- Jan 19, 2010
- 68,416
- 63,013
- 3,605
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Gregg Jarrett rips AG over indictment
- Thread starter nomadic5
- Start date
Who are only given the information the prosecutor wants them to have. The defense has no access to present differing evidence. I've served on a criminal grand jury and know very well how they operate. Any questions we had for the witnesses had to be given to the prosecutor and he only asked them if he thought they were "relevant" to the case. He had complete control over what information we had access to.
Did you do a good job?
That's because he isn't a criminal. He's a career politician. Republicans and conservatives like to make up shit about Democrats when they have nothing else. They've had nothing else..for a long time.You backed a corrupt politician; i.e., creepy old Joe Biden. But your guy is not being subject to an endless barrage of questionable criminal charges.
They did it to Obama, they did it to the Clintons (both). ^Shrug^.
Blaster
Diamond Member
- Sep 9, 2022
- 19,516
- 19,350
- 2,288
If SCOTUS had any guts they would but many of them are weak and afraid of public criticism.The supreme court needs to step in and put a stop to this....
There is LITERALLY no question about the fact that President Trump COULD HAVE declassified each and every one of the documents in question, had he simply taken the time to do so. He, as President, was NOT BOUND by administrative procedures for declassification - those procedures flow from his original power to declassify. The case is preposterous.
Further, we have two prominent examples from recent years of people who LACKED the power to declassify, and yet kept, held, and/or destroyed classified documents after their time in government had ended, when they had no legitimate reason to possess them. Again, this is not speculation; it is fact.
If the intention of this conspiracy is to see to it that Trump wins the Republican nomination, it is succeeding wildly. OTOH, it is weaponized prosecution, writ large.
Further, we have two prominent examples from recent years of people who LACKED the power to declassify, and yet kept, held, and/or destroyed classified documents after their time in government had ended, when they had no legitimate reason to possess them. Again, this is not speculation; it is fact.
If the intention of this conspiracy is to see to it that Trump wins the Republican nomination, it is succeeding wildly. OTOH, it is weaponized prosecution, writ large.
SCOTUS cannot just "take a case." They can only work on actual cases and controversies that are appropriately brought before it.If SCOTUS had any guts they would but many of them are weak and afraid of public criticism.
Yet he didn't. He admitted that. It's on tape. He knew that he was fondling highly classified documents, docouments that are still missing.There is LITERALLY no question about the fact that President Trump COULD HAVE declassified each and every one of the documents in question,
So much for that meaningless deflection.
Nope. Neither Biden nor Pence deliberately packed up and took classified files themselves. Their staffers did, by mistake. Nor did either of them refuse to give them back. That's not a crime, and only the most flagrantly corrupt partisan shills pretend it is.Further, we have two prominent examples from recent years of people who LACKED the power to declassify, and yet kept, held, and/or destroyed classified documents after their time in government had ended, when they had no legitimate reason to possess them. Again, this is not speculation; it is fact.
Remember, you won't be able to gaslight anyone outside of your cult. You will especially be unable to gaslight law enforcement. They're used to criminals claiming that law enforcement is corrupt, and Trump isn't doing anything new there.
BackAgain
Neutronium Member & truth speaker #StopBrandon
Tough shit. You backed a corrupt loser and he turns out to be
No. We backed Trump, not Potato.
And Trump is only alleged to be corrupt. So, your declaration of him having “turn[ed]out to be” corrupt is just proof that you still don’t grasp the basic precept: presumed innocent.
Last edited:
Jarrett has it correct as usual. Biden and his cronies want to know what Trump on Crossfire Hurricane that is what I believe the raid was abo\ut nothing more.
Gregg Jarrett rips into AG Merrick Garland over Trump indictment: 'He doesn't care about the law'
Gregg Jarrett joined "Hannity" to discuss the indictment against former President Trump, claims AG Merrick Garland is "criminalizing a civil dispute" over documents.www.foxnews.com
This was awesome last night
And all the nightly shows were on Fox.. just excellent coverage
And he lost. Trump is corrupt. Again, you should know this by now.No. We backed Trump, not Potato.
And Trump is only alleged to be corrupt. So, your declaration of him having “turn[ed]out to be” corrupt is just proof that you still don’t grasp the basic precept: presumed innocent.
He's getting his day in court and his due process...but man..it doesn't look good. At all.
Couldn't have happened to a nicer guy, don't you think?
Lord Long Rod
Diamond Member
- Jan 17, 2023
- 7,706
- 8,131
- 2,138
- Banned
- #33
Biden may very well be criminal, Jackoff No-trades. There's a lot of shady shit in Joey's past!That's because he isn't a criminal. He's a career politician. Republicans and conservatives like to make up shit about Democrats when they have nothing else. They've had nothing else..for a long time.
They did it to Obama, they did it to the Clintons (both). ^Shrug^.
- Jan 19, 2010
- 68,416
- 63,013
- 3,605
No..there isn't. If there was, he would have never made it to the Oval Office. His own party would have shown him the door. That's what Democrats do. We've seen what Republicans have become.Biden may very well be criminal, Jackoff No-trades. There's a lot of shady shit in Joey's past!
Trump got there because enough people enabled, lied and covered up for him...but that protection..is now gone.
- Dec 18, 2013
- 137,093
- 28,163
- 2,180
Election interfererGregg Jarrett rips into AG Merrick Garland over Trump indictment: 'He doesn't care about the law'
Gregg Jarrett joined "Hannity" to discuss the indictment against former President Trump, claims AG Merrick Garland is "criminalizing a civil dispute" over documents.
This was awesome last night
And all the nightly shows were on Fox.. just excellent coverage
berg80
Diamond Member
- Oct 28, 2017
- 15,226
- 12,676
- 2,320
Yes it was. But not for the reason you think.This was awesome last night
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.648653/gov.uscourts.flsd.648653.3.0.pdf
That's extremely compelling evidence.
Lord Long Rod
Diamond Member
- Jan 17, 2023
- 7,706
- 8,131
- 2,138
- Banned
- #38
You are a Biden denier, Jackoff No Trade!No..there isn't. If there was, he would have never made it to the Oval Office. His own party would have shown him the door. That's what Democrats do. We've seen what Republicans have become.
Trump got there because enough people enabled, lied and covered up for him...but that protection..is now gone.
berg80
Diamond Member
- Oct 28, 2017
- 15,226
- 12,676
- 2,320
Election interferer
For what?The supreme court needs to step in and put a stop to this....
Trump committed crimes
Similar threads
- Replies
- 38
- Views
- 513
- Replies
- 11
- Views
- 146
- Replies
- 28
- Views
- 316
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 7
- Views
- 33
- Replies
- 14
- Views
- 62
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8143
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 472
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-