the books. Also, sweeping Fed Laws like NFA 1934, and GCA 1968 are a travesty. States have passed extremely restrictive gun laws. ALL of them unconstitutional.
Actually, I've found that most people who vote REpublican are equally piss ignorant, but voting is a right.
Compensating for a tiny pecker isn't. (The Second is about militias, not guns.)
Since they have no power to make laws and cannot compromise, no deal.I see lefties frequently screech about how 2A supporters refuse to compromise. Well, that's because there's never BEEN a compromise, rather a one-sided chipping away of 2nd Amendment rights with nothing offered in return.
So here, I'll offer an actual compromise. You lefties want universal background checks? I can get behind that. But in exchange I want universal reciprocity on CCW permits.
Deal?
Firearm regulation should be 100% reserved to the states. That was the point of the 2A.That is not a functional proposal, as it would entail a conflict of state versus federal power. Congress can (theoretically) implement universal background checks. However, Congress does not have the power to mandate permit reciprocity, as licensing is a power reserved to the states.
Then you should demand a repeal of all federal gun laws.Because the 14th Amendment requires the states to allow all citizens residing in the states the right to due process and equal protection of the law.
Unlike you and other ignorant rightists, liberals correctly understand that the states do indeed have rights – but the states do not have the authority to violate the rights and protected liberties of their residents; “states’ rights” do not ‘trump’ the rights of American citizens.
that would violate the 2nd amendmentFirearm regulation should be 100% reserved to the states. That was the point of the 2A.That is not a functional proposal, as it would entail a conflict of state versus federal power. Congress can (theoretically) implement universal background checks. However, Congress does not have the power to mandate permit reciprocity, as licensing is a power reserved to the states.
BEEN THERE DONE THAT,,,ITS ALL THE FAKE SUPPORTERS THAT NEED BEATEN AND WHIPPEDThen you should demand a repeal of all federal gun laws.Because the 14th Amendment requires the states to allow all citizens residing in the states the right to due process and equal protection of the law.
Unlike you and other ignorant rightists, liberals correctly understand that the states do indeed have rights – but the states do not have the authority to violate the rights and protected liberties of their residents; “states’ rights” do not ‘trump’ the rights of American citizens.
All federal gun laws should be repealed because they are unconstitutional because the 2A was pointed at Congress. The clumsy-ass 14th fucked that all up.that would violate the 2nd amendmentFirearm regulation should be 100% reserved to the states. That was the point of the 2A.That is not a functional proposal, as it would entail a conflict of state versus federal power. Congress can (theoretically) implement universal background checks. However, Congress does not have the power to mandate permit reciprocity, as licensing is a power reserved to the states.
SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED
WE ARE TALKING 2ND NOT 14TH,,,and any compromise is treason and should ,,,will be fought at all costAll federal gun laws should be repealed because they are unconstitutional because the 2A was pointed at Congress. The clumsy-ass 14th fucked that all up.that would violate the 2nd amendmentFirearm regulation should be 100% reserved to the states. That was the point of the 2A.That is not a functional proposal, as it would entail a conflict of state versus federal power. Congress can (theoretically) implement universal background checks. However, Congress does not have the power to mandate permit reciprocity, as licensing is a power reserved to the states.
SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED
So, if you want to argue 14th Amendment protections against states, I will not get in your way. That's one benefit that clumsy 14th does give us.
What I am saying is that originally, the U.S. Constitution's Bill of Rights was included to make states more likely to ratify it. The 2A was an assurance that the new Federal Government would not fuck with our guns. Originally, states could argue that they had the power to regulate firearms as strictly as they wanted, but then came the 14th Amendment and fucked that all up for the states.WE ARE TALKING 2ND NOT 14TH,,,and any compromise is treason and should ,,,will be fought at all cost
What I am saying is that originally, the U.S. Constitution's Bill of Rights was included to make states more likely to ratify it. The 2A was an assurance that the new Federal Government would not fuck with our guns. Originally, states could argue that they had the power to regulate firearms as strictly as they wanted, but then came the 14th Amendment and fucked that all up for the states.WE ARE TALKING 2ND NOT 14TH,,,and any compromise is treason and should ,,,will be fought at all cost
So, now, neither the states nor the Federal Government can constitutionally regulate firearms.
It's gonna take a shooting war to get those rights back.
